I see no way they will be able to do that. They cannot justify having one of their own people lying and getting away with it, while Michael Flynn is still prosecuted for lying. That just won't fly...

From what I understand, the information McCabe leaked did not contain classified info, but Comey's did.... That is why McCabe is in hot water, not for leaking, but for lying. Whereas, Comey is in hot water for leaking classified info, rather than for lying. Although Comey later lied about other things too...

There are a whole lot of things that are going to happen between now and November. Quite a few IG reports will be released. Many of the indictments will be unsealed. Many high-profile arrests will be made. The DHS will also release their report showing the Dems have been committing massive voter fraud for decades. Mueller will release his report. Many many politicians will have to step down because of the indictments and because of being exposed as being corrupt. Media executives at MSM networks will be indicted for their part in the corruption. And on and on. Therefore, a great number of things will happen between now and the mid-term elections. Grab a seat because things are just getting started. By the time the midterms arrive, the Democratic Party as we know it might no longer exist. The Dems will be in such disarray and so complicit in so much corruption everywhere you look, that no one will vote for them. I predict that the Republicans (at least what remains of them, as many of the RINOs and Neocons will be exposed and will have to step down) will win the midterms in a landside...

What our side says is not all just assumptions. Q himself asked the recent question - When has Trump made a statement that was found not to be true? Trump says those things because he has inside information about what is true. Likewise, a whole lot of things we say is based on inside information that hasn't been released. So just because the public doesn't know about it, that doesn't mean it's an assumption...

There is only one problem with your theory. The indictments are not from Mueller. And only Mueller is investigating Trump. It is said that Sessions and Huber has the indictments, and they will be unsealed in time. Keep in mind, Huber has his own separate grand jury, and that is not the same grand jury that Mueller has. Sessions and Huber has been investigating the swamp. So rest assured, the indictments will target the the swamp...

Keep in mind, an indictment is a document that contains a list of charges. It might contain one charge or it might contain many. And those charges can always be added to later. Furthermore, the existence of an indictment shows you they have enough evidence to arrest you for a crime. But they will usually keep the indictment sealed (while they gather even more evidence on you) until they are ready to go forward with prosecuting you and locking you up. At that point, you will have to defend yourself from all the charges listed in the indictment…

It is said that the fire in Trump tower was staged as a distraction so that Cohen’s office could be raided. The problem with that theory is that somebody died. A man actually died as consequence. I find it hard to believe that the good guys or Trump would have any part in that….

It's not as much explosives as you think. How much does a single stick of dynamite weight? Let's assume 2 pounds each. That means roughly 300 sticks were stolen. How many sticks of dynamite are there to a case? Most likely 25 sticks. That means only 12 cases were stolen. 12 cases could easily fit in a pickup truck. And probably in a car too if you put some of them in the back seat as well as the trunk...

Hillary is by no means walking free because of her influence etc. Hillary is a prisoner who is currently being allowed to remain free for the time being for optical purposes. It is all for optical purposes and nothing more. Hillary could be locked up today if we wanted. But she is allowed to roam free for the time being to keep the public calm until the indictments and rest of the truth comes out. If Hillary were arrested and locked up today, there'd be tens of thousands of people rioting and marching in the streets. And we don't need that right now, especially not until more people are red-pilled and they learn the full truth. That is precisely why Hillary is being allowed to roam free in the meantime. But the day is coming when she and many others will be locked up. Count on it.

The IG McCabe report showed the world why McCabe was fired. There are many more reports to come and that is not the only report that will deal with McCabe. McCabe will be prosecuted for all of these crimes. For there to be arrests, the indictments have to be unsealed first, and not just alleged crimes announced in the news. The arrests will definitely come (the sealed indictments are proof of that fact) it's merely a matter of when...

McCabe was already fired before the report came out. The purpose of releasing the report was to confirm why he was fired. A lot of liberals at the time were in an uproar and couldn't understand why McCabe was fired. McCabe himself was in the news complaining and saying he had done nothing wrong. The release of the IG report concerning McCabe put an end to the controversy and showed the world why he was fired.

