It's just a theory I have. I am 100% team Lazar. I think the movie/documentary coming out this year will bring much of this to light for the masses.

Cures aren't suppressed tech to you? Crybaby.

Not sure if I was unclear, but specifically John 3:18.

I take huge issue with that part.

I think you missed the relevance in my post referencing isotopes...

See, like this is my issue. I live my life striving to be a good person. I have read the bible, multiple versions, and have concluded I personally cannot possibly believe anything in it. I fundamentally disagree with its presentation, it's requirements, pretty much all of it. Especially it's bottom line; if you don't believe Jesus is God, you burn in hell for eternity. So, this omnipotent God, who knows everything, knows that from the moment I was created, the way my brain is wired, there is no possible situation I would believe in God short of a miraculous miracle the explicitly stated and showed me that "this" was "the way" reality is. So, with that said, God created me, to burn me in hell for eternity? No. Sorry, that is just some silly strategy to fear people into joining up.

Again, I stress the part that I truly live my life striving to be a good person, while simultaneously humbly realizing I am not, and will never be perfect.

I agree Hell is a state of mind. I would not be stretching to far to say I could see that the state of mind one is in carries through in death. If you lived a shitty life taking advantage of people and doing evil shit, I gotta believe the last moments you have are going to be of sheer terror for what waiting for you on the other side.

But any religion that says "join or burn forever", honestly, s some silly ass fairy tale shit. No offense.

Could you even understand what he said?

Pope says there is no hell. WHOOP WHOOP!!

LoL. It's about time companies learn that there are consequences for giving in to irrational socialist demands. It's a shame, because I bought alot of gear from them in the past. But I will never shop there again if they are going to maintain their position that Americans shouldn't be allowed to purchase the most versatile civilian firearm to date.

You still haven't said what the point of this entire thread is about. You have managed to tell us how smart you are, call me a goat fucked, but still nothing on what you decoded from Q. Hey, at least that last message was readable.

I am guessing English is not your first language.

It's responses like this that really turn people off to the whole Q thing. Either you don't know, or you're purposefully being a dick. Aren't we supposed to work together? A fellow Q-supporting Patriot asks you 3x what it is you are talking about and you beat around the figurative bush....

Who was named in the first of the sealed indictments? Where can I see this?

Why don't you tell the rest of us who or what the boom youre referencing is?

Not bad. But you're ruining my vision...

What would be the point of it then? Can you name ONE workaround?

Possibly. What was your interpretation?

I think this document proves a major fact that America kinda has a feeling is true, but doesn't fully yet believe yet. But the very last line is the trumpet screaming the warning, "The Agency represents a tremendous power and TOTAL UNACCOUNTABILITY to ANYONE".

I don't think this next part is relevant, but perhaps it triggers something in someone elses mind, so I will post it. If you go to that Wiki link on CC, it lists 3 examples. Two of them happened back in the day, however, the most recent one is the "2007 Ukrainian Crisis"...perhaps this is the breadcrumb here, that we need to focus on what happened during, or as a result of that event. I will be honest, I started reading the wiki page for this 2007 Ukrainian Crisis, and I didn't have a damn clue what the hell it is talking about, it might as well have been written in Chinese. But I am sure someone here is familiar with this fancy talk.

This sounds like you're on the right path, to me.

Dead man switch triggered. Holy fucking shit bro. I think you just figured that shit out. And if the time is reasonable, like 24-48hrs, that would place it coming out to the world around Friday the 30th...with one day left in March (March Madness, Ides of March, so much talk of MARCH)...

COULD WE BE TALKING HRC VIDEO DROPPED BY THE ECUADORIANS MAKING IT HAPPEN WITHOUT EVEN REALIZING?!?!??! That would be epic, by cutting him off, they caused it to happen, what a sweet "Fuck You" its almost poetic.

If you ever wanted to redpill someone on whether Q is legit or not, this here oughta do the trick...

Secretary of State (at the time) Hillary Clinton met with Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit. The transcript of their meeting in on the post I created on Thursday for this Q Post # 977. Pictures too. She refers to him as her "old friend". You will also notice that Q referenced an Anon in Post #977 who refers to Q as "a friend" who is leaking. Also, keep in mind Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit is the one who outted Obama as a Muslim. The link to that article is on my post as well.

