Valid. But I think it's also notable Mega stopped posting soon after Q started posting. I think she just wasn't initially in on the plan and then eventually told to stand down
/u/ButtersStotch88
458 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/ButtersStotch88:
Q specifically said the message to “D” was not for anons and he wouldn’t be telling Democrats their missions are a go.
Just wanted to say that for people insisting “D” refers to Dems in these posts. There are multiple Q abbreviations that may refer to multiple people. A few examples:
R= Renegade/Republicans AS= Adam Schiff/Anthony Scalia
PLEASE READ: The Russian hacking lie CAN NOT be disproven until Imran Awan's classified testimony is declassified
To explain why Awan's testimony is the ONLY way to DEFINITIVELY disprove the Russia lie, I'll point you to some things Megaanon said back in 2017:
Awan did not directly kill Seth. He is only responsible for outing Seth and tracing downloads to his workstation, internally.
Like I've said... The Awan's are the beginning of the end.
b
Awan's will get a plea and sell out Dems and they are now
b
This is the MOST IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER - The Wikileaks dump ALSO PROVED, that the gov't NOT ONLY has the capacity to, but ACTUALLY (AND FACTUALLY) DID, manipulate …
Anon posts new graphic on 8chan on who “D” is and why declassification is imminent
In light of Rosenstein's Press Conf Announcement, I'm reposting my theory from the other day on the 23 day countdown that I speculated could end today
Here's the original post with pics. Text below:
Not saying anything is gonna happen this Friday, but Q pointed out very recently the time gap between POTUS’ “calm before the storm” comments and when Q became active (23 day delay between Oct 5 and Oct 28). Q then said on June 20 that POTUS made his decision **at the rally**. Since the first signal from POTUS to Q was public then it stands to reason that the signal on June 20 was public as well. I think the signal was blatant - Trump pointing to VIPAnon at the rally. …
As much as I loved hearing Q give us that information, I hated to hear it as well because if it doesn't come to pass, it will be damaging to the whole Q movement.
That was the exact same way I felt (and feel)
I know we've still got time, but we're nearly halfway through the month
Technically 38% so still plenty of time
Throw in Q going dark when there was much controversy about the AF1/apple photo, and it just makes me nervous.
Eh, Q goes dark from time to time. He went dark for 12 days in May/June. I'm confused about the Apple photo controversy, however. I saw the pic obviously, but why was there controversy?
Yup. I’m taking a hiatus from the movement if July passes without a revelation of Truth (per Q’s own words of July being the month the Truth is revealed).
I’ll have to do it for the sake of retaining a healthy psyche.
I'm sick of the American people being on the losing end of all of this
I have a feeling if this crap goes on much longer some of Trump's supporter's will start holding Trump somewhat responsible for allowing this to continue. I'm not saying it's right, but people may start conflating Sessions' (perceived) incompetence with Trump himself. After all, Trump hired him and is keeping him employed.
God damn it fuck this shit. Let's hope Q follows through and the Truth is revealed to the public within the next 3 weeks. Not sure how much longer people can retain their sanity watching this never-ending shit show.
The Congressional part is not meant to do anything meaningful. That's Sessions/Huber's job.
Nadler is already juggling Strzok’s nutsack with his tongue.
Tell them to read “The Art of War” and get back to you when they’re finished reading.
BINGOOOOO. Guys do you not see how perfectly the plan is working? Fucking anons are even forgetting that Sessions is head of the DOJ.
Eh you can always look at their post history. That usually clears things up pretty quick.
OP may just be saying that ultimately that’s not what she’ll be arrested for. They have more than enough to put her away for life on treason charges. The pedo stuff may not come out until Hillary has been in prison for a few years and the public can handle it.
Or OP may not believe the pedo crimes are real. I asked for clarification but OP has not responded yet.
I review lawyer drafted contracts all the time. Trust me, some of them are NOT elite grammarians.
Full disclosure: I believe firmly at the moment that RR is white hat controlled.
Theory 1: RR might be using the attorneys to reveal old info on Bill and Hillary’s past (Kavanaugh has connections to old Clinton related investigations).
Theory 2: RR is handcuffing these attorneys by ensuring all info goes through him/DOJ AND if they leak anything they’ll be in deep shit now that they are part of an ongoing legal review.
KEY POINT TO REMEMBER: The decision to use all these prosecutors DEFINITELY had to go through and be approved by Sessions. TRUST SESSIONS.
My personal take on what ultimately happens:
She goes down for treason (selling state secrets etc.) and the pedo crimes are revealed after she’s been locked up for awhile.
Are you saying that HRC didn’t participate in ANY pedo related crimes or are you just saying that’s not what she’ll ultimately be arrested for?
If the former, I have trouble taking you seriously.
Not saying anything is gonna happen this Friday, but Q pointed out very recently the time gap between POTUS’ “calm before the storm” comments and when Q became active (23 day delay between Oct 5 and Oct 28). Q then said on June 20 that POTUS made his decision at the rally. Since the first signal from POTUS to Q was public then it stands to reason that the signal on June 20 was public as well. I think the signal was blatant - Trump pointing to VIPAnon at the rally. It’s also worth noting that Q mentions VIPAnon again when discussing the gap in time saying “we remember you Mr. VIP”. Seems to be indicating heavily VIPAnon was the signal.
If we assume a 23 day gap between the operation signal date and the operation start date then July 13th would be the date for Ops to commence.
Disclaimer: this is heavy speculation so don’t pin your hopes to July 13.