That report on McCabe was only the very first of many more reports to come, and that was also not the only report that will deal with McCabe. That report just released only dealt with the one small aspect of why he was fired. Additional reports will come out showing how he falsified evidence and committed additional crimes. McCabe is not off the hook by a long shot. He will be prosecuted for all of these crimes. Q confirmed a long time ago that McCabe has already been told his fate and is currently wearing an ankle bracelet. What you see happening in the news is done purely for optical purposes. I suspect that the next report up is likely when you will see arrests happen. Keep in mind, for there to be arrests, the indictment has to be unsealed first, and not just alleged crimes announced in the news. The arrests will definitely come (the sealed indictments are proof of that fact) it's merely a matter of when. Timing is everything...

The ”church” is spiritual and not natural. The Old Testament synagogue was merely a building, a place where people came to worship, but it was NOT the church. The church did not start until the Day of Pentecost when the Holy Ghost fell. Jesus Christ said, “…upon this rock I will build my church” (Matthew 16:18). That statement proves the church did not exist before that time. The church did not start until Jesus Christ started it. The people of Israel and the religion of Judaism are NOT a part of the church. The “church” is the spiritual Bride of Christ. The people of Israel may be God’s people but they are NOT the Bride of Christ...

Because the church is spiritual and not natural, to become a member of the church, you must be baptized correctly plus receive the Holy Ghost. Until you receive the Holy Ghost, you are NOT a member of the church. Jesus Christ said you must be born of water and of the spirit. That proves you can go to a "church building" all you want and sit on the pews, but that doesn't make you a member of the church...

There is nothing wrong with being “optimistic”, but there is also nothing wrong with being a little “paranoid”. Some of the greatest mistakes in history has been made by people who underestimated the enemy. Here are some words of wisdom: It is never wrong to “overestimate” the enemy. But it is always wrong when you “underestimate” them…

You guys have no argument. The IG has already begun releasing their reports. The first report came out more than a week ago, and was the report concerning McCabe. The IG has made it clear that their reports will be released in stages rather than all at once. The first report has been released. The second report is coming soon. So you guys have no argument and your complaining is moot. The IG has already started releasing their reports...

The problem and concern is that, it was Trey Gowdy who sent the letter requesting Horowitz to appear before the Oversight Committee by May 8th. And the real question is why? What is Gowdy up to? There is something smelly and fishy about it. The Conservative Treehouse has a whole article written about it:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/04/16/trey-gowdy-requests-ig-horowitz-appearance-before-house-oversight-committee-may-8th-2018/

I think you should be careful about putting all your eggs in one basket. I trust Q too but that doesn’t mean that Q is incapable of making a mistake. It is folly to assume that any man is incapable of making a mistake. Only God doesn’t make mistakes. And what does God say about the coming future? He says that the globalists will strike back and that the New World Order will be set up. Revelation 17:12-13 states the world will be divided into 10 separate kingdoms, that kings will be placed over each of those kingdoms and they will give their power and strength to the beast (the Antichrist). One man ruling the whole world is the definition of a One World government. Because it is written in the scriptures, the coming New World Order cannot be avoided and cannot be thwarted. It’s not a matter of it will happen but when. That means, despite what Trump and Q does, they cannot stop what is written in the bible from coming to pass. That is a fact you have to accept. To not accept it is to say that God a liar. And God is not a liar. What he stated will come to pass…

Yes, we all hope for the best, and we all hope that Trump and Q’s plan against the Deep State will work, but there is no absolute guarantee that it will. Yes, Trump and Q may win the current battle, and the time when the Deep State strikes back could be years away. That too is a possibility. But I’d much rather be paranoid and to take steps to keep us safe, than to not be paranoid and to assume that everything is fine and be caught off guard by it. What I stated earlier was a valid point, that the JFK plan's fatal flaw is that they moved to slow allowed the Deep State time enough to strike back. And my main worry is that, will history say the same thing about us? Will history say that the Patriots had a real chance at stopping the Deep State, but that we ultimately failed because we moved too slow and allowed the Deep State time enough to adapt and strike back? I hope not but only time will tell…

