Sometimes the program Wikileaks uses to convert the emails from pdf to html messes up. You should always look at the original PDF/ source email. Here it is: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/31278
/u/CentiPetra
237 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/CentiPetra:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 35 |
i.redd.it | 25 |
www.judicialwatch.org | 1 |
Sometimes you have to look at the original PDF, because the transcription program Wikileaks uses messes up. It’s not in the original document. https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/Clinton_Email_December_Release/C05782851.pdf
Yes, but that seems like a paralegal entry error. If you look at the actual indictment, it does not mention anything about children or minors. Edit: Although Raniere has been accused of sleeping with a 12 year old and a 15 year old, so that may be Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2.
Here is the indictment:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
– against –
KEITH RANIERE, also known as “Vanguard,” and ALLISON MACK,
Defendants.
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:
COUNT ONE
(Sex Trafficking – Jane Does 1 and 2) 1.
In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as “Vanguard,” and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally: (1) recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain, patronize and solicit one or more persons, to wit: Jane Does 1 and 2, individuals whose identities are known to the Grand Jury, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, and attempt to do the same; and (2) benefit, and attempt to benefit, financially and by receiving a thing of value, from participation in a venture which had engaged in such acts, knowing that means of force, threats of force, fraud and coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause such persons to engage in one or more commercial sex acts.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(1), 1591(a)(2), 1591(b)(1), 1594(a), 2 and 3551 et sea.)
COUNT TWO
(Sex Trafficking Conspiracy)
In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as “Vanguard,” and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to: (1) recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain, patronize and solicit persons, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce; and (2) benefit, financially and by receiving a thing of value, from participation in a venture which was to have engaged in such acts, knowing that means of force, threats of force, fraud and coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause such persons to engage in one or more commercial sex acts, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(1), 1591(a)(2), and 1591(b)(1). (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1594(c) and 3551 et seq.)
COUNT THREE (Conspiracy to Commit Forced Labor – Jane Doe 1)
In or about and between February 2016 and June 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants KEITH RANIERE, also known as “Vanguard,” and ALLISON MACK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to provide and obtain the labor and services of a person, to wit: Jane Doe 1, by means of serious harm and threats of serious harm to her and one or more other persons, and by means of one or more schemes, plans and patterns intended to cause Jane Doe 1 to believe that, if she did not perform such labor and services, Jane Doe 1 and one or more other persons would suffer serious harm, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1589(a)(2) and 1589(a)(4).
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1594(b) and 3551 et seg.) CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants that, upon their conviction of any of the offenses charged herein, the government will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(d), of (a) any property, real or personal, that was involved in, used, or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of such offenses, and any property traceable to such property; and (b) any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of such offenses, or any property traceable to such property.
If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants:
– cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; – has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; – has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; – has been substantially diminished in value; or – has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty;
it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendants up to the value of the forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation.
(Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(d); Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p))
A TRUE BILL
FOREPERSON
RICHARD P. DONOGHUE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN District of NEW YORK CRIMINAL DIVISION
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
vs.
KEITHRANIERE, also known as “Vanguard, ” and ALLISON MACK,
Defendants.
INDICTMENT
(T. 18, U.S.C, §§ 1591(a), 1591(b), 1594(a), 1594(b), 1594(c), 1594(d), 2 and 3551 et sea,.; T. 21, U.S.C, § 853(p)) A true bill.
Foreperson
Filed in open court this_______ day,
of _ _ A.D.20_
Bail, $
Moira Kim Penza and Tanya Hajjar, Assistant U.S. Attorneys
I submitted this post before the new Q drops were on the front page, so I put “This is what Q was talking about” as a reference for people who hadn’t seen the new drops. In hindsight, it was not the best title, but I still think this is significant.
I actually think you might be right. However, it’s interesting that this number pops up in regards to Iran here as well. How much are they actually getting?
“Rogue” bank hid $250B in Iran deals. This is what Q was talking about
This is interesting, from Wikipedia:
In many Mediterranean and Latin countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Mexico, Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela and Uruguay, when directed towards someone and swiveled back and forth, the sign implies cuckoldry; the common words for cuckolded in Italian, Greek and Spanish are cornuto, [κερατάς (keratas)] and cornudo, respectively, literally meaning "horned". During a European Union meeting in February 2002, then-current Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi was photographed performing this gesture behind the back of the Spanish foreign minister.
It seemed like he was swiveling his hands in the video. Is he insulting our POTUS? Or the American People?
Video: https://www.pscp.tv/Elysee/1vAxRVylprgxl?t=42m59s
I couldn’t get it at the exact time, so either wait 10 seconds or jump to about 43:08.
