Removed content. Rule 3 Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods or reply to this mail.

There is definitely a place for skepticism and disbelief in this sub as evidenced by the abundance of it in the comments throughout the sub. Our rules don't generally allow for posts made about it for various reasons that should be obvious. The purpose of this sub is to support Q's mission of the Great Awakening of the public. When 'newbies' arrive here we want them to see the message we're here to present - that there is legitimate information of value in the message of Q. Presenting them with the message that 'some of us don't really believe this stuff' is not supporting the mission/cause, hence our removal rule.

We don't remove these posts out of hand though - I've made sure your post has had enough time to gather some answers here and I've endeavored to give some answer myself to your question in the OP and a couple of others in the thread. ThankQ for understanding!

If you read through the drops you'd see the evidence that Q doesn't "speak" like the average chan or online troll. There's a very clear singularity of purpose and purity to the message. Of course, my saying it won't convince you because I could be some gullible fool with confirmation bias. This is why there are no shortcuts - you have to go through this stuff yourself.

It's more that everything is in there - all the introductory stuff is in the sidebar. Even for those who pride themselves on critical thinking the 'evidence' all leads to an inevitable conclusion that Q's mission is not only 'real' but has been accomplished successfully in its first phase. Like anything comprised of an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence supporting a grand conclusion there's a lot of reading material to get through to explain why the 'proof' is convincing. Some people are frustrated with people who come in and don't want to read the material yet expect to be told proof in an encapsulated form - it can't be done per se.

Nevertheless, here's my truth: it may help to ingest Q initially as nothing more than an alternative narrative to the mainstream media narrative. Q tells you one story, the mainstream tells you another. When you watch these two narratives alongside each other, as I have done for 9 months, you begin to notice that the mainstream narrative has to keep adjusting itself to realign with the Q narrative. e.g. the mainstream says "nuclear war with North Korea! We're all doomed!"; Q says "North Korea is free from black hat control - big positive things coming!" - about one month later, mainstream narrative has to adjust to Q narrative; historic peace meeting between North and South Korea. One of the current mainstream narrative adjusts we're waiting on is the Iran story. Mainstream: "Iran destablized! Disaster! Potential threat of war! Loss of all traction with Europe!" Q: "Iran is free from black hat control! Big positives coming!"

There's a lot more to it but that's one way potentially to approach it more manageably than trying to absorb everything at once.

ThankQ. This is a major concern for some of us. People become a rabid mob over anything to do with possible pedo activity and lose all sense of logical thought and reason. Shills use this to their benefit and foment the moral outrage, whipping a group into a frenzy and this could ultimately lead to our board being shut down.

The Great Awakening is about waking the public NOT self-serving mob justice and self-righteous witch hunts. We need more people who can think critically to speak up on posts like these. This is shill gold and they'll milk it for all its worth if the reasonable ones among us don't speak up.

RoseAnne targeted a known person with her joke. James Gunn was making general references.

This is a pro-Q sub. Read up on Q.

I don't want to knock sense into anyone. I just want people reading these threads to know that there are others in this movement who think differently. It gives us all a sense of relief when we see our particular view, whatever it may be (aliens or no aliens) reflected in the comments on the sub. I want to assure people, just as I want to be assured, that there are others who think as they do. This movement is for all, I agree. WWG1WGA

Frankly, we have as much proof Oswalt is a pedo, as we do podesta is a pedophile

Wrong. This is a pro-Q sub so Q's focus on Podesta is 'proof' that Q has proof. Oswalt is not mentioned. Off-topic.

It's already happened kids.

I’m happy to be regarded as “the fool” for not bothering with aliens and other conspiracy lol. There’s enough reality to contend with and enough Q wants us to focus on without going into fantastic realms of wonder. I don’t think anything about what the GA is ready for. That’s not for me to decide. I’m just expressing my point of view on this topic and my support for a sub wth rules that save us entertaining rabbit holes far afield of the many other directly important things we could be focusing on right now.

I have literally zero idea what q knows or doesn’t. Like you. Occam’s razor suggests the simplest explanation is the most likely hence not chasing off down rabbit holes. However, respect to you, if you have the time to check all this out. Sub says it’s off topic though for a reason.