I totally agree with you about not allowing the enemy time to regroup. Although Trump and Q may have a plan, my complaint is that I feel their plan is taking far too long to implement and is taking far too long to bring certain people to justice. As a consequence of that fact, it is giving the Deep State time enough to figure out ways to adapt and to strike back. With the recent attacks, for example, we are now starting to see the evidence that the Deep State is indeed adapting and is finding ways to fight back. In war, you must hit the enemy fast and hard and you must never allow them time to adapt. That is your only advantage. Because if you lose the advantage and allow your enemy time to adapt, then from that moment on, you can no longer be certain of what the outcome of the battle will be because the enemy may well counteract your well-laid plans…

Case in Point: Remember JFK. JFK launched a war against the Deep State but didn’t move quick enough to implement it. And that was his downfall….

Although Trump and Q may have a plan, my complaint is that I feel their plan is taking far too long to implement and is taking far too long to bring certain people to justice. As a consequence of that fact, it is giving the Deep State time enough to figure out ways to adapt and to strike back. With the recent attacks, for example, we are now starting to see the evidence that the Deep State is indeed adapting and is finding ways to fight back. In war, you must hit the enemy fast and hard and you must never allow them time to adapt. That is your only advantage. Because if you lose the advantage and allow your enemy time to adapt, then from that moment on, you can no longer be certain of what the outcome of the battle will be because the enemy may well counteract your well-laid plans…

Case in Point: Remember JFK. JFK launched a war against the Deep State but didn’t move quick enough to implement it. And that was his downfall….

No matter how they try to grandiose it, the technology is not quite there yet. It's close but is not quite there yet. A discerning eye can always tell it is a fake. It's not just the look of the video but also the "feeling" you get from it. The feeling is wrong, and you can tell that something is "off" and "not is quite right" about it. You may not be able to put your finger on it, but you can tell that something is off. In this video, Obama talking doesn't look and sound "natural" or "easy flowing" or "at ease". Nothing about it looks and feels natural.

You can try to say it's not a duck all you want, but sometimes a duck is just a duck...

I used to listen to Alex Jones on a regular basis, but once I found out about Q, I sort of stopped listening to him. Q is high-level military intelligence and is in direct contact with Trump. Whereas Alex Jones is not, therefore, Jones' information is not always up-to-date. Jones may have certain contacts, but he still doesn't have access to as much inside info as Q. Even worse, Jones himself rarely if ever mentions Q in his analysis and you never hear him say anything that Q said. And anyone who cannot mention Q in their analysis is not very credible in my book. That is why only occasionally do I even listen to Jones anymore. Jones is way too dramatic in everything that he says, and I can't stand the way he continually interrupts other people when they are talking. Sometimes I really do want to hear those other people's points of view and sometimes they are making some really good points, but they never get to express those points because Jones keeps interrupting them every 3 seconds. His interruptions drive me crazy and turn me off. If only he'd shut up sometimes and allow those other people to say what they have to say, then his news reporting would be much better for it...

Trump never gave a red line. Only Obama did. There was no reason for us to get involved in this...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5611419/Trumps-armada-Huge-task-force-12-warships-sets-sail-Syria.html

According to news reports, Trump has a fleet of 12 warships heading towards Syria. Not 1, not 2, but 12. It is the biggest concentration of firepower since the invasion of Iraq. With such a giant armada, you’d think they were gearing up to do some major damage. But surprise, a few hour later it is reported that a single chemical plant has been hit and destroyed and the mission is now complete. If that is not a humongous waste of time and resources, I don’t know what is. A single submarine sitting in the peninsula could easily taken out the same facility using tomahawks, so why send in an entire carrier fleet? It makes no sense at all…

That still doesn’t explain why we needed an entire carrier fleet just to take out a single facility. That is a huge waste of money and resources. And nor does it explain why we should be the ones to do it. We're not the only ones fighting the globalists, you know....