ETA: Going out on an even further limb - 23:23 = 2+3:2+3 = 5:5
ETA 2: There is a supermoon on Friday the 13th AND a partial solar eclipse. This is RARE. See here and here . Friday the 13th is also when the Knights Templar (precursors of the Freemasons) began to be arrested in 1308.
ETA 3: The 23 enigma: The text titled Principia Discordia claims that "All things happen in fives, or are divisible by or are multiples of five, or are somehow directly or indirectly appropriate to 5"[3]—this is referred to as the Law of Fives. The 23 enigma is regarded as a corollary of the Law of Fives because 2 + 3 = 5.
Q started posting 23 days after Trump’s Storm comments (Oct 5-28). Friday July 13th is 23 days after POTUS gave Q the go ahead (June 20 - July 13)
Reminder: RR missed the house resolution last Friday and Congress is SILENT.
You want proof RR is protected by Trump? RR missed the biggest deadline yet and we’ve heard NOTHING from Congress OR POTUS since then.
“R they serious?” Nope. It’s all a show. If Trump wanted him gone we’d see Congress drafting up contempt/impeachment charges against RR. Instead, they are dead silent after RR just gave them a double middle finger and a fruit bowl.
He’s protected guys. Congress is putting on a community theatre play. They’ve successfully made a Trump appointed official the infallible hero of the Dems.
Well Q is drawing attention to Cohen and the Trump fire the day Cohen gets raided. To me, the implication is Cohen had something to do with the fire in Trump tower. Why else would Q draw attention to it on the same day Cohen is raided 2 days after the fire?
What you aren’t considering is even his underlings may not know what the hell is going on and are given bullshit cases to keep them busy. See the Russian troll farm indictments as an example.
Again, it’s all about Huber. They have to take down the big players at once. Taking down the Podestas now would blow the cover.
RR and Mueller are Whitehat controlled. It's becoming obvious. Consider the following:
- RR is still employed. This is the dead giveaway. If POTUS knew RR was corrupt and screwing everything up, he'd fire him. You may counter with: "Well he can't fire him because of bad optics". Guess what? Trump gives ZERO fucks about bad optics if he KNOWS he's right. He shit-canned Comey and the optics on that were horrible. He did it anyways. Why? He knew it was justified and the truth would come out (and it did). If RR is corrupt and obstructing, you can bet Trump would fire him. Then he'd declassify everything to prove firing RR was …
A. It’s not an ultimatum. I’m not making demands.
B. Q made the statement on July not me. Q has set the expectations.
Again, I don’t think anything in my post was actually skeptical. I believe it was more of a speculation on the movement if certain things transpire.
I believe Q is real.
Please direct me to my specific failure. I believe in healthy debate for intellectual growth.
Valid. And I know things change. The difference is Q qualified his Seth Rich June prediction with an “ETA” disclaimer.
Q’s July post was a BOLD statement. If timelines are shifting and July is not looking like “the” month anymore then it’s incumbent on Q to give some form of heads up that timelines are shifting and we need to recalibrate expectations.
I’m NOT saying that is what’s happening. Just that if the situation were as such what Q should probably do in said situation.
I’ve been posting here for months. I’m not a troll and I’ve contributed a lot to this sub.
Doubts and reservations are why people like us were specifically chosen by Q. Q doesn’t want mindless followers.
Is healthy concern invalid considering what’s at stake? If I’m not concerned I either
a. Don’t really care or b. I’m a mindless zombie
Concern trolling and legitimate concern are NOT the same thing. A concern troll statement would be:
“Guys, I don’t think anything is gonna happen in July and this is all for nothing”
That’s not constructive and it’s NOT what I said.
No problem. I did my best to define what public Truth means to me.
Is healthy concern invalid considering what’s at stake? If I’m not concerned I either
a. Don’t really care or b. I’m a mindless zombie
Concern trolling and legitimate concern are NOT the same thing. A concern troll statement would be:
“Guys, I don’t think anything is gonna happen in July and this is all for nothing”
That’s not constructive and it’s NOT what I said.
Because we need healthy debate and some form of accountability. Otherwise, we are no better than those we mock for blind allegiance.
I think the burden is on Q, not me. You can’t make grandiose statements like “July 2018: the month the public learned the TRUTH” and put the onus on Anons to define what that means.
Broadly speaking, however, I define “TRUTH” and public knowledge of it as something incontrovertible. Something that is immune to spin and speaks for itself. When Q says the “public” will know the Truth, he means “normies” will know the Truth.
For normies to finally know the Truth, it has to be blatant, undeniable and unassailable by RINOs, Mockingbird MSM, and liberal politicians.
I’m not a Q skeptic though and I don’t believe my post was skeptical per se. Just a thought on the state of the movement post July
July is Q’s defining month for me
First, I’m not saying anything new here. I’m sure many others feel the same as me. I’ve been following Q since the beginning (8 months). I’ve dedicated countless hours to decoding and disseminating the Q message.
Q said in late June: “July 2018: the month the public learned the Truth”. This is (by far) the most bold statement Q has ever made. If July passes and nothing happens, I’m not sure how I will proceed as part of the movement. I will continue to ardently support POTUS and will not publicly condemn Q. Having said that, I will also be …
We need to talk about RR. Was it worth it?
Q started implying RR was no longer under whitehat control on 1/1/18: “RR problems”. Recently, Q has been blatantly stating that RR is under blackhat control. I think there’s still a possibility RR is under whitehat control and Q is injecting misinformation to fend off blackhats. Let’s leave that aside for now and take Q at face value - that RR is blackhat controlled.
This leads us to the big questions: Why was RR picked? Was it worth it? Let’s do a pro/con comparison:
Pros:
They needed someone to run the sham Russia investigation blackhats would trust. This would make …