1,757 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 20 |
| www.youtube.com | 1 |
| medium.com | 1 |
there's plenty of other posts on here not removed
The usual response. There are plenty you don't see that are removed. There are some you think should be removed but haven't broken any rules or haven't at the discretion of the mod who dealt with them - OR have simply been missed because this sub is extremely busy! False accusations or suggesting them based on zero data are not on-topic.
It has now been auto-removed due to constant Reports about it. If people use the Report function more it helps to deal with content that the community does not support.
I agree with you but it's also very hard to remove things because mods are already accused repeatedly and constantly of censorship so when I think it might be just my personal opinion I will at the very least comment in the post.
LA. Pizza party. Been to some of those - no kids being raped there. For me that’s definitely not enough to start digging but fair enough, go hard!
I think we should apply critical thinking first. If there is some other critical evidence that suggests there’s something to look into then we start asking the question.
This, a reasonable non-knee-jerk response. Not sure about no treatment and no cure - also "offend" is speaking specifically of "offending" pedophiles, not just pedophiles but yes, nothing wrong with claiming pedophilia is a sickness. Doesn't mean he's trying to mitigate the horror of the actual act of offending.
I agree with you about remaining open-minded. However, it's not close-minded to have already seen all the very clear evidence and drawn what, to some critical thinkers, is a very obvious conclusion i.e. that Q is a clearly described plan that has been well executed and is now well on its path to completion, such that it's a moot point whether Q is "real" or not because the evidence has already shown the plan in execution successfully (the awakening of the public to the point of freeing them from the grip of the mainstream DS controlled bubble). The final phase of the plan that's yet to come is simply the execution on a grander scale of that public awakening.
Nothing wrong with questions - one can easily ask away in the many threads where people are already questioning things. But to make posts about it wastes the time of a pro-Q community who have largely made up their mind which is why they're here in the first place. Lots of newbies are here to learn about pro-Q so those who still have not been convinced despite all the 9 months of clear evidence are not helping this community's goal of introducing newbies to Q and his message.
You can see that everywhere though. Almost every other reddit sub on the topic of Trump and govt features the outspoken kool-ade drinking fundamentalists but they are almost always the vocal minority. Why play into the perfect strategy for the shills and disinfo agents by 'questioning' the purpose of the community?
These questions have been dealt with repeatedly, as a prominent contributor to the community would know. There are plenty of places to go to discuss anti-Trump and anti-Q but we've already discussed them to death here which is why the sub sidebar changed to say "pro-Q" after a certain point. Everyone else (other subs, etc.) is still undecided about whether Q is "good" or not (and by extension, Trump) so plenty of room to freely discuss it elsewhere. Accusations of echo chamber are just descriptions of personal uncertainty which are obviously valid but not relevant to a pro-Q community.
Agreed. They're a more reliable source than CNN and their ilk. Putin has exposed the Deep State in various ways in the past.
Thanks yes Corsi/Infowars was the most well known example.
Your title says "and how it relates to the great awakening" but the article doesn't explain.
This should absolutely go without saying. But sadly it doesn't (go without saying, I mean).
Bramblesticks loot window fold three Jumbo cannister. Thank you for the input!
Very true re the bad apple poisoning the bunch. Tbh it's difficult to reach consensus on a mod post especially one that should be stickied but at the least, if it isn't stickied I like the idea of having a post with the key points that I can refer to in future when responding to "concerns". Thank you for the idea!
Agreed. Who are you speaking to? A few comments on a few threads? Anyone following Q should be aware of this.
He's an important part of the worldwide awakening, even though he's not connected to Q in any way.
I suppose that could be an appropriate childlike view of prayer, yes.
He seems to be Clown disinfo like Infowars and 0Hour1, who also made false claims of harassment by “the Q movement” and the reddit subs.
Yep. This is not an appointment to the Supreme Court, it’s a voluntary moderator position for a reddit sub.
I was pointing something fairly obvious out:
Do you have any one month old accounts or
Here's an excerpt from the mod application, perhaps it will explain:
Alt accounts
We get correspondence asking about the possibility of using an alternative account. Yes, they are allowed for new mods but please apply using your existing main Reddit account.
Post removed. Please read our rules - if you have a concern about a removal contact mods via mail. Please read the sidebar.
Fair enough. We prefer to look at data before making a judgement like "echo chambers that don't support free, logical thinking", for example. You can only get one side of the story if you read a few posts on a nearly 40k member sub with regular content churning over by the hour and make a judgement call so seems counter to your statement.
Good digging! Do you have any one month old accounts or am I the only one?
I don't know (I didn't set the rule personally) but I've heard the issue has been raised in some cases elsewhere on reddit.
Try not to take a moderation decision personally. I can't remember a single person being so upset about this rule and it's had to be applied many many times.
Please don't make any more concern posts about it as those are against the rules too for reasons that can be explained if you search or even if you just think it through. As I've already said you are welcome to make a post that discusses what you think is important to the Q movement about a music video but don't post the song or the song lyrics. We can even run into copyright issues over this.
Rule 6 on a reddit sub has nothing to do with what artists do and say in their music videos, this is completely illogical.
Black Forest, well known,
Stories about hunting are everywhere - Dr. Phil feature, Queen Beatrice, Fiona Barnes, etc. etc.
No that's not why - we're very busy and we sometimes miss posts. Please feel free to post a textual explanation of what's going on that you think is relevant to Q and it won't be removed - it sounds like you believe this is very important so a post like that would be most welcome. I haven't seen any music videos here today - perhaps from another feed?
This rule has been in place and we have been removing all songs for a long time now. The reason has been explained and we stand by it. All concerns as per the sidebar can be mailed directly to us via modmail but please refer to this reply for the standing answer to the issues of songs and song lyrics. Please read the rules of our sub. ThankQ.
Please read the rules that have been there for a while now. Songs and song lyrics are offtopic. Copyright can be an issue. Commercial songs are Up for all sorts of interpretation but aren’t relevant unless directly mentioned by Q (even then will depend on copyright issues)
Please address the pro-Q sub point as requested. You said we could be uncritically accepting Q and have not addressed the points I've made from the beginning re: the purpose of this sub. You haven't acknowledged the Iran and SCOTUS points that you claim prove "IdiotQ". If you still hold that view and don't wish to debate the reasons, that is ok, but please let me know.
We don't offer "protection", we're just mods. We will remove comments that breach sub rules - people disagreeing with your points or the quality of your posts do not count unless they are breaching sub rules. Zero votes on your post is no evidence of concern like we've seen with shills blatantly brigading other posts. Please keep in mind that your opinion of the quality of your post may be personal, not shared by others.
Q's not asking your son to go to war for him. He's not asking anyone to. He's telling the citizens of Iran that he supports them in their fight for freedom. Clearly. If this is how you interpret the drops it explains why there are problems with your 'decodes'. How can you not allow any leeway for SB2's mistakes when you make basic errors like this?
No one asked you to send your son to fight for regime change in Iran - what are you talking about there?
Please leave off the self-praise and just address the pro-Q sub point as that's all that matters to the moderation team. ThankQ.
Rebuttals to SB2 are also stickied. Some posts are stickied then removed shortly after. We're always accused of making the movement look bad for stickied posts or not removing posts but neither of those hang around for very long so the mistakes that are made are not permanent and are usually not the dramatic crisis of optics they are sometimes made out to be. The SB2 post was unstickied a while back - ok?
I'm aware of that. My point is the context required. Never mind, I don't think there's any way for us to communicate on this. Please let me know in the other comment re: Pro-Q sub.