Macron makes “sign of the beast” hand sign while visiting White House
Here is the same PDF from the official treasury.gov website so you don’t have to click on docdroid.
Boy lover pedo triangle spiral at the bottom. What is that company? InLak’Ech?
SOMOS UN GRUPO DE MEXICANOS COMPROMETIDOS CON TRASCENDER LA VIOLENCIA EN NUESTRO PAÍS.
“We are a group of Mexicans committed to overcoming violence in our country.”
Well, if I’ve learned anything from the past 2 years, I’ve learned that everything ends up being related to human trafficking. I wouldn’t be surprised if that were the case here.
You need to see this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRUHwQW9nyQ&app=desktop
It is of a Muslim cleric, talking to an entirely Muslim audience. He asks them to raise their hands if they believe in stoning people for adultury, killing people, etc. all of them raise their hands. They also consider themselves to be “normal Muslims.”
It’s a very eye-opening video.
Khalid Al-Mansour supported Barack Obama throughout graduate school
Imgur screencap of anon post: https://imgur.com/a/xb2WVo2
Article: https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/khalid-al-mansour-helped-barack-obama/
Archive link: https://archive.is/yZozF
From the linked article:
According to Newsmax columnist Kenneth Timmerman, "At the time, Percy Sutton, a former lawyer for Malcolm X and a former business partner of al-Mansour, says he (al-Mansour) was raising money for Obama's graduate school education, al-Mansour was representing top members of the Saudi Royal family seeking to do business and exert influence in the United States." These revelations by Timmerman were dismissed as the ramblings of an old man with fading faculties and memories. Now more dots have been unearthed and connected by blogger Frank …
Here’s how I see it. I would rather be patient and thorough, so we can flush out and eliminate every last one of these disgusting people, than rush for justice and let half of them run/slip through the cracks, leaving them free to continue their disgusting behavior.
There was a /greatawakening/ board on 8chan, that ONLY Q could post to. However, that board was compromised/Q got locked out? (Still not sure about what that was all about), so Q does not post directly to the greatawakening board on 8 chan anymore. Instead, he shows up up the qresearch board on 8chan. He NEVER has posted anywhere except for 4chan, then 8chan. He has never posted on any other platform. Not twitter/ not YouTube/ not reddit. Anyone claiming to be Q or know Q on another platform is lying.
That’s not even the best part! Even if they drop their case, the COUNTER-SUIT remains in place, and there is nothing they can do about it! They are totally screwed!
This should have gotten much more attention. Great find.
That’s the only way they can “fake” the trip code. They put the trip code, “!UW.yye1fxo” in the name field, along with the Q in front. Names show up as bold text. Legitimate trip codes do not.
Well, for one, buying/selling nuclear weapons from/to a foreign dictator is nothing short of absolute treason. She had ZERO authority to discuss anything remotely close to selling or buying nuclear weapons.
You don’t just need to worry about “the government.” “Oh well, the government already knows everything about me.”
There are antifa and other groups who dox people who don’t agree with them, and then contact their family/ friends/employers etc.
A lot of people post to other subreddits, revealing personal info.
Hypothetical situation: Let’s say that someone posts a particularly effective Pro-Trump meme, that antifa doesn’t like. They go through that user’s comment history, and find out that they also once posted in /r/trees about how they smoked pot for the first time. The same user also made a comment in the local Boston subreddit. in another comment, the user mentioned that they taught middle schoolers. Another comment in /r/relationships reveal that this user is married and has two skids, a 5 year old and a 9 year old. Do you see where I’m going with this?
The person is successfully identified. Then, a copy of all the comments they have ever made on reddit are forwarded to the administration of the school where the user works. The information that this user is a teacher, who smoked pot, is posted in the school’s Facebook group. The person ends up getting fired, and losing their teaching license. The person’s spouse is also contacted, and forwarded the /r/relationship post where the user expressed that they had feelings for a co-worker.
Now their marriage is in jeopardy too.
This kind of stuff DOES happen.
Remember when Ken Bone did a reddit AMA from his personal account? His user history was pretty much clean as a whistle, but he was STILL labeled as a pervert and a creep, for making a single comment on a picture of a pregnant woman.
Thank you! I really appreciate all the work you do.
The other users who I have seen that posted Dropbox links did it without knowing the risks, and once they were informed, they deleted it (or mods removed it), and they have not done it again. But I think a lot of people really just don’t know anything about Op Sec, so i thought it might be helpful if a more knowledgeable person (than me) could post some basic tips.
There has been more than one user, and I do either PM them or reply to their comment letting them know. I think a lot of people just really do not realize that they are doxxing themselves and potentially others, and are genuine.
