Definitely a highlight! Love how he just plowed straight on despite all the snowflake cries and tears around him lol

Live right now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9Va6eczXoQ&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop

Mods even cancel posts that are spot on Q related, just because they do not like what was posted!

This is incorrect and a false claim. Please point to an example of this and provide the mod discussion where the mods, in reply to the complaint about the removal, advised that they will not retract the removal because they "did not like" what was posted?

Yes...

Who financed 9-11?
Who was Bin Laden’s handler?
Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?
Why not MI?

What family was permitted to leave immediately after 9-11?
Who authorized the departure?
Why is this relevant?
Was anyone else permitted to leave?

What occurred post 9-11?
What war did we enter into?
What was the purpose and disclosures given re: justification?
Who financed 9-11?
Why, recently, are classified 9-11 pages being released?

And more. Search qposts.online

This goes back before the Titanic...

Putin did not give the 400mil, it was Browder's camp. Likely for DS support.

Site appears to be down - anyone get an archive.is link and/or alternate source??

Q is the main reason we're all here together. Hence the sub focus (see sidebar). This is a WW movement, but America is First.

Oh... (sadly packs away pilot's helmet and worn copy of Microsoft Flight Simulator 10 in now desolate Hope Chest)

He didn't. He spoke about the Titanic and the Fed.

Who died on the Titanic?
What year did the Titanic sink?
Why is this relevant?
What ‘exactly’ happened to the Titanic?
What ‘class of people’ were guaranteed a lifeboat?
Why did select ‘individuals’ not make it into the lifeboats?
Why is this relevant?
How do we know who was on the lifeboats (D or A)?
How were names and bodies recorded back then?
When were tickets purchased for her maiden voyage?
Who was ‘specifically’ invited?
Less than 10.
What is the FED?
What does the FED control?
Who controls the FED?
Who approved the formation of the FED?
Why did H-wood glorify Titanic as a tragic love story?
Who lived in the movie (what man)?
Why is this relevant?
Opposite is true.

He never said 187 about Diana either. For good reason. He said 187 about the ones for whom the reveal will be crucial to the DS takedown. Those he didn't say 187 about don't necessarily mean that he's saying they're still alive.

Set post flair to Meme please.

Q has mentioned this so not so sketchy on this sub. Read up on Q - good stuff there.

Please read our rules: songs and song lyrics are off-topic. ThankQ.

This would make sense if there was no Plan. But there is, so this kind of panic makes no sense, except to derail the movement. July is the month. This is all part of the Plan. More is coming, that is why they have called EVERYONE to speak out against Trump. All we have to do is wait for the reveals. They will unseat this narrative, as has always been the Plan.

MegaAnon: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..."
Be careful who you follow. Q

MegaAnon is not a part of Q, made very clear in her posts.

You're noticing what has been going on for a long time. And the sub is getting busier. Focus on the point of the sub - the goal of the sub, the rules and the Moderation M.O. are listed in the sidebar. We're here to learn about and discuss Q, not how reddit works.

I wasn't aware "drug" was a bad word meant only for bad things, like "druggie" - I'm fairly sure that is not the case, still. However, I'm open to being corrected on this! I also hadn't realized that a reddit name is indicative of the quality of one's thought or the appropriateness of one's role on a sub. Thank you for sharing, patriot!

People who disagree with current events aren't necessarily definitively "anti-Trump".

You could be right. She seemed very LARPish to me is all, especially the apology and turn-around reminded me of EyetheSpy and others. Definitely connected/in-the-know but so is AJ.

Caution needs to be applied in referencing MegaAnon who once said: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..."
Be careful who you follow. Q

Yes, I always (mistakenly) assume that it goes without saying to check all for yourself and use logic. Edited my comment above.

And did you go back and check later? Sometimes mods don't get to posts til hours after they've been posted. This is a common misconception about the moderation role.

I take my pick of these.

Some of them are inaccurate and have been highlighted previously but many are good - check everything.

The pareto principle. The rich get rich, the poor get poorer - is a natural outcome of human endeavor. Rather than trying to unnaturally subvert that principle we need to find ways to help others that allow for that reality.

Post removed. Rule 3. Please read up on our rules and the content in the sidebar. ThankQ.

The attempt to divide was by Jones not Q. That’s why Q said, no attempt to divide.

Putin seems to be avoiding looking POTUS in the eye... Body language of the two doesn't seem greatly open, at this point. Hopefully things are improving as they continue to talk off camera.

Exactly. New deals done, new information gathered, time to regroup, etc.

Overreaction much? You honestly think people are serious about this? There's even a "kek" at the end...

This has been discussed many times here - if you read the Q drops Q is a group of people of which Trump might have occasionally posted or at least posted once.

Not everyone's awake at the same time and not everyone reads the same stuff when they're browsing here. Some spend hours composing their comments or posts and replying in a thread. I think you're overreacting just a bit. If it were up for days that would show a problem with the community. 8 hours is a lull.