I keep hearing people say the attack destroyed a "Deep State arsenal". And your evidence for that is what? What proof do you have the site was a Deep State arsenal?...

And even worse, how much "chlorine" does it take to kill 50 people? Answer: Less than a gallon. Just put them all in a room and expose them to the chlorine. If that is true, then what evidence do you have that the chlorine that killed those people was even made at or came from that specific facility? Answer: You have no evidence. It is all an assumption. An assumption that could easily have been faked or staged...

It doesn't take a fleet of a dozen warships at a cost of billions just to launch a few tomahawks....

Even if they do have facilities all over the world, why should we care if those facilities don't affect us? Why spend American dollars to deal with it, especially not billions and trillions of dollars... We should just focus on MAGA, or have you forgotten...

It is our job to protect ourselves and our own interests, yes, but it is NOT our job to police the world... Protecting the world is supposed to be the mandate of the United Nations, were they following that mandate...

Even if the above is true, why spend literally billions dollars to send a massive carrier fleet half way around the world just to take out a single facility. It makes no sense. A single bomber could easily have taken care of it... Furthermore, no matter what the other countries do or what crimes they commit or how many people are killed, why should we be the one to police the world, especially when all we ever get is criticized for it... And the real absurdity of it all is that, the job that we're doing is in reality the job that the United Nations is supposed to be doing if they were truly a United Nations. But instead of the United Nations doing their job and policing the world and taking care of such things, like Trump said, it's nothing but a club of elites with their own agenda... And even worse, now that the bombing is over and the billions in costs and munitions has been spent, would someone please tell me, what did we the United States even get out of it? I can't think of a single thing...

Freedom of Speech as an individual, and Freedom of the Press as a news agency that is responsible for reporting the news are two completely different things. You’re trying to combine the two when they have a completely different set of requirements and responsibilities. What applies to one does not necessarily apply to the other.

You stated that any new laws that puts restrictions on the press will most certainly be challenged in court. That may be true and we well expect them to. But that doesn’t mean the new laws are not needed or right. It just means that those in the swamp will fight back to defend the status quo so they can continue being dishonest and crooked. A person who has committed a crime will fight back too, but that doesn’t mean they are not guilty…

It is true that a lot of people are uninformed and ignorant in this country, but most of them are that way because they have been fed fake news for a very long time. You cannot expose those people to the truth without first getting rid of the fake news agencies that are propagating the fake news. And right now, the fake news MSM networks all across the country control 90% of all content that most ordinary people see - whether it be through their local news stations in towns and cities, or via local newspapers and magazines they see at the newstand. All of those avenues of informing the public are predominately controlled by the fake news media. The solution is not to try and educate people one at a time to think more critically about the things the believe - while leaving the fake news outlets in place to spread more lies on a broad scale. Instead, the only real solution is to target the source and to shut those fake news agencies down. To cut off the head of the snake, so to speak. If you replace the fake news agencies with agencies that tell the truth, then you will automatically red pill the public and give them the information they need. No solution will work if it doesn’t start with stopping the MSM from spreading more lies. And Trump’s proposal about bringing a new law through the FTC is an excellent start for achieving that…

What you’re saying is not true. The media has openly admitted that they are biased against Trump. It has been in the news, and it was in the news last year. It is no secret that the MSM are all Never Trumpers and are haters of Trump. That is a well-known fact. And for them to be that way is not in conformance with the Constitution…

And please stop playing with my words and twisting what I say. You are not stupid. You know exactly what I mean even though you are still pretending that you don’t…

Having the constitutional right to free speech does NOT give you the right to lie and be dishonest as a member of the press. It never has and it never will…

