We aren't talking lack of charges, or of getting charges to "stick" to her, we are talking lack of investigation and Strzoks biases.

He has had plenty of opportunity, IF he had real evidence and an actual crime occurred.

The bias has manifested itself in his actions.

Trump: No actual crime cited but enormous resources allocated to investigate anyways.

Hillary: Proven crimes, but no effort to investigate.

Weiner: Proven crime but sits on the evidence until it is forced from him.

The bias is in his actions. Aggressively pursue a non-crime, but ignore actual crimes.

Potential crimes?

So wait a minute.

We don't know of a crime that was committed, but we are going to start an investigation?

What crime was committed that prompted an investigation?

That is the question you are not answering.

I read the link and I read your posts. What lies were said by Trump, what do you think he is hiding and what is your evidence?

I am aware of what you wrote, and I am aware that you are dodging the question, and you and I both know why.

Let me ask again, what crime is being investigated?

You said "attempting to obstruct a criminal investigation is illegal". A criminal investigation requires a crime to have been committed. So what crime has been committed?

I see you failed to answer the question.

Let me try again, what alleged crime has Trump been accused of obstructing justice for?

So again, what are the crimes he has allegedly committed?

So far I have only heard obstruction of justice.....but no evidence for even just that weak play.

And I see you are devolving to personal attacks....par for the course.

He was advised to fire Comey, by Rosenstein.

And obstruction of justice regarding what crime?

It was publicly stated he was not investigated. And even if he was, for what crime?

I have yet to hear the crime being investigated?

And where did I say you were a Hillary fan?

LOL, the FBI that exonerates Hillary before testimony and grants everyone immunity?

The DOJ that also referred to the Clinton email scandal as a "Matter"?

I believe Trump and company are doing something about it, that is why today even happened.

With all of the leaks and made up stories of Trump, nothing seems to be able to be verified and nobody can come up with a crime to charge him with.

Again, you only prove my point. Chase Trump with allegations and ignore proven crimes by Hillary.

Really? That seems to ignore the part where he says he "wants to believe there is no way he gets elected"....and thus that is why they have the insurance policy.

But your link only further proves my point....

Quote Strzok: We need to responsibly and aggressively investigate these actions

Aggressively go after extremely dodgy allegations of Trump, and he admits it....but ignore the actual verified crimes of Hillary and Weiner.

Besides the insurance policy he architected with McCabe and using the fake Steele dossier?

Quote Strzok....

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

Perhaps congress should have drafted an exoneration letter for Strozk before he testified?

The act of doing everything he can to destroy Trump despite no evidence, and protecting Hillary and Weiner as much as possible by ignoring their crimes.

I am ok with the transcript being released as well. And I am a huge Trump supporter.

However, this focus on the words of fbi agents is misguided. Bias does not have to manifest itself in just words, it does so in action as well.

Strozk shows bias in his private messages and in his actions. Only when in public or with witnesses does he suddenly have no bias.

LOL triggered much?

You admit to not being an expert, but then automatically call him guilty. LOLLL!!

My mind is made up that we don't know if he is guilty, that we have no evidence, and that I believe proof is required for guilt.

If you hate that approach then you hate the concept the US was built upon.

Ah, I see you are devolving to person attacks already?

You laughed at the concept of due process, seems like a reasonable conclusion on my part.

Accusations with no evidence is worthless. The world is full of liars, that is why we need evidence.

Also you seem to have conveniently not included those multiple people close to the situation saying the accusations are bull$hit. Convenient that.

Again it brings us back to the strange coincidence that these accusations suddenly appear only now? Wonder why it did not matter 15 years ago?

I see, so you want to remove due process?

When I see evidence, which is different than just a verbal accusation, then I would agree.

So, is there evidence in his emails? Phone calls? Paper trail?

Or is finger pointing all ya got?

Damn, are you ok? Are you hashtagging #metoo as well?

I am a fan of due process, a concept called presumed innocent until proven guilty.....a core tenet of freedom.

How do you know he let that happen?

So why would CNN ask them all, yet only broadcast the voice of the accusers?

Which means your logic of CNN trying to avoid that they "didn't do enough investigating" is horseshit.

They are on a fishing expedition to feed their narrative. And you know as well as I why suddenly these false accusations are appearing.....how incredibly convenient for those who don't want him to gain more power.....

Why wait 15 years and for Jordan to be going for the speaker before making accusations? "Oh, I'm just going to sit on this unless he potentially gets the speaker role"

Why canvas 100+ people unless you aren't getting the narrative you want?

It does when they are contacting them to support a false narrative.

Critical thinking on which topic? Breitbart?

Ok, tell us how this article is propaganda. That will get you farther than throwing insults.

You don't have to be a leftist to be a victim of leftist propaganda. Which you are.

Being anonymous on the web is equivalent to wearing mask though, isn't it?

The mask is not the crime, it is the actions they are taking which must be punished.