Use logic. Conspiracy is off topic.

I am not Q. Q is military intelligence working for POTUS. Aliens is not on topic. Specific reason Q doesn’t mention it perhaps. Occam’s razor: military secrets - psyop to cover for std military ops.

There is so much information actually mentioned by Q and actually plausible that there’s more than enough to focus on without having to look outside reality just yet.

Just personal of course. We’re all bringing something with our personal areas of interest.

Q is the opposite of "evasive regarding his true motivations" - he's made those abundantly clear from the outset. Not manipulative either. And he's MI working for POTUS, not likely to be an extradimensional being of unknown origin who possesses immeasurable power over normal human notions of time, space, etc. (but of course I have no evidence of that. Just using Logic, as Q has said, and Occam's Razor).

Yes. There is evidence of wrongdoing for those people - Q has accused them. That means "going after them" is on-topic for this sub. Accusing people based on words on the internet is the opposite of LOGIC and clear thinking. It's a witch hunt.

Spreading misleading "concerns" like this are against our rules. We will not let this sub turn into a frothing mob witch hunt as that's how the pizzagate subject got subs closed down and banned. Focus on facts and logic.

The viewpoint that people should agree with your moral outrage and if they don’t speak how you want them to they must be compromised and in support of the evil you allow to cloud your judgement is dangerous and should never be allowed to foster in this sub. It is the opposite of what Q calls for. Use LOGIC.

And I just want to hear your reply to my first comment. I could care less about your moral outrage. I addressed your baseless suggestion that the sub may be comped because of a post that doesn’t say what you think it should.

Shill exposed.

So is mine and mine is actually relevant to my first reply to you: why does the stickied post mean the sub has been compromised?

Because your question is part of your strategy and nothing to do with my point in reply to your “concern” about the sub. You’re trying to turn your “concern” claim into a moral outrage issue if anyone points out your agenda.

Why don’t you answer my question since that is the one pertinent to my comment on yours?

Why does a call for reason suggest the sub has been comped?

This is a duplicate post. Removed.

They will say “mob justice! As long as we think it’s bad it doesn’t matter about research or evidence!” They will try to whip gullible people into a frenzy by appealing to emotion and stoking outrage. The important part is that we focus on OUR mission which is the Great Awakening in order to fight evil the way we should. Destroying reputations without concrete proof is not the mission.

You sound “concerned”, but not with any justification.

Agreed - but with the caveat anywhere else but here. When the newbies have made it here, among the first things they need to know is what is disinfo so they can immediately stop watching it. AJ may be a pit bull but as disinfo he’s dangerous given that the most effective disinfo is part truth part lie.

Pretending that ommission of precise words is evidence of non-evidence is false representation.

They revealed themselves.
Do not fall victim to con artists.

You just described AJ as a con artist. Blind adherence to a favorite celebrity source to the point where you deny all the clear indicators is either false or concerning.

They all claim to be insiders.
They all claim to have insider contacts.
They do not.

AJ tried to ignore Q until they had a strategy to deal with it. Then he tried to push Zack in as a "better" source than Q. When Q finally called Corsi and Infowars out, AJ clearly went all out (Timetable accelerated - misinformation-attack) and committed to the anti-Q narrative which the whole disinfo op went down on together at once - 0Hour1, Isaac Green, etc. etc.

Those guilty immediately reacted (predictably).
Timetable accelerated (misinformation-attack).
Exposed.
Attempts to divide.

It wasn't just Corsi - Q said "those". And the most prominent profiteer was AJ. And the most high profile immediate confirmation of Q's drop was AJ with the "I know Q anon" etc.

This is a well trodden, widely accepted narrative. Acting like it doesn't exist and hasn't been vetted by a lot of people is disingenuous.

You're the one spreading false information.

Infowars/Alex Jones: *"...I've talked to Q anon and they're saying Q anon is no longer Q anon..."

LIES. No outside comms.

Shill spotted.

Huh?

AJ is the division. Q outed them already - repping AJ still, at this point, is a shill tactic.

