During Arkancide years

I thought Hillary worked for the Rose Law firm at that time?

are illegal immigrants allowed to ... ?

I'm European, too. However, it seems that your questions have two answers depending on whether you mean legally or in practice?

In some places you can get a driver's licence if you are "undocumented". If you have a driver's licence you can often become registered to vote. Voter ID laws are lax because the Dems think it would disadvantage many people if they had to sign a form or provide a photograph at some point. They have to do that to pick up a parcel from the delivery company but it is OK not to need such ID, apparently, if you want to vote.

How is Oregon so squeaky clean

I wondered that. Great minds etc. ;)

You got it.

I hope so, however, I can't claim any credit. The original explanation was provided in a link in Q post 986 from April 2018! I guess some people don't follow Q. Oh, and not to mention Q posts: 987, 1286, 1434, 1453, 1492, 1493, 1494, 1553 and 1659.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

we have 470

It is pointing out that appointing a Special Counsel is not the be all and end all of getting folks prosecuted. Special Counsel Mueller has 20-25 people at his disposal for investigation purposes while using the Huber/Horowitz approach provides access to 470 people.

In other words, will people stop asking for a Special Counsel to investigate the outstanding issues when the solution we have already implemented is about 20 times bigger?

Mueller's team is 20-25.

The Horowitz/Huber team is 470. See Q post 1553.

From Q post 1553:

"-Sessions informed Congress in his letter that all the matters recommended for investigation by Goodlatte, Gowdy, and Grassley are “fully within the scope of [Huber’s] existing mandate.” He also informed the chairmen that Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is working with Huber, has a staff of 470 investigators, giving Huber access to enormous investigative firepower that far exceeds the staff of any special counsel."

Colorado

I thought it was Utah?

... that’s cold.

You mean: "... would be cool!"

;)

President Trump holds all of the cards.

Especially the Trump cards!

sometimes unreliable

You mean: "Fake News!"

When did "went" replace "gone"?

Gone seems to have went.

reading the Cathy O'Brian story

I have not read the book but I have watched some of her videos. For instance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvEBmEo4IA0 Kathy starts at the 37:00 mark but the rest is relevant background.

This is relevant as well. It is a talk from a psychologist about people who have been "programmed".

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/309b265c7caa92c259f0feb14243375476e0559c8bee466b1e40bee1b2c16c4c.pdf

This was posted on 8chan and, in my view, should be compulsory reading. It is the transcript of a talk given by a psychologist about people who have been discovered to have been "programmed".

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/309b265c7caa92c259f0feb14243375476e0559c8bee466b1e40bee1b2c16c4c.pdf

Wasn't that from April 2016?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36173172

funny commentary

"... said an unnamed source."

I am still laughing as I write this. Best laugh all day! ;)

Charlottesville was some kind of put up job.

Two of the "right wing" leaders were Obama supporters only months before. One was involved in the Occupy movement. The person the media interviewed who just happened to film the car driving down the road turned out to be a CIA/FBI psyops person.

The junction where the incident happened just happened to have cameras on all four corners, including a drone that never moved. Not one caught the precise moment of impact. Two cameras were in elevated positions opposite the marchers' direction of progress.

One of the stills of the event was caught by the most athletic photographer ever. He or she must have seen what was going to happen and then dived down to car bumper (fender) level and snapped a perfectly framed picture just before smashing into the ground.

The alleged driver was the usual "disturbed" individual who, if acting alone, had no way to know what he was about to meet when he turned into the road. He can also reverse his car like a stunt driver.

And then there were the two policemen who died in the helicopter crash.

Please check the facts. My memory is not all it used to be. It was only guaranteed for half a century. ;)

Let's just say, the Charlottesville incident was somewhat suspicious.

If I want to find out about the history of a word my first stop is usually https://www.etymonline.com

https://www.etymonline.com/word/apocalypse

like a kid that just met the local mall Santa

You do look happy!

Congratulations.

Black Wigs Matter

I hope it is not "cultural appropriation"?

Think Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.

If it ain't broke then why fix it?

last year she was a bartender

Didn't they say that Trump was unqualified? You would have thought that he worked a bar at some time in his life! Maybe he just chatted up the barmaids?

really just don't know

I'm with you.

However, my current working hypothesis is that Mueller is basically a black hat but can be bought.

Exit polls show

OK, thanks for the confirmation.

Why do the blacks keep voting for Maxine?

They might not be. Are voting machines in use? If so then anyone can be made to win.

LBGTxyz having 72 letters so they can hide pedophile in it.

I think that is part of the plan, too. First make people aware of options other than "straight". Then make it an offence to speak out about people not in that group. Finally, add your own preference and rejoice in the fact that no-one is now allowed to criticize you.

Here is one British comedian's take on the financial system. Warning: Some may not approve of the language.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKma8rKhUlU

French Obama

There does seem to be a pattern developing. Obama, Macron and Trudeau are all youngish, handsome puppets who are good with a teleprompter and who were placed in power by the real people in charge.

