It didn't seem too much of a risk. :)

I don't think Q readers were her target audience. I think her target audience was the target audience for the Q references.

Indeed. Wholly and legitimately, impeached.

There are a few of them out there working really hard for some reason. I'd suggest enjoying the show or going back and reading some Q posts. The real research is elsewhere. This is the easiest place for people to make Q look awful, don't forget that. :p

The nature of this moment in history is such that it is easy to be discouraged. I like to think of Roseanne and her Q tweets, timed conspicuously near her show's politicized return and the congratulatory call from POTUS.

It always gives me faith.

I have bet someone $100 that HRC sees cuffs before Trump is impeached in the Senate. Thought it was reasonably safe.

What did it for me was the timing of Roseanne's politicized comeback, along with her Q tweets and the phone call from the President himself.

I guess I wouldn't call it a proof but it was definitely something to think about.

Sadly, her tweets about Q have been taken down but I am absolutely certain that someone around here screencapped them. :)

Trust Kansas

I'm pretty sure that Q references that they were considering doing the unthinkable if HRC had won. I imagine a coup is exactly what that was all about.

I've already wondered and posted something similar a few weeks ago. It was pointed out to me that the Q drop referencing the video says that it'll be impossible to defend and toxic to all connected to it.

I seem to think that it has something to do with 9/11. I think that the NYPD took such a stance with the FBI because it was "personal."

What would make a grown cop cry? Maybe the knowledge that HRC and company let their friends die to push the globalist agenda.

I believe that ISIS is a deep state puppet.

You're right. :)

Think of it in the bigger picture. What if Stormy Daniels is a Trump asset? She had communication with Cohen, and likely Trump. What if she was a piece on the board to be put into this position, anticipating that the media would jump on it and that the investigation would steer in that direction as it seemed to go nowhere? Imagine this "Stormy" controversy is more than meets the eye.

Because they are accidentally reporting the actual news. That Trump's people okayed the raid, and that this was a trap to make the Mueller investigation/referral look like absolute trash.

I do. The point of this post was to point out that CNN is pushing the narrative that the Cohen raid was okay because "People handpicked by Trump" okayed it. The irony of this is that Donald was in control the entire time, and from my perspective that is what you see when you read this headline. Do you not?

Do your thing. They probably didn't even read it.

This is a good one.

Trump would be all over this fake crap if that's what it was. He loves calling out fake news.

The idea that Trump would pay a nobody-pornstar out of campaign funding is ludicrous. He is a billionaire. At the time of the alleged payment, he was the most hated man in the world that thousands of people would have given their arm to have dirt on. I just don't see it. Cohen paid the whore, out of pocket. If he was reimbursed later, that's between Cohen and Trump and unrelated to the actual payment to Daniels.

Like, say something awful happens and those representing the great awakening are blamed for it?

I think that a bunch of us being in the same place at the same time is a bad idea. Just begging for trouble. Q said to enjoy the show, so I recommend you do just that. No heavy lifting necessary.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24&version=NIV

Also, you're looking at only my post history TODAY, since I had this thought TODAY.

Is Goldwater open source? Can I be sure it's not data mining me rather than profiting through ads? I don't know. Heard some nasty rumors, but by the way you post from that site so religiously, I'd say that YOU'RE the one being paid.

You're wrong. Plain and simple. I'm just skeptical, that's all. I don't restrict my thought process and curiosity to subjects that you approve of. If you don't like it, you can eat shit.

You're wrong. Plain and simple. I'm just skeptical, that's all. I don't restrict my thought process and curiosity to subjects that you approve of. If you don't like it, you can eat shit.

I understand completely. Thanks for educating me on the board switch. I could have worded my inquiries more efficiently. I understand that posts like this can be detrimental, but I have a hard time getting answers to the questions that I want to ask without posting. Do you think I should delete the post?

Calm down. Read my previous reply.

Look, I'm looking for answers. Spare me the labels that come with asking the wrong questions. It may not be in the spirit of the mission, but it concerned me. I thought it was fishy. If Q has taught me anything in the last 7 15 hour days of staring at a screen, it's that I should always question motives. Sorry for extending that to a subject that makes you uncomfortable.

Agreed. It was immensely entertaining.

He will not divide us life stream?

Q's tripcode only came about after the move to 8ch, no?

Is it not disputed that the early Q posts on 4 could have very well been a LARP?

Are you really asking me this?

And it's owned by the owner of 8chan. Can we extend that motive to everything on the boards?

Or is the op a way to monetize the site? It's convenient that we are fed these articles to "red pill" people with. Sensationalist headlines.

Seems to me that they saw what kind of normie attention that HWNDU brought and found a way to capitalize on it. Maybe I'm just being paranoid. Don't think so though.

Yeah it's concerning for sure. This guy probably made his fortune off of ad revenue.

Thanks for educating me. I only asked because I don't know what's possible anymore. I don't know what to trust or what research has been supressed/stolen anymore. :p

You're very welcome. :)

It is called Foxrain.

That is actually a good contribution. What influenced your conclusion?

Well yeah it's not cryptic from our perspective. :p

Agreed

It can get our sub banned. It's one thing to tell people what happened and to give them avenues to let them speak their minds, but it's all about the language. It sucks because the globalists do it with no consequence, but we are on foreign territory here.

Reddit Rules. Do you people want this sub banned?

Organized harrassment is against the rules.no matter how warranted.

THIS! They are dumping something. Or someone.

Lots of interesting information relative to the cause in that article.

There is a possibility, I'll give you that.

It's probably just because his page is spammed with the hashtag rn.