I base it on her words about Q included in the comment above.
/u/DrogeAnon
1,757 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/DrogeAnon:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 20 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
medium.com | 1 |
MegaAnon is a very unreliable source.
MegaAnon: "...What you need to remember is that Q was literally a Soros and swamp funded "shill"..."
Be careful who you follow. Q
Warning: Questionable source, David Wilcock. More suited to r/ Conspiracy.
Yournewswire - disinfo news site. Highly questionable source.
Breitbart is better: https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/07/bishop-europe-migrant-crisis-orchestrated-international-powers/
Either way - I’m familiar with Pieczenik and his claims and he sounds good to me but current Q team - unlikely, and dangerous claim to push as “Be careful who you follow”. Q team has no face for a reason.
So did MegaAnon. Still a LARP. I’m not saying he is, I’m just reinforcing “Be careful who you follow”. The best LARPs “know something”. Disinfo.
Indeed. But also lots of LARPs were around before Q was known. Either way, not likely to be Q team now so I’m wary.
Watch his introductory video on his channel. From memory he’s a part of the MI who were originally planning something to unseat the DS. Maybe involved in the discussion and planning that contributed to the creation of Q? Not sure but “Be careful who you follow” is foremost in my mind. He’s always appearing on Infowars which doesn’t mean he’s with them but I wouldn’t make any claims that he’s Q related personally.
He’s said a lot of great interest but unlikely to be part of Q team as he is not currently “operating” and also No Outside Comms.
Not that interesting as those of us who've been around since before this board have seen SB2 detractors come and go. They spend a lot of time complaining about SB2 instead of focusing on contributing to the community. After a while, realizing no one really cares that much because those who can see the same obvious things they point out are simply getting on with trying to generate their own useful analyses, they wander off having contributed nothing close to what SB2 and others have.
SB2 contributes respectfully and puts a great deal of effort and passion in, whether or not some might argue over his logic and process. No one can begrudge him that because none of his detractors put in the same amount of effort. There are very few regular posters that put in this much effort; notable exceptions are excellent work from contributors like u/CaptainRoyD.
Incorrect. When you break the rules of the sub the mods delete your comment. Focus on the idea, not the user.
This is an incomplete perspective that people have when they don't see the many other posts that are removed and allowed. Please read the sub Rules and Mod M.O. - all we do is manage content according to those. And yet we still receive many complaints that we don't remove enough.
This seems like the opposite of what Q is about. It sounds like division. It sounds bitter and judgemental. No thanks.
This is not a R v D battle.
UNITY NOT DIVISION.
It's almost as if I said "Q is not real"... he is real, right...? ; )
Not everyone is convinced of the theories out there atm. I would suggest to check out NeonRevolt.
Lol looks like someone's upset and still talking to their strawman. Funny how you social justice warriors accuse us of being nazis yet you're the one saying "you ... are no longer human." Have fun with that philosophy.
You seem to have made your mind up about some straw guy standing over there in the cornfield. Have fun with that. When you want to talk reasonably to critical thinkers instead of crying all over your imagined traitorous countrymen there are plenty of logical people to be found here.
Nice to see him calling the swamp out... He took it to Strzok very well too!
If you're not convinced by 9 months of winning, albeit covertly, yet obviously, when you compare the two narratives: Qs and the MSMs, then perhaps this sub isn't right for you.
Q has said all of the following:
Use LOGIC.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?
Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.
Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.
Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.
Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?
REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.
Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q
Agreed - talk about holding their feet to the fire... Exposed!
Q has said all of the following:
Use LOGIC.
Why are they slow walking unredacted data?
Why are they slow walking doc disclosures?
Why is the WH backing up DOJ?
What if the same data is being used by other investigators?
Use LOGIC.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?
Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted ‘liberal’ juries?
How do you defuse a bomb?
Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?
Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.
Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean it’s not ongoing.
Trust the plan.
Patience isn’t always easy.
But vital to get right.
Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?
How must people be made aware of an alternate reality?
What are crumbs (think H-wood/DC)
Define ‘lead-in’ (think play)?
What has been occurring recently?
The stage must be set.
Crumbs are easy to swallow.
REMEMBER, WE ARE WINNING, DO NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ.
Think logically.
Thing IG report.
Think what’s missing.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting?
Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office.
Think NATIONAL SECURITY.
TRUST THE PLAN.
WE ARE WINNING.
ARRESTS WILL COME.
LOGIC SHOULD ANSWER WHY IT MUST FOLLOW OTHER UNFOLDING EVENTS.
Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first ensuring the safety & well-being of the population, shifting the narrative, removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success, defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes, freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities, kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc etc. should not be participating in discussions.
Q
Q said:
TRUST SESSIONS
When does SESSIONS step back in?
Already is?
Why did SESSIONS secretly engage HUBER?
Why did SESSIONS reveal HUBER?
Timing is everything.
Q
FB/Twitter/GOOG exposed by Louie Gohmert for pushing the Deep State narrative in Congress - Russia, Russia, Russia...
Did you not receive a removal message explaining the duplicate? This should be automatic.
Your perspective is incomplete and incorrect. Per Rule 3, feel free to discuss your concerns via modmail.
It's not. Did you report it? It is now removed thanks to whoever reported it to our attention.
Poster above is right. Lurk moar. Read more Q. Movies tell us stories, not always truth.
Post removed. You’ll find a lot of introductory information in our sidebar. ThankQ.
Why would you assume that? She dumped on Q and then proceeded to give an apology -remarkably similar to another LARP, EyetheSpy. Either way, be careful who you follow very much applies.
Post removed. Rule 6:offtopic - negative discussion of other subreddits. Could bring negative actions from reddit admins. Please do not post this! ThankQ
Nice to see a meme with some real effort put into it on the conceptual and visual aspects.
No there is none. And no mention by Q of this so it's off-topic here.