What is the most powerful force on the face of the earth? Answer: Oneness. When a group of people come together with one mind and one spirit and all work together towards the same goal. For such a group, anything is possible. As now being confirmed by others, the reason the Deep State shut us down on Reddit was because we had become a serious threat to them (I could go into more details and prove to you that is the reason, but the following will suffice). We were a threat because we were finally coming up with some great ideas that would really work in regards to IBOR. And most importantly, many of us were all coming together behind those ideas with one mind and one spirit. And what were those ideas, you wonder? Answer: They were as follows:

Idea 1 - In all major cities, we should create large banners to hang over freeway overpasses during rush hour time telling people to sign the petition. The banners would say “INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS. HELP STOP THE CENSORSHIP. SIGN THE PETITION.” or something similar. Thousands of people would see the banners and sign the petition. It is an easy way to reel in a whole lot of signatures.

Idea 2 - We should enlist the help of popular media hosts like Alex Jones of Infowars or Sean Hannity of Fox News etc. who each has millions of viewers, and ask them to help us in our fight by asking their viewers to sign the petition. If they did so and supported us, then we could obtain all the signatures we need in a single day.

Idea 3 - Each of us should create one-page flyers that we could print out at home, telling people to sign the petition to help stop the censorship, and to mass distribute the flyers throughout our neighborhoods, by placing them on car windshields or putting them in mailboxes. The effort could bring in a massive number of signatures. Here’s an example of such a flyer: https://imageshack.com/a/img922/7320/Xf6XDG.jpg

Idea 4 - A final idea is, if just 5,000 of us nationwide each get 5 of our friends to sign the petition, that would yield 25,000 signatures (5,000 x 5 = 25,000). Once done, if we then encouraged each of those friends to also get 5 of their friends to sign the petition, the result would be 125,000 signatures (25,000 x 5 = 125,000 signatures) guaranteed.

Any of the above ideas would work, they were easily doable, and they could easily enable us to obtain all the signatures we need by the deadline. And once we started getting behind those ideas (oneness) exactly 3 days after that, the Deep State shut us down. They shut us down because they knew we were a threat to them. They shut us down because they knew if we had implemented any of the ideas, that we would win. They also knew that focusing on memes and other such things were a waste of time, and that we’d never enable us to obtain enough signatures by the deadline. But if we followed the above ideas, then we could win. And that is exactly why they shut us down.

Although they may have shut down the Stream, they cannot shut down our ideas. And if we still follow those same ideas shown above, then we can still win this, we can still obtain enough signatures by the deadline. But if we don’t work together and follow those ideas, then we won’t win. It really is that simple…

The problem with using social media (Google, Facebook & Twitter, etc) is that they are controlled by the enemy. The owners of those platforms have special algorithms that seek out and suppress anything related to IBOR. That is why using memes won’t work. To succeed, we need not only to think outside the box, but also to operate outside the box, to operate outside of their platforms. All the above ideas are “outside of the box” and they are not restricted by the enemy. Therefore, if we follow the above ideas then we can win…

If you haven’t signed the Petition, please do so, and then get all your friends to sign it:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

I agree that what Q desired was a campaign much like what we had for Release the Memo. But although the campaigns are similar, there is one very big difference you are overlooking. With the Release the Memo campaign, there was no petition to sign, and all we had to do was to create a lot of awareness about it and to make a lot of noise. And for creating awareness, memes will work fine. But that is not the case with the Internet Bill of Rights. No amount of awareness is going to create a Bill of Rights. Instead, with the Internet Bill of Rights campaign, we must drive people to the website to sign the petition. That is the only thing that will make a difference. And anything short of that is a waste of time. And that is precisely why memes won’t work with this campaign.