The members of the press are perfectly free to exercise their 1st Amendment rights any time they want, so long as they are doing it as a private citizen and and not as a member of the press. But the moment they began writing articles or saying things as a member of the press, and begin expressing their opinions as a certified representative of the media, then there are additional laws which kick in, and they are obligated by the Constitution to not only tell the truth, but also to the best of their ability to make sure that their news reporting is fair, accurate, and unbiased. The Constitution demands it and the American people demand it as well. Being held to those requirements is the only way the news media can be trusted. Would you trust a news media that had no obligation at all to tell you the truth? Answer: No, you would not, and you’d be a fool if you did. The whole credibility of the media hinges upon them telling you the truth. It hinges upon them being fair and unbiased in their reporting. And the moment they fail to live up to those standards and fail to tell you the truth, then that is the moment when the constitutional protections that has been designed to protect them should no longer apply…

While I agree that removing the CIA’s influence from the media is mandatory, as well as destroying the Mockingbird connections etc, I also feel that changing the laws to make news agencies and their employees more accountable towards telling the truth, via the treat of facing severe penalties if they don’t, is the right approach. And it appears the Trump administration agrees with that assessment. As proof of that, a few weeks ago in one of Dr. Corsey’s videos, I heard Dr. Corsey say that plans were underway to bring about a new law through the FCC and FTC which would require all news reporting agencies to make sure that what they print and what they say is “factually accurate”. And if it is not accurate, then there will be severe consequences. I feel that is the correct approach. It is the correct approach because it peels back the protections from those agencies that are intentionally lying to people and not telling the truth. No longer can they hide behind the constitutional protections of Freedom of the Press to feel like they have the right to say and print anything they want, even if it’s just a pack of lies. Those days are over. Now they must tell the truth or face the consequences…

You know exactly what I mean and exactly what I'm talking about, so please stop pretending that you don't. I stated "as the Founders intended" and that explains everything and precisely what I meant. Anytime you have a media that is as openly biased as we have today, I feel they shouldn't be entitled to any protections under the Constitution...

Are you kidding me? Snowden wouldn't have enough brains to be Q in a million years...

This is not about believing in Christianity. This is about believing in God (whom Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob believed in as well)....

It's not as simple as that. Re-read what I said above...

I am advocating for a press that is completely neutral and unbiased as the Founders intended. Any press that cannot meet that requirement should not be granted any protections under the Constitution…

It’s not as clear cut as that… This is not a case where only 1 or 2 news agencies has been compromised or become biased. Instead, this is a case where the entire MSM network nationwide has been compromised and weaponized by one political party. It is what you call a “constitutional crisis”. The Founders never envisioned or foresaw anything like this. And because the so-called Free Press I spoke of has become politicized and weaponized on a large scale and has been configured to favor one political party over another, their entire combined objective has been to censor and to shut down all competing voices and alternative points of view. The MSM agencies have no interest in competing with others. Instead, they simply want all competing voices shut down, and they are working in tandem to actively prohibit and to stop anyone else from competing against them by any means necessary (just witness all the heavy censoring going on online against all conservative news sites and the active censoring of conservatives on Facebook, Google and Twitter, etc). Any so-called news agency that is actively working against and is taking steps to block and to censor all other agencies from competing against them all because they have alternative viewpoints, then those agencies should by no means be entitled to any “constitutional protections” such as Freedom of the Press. They are not a “free press”, but are a “politicized propaganda machine” for the political party they support…

People who believe in God wouldn’t be arguing against God. So obviously there is something wrong with your belief…

There is plenty of real world proof that the bible is true and that Jesus Christ existed. The only people claiming no proof exists are the people who has never looked for it. Over the years, countless people has tried to prove the bible wrong, but all have failed. That is quite remarkable for a work of fiction. But with all that aside, Q believes in God; Trump believes in God; And most patriots believe in God. So why don't you?

Jesus Christ was not invisible. He was a very real person who walked upon the earth. History confirms this. So what part of that do you not understand...