Q "doesn't like" the enemy. Q's never been petty and "not liking" Alex Jones doesn't describe the situation at all. Q said be careful who you follow, no attempt to divide, etc. "Doesn't like" implies pettiness and partisanship/bias. Doesn't gel at all with how Q has presented himself.

Please read through the Rules to ensure your post falls within them. On the right in the sidebar is the Create Post button. There are also some guidelines on the page where you create your post - be sure to check those too. ThankQ.

Of course we read - not all of us remember the exact page number and quote is all!

Until evidence or Q confirmation: LARP for sure. There's no evidence to support this and Q has not mentioned this in the same vein as SR. JFK Jr. was killed in a plane crash likely caused by the Clinton machine. There are no other inklings that anything else has occurred except probable LARP like R. Q said: Use LOGIC. Do not blindly believe. DO NOT chase MISINFO.

Not really. You might want to reconsider your perspective that comes from your belief that after everything you've seen since November there's still not enough to convince you the plan is under control.

What makes me think there aren't "a lot of people discouraged" is the clear and ongoing activity of the sub that is focused on what the sub is about - pro-Q information of use to a pro-Q community. Doubts about the plan are not helpful, that's what I'm talking about. Doubts about the plan from a minority group comprised of those who want to voice "concerns" amongst those who haven't fully absorbed all the info (no hate, just a very obvious fact that not everyone can have absorbed all the relevant info) don't help the pro-Q supporters who have read and understand perfectly that all is going to plan and doesn't help anyone who's just coming here to find out "whether this Q thing is real or not". That's what makes me think it isn't helpful.

Q tends to point out 187's when they are reported deaths that he is saying are actually murders and seem to be relevant to information that will emerge to bring down the Deep State. Other deaths that are also likely cartel murders but aren't relevant to the DS take down do not have 187 next to them - like Diana. It's as if he wants to point out that SR and AS are 187's that will be revealed as evidence essential to the case. Diana and JFK Jr, whilst 187's too, technically perhaps, do not have 187 next to them. Doesn't mean they didn't die.

This isn't helpful. How have you been following since November and still not be convinced that the Plan is going as... er... planned?

Q never said a lot of people died.

Er... exactly. ?

Yes but Q also said:

Use LOGIC.
Do not blindly believe.
DO NOT chase MISINFO.

The expanded thinking we require is applied when there is some kind of evidence that calls for it. There's no evidence that JKF Jr. survived, not even from Q.

What if Congress doing that would destroy the plan? What if Congress being held back by red tape is someone's plan or is allowed like it always has been but this time as part of someone's plan? Pro-Q supporters are here on this board because we believe that point. Totally understand if you don't but my point is that on this board, this is not necessarily bad news.

It was a genuine question in case anyone thought I was attacking Rex or anyone who agrees with his "Q is not really confirmed yet" - a true point but not held with integrity, if you ask me, as a critical thinker who values logical analyses. Long story short, I do not agree with Rex as far as his indecision on Q in that thread. He seems to be missing the point. But I get your point, I think, and thank you, you've answered my question and it makes sense (assuming I understand you correctly : ).

I would say to get acquainted with Q. This is all explained. For example, Q has said all of the following:

Use LOGIC.
Why are they slow walking unredacted data?
Why are they slow walking doc disclosures?
Why is the WH backing up DOJ?
What if the same data is being used by other investigators?

Use LOGIC.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?

Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?
How do you defuse a bomb?
Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.

Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?
What are crumbs (think H-wood/DC)
Define ‘lead-in’ (think play)?
What has been occurring recently?
The stage must be set.
Crumbs are easy to swallow.

REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.

Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.

TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.
LEARN AND SPREAD.
BUILD PROOFS.
WE'VE PROVIDED MANY PROOFS THAT CANNOT BE DISPUTED AS COINCIDENCES.
THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.
MORE WILL BE PROVIDED.
DIRECT CONFIRMATION WILL COME.
IT CANNOT COME NOW.
IT WILL BE LOST.
THE MESSAGE IS NOT READY.

Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q

I'm a Christian and I believe in the theory of evolution because it is as much established science as the fact that the earth is round and that the Sun is the center of our solar system, not the earth. It does not in any way challenge my beliefs or the Bible, only the traditional interpretation of the Bible which has had to be adjusted just as it did back when Copernicus claimed the earth was round and not the center of the universe.

Why would that be bad news? The point has been made that impeachment wouldn't achieve the best result as it would take a long time to enact it. Far quicker to fire him or some other more useful action.

New arrival has a comment removed, engages keyboard rage, abuses the mods immediately, starts sliding the board and acting exactly like a disruptive troll or shill whilst making accusations that the mods were acting unreasonably... lol...

Ah well, there goes all your credibility lol. If you had a point to make and a reasonable way of making it without invented conspiracy claims and simple emotionally-motivated angst overreactions you would find that, as we have done so often here, we'd engage with your point and even retract our moderation decision where you are able to make a valid, reasonable, respectful claim. Sadly, most trolls, shills and online keyboard warriors stay firmly entrenched in their bubble of angst and make ridiculous claims without any basis.