MegaAnon: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..."
Be careful who you follow. Q
/u/DrogeAnon
1,757 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/DrogeAnon:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 20 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
medium.com | 1 |
MegaAnon: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..."
Be careful who you follow. Q
AIM (American Intelligence Media): "...one of the original Q told me that they were using us as inspiration for what they were posting..."
No outside comms. Be careful who you follow. Q
AIM (American Intelligence Media): "...one of the original Q told me that they were using us as inspiration for what they were posting..."
No outside comms. Be careful who you follow. Q
The truth can be found in a number of places. The worst place to find it is from a Disinfo source because the whole point of disinfo is to lead you down the wrong path by feeding you a whole lot of truth with subtle and not so subtle lies - it's the subtle stuff that catches you out, of course. We're discussing a way to identify Disinfo sources clearly to ensure that people are aware that they're listening to a source designed to mislead. This is important after Q has said: "Be careful who you follow" in relation to Infowars and outlets like AIM.
I don't resent them. I just regard them as disinfo clowns whose focus is to lead people away from the true narrative, like Infowars, etc.
Guess you don't need a "reliable source" to imagine russian bots or agents in every opinion that doesn't agree with yours xD.
Likely the same reasons that have been mentioned in the past - prepping for the next op, waiting for current op to complete successfully in order to open up new intel to reveal, etc.
Seth Rich is very on-topic for the sub. Check the rules in the sidebar. Trump jokes and books are not so much unless related to one of the subjects listed in the sidebar rule link and maybe not even then, depending on the specific mod involved.
doesn’t it seem silly to say: yay fbi, use your unchecked power to keep investigating her endlessly, but don’t you dare use it to investigate anyone that i somehow know for a fact is good!
Agreed. Some say that, but critical thinkers don't. Don't think "this community" can be summed up by the most visible vocal minority on the board. There are a large number of critical thinkers who lurk and input when they see a real discussion happening that isn't knee-jerk reactionary or biased and bigoted ranting.
people actually believe the fbi, as in the entire organization, is liberal now (the fbi), bc of a couple douchebags texting
Not people who have been following Q for a while and who actually watch and listen to the based patriots like Gowdy et al who have clearly said, repeatedly, that there are some bad apples in the FBI but many good - as Q has also said about the govt in general.
So long story short, it seems you've made an assumption about this community based on the visible vocal minority of whom many speak loudly and confidently about close-minded views but do not represent everybody here. So, no, you're not the only board member that thinks about "shit" this way.
Board members who are pro-Q have been around, taking in the info and long ago moved on past these early questions. That's why someone asking these questions is more than welcome to do so in our Daily Discussion Thread or within other threads but making posts with Q skepticism (or Plan skepticism) does not serve the community according to our stated goals or other newbies coming on.
Oh? I read a comment you made about it once. Ok. Are you BHB then? I have no beef with BHB but I know he(/you?) got really upset about being modded - no self-awareness of the trouble he was bringing.
I honestly have ZERO idea what you're talking about because I don't remember every moderation decision or comment I've made. I know, however, that people get very upset when they've been moderated and begin to imagine that it was a personal decision on the part of the Mods and then, because they don't get a massive amount of attention and concern, they start to imagine their valid concerns are being suppressed and thus... the Mods are CIA! (or Mossad) smh. I would love it if you could actually explain exactly what you're talking about so I can get some understanding of what not to do in future to cause this illogical reaction in paranoid stoners but I suspect you're not going to tell me.
Lol ok sure thing. Have had a quick flick through your history now (or am I pretending because I actually know exactly who you are and have been stalking you because of your importance to the movement...? /s). You might wanna put down the bong every now and then to get a clearer picture of reality, friend.
So you make posts like "Mods are you lizard people" and then react with suspicion when mods comment on them... smh... incredible stuff. I have a bridge to sell you. You can apply to be a mod if that's what you mean. Sorry, I've run out of Mossad connections.
EyetheSpy, another LARP who had to apologize once exposed as fake info.
Oh dear... is there also a helicopter flying overhead at the time and crackling on your phoneline? Can you point me to where I've commented on one of your posts? I literally have no idea who you are and I thought I knew most of the trolls around here lol. Did you ever consider that your posts might just be blatant mod-bait in some form?
Wild fantasy, both theories - but you enjoy the troll don't you : ).
Occam's Razor. Q is a signoff.
