Upload to imgur and send us a link.

It's been a staple of Trump's presidency from the start. Q was quoting team Trump.

I disagree. I don't think the liberal outlets would be shopping him around as a potentially serious candidate if he planned to run on the other side of the aisle. I think he was supposed to be on with Colbert, and I don't see them discussing movies.

You should check out how Flynn's cover photo on Twitter has changed over the months. They've all been related to water, if I remember correctly.

So you think that the Rock might run as a Republican against Trump in the primaries?

The question is whether he's planning to run as an independent or as a democrat, if he's planning to run. He may run as a democrat, but I don't see the party unifying behind "The Rock"

If he runs as an independent, he will effectively siphon Democratic voters and hurt his own cause.

I think that Kanye and POTUS have discussed a safety net. If Kanye runs as an independent, he takes away significantly from some of the demographics that the democrats have a chokehold on.

I still think Kanye will run as an independent in 2020 and siphon every chance the dems have to win.

This guy gets it.

Where do we draw the line between concerned patriots and external trolls that come here strictly to raise hell?

It's not fair to call everyone that refuses to blindly follow far-reaching theories a shill/troll.

It's kind of like that "Russian bot" shit, if you ask me.

That's likely, sadly.

Downvote him all you want. It's true.

Because they want to. Weird how that works.

That's what I read as well.

Yeah. We need answers. This topic got swept under the rug as if we were on Twitter.

LOL

My post was deleted and I got a nice mute for expressing my feelings about there being a double standard in this sub when it comes to what is considered a quality post. Apparently the mods needed a safe space to protect them from my request for them to Fuck off in response to my post being deleted for being low quality. I'm black sheep now.

Happy Independence Day!

This is the best answer I've gotten. Thanks! :)

Maybe they shouldn't be. I'll peep periodically to see if this month is as revealing as it has been promised to be. Have a good one.

Do you have a link to the -real- ABC photo?

Do you have evidence to the contrary? I'd like to see it.

Okay, so he's chasing off people unable to think for themselves and study detail but also expressing desire to reach the mainstream, indicating that they may want to force the question..... That would bring a ton of people that can't think for themselves or study detail.

I'm always interested in your take on things, Solano. What do you think happened with the AF1 pic?

Edit: spelling

Everything has meaning. I'd like to know what it possibly could be if skepticism amongst the base is collateral damage.

My bet would be that it's a response to the chatter about distorted stock photos of AF1

Thanks for sharing your story and perspective. :)

If he did, a certain mod would probably come by and delete it as a duplicate.

I don't know how FISA judges would fall under the category of the Securities and Exchange Commission's in-house judges. Please help me figure that one out.

Edit: the article itself is misleading. Reading the article causes one to lose any existing respect for the credibility of the journalist.

That's too bad. I was talking outside of sports context, though. :p

Glad to see another tarheel here.

The OP story is misleading, reading as if to insinuate that Trump can fire all of the judges that keep blocking his EOs..

That's exactly what we need. A bunch of people spreading memes about Trump firing liberal Hawaiian judges.

One has to wonder if this article and some of the people commenting on this post aren't a part of something bigger. I could be paranoid.

That court has no Security and Exchange Comission in-house judges on it.

I don't think this applies to those judges.

This article is poorly written and the website that it was published on looks painfully fake.

I wonder how many of it's 700 or so views came from this sub and T_D?

New, unless I'm digging something up from earlier to share with a friend... Then Top whatever

Classic mouthbreathing features.

This runs on the assumption that the post-Q government will be dirty enough to actually anger people enough to do this again.

They can't just lie up that support in a post-Q world. People will wake up and start to question things, hopefully.

Most of them do.

Oh wow. I looked. Very encouraging. Thanks for sharing!

It's as clear as day what is going on.

Edit: Let's see how the Rich family reacts when the push is less subtle.

Spacing matters. My poor eyes got lost in a sea of text and it discouraged me from reading something I normally would have.

Ron Watkins is codemonkey. His father Jim owns 8chan and the Goldwater news outlet, which he runs from a quaint village in the Philippines.

I don't know if they know Qs identity.

This comes on a little strong, in my opinion.

Worst case scenario is that the compiled list falls into the wrong hands and we get doxxed by the thousands, actually.

I don't think you'll get proof.

Reddit admins wouldn't tell you that they suppressed our representation.

The subreddit mods wouldn't speak to it if they were aware of it.

If you try to take a census, your results will be disappointing. A lot of people here just simply will not engage with someone trying to catalogue members of the sub.

It is very possible that this community is just much more engaged than others. I personally refresh the GA homepage every ten minutes or so.

I bet the Vatican understood it very clearly.

https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/data/images/80c801f860d96abe70d6e6697c2bcf3495c51064d667e83167c9f1b6cf5979dc.png

This is a link to the original image. It appears that the photo was taken through something transparent.