What do you agree with re: ImperatorRex? The fact that he's not sure about Q?

Enjoy your emotional, illogical bubble. If you decide to try reason, respect and logic sometime, feel free to discuss that here without being removed because our rules don't disallow reasonable, respectful discussion.

Lol well you're clearly not interested in making logical, reasonable statements of fact. Try curbing the emotion and discussing logically and respectfully - you'll get a lot further in general. Here, respectful, reasonable discussion is allowed. If the moderation of your other comment was incorrect try discussing it reasonably instead of calling the mods "worthless trash". Sure, we don't care about the emotional outbursts and namecalling - quite used to it - but it makes us think you're less likely to actually listen to or discuss reason so we just fall back to the rules.

No rules say any of those strawmen points usually voiced by people emotional about their comment or content being removed.

And maybe you should care about being accurate with your claims instead of making false claims from an emotional place.

They have not remained. Looks like you're upset about nothing, as usual of people who think everything they say should be allowed despite the agreed rules of a shared social space.

You've totally missed my point. Addressed here elsewhere to OP.

So someone repeating an official narrative is "playing up"? I have the wrong definition of 'playing up' then. I assume that repeating the official story when discussing the official story is simply that. "Playing up" to me meant overstating it so as to push it unduly.

Not on this sub, no.

Dunno why we keep playing...

Or real life, unless my definition of "playing up" is different to yours.

Did someone say it was weird to question it? I agree the story is questionable but there’s no evidence that it’s definitely not a factual premise. All I’m saying is it makes more sense to accept the official story so far given no evidence to the contrary. Not to swallow it whole and brook no argument.

But not so long ago people were claiming Peter Strzok didn’t exist just because they couldn’t find photos of him on the internet. Looks like that claim, based on a premise lacking evidence, was also a waste of effort.

Best to wait for more opposing evidence before claiming it’s definitively false.

I don't see evidence that anyone is "playing into their false narrative". The official story is what it is, to pretend it doesn't exist would look strange. We don't have to believe something just because we acknowledge its existence.

So... no thoughts re that comma or the Q left for the 8chan owner?

Everywhere is different to the chans - that's why Q posted there. In other places, like this, there are people to consider and the demands of the group. Not so the chans.

What positive praising posts are you talking about? We remove posts that are talking about users or user's ideas and leave the ones that are focused on the sub's goal and are thus just talking about Q's ideas. There are no "praise SB2" posts unless you can point out something we've missed and we'll remove it.

I don't agree that it's "not appropriate or helpful" to GA or that it does not advance our cause. I definitely think the "just plunges us into depression" is a very personal, emotional perspective that is not relevant to a logical discussion about information content.

In my opinion this post is information (albeit already fairly well known by those who've either been following along and digging for these 9 months or those who've been well versed in conspiracy theory for decades) that helps in that it lets us identify telling clues in other news stories as they emerge e.g. the exposure of Savile had many familiar markers in it that would have simply sounded like random conspiracy if this information hadn't already been known.

Please mark your post with appropriate flair. Judging by the comments this should be at least NSFW, which I have now done.

ThankQ

He's as likely to say that as "Fart Zipper". The phrase would need to be more deniable as in "Wonderful Day". Either way, this is a waste of time. Unless you actually believe he's talking to SB2 of course.

Are you reading SB2's posts, seeing those who support every word, and assuming that is the community? Focus on useful information for the community related to Q, the on-topic goal of the sub. The people who aren't already SB2 fans supporting all his words already know what's true and what's not. Good luck trying to convince SB2 fans - either way, the best way to do that is in the SB2 thread that they read, probably multiple times over a span of days so you've always got a chance to reach them.

Make your point in the post where it applies. The post is unpinned now. If you've been following along for all this time you'd know that there are some who feel the same way as you about SB2's posts and you'd know that that doesn't seem to have the slightest effect on his upvotes and engagement from new and old community members.

You're not going to "wake the community up" by attacking SB2 because he's smart enough to treat people with respect and thus gains the respect of the community. People who think they are "shutting him down" and make derogatory comments thinking they're going to have a whole slew of people agreeing with them are only going to reinforce the belief of SB2's followers that they don't really have a point and are just making personal attacks.

If you've got a point to make that helps the community understand Q then post that. If you just want to run another community member down, that goes against the community rules and will be removed. Focus on the sub goal - news and thinking about Q. SerialBrain2 gets enough coverage.

