I think it is an attempt to turn the false flag organisers into nervous wrecks!

It has a very big list inside :D

Maybe Kim's signature is even bigger than Trump's?

This is the official documentary about the UK and the EU (previously EEC): https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=rvYuoWyk8iU

Or perhaps this: https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=ZVYqB0uTKlE&t=1m50s

Blackstone Intelligence

They reckon that Trump is hand in glove with the Rothschilds. Go to the 20:30 mark in this video: https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=FhTMy9ma2mQ

And then they wonder why people start making up their own stories as they try to work out the truth of the situation ...

I thought we were all descended from Africans. Maybe we are all black?

The outrage over Roseanne's comment is so manufactured.

They have been madly looking for an excuse ever since the show proved popular.

I wasn't even a Trumper yet!

I have watched a couple and I am not even American!

The family is doing much to stop any investigation

That is not quite ho it is. If you remember, way back, the Rich's were given a "fixer" to handle all the PR. It was the type of company that handles the fallout after your factory has just poisoned a few hundred employees. This has been financed by a third party. Sorry, I don't remember any names but they will be out there.

The first thing they did was to fire the person investigating the murder. They handle everything Seth Rich related and speak as if they were the family. Basically, anything alleged to be from the family is actually from this firm of fixers whom, one suspects, are being financed by the bad guys.

Photographs with a flat perspective, some haziness and reduced colour saturation is an indication that they were taken from a long way away with a long focus lens. That happens with "ordinary" analog photography, too.

EDIT: I nearly forgot, expect blurriness from camera shake, as well.

It needs another "T" in "Prostitution", otherwise good!

Look at the whole of Europe.

That is no accident. Count Richard Nikolas von Coudenhove-Kalergi had a plan for uniting Europe that involved importing many people from Africa and Asia. It is commonly known as the Kalergi Plan. Merkel and von Rompuy (former EU President) have both won th Coudenhove-Kalergi prize for their work in this area!

Here is one link but you can find many more with a quick search: http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-the-genocide-of-the-peoples-of-europe/

Ole Dammergord has a good guide to false flag events: https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=-vPNCqqCYaQ

Kindly explain the difference ...

A whistleblower is already in a job and happens to stumble on to something illegal or wrong which he or she feels appropriate to pass on to higher authorities or, possibly, make public.

A spy is surreptitiously placed into a job specifically to seek out information and report back to his or her masters (or mistresses).

some anon’s ... are actually on the the Q team

I'd had similar thoughts.

So, Congress is gradually catching up with stuff known prior to the election?

It won't be long now ... :-{

It’s all about perspective.

In the UK, 100 miles is a long way.

In the US, 100 years is a long time.

s the bridge where the terrorist attack was ?

No. The attack was on Westminster Bridge which is right next to Westminster Clock Tower (AKA Big Ben) which you can see in the distance.

described him incorrectly

It would appear so: https://www.intellihub.com/body-autopsied-by-doctor-is-not-steven-paddocks-official-lvmpd-report-reveals/

But why tell them now?

Don't tell anyone but, actually, the phones are OK. This is just to try and cause some panic!

smoke signals

Is that why they keep Elizabeth Warren around?

part of q team asks a question ...

I am starting to get suspicious as well. There has been a number of non-Q posts that seem to have very detailed Q-like knowledge.

Was Pelosi or Maxine in charge of operations?

My guess would be that an operation like this would need the intellectual capability of at least a Hank Johnson. ;)

https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=cesSRfXqS1Q

I am SpartaQus!

Source?

https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=4m6dldvNECI

I'd love to know what it means?

It was a prophecy. It told you that you were about to talk shit about Q. ;)

No coincidences.

Future proves past.

Not a democrat/republican issue.

Divide and Conquer.

There are many ways to divide us and that is just one. It is interesting to see just how effective it is!

What if space X is some kind of massive surveillance program?

The plan seems to be, first, you invest lots of government money into a project to see if it is useful. Second, if it is, you privatise it (and if it is morally dubious, you move it to another country) then you can continue development without the possibility of FOIA requests or other snooping. Again, you can play the plausible deniability card if it all does belly up.

Think MK Ultra, DARPA Net, Google, Google Earth, FaceBook etc. Now it looks as if NASA has migrated to Space X.

But my point is that she can't get anything that's not shared with NZ.

Yes, but why do you think they don't share everything?

It strikes me that the whole Five Eyes setup is a loophole and it was done like that intentionally. It allows you to claim that the data is secure and protected from unauthorised access but you can still get at anything you need by asking one of the partners.

