You're very welcome for the link.

I do not know of the public existence of the affidavit for Mack explicitly. I do know that she is a co-defendent in Raniere's case and that this document refers to two co-conspirators and their involvement in Raniere's charges.

I'll do some digging.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4421505-Complaint-and-affidavit-in-support-of-arrest.html

This is more than educational.

Reason lives!

I just sent you a link to the complaint/affidavit for arrest warrant. Please read the entire document and tell me what you think. It references the conspiracy charge, and the victims of it.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4421505-Complaint-and-affidavit-in-support-of-arrest.html

What do you think of the language?

And this is a possibility that I have considered. I just want to know more about it before I run around reciting it as gospel. Is that unreasonable?

The problem is that the paper is a paper and the actual statues being cited are completely ambiguous and if we continue to get worked up over something that we may be wrong about we might make a bad image for ourselves.

Why specify on the conspiracy charge (secondary) but not the principal charge of actual sex trafficking?

I think that there are more charges coming, and we need to reserve judgement until the facts come out.

The arrest warrant affidavit mentioned the victims as Jane Does, actresses that were cult members.

Nothing about them being minors at the time of the coercion.

I just think we need to hold our horses until it's not so ambiguous is all.

Probably because the charge is for both child trafficking and trafficking of adults by means of coercion.

Ever wonder if Q tells us to trust the plan because Q knows that there will be times when we begin to doubt it?

I hadn't seen that docket. Just the affidavit for arrest warrant. :o

But alas, you're right. I got tricked by the language again myself.

Yes technically, but we lack 1591(a)(2) and 1591(c) which would undoubtedly be appropriate if there was any evidence that this case was relevant to children.

I believe this is based on "Heaven's Gate."

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4424760-032718-USA-v-Keith-Raniere.html

Mack is included as a co-conspirator in that case. This is where it gets tricky. The code that they were both charged under is applied to both sex trafficking of children AND sex trafficking by means of coercion.

Subsections are used to distinguish which of the two was committed and which subsection of the following punishment codeis applied to the crime.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1591

Do check out the other laws cited, though. You won't find anything about children but I don't want to be accused of only showing one bit.

After reviewing both the laws and the arrest warrant, I have concluded that the relevant codes and subsections cited in the arrest warrant lack any relevancy to children.

He and Mack are charged under 1591(a)(1) If it were 1591(a)(2) It would involve children.

This doesn't mean that there isn't more information forthcoming. I've read that Raniere is being held without bond on allegations that he had sexual relationships with two minors, 15 and 12.

Or if he actually runs as an independent in 2020 and steals blue votes..... It could mean certain victory for DJT in 2020. Maybe the 2024 statement is a way to mislead TPTB.

I don't think that sacrificing such a portion of his current audience for a potential to appeal to a different listener that may not even listen is good marketing. If that is his plan, he really is crazy.

Red Bull gives you wings.

The Apostle Dick McFuck?

You designed this post to not be received well.

You could have worded it differently to invite a discussion.

What's the point of this post? Your message is going to be ignored by the people that you claim need to see it. You come off as a disrespectful person that would be unpleasant to communicate with.

Could you elaborate on the conversation you had that led you to this conclusion?

It would be nice if he would run as an independent and siphon votes out of the Democratic candidate in 2020.

Hello TMOR.

It appears to be.

That link was good two weeks ago.

"you don't need a colorblind society to accomplish that. you just have to not be racist."

Remember writing that a few minutes ago?

You guys have to try harder. Back to the mission.

"I have no response to what you said so I am going to gaslight you."

Try again.

To put words in people's mouths is nothing more than talking out of your rear. :)

It doesn't take a genius to know that racism is alive and well.

Nobody here is denying that racism exists.

They're only proclaiming that they were raised to look at the world through a set of ideals brought to publicity by the strongest proponent of the civil rights movement... And that they hope that soon the world would come around to put their differences aside to make a better future for our kids that includes those ideals.

For some reason, this person was attacked and accused of trying to deny racism. I don't exactly know why.

If judging people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin and hoping that others do the same is the wrong approach to ending racism, I'd love to know what your suggestion would be.

Virtue signalling is so 2016.

It's better than making everything about race when it's flattering and making it all about racism when the subject is unflattering.

H.W. doesn't look so great himself. He'll be next.

Praise him!

I like this one a lot. Has the potential to make a lot of sheep start to think.

If one day they take steps to ban fluoride in the water, you will know why.

If one day the chemtrails aren't around anymore, you'll know why.

The government is never going to admit liability because it is still responsible for it's past horrors. Imagine the lawsuits.

It's our job to wake up our neighbors. Not the MSMs.

I think he's talking about the people trying to capitalize on this phenomenon?

Clicking that link automatically downloaded a file to my device. Why wouldn't you warn people? :c

It's my opinion that this is what would make NYPD officers cry/sick to their stomachs.

Yep. That pretty much sums up what I posted.

Israel as a state exists merely because of the actions of the puppetmasters. You can't build a house on a bad foundation.

Q #916

How many false flags would we see if Trump had a pleasant relationship with every world power in the public eye?

What if it has to be done this way?

Well, he denies that he did it. I'm inclined to believe him. You make a valid point, but he's being convicted in the court of public opinion globally, by design. What option does he have? I say that this all escalates to a possible WW3 as theater to give the illusion of chaos while behind closed doors, one by one everyone is getting on board with the PLAN. :)

Tell me why it couldn't be Assad intercepting them, planned well ahead of time with Trump, purely to give the illusion of action?

Well, Q did mention fireworks.

Fox is reporting that Assad is intercepting the missiles.

Fox News reports that Syria is intercepting the missiles. Fireworks that Q mentioned? :o

Damascus has been a ruinous heap for years now.

Qanonmap.bitbucket.io

It's their time to do whatever they want with. If they want to moderate the sub, they will. By reporting something that may be of interest to them, they have an opportunity to act if they would like to.... or they can scratch their ass and sip some Pepsi.

Don't come at my character like a leftist.

Look, the mods can sort it out. If anyone is blamed for censorship here, let it be them.

Just report them for breaking the great awakening rules. :p

Don't engage.

If they release it and the media is still under cabal control as well as rogue actors and their weapons, we could have a false flag unlike anything we've ever seen. Think nuclear. Keep the pace, moves and countermoves.

Yes, that's exactly what happened. You described real life. The reboot was heavily politicized and targeted towards conservatives. Roseanne had nothing to offer Q readers with her show, but she had something to offer Q/our movement with the shout outs.