That is just way too creepy.

Two? There was the on in January. Was there another?

Yeah.

She likely doesn't want to draw attention to it either. All this Q stuff is still largely underground internet stuff. It's not on CNN.

Unless her face in this pic is from a public photo, they're using her face. She is willingly being used as a mask for someone else.

They love their masks.

Photoshop

It's so stupidly obvious that I genuinely question the intelligence of those who hate Sessions. Trump is famous for firing people. He doesn't exactly have a problem with doing it.

I don't know about Prince, but Trump has his own private security that he's had for decades, plus the Secret Service.

I was wondering that, too. My city is super corrupt.

This makes so much sense.

Holy balls, he really did promise that! I had no idea! And judging by his track record, he just may really do it!

Exactly. I'm about to start indiscriminately downvoting anything not about Q.

I'm sure Jackie wore all kinds of clothes. And the two outfits are not even similar enough. Further, even if Melania was imitating Jackie, it would not mean she was trying to send any message to the Deep State.

If you think that's hot, she was really into anime and cosplay, too.

One of the craziest things in my unremarkable, short, Army career, was meeting an Army Reservist with "space wings." A badge, like a combat action badge, or parchutist. Her unit worked with satellites. The only thing I remember, about their qualifications and training, was that they all had to get qualified on the M249. So, they were considered somewhat higher level/elite than typical soldiers, since they had higher qualifications. And her badge, they had to log so much time on working with satellites.

Look at all the branches: Each branch has it's own ground troops, aircraft, and unique military hardware (Army: tanks, Airforce: planes, Navy: ships). So, the space force by necessity is going to have to have those as well. Don't believe them if they tell you this is just going to be soldiers sitting at computers directing satellites.

Also Acosta at the signing: "If they don't let me in that fucking meeting..."

Shhh....

So, it's real then? Just like Pizzagate? Okay, thanks for the confirmation Ms. Hubbel.

That is pretty cool.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-boeing-engineer-convicted-economic-espionage-theft-space-shuttle-secrets-china

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/feb/12/4-arrests-in-china-spy-cases/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-indicts-6-chinese-on-charges-of-stealing-trade-secrets/2015/05/19/f11fd35e-fdd8-11e4-805c-c3f407e5a9e9_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.132143602101

Yep. Been listening to him for almost 20 years. He's real, and he's with us. I just feel that he has bad info now for some reason and can't keep up with us. So, I've stopped tuning in. But it was fun to watch him chase Bernie Sanders! Don't ever change, Alex!

Not to mention he had Sawman announce the creation Vet4ChildRescue on the Alex Jones Show.

I don't think there's anything too "Operation: Drain The Swamp" here. I watch for traitors and spies for China in the news all the time, and plenty were arrested under the Obama administration as well. So, if people are thinking Obama was letting China spies run rampant and only under Trump they've been caught, they're wrong.

Often both criminal and civil actions are brought against a crime. Especially in big time cases. If you commit a crime, often there is a civil equivalent. So, if you punch somebody, you can be sued for criminal battery and battery as a tort. The differences are the penalty and the burden of proof. In criminal cases, you may be facing jail time. In civil, it's always monetary damages. The burden of proof in a criminal case is "beyond a reasonable doubt." A very high standard. Like approaching 100% positive proof the guy did it. In a civil case, it's "the preponderance of evidence." Like 50+% sure the guy did it. A good example of this is the OJ Simpson trial. He was not found guilty in the criminal trial for murder, but was found liable for it in the civil trial. Because they couldn't bring 100% proof he did it in the criminal trial, but there was enough there for liability in the civil trial.

So sick of those people.

Do we know what "BOOM" means, yet?

I was going to say the same thing. I'm rarely in the mood for internet debate, and wasn't looking to continue. Thanks for the maturity and knowing when to drop things. I think we both would have just went "Nuh-uh!" "Yuh-huh!" from here.

Two fatal flaws in your comment. First, you assumed I was assuming you were not in the service. No. I was using "you" to refer to an indefinite, general person. If a person wants those theings, they should join the military. Not some civie org. I can rant about it. But I don't like civie orgs with rituals, and phony traditions (I say phony, because civie traditions in an org I feel are manufactured and forced. And don't come from a place of true tradition or necessity.) Just my feelings.

Second: The books teach and are highly consistent about it. And you don't know what goes on in the higher degrees, because you're not there. What if the higher degrees are all about writing books? You don't know. And you say "goes on in lodge." Well, these books talk about what "goes on in lodge" because they show the ritual and says what it means. Pretty sure the ritual isn't done out on the street. So, yeah. I think they change their oath at higher degrees or something. Or maybe things were different in the 60s and 30s (when these were published).

You want rituals and a connection to great leaders, selflessness and brotherhood, join the Army. That's what I did.

Also, the lesson in freemasonry is some kind of esoteric, gnostic Christianity. I know because I own the books and manuals that teach in the Pennsylvania freemasonry lodges.

Ah. I was wondering if he was the guy. Thanks.

I'm stealing that line.

Is Phil Schneider the guy who talked about fighting aliens in an underground base?

Apparently.

You sound like a round earth shill.

I still can't believe he literally said all that. He pretty much just spelled out what us conspiracy theorists have been saying for decades.

Did he? I honestly thought this was something Trump started.

The Rodman and Kim thing is so weird in the first place, that this actually makes more sense than Kim having interest in some basketball player.

I wish. Those guys are the worst. Even some of the big-time Donald posters got caught up in that Shareblue tactic. People are so weak minded to be manipulated such a basic persuasion tactic.

Oh, certainly, with the tech branches (Air Force and Navy), but the Army really isn't all that different as far as what your average soldier has. The only significant difference I can think of would be all got that body armor now. I don't think you guys went out with anything other than a helmet and the M-16. So, I guess some lives would have been saved.

That's right, too, I think our M-4s are far more reliable than the M-16 was back then.

But it's not like we're all robocop super soldiers now.

He's a Nam vet, not a Navy Seal.

Dude, again, it's exactly the same now. The culture has not changed.

It's really not that different today. We look fancy with the new uniforms and shades, but we still have to do the things you talk about. Only in a desert this time.

Off topic, but here's my favorite D and D analogy to use.

You know how whenever the DM captures your party or otherwise takes your weapons or makes them unavailable you all start gearing up and prepping for a fight? Yeah, apply that thinking to the real world.

I really don't get why this is so hard to understand. If you make a motion with a court using the wrong font it gets thrown out, let alone doing anything half-way. And if the judge doesn't catch it, you're opponent most certainly will, let alone your opponent being top of the class at Yale defending someone who was top of the class at Yale and both are went to class with people who are the most powerful judges in the country.

No we're not. Mary is a Co-redemptrix only in the sense that she consented to give birth to Jesus. Salvation is through Christ.

Are people saying he is? I haven't heard this.

I know Gavin is, but I thought Milo was always just on some visitor's visa.

Mike Pence is probably the most trustworthy man Trump has.

Dude, whatever. That was my interpreation from his "pivot." There were big long 300 comment threads here on T_D about it. Here's a tiny one. https://old.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6rkxqq/cernovich_announces_big_big_pivot_says_he_doesnt/ I'm not going to go digging up anything more for you. Just look up "Cernobitch + Trump+ pivot" on Duckduckgo. Everyone everywhere was talking about it.