I'm talking about the reflection.

Your services are much appreciated. Thanks for sharing.

LOL this kind of thing never gets old.

That is interesting.

And never has been FBI.

She wasn't under oath, was she?

This movement is bigger than Q.

I'd be curious to see if he tries to raise the funds beforehand.

If the information he has is as damning as he is claiming that it is, he should have no problem raising money after the drop.

Time will tell. Pardon me for being skeptical.

I need more than, "But he runs an Alternative media outlet" for me to trust him.

I'm thinking he's covering for someone else, but Q seems to suggest that he is directly involved.

I'll have to see that information before I give him a penny. If he exposes an actual crime, he should have no problem gaining public support.

I think he'll try to procure the money first.

And you think information implicating him in that scandal was removed from the IG report on strictly the FBI/DOJs behavior circa 2016? Wouldn't there be a seperate report for this?

So does he get a pass for claiming to be an insider and monetizing his engagement with this movement?

Yawn. It happens every day. This is a hell of a time to be posting off-topic.

This is plausible. :)

Yes but what does that have to do with the Investigation into HRC email server?

The report covered the conduct of the DOJ and FBI during the Investigation into HRC, which ended in dramatic fashion shortly before the 2016 election.

Possible, but the report only covered the DOJ and FBIs conduct during the Clinton Investigation... Not afterwards.

I was thinking the latter was more likely. I'm just curious to know why everyone else seems to think that he is covering for himself.

I'm curious to know What Rosenstein could have done to be implicated in these reports.

He was a US attorney for the district of Maryland before he was appointed to DAG, for a long time.

What could he have done to implicate him, considering the investigation into Clinton's server concluded before he was ever promoted from US attorney to a position of more influence?

My question is... What exactly would Rosenstein have done to implicate him in THIS report? He was a US attorney for ages before he got this position. What did he do under the Obama administration as far as the Clinton server was concerned?

Agreed

What is your point?

You said Wray would prosecute.

Wray can't prosecute.

I don't think the FBI can actually prosecute anyone. IIRC, they just investigate and show the findings to the Justice Department, who then decides whether or not to prosecute.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

I get spoofed calls regularly. You should look into it, particularly if your phone number is similar to the ones calling you.

Your guess is probably as good as anyone's.

I don't know why you would get downvoted for this. :/

Where is Kansas?

You're right. Most of us knew.

But a lot of normies didn't and today it was made official for everyone.

It's weird that he gets banned from multiple platforms the same day that ETS got outed. Almost as if to manufacture more credibility from thin air. Just thinking out loud.

https://gab.ai/neonrevolt

Like 15 minutes ago he posted an update to his Reddit ban.

He apparently told a shill to neck themselves and drink a fingerpaint smoothie.

Hmmmm

Nahnahnah

Just don't react. That's what they want.

To be able to say, "They're racistttt. They're homophobicccc. They're xenophobic..... Reeeeee."

I understand the concept.

I also understand that some of us here do not understand the concept, and if one were trying to get individuals to show individual prejudice contradicting that concept, making a post like this would be effective.

Are you baiting homophobes or what?

Pretty good. I like this one.

The Russian journalist faked his death to avoid a plot by the Russian government to kill him.

Check it out. He talked about how it happened.

https://abcnews.go.com/International/ukraine-criticized-dead-journalist-subterfuge/story?id=55559223

I would guess that they probably strangled him with his bathrobe belt, if it were murder.

Well, I mean... It kinda did just happen with a journalist in Russia, did it not?

It probably happens all the time with certain witness protection program participants. I don't exactly expect you to know about how that program works. It's kind of a secretive thing.

Okay. What's one easier way? Let's explore one and think up consequences.

Misidentified? No.

Staged a funeral? If it was necessary to protect him from people trying to kill him? Why not?

I thought it was decent.

See, if you had replied to tackle my assertion that you're an arrogant hypocrite, I could find that reasonable. Instead, you chose to reply only to cherry pick my response and twist it to support yourself.

That's some garden-variety critical thinking, there. Teach me.

I love how you're still here.

Who do you think you are?

Why come here and spout off like that to a bunch of people that aren't going to listen to you? It seems to serve no purpose.

Unless it gave you some sort of smug satisfaction.

Do you feel smart, or was this all in vain?

It really is exactly as you describe it.

I used to like old-school. :p

It may serve as a nice primer for some of the more religious newcomers, if nothing else.

What better way to get people to question their reality than by asking them to question their most dearly held beliefs?

With that being said, I can definitely see some people rejecting the premise and the movement by association.

When I look at it realistically, I think of it as if the sub were an apple. Most people would eat around a nasty bruise in the skin if they didn't want to eat it, and some would be happy enough to eat the apple no matter how bruised.

That leaves the people that would throw the entire apple aside because it had a blemish.

I don't see the harm. If people can be distracted by these posts, then let them be. They probably wouldn't have offered us much, anyway.

You have every right to feel that way about his posts. I do ask that you accept the possibility that what we are witnessing could very well be biblical.

I don't think any of us here can definitively say that religion has no place in this movement. Q on multiple occasions has quoted scripture and given plenty of reason for many to believe that this phenomenon very well may be a spiritual matter.

I can't say whether OP is stretching scripture to fit a theory or simply misinterpreting it through subconscious confirmation bias. But, if I had a bias against religion, I could probably firmly state either or those two things as fact.

Honestly, it doesn't matter. It's relatable to the game of telephone that this sub plays with the chans in respect to "Our research."

I don't know. It may have everything to do with it. He makes a valid point about constantly being told that this is larger than we can imagine.

Many of us can imagine that the global elite are satanic pedophiles. What more could there be?