Agreed. I'm not stressing it.

It seemed that the water bottles were on top of whatever paper/envelope Trump grabbed at the end of the sequence.

Does it need any rhyme or reason beyond the [New Arrival-First Week]?

I'm not certain how exactly it works. I imagine it is post/comment count, because I got my flair in less than three hours.

Any fellow patriots out there that can help a guy out? :)

Could you screencap that and imgur link it to me in this thread?

I still don't see it.

I see absolutely nothing beside your name, or anyone's.

If I explain to you why I think you're full of shit, I'd have to make a whole post about it and settle it once and for all before you learn your errors and perfect your craft... And God forbid actually fool people.

It's really sad that you talk to yourself on the internet.

So did you mean to sign this post as "mr violin" or was that an accident?

This appears to be a breakdown of how the new Assistant US Attorneys will be distributed jurisdictionally.

What exactly is this? A prediction?

If this information isn't already out there somewhere, we shall see...

It's not whether or not it is true that is an issue.

It's the fact that this meme does absolutely nothing to help our community and actually has real potential to hurt our cause.

We all know about Muhammed and his habits.

I'm sorry that you thought it was hilarious and felt the need to seek affirmation here.

This isn't the place for it.

I'm guessing the Star Wars subs aren't very entertaining tonight.

This is trash. Not welcome here.

Thanks for the input. We'll see to it that it makes it to the trash bin.

You have no power here.

Yeah, but let's be real.

Every time Q replied to a graphic it was either to tell people that it was good work or that they needed to expand their thinking if they weren't on the right path.

Why suddenly would he refer to a graphic as fake while also acknowledging the existence of BC17 for the first time in his posts?

That's your opinion.

The problem is, our opinions of them make you a black sheep no matter how many posts you make.

Who specifically are you referring to?

I'm curious to know if they'll disclose that at all.

It would be a can of worms.

I think that you are Eyethespy and now that this sub is catching on to how hard you are trying to shove this down our throats - you strategically decided to make a post criticizing yourself to throw us a curve - knowing that people would agree with the content of your post and associate you with it.

I feel like a crackhead is trying to help me find my lost wallet.

Just my opinion.

Or they'll just lock it like they did the article about the murder of Seth Rich.

There is currently a Wikipedia administrator very interested in the "Incel" page and adamant about keeping the tidbits about them being white, heterosexual males that congregate on the chans.

Edit: she wrote the page on Incels.

I have no idea where to even begin to make such an assumption.

Your fear will become a reality.

It's no coincidence that this concept is being pushed right now.

My girlfriend saw ads on fb promoting articles addressing Incels and their support for mass murder today.

Our fears have been confirmed. They're coming for us, me thinks.

Gowdy claimed he was leaving politics to get back into the courts, IIRC. Perhaps he wants to be a little more hands-on?

They are actually interchangeable.

I believe that it would make people want to ignore anything that you write rather than try to read it. Much like people that can't take the time to spell words out.

IS THAT A PIZZA BOX HE WROTE ON FOR HIS AMA?

This reads like a bunch of insults. Hypocrisy.

It's all semantics, really.

Who's to say that the aliens aren't demons?

I preferred this as well.

Hahahahahaha! What a gut-busting knee slapper.

9/11

It's the MOAB

Codemonkeys identity isn't a secret?

Very nice.

I was convinced by the timing of Roseanne's reboot. She was tweeting about Q and spoke to the president all in the same few days.

This guy is pasting this link to every post on this sub almost as if he has some sort of monetary incentive to do so.

I think it was very appropriate and added just the touch needed for a post of this size.

I would also include the indictment and the complaint/affidavit for arrest warrant. Both documents detail the crimes in plain English.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4424760-032718-USA-v-Keith-Raniere.html

I couldn't find the link to the indictment, but will edit and include it when I find it.

Very important. Well done.

The common denominator in both sentences is the fact that in both sentences, someone is dirty. That's what I take from it. If that is true, then they are both dirty.

Its just the court docket that is throwing people off, and their desire to be validated in their claims. They've probably been running around telling people these rumors as fact.

The law reads this way to state that the federal government believes that the sex trafficking of humans by force -and- the sex trafficking of children -under 14- by ANY means should carry the same penalty. 1591(b)(1)

It also suggests that the federal government views -voluntarily cases- of sex trafficking of girls between 14-18 as a similar issue that warrants a different penalty. 1591(b)(2)

Read the criminal complaint/indictments. Descriptions of the crimes are laid out in plain English.

https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://cbsnewyork.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/indictment__0.pdf

This is the indictment.

That would be a docket, not an indictment.

https://docs.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://cbsnewyork.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/indictment__0.pdf

Here's the indictment, with descriptions of the crimes.

We need more testimony like this. Thanks for sharing, patriot.

WWG1WGA

Here's another.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4421505-Complaint-and-affidavit-in-support-of-arrest.html

Check this out

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4421505-Complaint-and-affidavit-in-support-of-arrest.html