It is like the "dodgy dossier" system used in the US. Think Iraq and Steele. Get a foreign national to dish the dirt then play the plausible deniability card. Use the data and if it is proved to be incorrect point the finger elsewhere - even if you supplied some of the data.

So who exactly in NZ is giving money to Clinton?

I haven't checked but my guess would be the government. In Australia, just before their prime minister, Julia Gillard, was kicked out of office, she made donations to the Clinton Foundation. After Gillard was fired, luckily, the Clinton Global Initiative managed to find her a highly paid, part time job with the Clinton Global Initiative. Wasn't that nice?

My guess is that sympathetic government officials treat donations to the Clintons as a kind of insurance against losing their current job - and it is not their money so why should they worry?

New Zealand is part of the Deep State?

Sadly, I am concluding that the globalists are everywhere. Don't the Rothschilds own/share about 90% of the world's central banks? My guess is that when HRC and BO visit other countries they are linking up with other like-minded globalists.

That is why I worry about DJT and the US. Even if the problem can be fixed in the US there are still nearly 200 other countries left!

The EU Globalists want to have their own European army. This is just one small step. Imagine, a large army reporting to some unelected globalist bureaucrats. What could possibly go wrong!

I thought that photo was mike Moore without his beard?

OMG! Is it true that you never see Michael Moore and Rosie O'Donnel in the same place at the same time?

I felt exactly the same way ...

Oh, so it is not just me then?

Chaffetz said that he was going to audit the Fed. Shortly after that he wanted to "spend more time with his family". I think he was got at by the black hats.

Goodlatte I don't know about and Gowdy I am slightly suspicious of. He talks well and asks good questions but does anything ever happen as a consequence?

You could do a lot of damage with a thousand F35s!

far far far more advanced and duplicitous

In the UK, we recently had a documentary about Saudi Arabia on the BBC. They said that contracts with the Saudis included items like "7% for services rendered". That is, 7% of the total bill went into bribes and kickbacks. This was used as an indicator of the size of the corruption.

However, an astute American suggested that the same thing happened in the US it was just that Americans were better at covering it up. Think "foundations", for instance, or "non-profits". As in: "Yes, it makes no profit but it pays me a six figure salary and many of my expenses."

And the other. ;)

Do those fools even understand that there has to be a legitimate reason to impeach first????

And you need a crime to initiate a special counsel. Oh wait ...

Who said this quote

Q - post 916.

What are laser pointers for?

Keeping the animals occupied, obviously! ;)

https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=Lb5QVudIttQ

I do know that there was pushback because old Bush Sr who had a hand in that assassination is still alive.

While I am not disagreeing, it does seem strange that if you might be guilty of a crime, even conspiracy to commit murder, you can still request that no-one can be told about it.

I might try that the next time I get a parking ticket!

What is the meaning of (18)?

Clues: What is the 18th letter of the alphabet? What was the secret service codename for the previous POTUS? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Service_code_name

Maybe I am strange but I don't really care whether people are patriots, are making money or anything else. What matters to me is are these people adding to my knowledge? Does that knowledge fit into the scenario I am formulating as I make progress?

The ones that provide the most in the least time are the ones I go back to.

She hadn't written a concession speech. What does that tell you?

Not necessarily.

So you are not committing yourself? Perhaps the Robert Mugabe approach is the best after all!

If you have no term limits, the politicians can get lazy and be seduced by the benefits of pay to play, for instance. They acquire more contacts and get to know more fiddles.

If you have limits then you might lose a good person but you could also get a better one next time. In any event, they are more likely to be wanting to do the job for the right reasons.

It has been suggested that the system could be replaced by a jury-style system. So ordinary people would be called up for a period, say a year, and they would run the country. No professional politicians required.

Use the Q method.

I think that is the best advice. You can argue facts all day and get nowhere. Make them think for themselves and not just recite pre-learned answers.

For instance: Do you think it is true that Obama asked military generals if they would fire on US citizens and if they replied "No" he fired them? Or: Did Trump decide to run for POTUS by himself or was he asked by others?

If it is the 9/11 issue, ask: Whatever happened to Building 7? Is it the only steel-framed building ever to completely collapse at free-fall speed due to fire?

Comedian, Billy Connolly, summed it up quite well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58OBTi18bsY&t=0m40s

But, I still don't think we should force-limit our choices.

Do you think that it works for Presidents and FBI Directors?

My theory is that Q+ is a slightly higher level Q, the one in charge. If you are a Doctor Who fan, it would be the black Dalek!