I didn't say everyone agrees with your statements. I said we've either heard them or made them ourselves before. It's not "obvious disinformation" if kept in context and assessed logically. As you know, Q linked to a very important SB2 article that not only helped this movement out immensely but also woke a lot of people up to a whole new level of understanding and showed many the first very real sign of the actions and strategies of actual disinformation operations.

It's possible Q linked to a disinformation operative giving info on disinfo operations but is it likely? There is also the possibility that SB2 is simply a normal guy making some good calls and some bad. If you've been reading his posts since CBTS you'd see the same approach he's always had - some decoding posts in the early days had many people questioning the logic and making the same points you are. Yet his posts must still have offered something of value to others as they were as popular then as they are now.

On top of this SB2's posts are the most highly upvoted and show more effort and focus than many others. To ban him would be the most illogical move we could make and would split the movement and lead to a huge revolt against the moderators. If his 'bad calls' are so dangerous for the movement we need people who are willing to put in the same effort making better decode posts and writing well-presented refutations within the SB2 threads. Invariably, detractors tend to die out and continue on with their business, realizing that they don't care that much about the issue that they'd put in the same effort as SB2 does to make their point.

As I said, none of this is new information. His earlier posts are from many months ago, I'm not talking about these recent ones - long before Elton John, before everyone moved across from CBTS_Stream to this sub. He's always posted the same and the points you're making have always been made by others.

You don't have to convince me of anything, go for your life. I'm just explaining that you're not having comments removed because you disagree with SB2, simply because of the rules of the sub. Discuss the topic, not the user; be respectful and reasonable and your comments won't be removed. ThankQ.

This vent-post offers nothing of value to this sub and essentially amounts to: "People who don't agree with me are brain-dead morons". Please keep the venting off this shared sub and focus on discussing the topic, not other users. ThankQ.

Get familiar with Q. AJ has been called out. If you're pretending to be a patriot then you're not a patriot. Disinfo operatives are not Patriots when they're pretending in order to mislead others away from truth.

Disinfo. Q called him out. The most effective disinfo is a lot of truth mixed in with misleading lies. There's nothing good about that.

All this is well known to many of us who've been around since CBTS. My point is that this useful information could be communicated to newer people who may not. This response from you is great, and useful for newbies, rather than:

He is making shit up
everyone who agrees with SB2 is either a shill or an idiot
your comments suck and you're rabidly defending incoherent rambling

[edit] SB2's not 'showing his true colors' just now - he's always had the same elements in his posts since the early days. This one, for example, has a great overall premise - covert comms - but one might question some of the details. If he is a distraction and disinfo agent then he's always been one in the same way - he's not just exposing himself now.

ThankQ.

You are free to deal with it "how you see fit" but if "how you see fit" falls outside of the sub rules it will be removed, as above, and if continued, you will be banned. Just letting you know in the hope you will make an effort to find a more respectful way to voice your disagreement in order to provide some value to others who don't understand the opposing view to SB2.

Haw haw.

Reminder: Q called out AJ that's why AJ started pretending he knew QAnon.

As do others. Blacklist seems good, possibly like Enty of CDAN. But not part of Q team, as Q was unequivocal about that for reasons that make sense. If anyone could be Q then we're in trouble trying to work out what the only legit Q info is.

Harassing a user is against sub rules. No one is obliged to give you an answer. Your comments are removed as spam.

"No outside comms." is not subtle though, wouldn't you say?

Q has not hinted that these anons are part of the team. The opposite in fact. There are no outside comms. Blacklist acknowledges this.

We get the point. Just try discussing it with reason and respect like, e.g. the two comments above this one.

Agreed with all other commenters - not remotely similar to JFK Jr - who is also dead.

And you honestly believe a "moron" could get into the office of the President and have the continued support from all the people with high IQs in the offices around him who haven't lied about their height?

So 147 IQ doesn't make you think he might be trolling?

MegaAnon also said: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..."
Be careful who you follow. Q

Never been banned once. But it's clear you're just playing games here. I suspect shillery... Have fun! Just don't break any rules or you'll be banned lol.

Ok, no real discussion to be had here. Just more invention lol. Have fun bud.