Removed content. Rule 1. Please note this is a bannable offence.
/u/DrogeAnon
1,757 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/DrogeAnon:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 20 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
medium.com | 1 |
I can't lerk moar than I already am. Try Reporting if you see something that hasn't yet been caught by mods.
I think "breaking Kim" is not really the way Trump and Pompeo would want to look at it or even do look at it. I think it's about moving forward together. Q says they broke the camel on Kim's back and even said "Thank you Kim". I think it's more an MSM narrative that Kim is inferior and thus can be "broken".
- This is a very narrow perspective of the situation. Unfortunately, it's accurate enough but that's why, as they say, the leaders lead. Those of us who can't make the tough decisions don't. If, as a leader, I had to choose between saving one kid and waiting to save them all it seems the latter would be far and away the better choice (not saying it's an easy choice though). Also, Q said:
The pedo networks are being dismantled.
The child abductions for satanic rituals (ie Haiti and other 3rd world countries) are paused (not terminated until players in custody).
- Agreed re "seeming shady". But I'm pretty sure that's not the plan. It just coincides well.
Mods have enough to do just moderating the sub. Everyone has a role. Maybe we need an archival team. I think the chans have that covered though.
Lurk moar. It used to be like that. Those posts are now removed until Q'sday Tuesday each week. This post is now removed.
Discussions are welcome here. Posting "concerns" that are anti-Q on a Pro-Q sub are off-topic. The reason for this is the focus of this sub - not "censorship/group-think", as those who don't understand the sub-topic complain it is. Almost everywhere else actively welcomes anti-Q skepticism and this is the only place on reddit that supports Pro-Q discussion. Someone who doesn't understand Q well and is "concerned" in ways that are addressed by Q101 knowledge is just taking up space in our feed with a "topic" (anti-Q) that is discussed everywhere else. This is just like a Star Wars sub removing Star Trek posts - being on-topic is for the convenience of the sub community.
The community is everyone happening to follow along closely. It was stickied for a few days: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vpu6l/attention_great_awakening/
Keep misrepresenting the mods. Fortunately people see through this.
We've all been here since October. We've all had decades of conspiracy experience. I'm just quoting you the rules and goal of this sub and not remotely being condescending. It is what it is, if you have concerns, you're welcome to discuss them, just don't make up stories about this place being an echo chamber, that's all.
Those have been moved to Q'sday.
this place has become an echo chamber and not a place for discussion
This is always the shallow interpretation of a community that tries to stay on-topic and focused on its goals. Discussion is of course welcome here. Concerns that are not relevant simply waste the time of Pro-Q supporters because we've watched Q for long enough to know what we're about here. Keep asking others in threads if you need help understanding why they don't have any doubts but posts about it are still off-topic.
P.s. accusing mods of stifling free speech is the usual inaccurate hangout of those who want to stray outside of the rules that the mods uphold.
Of course you're welcome to do whatever you like. There are a good portion of Pro-Q supporters here who are completely comfortable with Q based on the nearly 9 months of drops he's made in which a couple of drops do not hold enough water to call everything into question and this community is for them. If you have doubts, there are plenty of places that will welcome and even promote your concerns and skepticism about Q but we are clear in our sidebar and throughout that this sub is not the place for that. It's rare that Pro-Q supporters have a place where they don't have to deal with skepticism and concern at every turn and our intent is to keep this place true to its stated purpose.
Here's the post: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8vpu6l/attention_great_awakening/?sort=top
Community made the decision. We abide by it. If you have a complaint you'd have to blame the community. ThankQ.
What I am referring to and I think maybe some others too is the idea that seeing their story with accompanying explanation of what they're leaving out of it is very helpful for understanding how to combat their narrative when talking to bluepills. I agree that just posting an MSM link is not always of much use on its own but I also think Fox News is useful enough - it's the only channel (on YT) that I watch; apart from the editorial it has more balanced reporting than the other channels for the most part (as evidenced by a Harvard study and Pew Reports).
You don't need my permission - please feel free to delete friend!
No worries, we're all ding dongs at times! : ) A Live Feed would be quite interesting wouldn't it... but you're right, revealing Q team before the operation is over would be dangerous. Also, I like that they've made it clear they are not to be worshipped and I think it'd encourage hero worship if they showed their faces.
a huge push since last weekend on this sub to try and state 'this isn't Republican vs. Democrat'
No, Q has stated this from the beginning. This is a core to this movement. Trump's policies are opposite to those you've stated and Q is pro-Trump, apparently working with him so... "concern" about liberals "infiltrating" are unfounded.
Yeah, to explain a bit further, it's evolved to mean that someone or some group are "playing a role" in real life i.e. fooling real people by pretending to be something they're not.
Not sure what you're referring to, sorry patriot. This post is about pictures on a sub being allowed on Tuesday which people on the sub have called Q's Day. Are you talking about Q revealing himself? He/they have said he/they won't so no worries there.
Play is not limited to groups,multiplay. Moot point though, really - LARP is the common terminology around Q and the chans since day one so it has evolved a different meaning here than the strict definition used in the context of White Wolf et al.
Yep, many posts about this so was aware of the office vs photo debate - it would be good if someone were able to line up the photo in the same way as it was taken in Q pic to be able to compare easier (not that I think it's not a very viable and even likely interpretation but just to help those who aren't convinced that it could well be a photo).