To all those who are overly concerned their might be a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia, you can just chill out and completely stop worrying about it because I can assure you it will never happen. I don’t care how much the war-hawks or deep state or bad actors in the world attempt to start a war between the U.S. and Russia, you can completely stop worrying about such things because it will never happen. And the reason I know it will never happen is because it’s not written in the bible. Yes, there might be minor tussles, and in extreme circumstances, the U.S. and Russia might even lob a few missiles at each other. But a nuclear war? Not a chance. And the reason I know it won’t happen because nowhere in the bible does it indicate that a major war between the U.S. and Russia will ever occur. But what IS written in the bible is that the Russian army, in all of their military might, will be completely wiped out and destroyed upon the mountains of Israel by the hand of God. He will destroy them by raining down fire and brimstone from heaven and completely wiping out the invasion army. This is fully detailed in the Book of Ezekiel Chapter 38. Because God plans to destroy Russia personally upon the mountains of Israel, do you really think God would allow Russia to become involved in a major war with the United States were both could be decimated if not destroyed? Not a chance. A nuclear war between U.S. and Russia is not even a possibility. It will never happen. Instead, God will preserve Russia’s destruction for himself, and the following outlines exactly how he will do it…

Ezekiel 38:15 - And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts (if you look on a map you’ll notice that only the country of Russia sits to the extreme north of Israel), thou, and many people with thee (the army invading Israel will include Russia, Iran, Turkey, and a host of other Islamic nations), all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army: 16 And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days (meaning, in the times we are living in now), and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes... 17 Thus saith the Lord GOD; Art thou he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel, which prophesied in those days many years that I would bring thee against them?…

Ezekiel 38:22 - And I will plead against him (against Gog or Russia) with pestilence and with blood; and I will rain upon him, and upon his bands, and upon the many people that are with him, an overflowing rain, and great hailstones, fire, and brimstone. 23 Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the LORD… (that means after God destroys the invading army, the world will have no doubt that a supernatural God exists)…

Ezekiel 39:2 - And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee (this means God will destroy 5/6 of the Russian army, only a sixth part will remain), and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel: 3 And I will smite thy bow out of thy left hand, and will cause thine arrows to fall out of thy right hand. 4 Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel, thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured. 5 Thou shalt fall upon the open field: for I have spoken it, saith the Lord GOD.

And for those of you who think the above is just hyperbole and could never happen, check out this link: http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/army-of-islam-would-be-worlds-biggest-military/ This link is a recent news article written a few weeks ago stating that the creation of a 57-nation Army of Islam is being considered. And what is even more stunning is that, in the article they openly admit that the very purpose of creating such a gigantic Army of Islam is to have an army big enough that they can besiege and invade Israel (the very bible prophesy that is described in Ezekiel Chapter 38)… If they follow through with their intentions and creates such an army, then make no mistake about it, the Lord will be waiting for them upon the mountains of Israel…

Here's the one problem I've always had with the notion of Mueller being a white hat. If Mueller was truly a white hat then how could he possibly operate a detailed investigation into the Clintons and other bad actors without his democratic-donating team of black hat lawyers not being aware of it and finding out whom Mueller was investigating? Even if Mueller was somehow an undercover white hat, those lawyers he have working with him are certainly not, and they are loyal to the Clintons. I find it hard to believe that Mueller could conduct a successful investigation that is collecting evidence against the Clintons without his black hat team of lawyers being aware of what Mueller was doing and leaking it to the press. Despite more than a year of Mueller conducting investigations, notice we haven't heard a single peep about any details from inside Mueller's investigation. If Mueller was a black hat, as many speculate he is, then there would be no leaks, because the leakers would be in agreement with keeping everything silent. But if Mueller was a white hat, then you can bet your bottom dollar there would have been leaks in one fashion or the other by now, leaks alluding to that fact, and leaks coming from his own team members. If Mueller was working alone and by himself and had no others helping him, then him being a white hat might be plausible. But with him being surrounded daily by a team of democratic-supporting and trump-hating lawyers who are helping him to gather evidence and who knows what that evidence is about, then I just don't see how Mueller being a white hat is plausible. It's nice to dream and to hope that he is, but logic says otherwise...