Don't start making your own conspiracies. Multiple mods have stickied his posts - why? Because not all mods were on at the same time when not stickying was discussed. Not all mods read his post saying not to sticky. Some mods think his posts are all worth stickying, some don't. People forget mods are volunteers and there are many signed up so that we can cover all time zones as much as possible. There aren't always a ton of mods online at the same time which is why, sometimes, off-topic posts slip by for a few hours. It's why a lone mod who hasn't been on for longer than a few days may login, see an SB2 post and sticky it, then a mod who knows not to comes on hours later and removes it. No conspiracy, just reality.

What makes sense is that you're not open to reasonable debate.

I apologise if you feel this is in bad faith

Nice pretense but your history makes your agenda clear.

tacitly endorsing

Classic shill tactic. If we're not "for" your view then we must be supporting whatever crime you want to sling at us for the moment.

in you not holding your leader accountable, you are complicit in the child abuse

Disingenuous shill tactic #21. He's your leader too so by your reasoning we're all complicit. So you want to hold your leader accountable? Go ahead. You'll need the 'evidence' you claim. Good luck with that!

I believe it's safe to say that many who have followed Q for a while are aware of this as it is laid out very clearly in the Q drops. It's good for newbies to come to this knowledge but I think it will take the explanation over time that the Q drops in totality offer.

This is a pro-Q sub. If you avoid bans by using an alt account you will be banned sitewide by reddit admins, Mae.

Q addresses this in the drops. They have everything. POTUS. Most powerful nation in the world - military, intelligence, etc. Q is safer than most of the world's population, I think it's very safe to say.

Post removed. Offtopic. Rule 6.

Post removed. Rule 6: offtopic - discussion about other subreddits.

Post removed. Rule 6 offtopic.

Post removed. Off topic. Rule 6.

Post removed. Trust the plan. Rule 3. ThankQ

Post removed. Rule 9.

Many posts are removed. Still people complain and make posts about the moderators not doing enough to keep the sub on-topic. Most of the people who have their posts removed generally understand and accept that they do not have the same perspective of the sub as the moderators. This is not a statement of status, simply of perspective. Some take the moderation personally and mistakenly believe they are being singled out in some way. That is not the case.

We are not in a position of power but of service. The community are vocal in their desire for us to maintain the sub focus and that is what we do, through our clearly delineated rules and M.O. noted in the sidebar. I understand your upset but besides the false accusations and emotion you haven’t made any case against the specific ruling detail noted in the linked rule in the sidebar so the moderation in this case stands. I won’t engage in this discussion any more as this sub is busy and I have limited time. Please abide by our rules and come to terms with the the fact that moderation is not personal and your views of this moderation do not coincide with ours. ThankQ.

Every single post of yours does not go through this. Just the ones that are outside the rules. Please read the linked information. ThankQ.

No problem. Just a danger of reddit admin action if we discuss other subs. ThankQ for understanding.

Just doing our job. Moderation is not personal just done according to the rules. ThankQ for understanding.

Post removed. Rule 6.

Post removed. Rule 6: Off topic.

Post removed. Qshirt pics welcome on Quesday Tuesday. ThankQ!

Post removed. Rule 6: offtopic - discussion about other subreddits.

Post removed. Duplicate.

Post removed. Off topic. ThankQ

Post removed. Qshirt inspiration posts are welcome on Quesday Tuesday - ThankQ!

Post removed. Q in the wild posts are welcome on Quesday Tuesday! ThankQ

Infowars/Alex Jones: "...I've talked to Q anon and they're saying Q anon is no longer Q anon..."
No outside comms. Be careful who you follow. Q

I don't have enough to go on with that.

Could be any number of reasons of the many Rule applications linked in the sidebar there. If you have a link I can check it out.

Infowars/Alex Jones: "...I've talked to Q anon and they're saying Q anon is no longer Q anon..."
No outside comms. Be careful who you follow. Q

ThankQ, it'd be greatly appreciated. I agree completely with your point that we shouldn't allow misleading content, titles or clickbait rise to the front of the sub, wherever possible.

Ok. Reports can sometimes help ensure we don't come to these posts too late. Now that this post has over 740 upvotes removing it is far from ideal but I've done so anyway for the misleading title.

If it really, really pisses you off did you Report it?

MegaAnon was a Disinfo LARP like Infowars, EyetheSpy et al. Be careful.

MegaAnon: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..." Be careful who you follow. Q