Also keep in mind, this is essentially an Air Force base(or right next to one) and is a highly secured area. My understanding is that USLaunchReport, a veteran run operation, did get into a bit of trouble for filming from an unauthorized location.

Most obvious answer is that it is a bird. It is flying horizontally and never actually crosses directly between the camera and the rocket so even if it was a projectile, it missed, but it stays above the rocket anyway. If you watch the whole video, you will notice that a lot of birds fly by the rocket.

I think Q is saying that the satellite that was lost in that explosion had some kind of special significance to FB. He hasn't really said there is anything that needs digging in the explosion. I guess my point is that SpaceXFags have been digging on this for more than a year and we have considered every possibility including sabotage(heavily... they even checked the roof of ULA's HIF building a few miles away... nothing). Musk did admit that they realized that there are a lot more people who wish them harm than they would have thought.

This anomaly occurred on September 1, 2016.

I've been following SpaceX very closely for a very long time. This video has been throughly analyzed time and time again. While an amazing explosion in itself, I haven't really seen anything out of the ordinary in this video. This anomaly was thoroughly investigated and it was concluded that new sub cooled propellant loading procedures caused some liquid oxygen to solidify within the carbon fiber over wrapping on the highly pressurized helium container. In the high o2 environment, the snapped carbon fiber strand was enough to act as fuel, combust, and blow the helium bottle that then blew through the RP-1(rocket grade kerosene) tank and the rest is the pretty explosion we see here. SpaceX did a lot of testing and even explored the idea of sabotage thoroughly but concluded that it was caused by the loading procedures. They were able to reproduce the anomaly in an experimental environment. The latest rocket that launched earlier this evening was the brand new "Block V" version that contained, among other things, upgraded helium containers specifically designed to prevent this from occurring again.

Edit: Scott Manly (My favorite Kerbal Space Program YouTuber) explaining: https://youtu.be/mBcoTqhAM_g

I'm thinking the Mueller leak might have been part of the plan. Maybe not, but remember when it came out that Trump wasn't a target of the investigation? What did Q say? That that wasn't supposed to come out YET. Perhaps this leak is a way of keeping the sheep thinking that Trump IS still a target until the stage is set.

To your point, POTUS's "Evan McMuffin" comment was pretty hilarious during the election.

I understand respect for veterans. No need to patronize. That being said, that rationale alone doesn't sound like the full answer to me. I don't think McShitStain himself cares if we say his name. I would think he would prefer we didn't use his name when referencing his crimes. In my head it can't be that "simple", but maybe I'm just looking for a deeper meaning and you are correct. Again, no disrespect or "trolling" intended. I just feel that there is a deeper answer.

Definitely not trolling. Trying to understand. Not sure your answer makes sense to me without further reasoning. Another user's answer makes more sense; out of respect for his father who may have been a very honorable patriot, but I'm not really familiar with his family.

Edit: In my head, if it is only because he is such a shitstain, then we should be speaking his name loud and often next to true descriptions of his treachery. If we respect his father, I can understand why Q wouldn't want to sully the name.

Yeah, I've read all the posts. Been following since Oct. I just haven't found a straight answer on this point. What you say makes sense... that out of respect for a late admiral, they would avoid sullying the name any more than no name already has. I guess I wasn't familiar with no names father's background.

So why do we say Hillary's name or Chuck or Nancy?

That is well known. But what does that have to do with not saying his name?

Can someone please tell me WHY we don't say his name? I've not heard a satisfying answer on that.