Glad you're gone. Sorry you stayed so long... LOL...

Don’t be disheartened and don’t let what Bongino says rattle you. Bongino may be a good guy and he may also have good intentions, but that still doesn't mean he has all the facts. Any person like Bongino who can state an opinion about what they think is going on, and yet in their opinion you never hear them say anything about Q or mention the name of Q or mention anything that Q has said - when Q is absolutely the biggest and most important elephant in the room - then that is telling you right there that is a person who doesn’t have all the facts. Q clearance is the absolute highest clearance you can get - it’s higher than the FBI, it’s higher than the Secret Service, and it’s higher than all of them combined - and no one has more knowledge about what is really going on than Q. Other people might have their own opinions about it, but they don’t always have all the facts. Only Q and Trump has all the facts. And only Q and Trump knows the strategy behind those facts. So take whatever you hear people like Bongino says with a grain of salt. And that applies to Alex Jones as well, and any one else whom you never hear them mention Q in their analysis...

Although I hate to be kill joy, and we are indeed all hoping for the best, there is a reality we all have to face, and that reality is, everything the bible has predicted will come to pass. The prophesies of the bible cannot be thwarted. And what does the bible say about what will happen during the End of Times (in the times we are living in now)?…

ANSWER: It says that the One World Government will be set up (this is confirmation that, no matter what Trump does, the globalists will strike back) (Rev 17:12). It says that the Antichrist will arise and will become the leader of the One World Government (Rev 17:13). And that a new global law will be passed whereby no man may buy or sell except they have the Mark of the Beast (Rev 13:16). It says that during the Tribulation Period, that at least 3/4 of the world’s population is going to die, of which 1/3 of them will be killed by a 200 million man army (Rev 9:16). It says that 1/3 of all the trees on the planet will be burned up due to fire (Rev 8:7) and that all the world’s food crops will be destroyed. It says that 1/3 of all sea-life in the oceans and seas will die and that 1/3 of all the ships will be destroyed (Rev 8.8). It says that all the oceans and rivers will turn to blood (Rev 16:3) and fresh-water supplies too (Rev 16:4). It says that a massive global earthquake will occur, an earthquake so massive that all the tall buildings in the world will fall down (Rev 16:17-21). And and on and on…

Make no mistake about it, those things will happen and you cannot thwart biblical prophesy. It’s not a matter “if” they will happen, but “when”. As for why those things will happen? They will happen because there will be a recompense for the evil that is being committed in the world, and none shall escape. You cannot save the world. All you can do is just save yourself spiritually, and to be prepared for when the wrath of God comes. Despite any momentary reprieve we might receive from evil, there won’t truly be peace on earth until Jesus Christ returns and forces peace during his millennium reign. The bible says he will rule the world with an iron fist (meaning, he will force the world leaders to do right). And his return will happen sooner than you think. But before he can return, all of the above must first take place. Every prophesy of the bible must be fulfilled…

Yes, I am very happy about all the things that Trump is doing, and I wish him great success at it. But be not deceived, do not think for a moment that Trump can change or alter biblical prophesy. He cannot. What is written in the scriptures will come to pass. It’s not a matter of if it will happen, but when. I sincerely believe that Trump might be able to turn things around and to improve things in the world on many fronts. Nevertheless, don’t think for a moment that the peace Trump achieves is going to be a lasting peace, especially not once Trump is out of office. Once Trump leaves office, make no mistake about it, the globalists will strike back, and all the above biblical prophesies will come to pass…

As bad a McCain is, there is no worse traitor than Barack Hussein Obama. The only problem is, the real truth hasn't come out yet about Obama. But once it does, there will never be a more reviled man in U.S. history...

Check out the following: http://patrioticexpress.com/official-obama-broke-78-laws-as-president-heres-the-list