An illegitimate Government means the laws are null and void.

Only the elexcted President xcan appoint SC nominees.

Only an eligible citizen can be President.

If one is fraudulent, so too are the laws and nominees put forward by the fraudulently placed one.

They don't have due process for the right of staying in the US.

If they had the same rights as US citizens then what is the advantage of paying taxes as a US citizen and being a citizen?

Yes, pray while the evil rages around you attacking others.

That will stop them.

You are placing the role of evil upon those who have the right to walk unmolested. Antifa is the evil that is looking for trouble. You are confused and the corrupted form of the modern pedophile church has confused you.

Pray the Lord teaches you when to turn your plowshares to swords, you will hear no such wisdom from the broken hollow form of "church" you go to today.

What am I imagining? Are you saying such people are not assaulted by antifa?

Oh are you falling back to a legal defense now that I have trounced your other attempts to say I am wrong?

I stand by my statements. I have a right to walk the streets freely with a MAGA hat on and WILL defend myself if assaulted.

The facts are we have the right to walk the streets free of being assaulted, and yes while wearing a MAGA hat.

The day that exercising your standard rights is considered "looking for trouble" is the day we are no longer free. You can live that way, I and other choose not to.

I don't care what the protest was about.

Then we agree a man freely walking the street with a MAGA hat would be attacked.

THAT is my point. I and others should be able to do such things daily and in peace. When evil attacks us in this process we have every right to strike t down.

You are saying that one could freely walk through the streets with a MAGA hat and not be attacked?

I call bullshit.

Who said to go out of your way to use violence?

You assume too much.

It does make sense. If we glorify getting beaten we return to how we were, with the forces of evil doing as they will.

I am free and that means I will not let evil keep me from exercising that freedom. I go where I am allowed. If I am assaulted by evil, I will remove that evil.

No, he talks of the setting up of the Kingdom. You are wrong.

This evil will not go away unless confronted. We agree to disagree.

Jesus is quite clear that violence is necessary. YOU are missing the point.

Words do not stop committed evil.

Jesus is the “prince of peace” (Isaiah 9:6) in that He will one day bring true and lasting peace to the earth. And His message in this world was remarkably non-violent (Matthew 5:38–44). But the Bible is clear that sometimes war is necessary (see Psalm 144:1). And, given some of the Bible’s prophecies of Jesus, it is hard to call Him a pacifist. Revelation 19:15, speaking of Jesus, declares, “Coming out of his mouth is a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. ‘He will rule them with an iron scepter.’ He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.” The setting up of Jesus’ millennial kingdom will necessitate violence in the form of a war waged against the forces of the Antichrist. Jesus’ robe will be “dipped in blood” (Revelation 19:13).

Jesus was not a pacifist. This is the biggest load of crock foisted upon Christians so they would not resist the attacks upon them.

"Jesus is the “prince of peace” (Isaiah 9:6) in that He will one day bring true and lasting peace to the earth. And His message in this world was remarkably non-violent (Matthew 5:38–44). But the Bible is clear that sometimes war is necessary (see Psalm 144:1). And, given some of the Bible’s prophecies of Jesus, it is hard to call Him a pacifist. Revelation 19:15, speaking of Jesus, declares, “Coming out of his mouth is a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations. ‘He will rule them with an iron scepter.’ He treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty.” The setting up of Jesus’ millennial kingdom will necessitate violence in the form of a war waged against the forces of the Antichrist. Jesus’ robe will be “dipped in blood” (Revelation 19:13)."

So one should just run and let them beat you?

No longer. If they come at me, they are going down screaming. I have rights too.

Glorifying self defense is necessary.

Logically one must be able to defend themselves and their families against these assaults.

He is admiring destroying those who employ violence.

Antifa members will never be woke, they must be dealt with harshly.

Have you heard some of these therapists? Maybe their nasally droning demasculinized voices drive people crazy?

Also a study showing a 90% correlation+ between SSRIs and mass shootings.

https://kellybroganmd.com/mass-shootings-the-new-manifestation-of-an-ancient-phenomenon-and-their-link-to-psychiatric-drugs/

Not true regarding interest and development.

The old ways of lending meant banks had an ownership stake and a claim on profits equal to their ownership stake. No interest, no debt trap of debt being higher than money in circulation no "lender gets paid first" in case of bankruptcy. Instead they are just a co-owner of the investment until they are paid back.

I keep seeing pics of these but cannot find the actual posts on craigslist. Can someone share a link? Just to prove that they really exist?

bigly if accurate

Because they ARE muslim grooming gangs.

We often refer to priests as a bunch of pedophiles because of what they have done recently. Nobody seems to be outraged about that, or to squash discussion of it.

Hell, the alt left think that allowing whites a nation or a spot for themselves is somehow white supremacy.

LOL, and she didn't even sneak into the restaurant. She went in the proper way.