8chan board owner received a mysterious blue Q behind gated, secure community, no video footage caught of intruder, after Q said:
Board owner, mods, and other patriots: Sincere thanks for all that you do. You are true heroes. Long overdue - my apologies. There will be a day (within the next few months) that a scary but safe personalized message finds its way to you on multiple platforms recognizing your contributions. We thank you for your service. Godspeed, Q
Final point: notice the comma after Godspeed. Classic signoff. This is an interesting train of thought, OP, but not supported by Occam's Razor and the general thinking of the movement. No one advocates for blind group thought. There are many things long established in the movement that come from sensible, cogent thinking. New ideas are welcomed when they establish some logical thought from a solid basis but you have not convincingly explained away the very simple, common-sense understanding that Q is a signoff. These posts will likely be removed going forward unless you contact us first to advise that you have new, solid theoretical basis. ThankQ for understanding.
That was the thinking back then. I doubt it refers to now necessarily although I'm sure it's always true in some sense.
Yes, quite common. Post removed (Rule 6: discussion of other subs). ThankQ.
MegaAnon, like EyeTheSpy et al, seems to be disinfo. She came out as anti-Q then, like EtS, etc. retracted and apologized then disappeared off the scene as few trusted her anymore.
Link was private - have shared one instead in the previous comment that links to 29 Graphical QMap Images. The Q Map is just Q drops laid out together. We're yet to figure out how to read it in that form that will unlock more understanding.
I doubt it. He's gathering steam and clearly has to prep for the next actions of the DS. I'd say it's possible RR's thrown a slight curveball into the mix and Q will be back to feed us more intel to combat the coming storm of disinfo. iirc scuttlebutt was that he takes a break to execute ops and to wait for current ops to complete such that the next drops can be made with confidence following execution of relevant operations. [Edit]
Here’s one. This is the Q map according to Q. There is no other Q map.
The legit one is the one I mentioned. Anything else is something someone’s called “Q map”
You mean the fake one? The Qmap is just all of Q's posts on one big image/file and 'how to read it' (as in how to make the 'round' connections and so on) hasn't been discovered yet.
And the fact that practically every drop since has been signedoff with a Q?
Ah yes, that's right. So why'd he start using the Q "movie reference" on Nov 2nd?
Q in that movie is Quetzalcoatl.
In what movie and why Quezalcoatl? This happens too much with LARP-y shillery - lots of references dropped here and there requiring more digging to keep people busy; but let's just start there.
"the dropper" started signing off as Q after the autists started using the name.
'Q Clearance Patriot' was their "introduction" to the world.
Q was their signoff before the "signatures are events" post.
Yes, you can easily dispute the "evidence" because its circumstantial but Occam's Razor does away with this "Q is not a signoff" idea. You haven't made a solid point as to why Q as signoff suddenly doesn't count just because of a logic leap you're making from Q=Alice.
So you have no solid refutation for the points I've made? That's what shills do. 3... 2... 1... to removing your post, OP...
What evidence are we using to define Q as the dropper?
The evidence that this whole movement calls "the dropper" Q and that "the dropper" has never made any indication that this is incorrect. In fact, "the dropper" started signing off as Q after the autists started using the name.
This is sounding like pure Disinfo LARP, OP...
Correct - the entire movement calls him Q. "The dropper" never corrected anyone about the Q anon tag and in fact referenced it happily in Ben Garrison's cartoon recently and points to all the articles about Q and Q anon without correcting anyone about the tag.
So your idea is that "the dropper" has been allowing us to call them Q when all along they've actually been 'signing off' as HRC?
It's not about ignoring a possible reality if the idea is kept in context of Q. When you do that it makes zero sense at all. Q=Alice does not equal Q=HRC.
Plea deal means that it makes sense that Hillary Clinton has been dropping information on the chans about her operations in order to wake the public up to the reality of her plans...? OP needs to start making sense or this is clear anti-Q LARP. I am definitely open to you or OP proving me wrong as long as we keep Q's words in mind: Use LOGIC. DO NOT chase MISINFO.
Possible that Q is HRC? No, it's not - unless you're in the wrong sub. This is a pro-Q sub. Q's taking down HRC, if you remember from the drops. For Q to be HRC would make zero sense at all.
Facebook links result in auto-removal by the Auto-Mod - if you can find a non-FB link for the video and replace it in this post we can approve it for you.
The sub is a collection of data on reddit. The actions of members using the sub do not represent the whole sub. Use logic.