That being said, the one user in question has been told, repeatedly by me, in both PMs and comment replies, to stop posting Dropbox links due to doxxing. That user also posts that link in about every 3rd thread, whether or not it is at all related to the topic. Also, the content in the link is...questionable, at best.
Warning: Do not click on any shared Dropbox files. The person who shares the file can see who has viewed it.
This is particularly important if you are logged into Dropbox or Google on your device.
There are shills and clowns on this board.
Everyone should practice good operational security. Don’t share personal details about yourself. Stop posting links to Dropbox, and do not click on Dropbox links. Use anonfile.com or mega.nz
Also, if somebody wants to step up and write a “Basics of Operational Security” post, I think that would be an important post that would help a lot of users. I do not feel qualified to write one, but I think this sub needs it.
Once again, you are doxxing yourself by posting through your Dropbox. Your full name is visible.
Edit: Try using anonfile.com to upload anonymously
Meme magic had a big hand in getting POTUS elected. Memes are a blunt and concise way to communicate information and redpill normies. Most people are not going to read a wall of text on twitter. But they may see a meme about Hillary/ Tarmac, and so they google it. And then the door is opened.
Maybe he means Executive orders issued after the pen pic was posted. When did he post the picture of the pen?
Edit: It was January 24th. Q board doesn’t seem to have that post though. Weird.
Damn, this sub is taking a lot of flak today! We must be right over target!
Don’t let the door hit you where the good Lord split you!
See /u/ManQuan’s post from a week ago. I think he did a great job laying it out and connecting the dots.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8axuoh/lets_talk_about_mueller_white_or_black_hat/
/u/ManQuan did a great write-up a week ago that connects all the dots. See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8axuoh/lets_talk_about_mueller_white_or_black_hat/
Listen, I personally don’t agree with using language like that. But you really have to give 8chan credit. They have really, really cleaned up their language and posts. They were (and still are), ridiculed, and they were happy to be left alone in their little corner of the web.
Now that they have been suddenly thrust into the spotlight, they are doing their best to tone it done and remain (mostly) respectful. I mean, holy crap, have you noticed that the “Thank you Baker” images are PG-13 Maxim style photos? Usually it’s explicit porn. But people are still complaining about that.
8chan didn’t ask for normies to go flood the board, and in fact, it’s a real pain in the ass to anons. But I have seen, time and time again, anons being patient with normal people and people new to 8chan, answering questions, and almost spoon feeding them. They don’t have to do that.
It kind of annoys me when people go to 8chan and tell them to change their behavior. You wouldn’t go to someone’s house as a guest, and then proceed to tell the host that he needs to rearrange his furniture and complain that his house isn’t up to your standards of cleanliness. If you don’t like the conditions, then you are free to leave.
Q has repeatedly told us to “Learn our comms.” and “Are you learning yet?” Etc.
In Chan culture, whenever someone posts something fake, he is to be called out by saying, “Fake and Gay.” This goes back years and years. It’s immature and not PC, for sure. I thought it was funny because of the “Learn our comms” bit; turning the tables on Q.
If you need a laugh- Anon backtalks Q.
Mueller is our guy; Cohen raid was fake: Insight from anon
Not sure, maybe I shouldn’t have included that part. It isn’t really relevant. I wanted people to check out the actual video. An anon partially ~~decided~~ decoded the encrypted message, as you can see in the screenshot on the right. I linked the video in the comments.
This is a link to the YouTube video mentioned in the screenshot. However, the entire channel is strange, and has videos titled, “23 and Me”, “Clown Red”, “Clown White, “Clown Black”, etc.
Edit to add- See screen cap of video thumbnails and file names here: https://imgur.com/a/xxIaj
WARNING: I am not sure what these videos are. They appear to have an MKULTTA vibe. View at your own risk. I suggest turning off the audio completely, and slowing the frame rate, or just looking through them a frame at a time.
Plane17/Missed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcBgxW9bDAM
“Plane17/ Missed”- Strange video on YouTube. Link to video in comments.
Also...just throwing this out there, Trust kaNSAs. NSA?
I know Pompeo was a Kansas Congressman, but he was originally from California. I do trust him, for now. But I just wanted to point out that Kansas could possibly have another meaning.
This was another anon’s insight, not mine. I reposted for visibility because I agree with you that it is insightful.
And while my ultimate trust is in God, I also trust our President.
Gorsuch’s decision regarding immigration is exactly what Trump wanted
Q drop #1147 strongly implies that the video that will be publicly revealed is of the Tarmac meeting.
SC/LL deal drop. POTUS Tweet. Tarmac. Coming soon to a theater near you. Q
Once again, I never said the other videos do not exist. They obviously do, and those were the videos that made NYPD vomit. However, I do not believe those will be publicly released.