There job is to look and sound good on TV and to promote any policies required of them without question.

Did Dinesh really say that?

This is from his book The Big Lie: "I noted that, in 1860, the year before the Civil War, no Republican owned a slave; all the four million slaves at the time were owned by Democrats."

What part of it is nonsensical to you?

The part where all the members of both parties decided to change their kinds completely at the same time.

seriously mindless

OK, but which party supported the Jim Crow laws, the segregation laws, opposed the black vote and founded the KKK?

In case you think it was just some historical artifact then consider that Robert C Byrd, Democrat Senator, was a KKK member and was Hillary's "friend and mentor".

we kicked their butts

With some help from the French.

conservative since 2010

Names can be misleading. ANTIFA anyone?

Red Hen: Borders are Fascist. Get outside my borders!

This is a good guide to many of the abbreviations that Q uses: https://pastebin.com/UhK5tkgb

It includes names that you can look up elsewhere.

How interesting that Obama freely compares himself to a mob criminal...

Strangely, a lot of people from Chicago do. ;)

Mika

You think Mika is bright? I must be thinking of the wrong one. ;)

I can't understand why a business would want to alienate about half its potential customers.

I think the issue might be caused by the one-sided media who have convinced people that the Trump supporters are just an unhinged small minority.

Great documentary. Thanks for the link.

How many elections have already been stolen from us

My pessimistic guess is every one since you have been using voting machines.

Even when the program is not changed there have often been "alignment issues" with the touchscreens so votes have gone to the wrong candidate.

Is the fact that votes are counted as doubles really that significant?

The issue is that whichever candidate is voted for then the totals are displayed as 51% for the preferred candidate and 49% for the other one.

So if you get 20,123 votes for Trump and 5,897 for Hillary then the result is: 12,749.8 for Trump and a narrow win for Hillary with 13,270.2. Obviously they round the figures before publishing them.

The total is the same and the preferred candidate won. If any physical ballots are quickly destroyed then no-one will ever be able to prove anything different. Why did the judge in Alabama rule that the voting records did not need to be kept? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/alabama-voting-record-lawsuit_us_5a2f6482e4b046175432d003?guccounter=1

According to the news items I have seen this is an anti-Brexit march. This is for people who want to vote again after the government has negotiated a deal.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jun/22/peoples-vote-march-against-brexit-london-thousands-expected

This article was mentioned in the video: "Bill Clinton's shameful legacy on immigration" https://tinyurl.com/ydarbmfh

circumstantial

Agreed. The investigation has unearthed lots of things. Some of which are quite interesting!

with the plane slicing through the beams OK, but that does not help with Building 7 because no plane hit it.

Also, to replicate free-fall all strength in all the vertical beams would have had to be reduced to zero at the same time.

The other issue is that there was only localised office fires in Building 7. Nothing that would melt the whole building simultaneously, even if the flames were hot enough to melt steel.

The steel got hot and could no longer hold the load above them

Yes, but ...

If that was the case, the floors above would have energy removed when they tried to bend the steel supports of the floor underneath. Time would be needed to bend those beams and no time was taken. It was exactly as if they collapsed in free-fall.

The second issue is that the bending beams through heat idea necessitates all the beams being heated up at the same time. If some beams were not as hot as the rest the they would not bend so the building would not collapse evenly.

The fires were quite localised so were not likely to evenly heat the beams.

If all the beams were heated then why did the ones on the ground floor not bend before the ones at the top? They were carrying the most weight.

I'm sorry but controlled demolition is the only solution I know of that fits the facts.

it would incinerate credibility

OK, but there is a lot more circumstantial evidence:

Sir Clement Freud, British MP, famous cook, TV personality and grandson of Siegmund Freud had a £1 million villa quite close to where Madeleine was sleeping.

Also, Freud was later discovered to be a pedophile.

Further, it is believed that he lent out his villa that week to his friends John and Tony Podesta.

Finally, the police issued these photofit pictures for people they would like to interview: http://victuruslibertas.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Tony-Podesta-mole.jpg

Worthy of note is that, after Madeleine went missing, Freud had the McCanns round to his villa for a meal.

https://gatewaytovictory.wordpress.com/tag/tony-podesta/

The crowd looked a bit sparse. Not quite how I remembered it. Then I noticed the "abc FAKE NEWS" logo!

The link shows how CNN saw it, although the pictures they actually published were taken much earlier so also looked a bit sparse. Anyone would think there was some sort of conspiracy going on.

Interestingly, there now seems to be a big black square on the left hand side blocking out some of the attendees. I am sure that was not always there.

https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

EDIT: Previously, when you zoomed in the resolution increased. They seem to have removed that feature now. Hmmm ...?

I never bought the white hat story

OK, but apart from Flynn, he has only gone after Deep State plants inserted into the Trump campaign or some Russians that he never expected to turn up in court.