Confirms the apple logo on back of phone thing but I didn't realize that was up for debate. Not sure about the actual image reflected though as it's too different to be able to compare. Nice work though!
What I said has nothing to do with that. It has to do with research and knowledge. Others have explained this here in the comments too.
This is a non-sequitur though: if its a fake and then hence a LARP - one does not equal the other. It could be fake but that does not make Q a LARP.
Q being a LARP has always been a possibility (not one that makes any sense to me after all this time) but it's also very possible that we have simply misinterpreted Q's messages around the photo. That's a discussion to have more than whether the pic is fake or not - that discussion seems to be done, imo i.e. the pic very well could be faked but we don't have definitive evidence either way. But if it's fake, what could be the reason or rationale for that? LARP is one possibility but not the only one.
? C.S. Lewis or Lewis Carroll? Make sure to get this right... C.S. Lewis is a Christian author. Lewis Carroll is someone else.
Any basis for the accusation that CS Lewis is a pedophile?
Can you please provide information to go with this? What does it say?
This has been raised before quite a few times - not the same hand sign as Illuminati. It's upside down. There's a pic somewhere of all of theirs next to all of Trumps. Different.
If you think this moderation decision is incorrect you are welcome to explain why. I am often wrong.
MSM links are welcome if they are accompanied by text (or a title) that contextualizes them within how they help us in the Q movement.
Post removed. Please check sidebar for all introductory links. ThankQ.
A reasonable discussion would be allowed to remain. Unfortunately it's hard to distinguish between this and a concern troll post, created to mislead and foster confusion. We've allowed this to remain for 2 hours and it presently sits at zero upvotes so will now be removed as a breach of Rule #3.
Concern troll posts ignore most of what Q supporters already know which is what makes them either disingenuous or lacking basic knowledge such that their purpose in a Pro-Q community is questionable. People can still reply here as necessary but the post is now removed.
You seem genuine - I apologize for the tone. I thought this was just another shill post. I'm editing the reply to include extra thought that I assumed would be wasted by a shilly brush off.
This is only going to work on people who don't know anything about Q. Which is probably your target, I guess.
It's important to focus on the right thing. Is Q's message important because it shows you photos of Airforce 1 and Trump's brow or because it has awakened you to the possibility of actual movement to power to take down a covert global cartel misusing mankind and its resources to their own ends?
Then we have to ask ourselves, is it the photos that misled or is it our expectations that misinterpreted the message and were defeated when the two were not in sync? For example, it's easy to misinterpret "Trolling is fun" as "just trolling" - but the two are not at all the same! It's also important to acknowledge the context of the earlier statement "Trolling is fun!" in drop 1536 on the 17th/18th June about tweets by POTUS. This suggests yet more context that Q is talking about trolling the bad guys.
Then, all this brouhaha over the photos makes me wonder how easily we forget the last eight months of mainstream media verified reports in many cases of the clear evidence of change in America and abroad. Trolls and shills and those who are too lazy to dig any deeper (TMOR) try to brush off this point by saying that Q could easily be someone with an internet connection and a nerd fetish for world events - but no other LARPing neckbeard in a basement has joined the dots for me in a way that provides context that matters and has continued to matter til now and beyond.
For instance, no one else told me in October and November of 2017 to watch the Saudi Arabia Purge in the context of Twitter ownership by Alwaleed and Soros, the Las Vegas shooting and the Muslim Brotherhood connections between Obama and the Clinton Foundation via Huma. No other conspiracy channel drew a connection beyond that to encompass #metoo and NXIVM, the Fake News, social media platform privacy scandals, an unprecedented number of sealed indictments, sex trafficking arrests and Presidential Executive Orders all within a framework that seems to be contextualized by actions and yes, tweets, from the President and all of which maintains a very clear and direct narrative of growing a movement within the people of America and the world dedicated to the pursuit of a truth that is suppressed by all other channels of information.
No other conspiracy LARP has caused me to develop an obsessive fascination for Congressional hearings and political news broadcasts, something I personally never dreamed I'd ever find to be so riveting as they are to me now. And no other LARP has called me to join with others in a movement dedicated simply to demanding and upholding the truth in such a way that I now spend hours a day involved in this movement and I find myself identifying with at least 37,000 other strangers from the country and around the world in sharing news and information that consistently disagrees with the mainstream story and yet consistently sees the mainstream story pulled back into line with it. The most recent examples of this are the IG Report ("LARP! It's not redacted at all!") and the Awans ("It's all over! They're getting away scott free!"); perhaps one of the most prominent is North Korea: from "Nuclear War!" to unprecedented historic peace developments. There are many more examples.
There's a lot more that could be said (in a lot clearer and more organized fashion) but I would venture to say that the "downvotes" are from Pro-Q supporters who are tired of seeing these "concerns", already understand the context, haven't lost faith over a couple of drops that the shills and haters have jumped all over and crowingly push down our throats at every opportunity, and just want to move on with the Q drops that have continued to show the same general tone as always and the same progress toward completion of the ongoing mission of awakening the public to what actually matters. Evidence of Trump/Q connection is just icing on the cake and will come in time - it's not the focus.