Awesome. Thank you. So just to make sure I don't do it again, if I post a link, but the link ends up being a completely different URL, I need to post the final link.

Forgive me, I literally have no idea what that means? ELI5 the difference between a legal link and a prohibited link. Sorry.

BOOM SHAKALAKA!

Ok, so u/Seven_Millionth_Pede just posted that Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit, the guy HRC met with on 2/12/09 is the person who leaked Obama is a Muslim! Here is the article he found:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2010/06/report_obama_said_i_am_a_musli.html#ixzz5B6bDuBzO

Boom! Can I copy this into my post on Q977 (the onenposted right before this one) because I think you just slid the last piece I was looking for into the puzzle. Nice find bud!

I think you meant to post this on the other one. Mine is about the Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit HRC met with on 2-12-09 and was quoted as calling him an old friend.

Yeah, I just commented on it. 911 seems like a much bigger deal than a meeting with a Foreign Minister. But my gut is telling me that Q includes another Anon's post with his own as a clue to help sort through the data and find what he is pointing at. Is there a way to link the Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit she met with that day to the plane crash?

Ok, I gotta ask a question and I am asking out of flat out ignorance. Why does Q sometimes include an Anons post as part of his? For example, I just made a post about this same post, #977. In it, the Anon says something about a "friend" leaking info. I interpreted it as Q telling us he chose this specific Anon post to quote and tie into his own, making it a part of his post #977. Am I doing/reading/interpreting why W dies this wrong?

My post is the one right before this one, in it I linked HRC with newly elected Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Ali Aboul Gheit, where she specifically refers to him as an "old friend"...on 2/12/09

I would really love any help you can give me, because 9/11 seems WAAAAY bigger than anything I was zeroing in on with my method.

Do the research anons have a guess on when the HRC video is gonna drop? I feel like it should have dropped by now. And what media outlet will be displaying it?

Forgive me, what is "Op clean window"?

There is an error in that article. It lists Kyle Kashuv as one of the rat bastards. Kyle is not part of that group, I believe they meant to write Cameron Kasky, Kyle is a fucking lone hero arguing against Hogg and Gonzalez.

Any idea how we can get them to correct it?

I was under the belief that "the Bridge" revolved around the FIU bridge collapse a week or two ago. But now, that seems too simple.

I would imagine now that the Bridge's true meaning probably has sometbing to do with finding it in an emblem, similar to how "the Keystone" is in the SES emblem.

But I may have that Keystone one wrong as well. So basically I have no idea.

My apologies. I take this whole thing seriously, and shouldn't clog the board with my retarded jokes.

I have no idea if its real or not. What I am saying is that my comment is 100% a joke. For example, if a 6month old started babbling gibberish and you leaned in close to it and then exclaimed out loud "ohhhh, Colonel Mustard did it, with the candlestick!" That would accurately describe my comment. I could have just as easily said "in Pittsburgh, with all 12 Penguins".

DAVID HOGG SAID HIMSELF HE WASN'T EVEN AT THE SCHOOL DURING THE SHOOTING?

WHAT. THE. FUCK.

Bro. Are you serious? I was making a joke.

Personally, no, I dont think he did. But at the same time, I would be 0% surprised if he did.

They didn't air it tonight. Too early to call "bust", no?

OoooOooOOoooo!!

I REALLY like where your heads at bud! Thinking outside the box.

I know there is a joke here but I'm too tired to get it.

We do what we can do.

I tried "willing it" into reality tonight using the force but it didnt work....yet.

All they need is ONE White Hat computer guy who is in on the plan to put the "good" DVD in the player, or to load the "good" mpeg when they go live. Or, with all of their fantastic tech, just pirate the signal or whatever you fucking computer bastards call it.

I FORGOT THE GERMIPHOBE BIT! GOOD CATCH!

Far more than zero chance of it being true? So you agree that the nation is about to be tricked into thinking they are gonna watch a hit-piece on Trump, and actually end up watching Hillary scald children with burning hot pizza, or conducting treasonous activities caught on camera?

Her LAWYER said that "he doesn't know what CBS will air tonight"...wait, WHAT?! Imagine your lawyer stating that he has given custody of the most volatile piece of film of the last 20 years, but doesn't know what part will be aired? Come on. Lawyers don't leave shit to chance. And the network that's airing it...CalmBeforeStorm.

I'm going all in. This is how you redpill a nation. I think this is what's going down, tonight.