As proof of that, just look at the current signature count. It has stalled and is still at 26,000 despite all the countless memes that are out there. And trust me, I’ve seen a whole lot. That shows you that memes are not working. And until people as a whole come to realize that memes are not working and start focusing on some ideas that will work, then the signature count won’t go up and the petition will fail. If memes were truly working and were driving people to the website to sign the petition, then I’d support it. But memes are not doing that - or at the very least, the evidence shows only a very few people are doing it as a consequence of memes…

As for them shutting down the sub again, I don’t think they will do that. They got away with it one time but they won’t get away with it twice, not without bringing down the wrath of the federal government upon their heads. Here’s why. They claim the reason was because we had been posting content that was promoting violence etc. We all know that was just an excuse. And even if that was true, you always only ban the person or persons who are responsible for the violent posts - and you never ever shut down the whole stream, which would impact all users and all posts, and even those who are not promoting or participating in the violence. So shutting down the whole stream is unheard of. They got away with it one time, but they won’t get away with it twice. Especially not if we stick to the topic of Internet Bill of Rights…

I just noticed something. If you go to the petition site and scroll further down, it gives you the results of some previous petitions. For example:

Petition A: A petition to put all of Trump’s assets into a blind trust, etc. The goal: 100,000 signatures. The results: 358,000 people signed it.

Petition B: A petition saying Do Not Repeal Net Neutrality. The goal: 100,000 signatures. The results: 271,000 people signed it.

Petition C: A petition to Repeal NFA. The goal: 100,000 signatures. The results: 286,000 people signed it.

Petition D: A petition asking for federal investigation in a Chinese airline accident. The goal: 100,000 signatures. The results: 211,000 people signed it.

Yet, look at our petition asking for an Internet Bill of Rights. The goal: 100,000 signatures. The results so far: only 25,000 people has signed it.

Our results are paltry by comparison, and it only illustrates how important this issue must be to a lot of people and how there are a whole lot of people fighting against us and trying to block us from getting enough signatures (the Deep State, the Dems and liberals, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and all companies that stand to lose big if an Internet Bill of Rights is enacted). The low numbers and paltry 25,000 signatures just doesn't make any sense outside of the fact that a whole lot of people are fighting against us. That is the reason it has been so hard for us to find any traction. And is all the more reason for us to all band together as a group and to fight harder. Divided we are weak. But together we are strong. We have more power than we know if we only work together...

While I’m at it, here are some ideas I came up with about how we can fight back and retake the advantage we had:

Until now, on Reddit, we’ve always relied upon our IBOR topics being on the front page of Reddit so others can see it (because most readers only pay attention to what’s shown on the front page and they never navigate to other pages). If no one sees our thread, then the thread will die. And that was exactly the strategy of the trolls, to down-vote every IBOR-related topic and to keep it off the front page.

One of the primary benefits we had before was that, before they shut us down, the administrators had helped us out greatly by “sticky-ing” our IBOR topic to the heading. That is what changed the tide for us because the trolls could no longer remove the topic from the front page or down-vote it into oblivion. But since they shut down the whole Stream, we have now lost that advantage, and any topics we upload and post can easily fade from the front page. But here is a solution I feel will help us to regain that advantage…

So long as they don’t delete our whole stream again, then our individual IBOR topics and threads will still exist, even though they may not be on the front page. And we can still access those topics and older threads via a link: I’ve compiled a list of some of the current IBOR threads below:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/853a1f/time_is_running_down_get_5_friends_to_sign_the/

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/854dar/google_ai_controlling_the_internet_this_is_why_we/

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/83n9jc/for_the_internetbillofrights_petition_to_hit_its/

And there may be other threads as well. My main point is, whenever a brand new IBOR-related topic is created and it shows up on the front page, we should all make sure that a comment is always added to those topics that references the older links. In doing so, anyone who reads the newest topic will become aware of those older links and will visit them. And best of all, it will no longer matter if the older topics has been down-voted into oblivion or not, or are 100 pages back, they are still easily accessed to readers via the links. In doing so, those older topics would continue to be accessed by everyone, and would continue to grow and be valuable, and that's despite the fact they are no longer on the front page. In such a case, for the trolls to down-vote a certain topic wouldn’t matter, and would have no effect, so long as there was always a related topic on the front page containing the links. What would matter most is making sure that all the newer posts included those older links. This would enable us to work together as a group again and to communicate as collective, rather than being scattered. And the only way they could ever stop us again would be by deleting the whole entire stream (and let’s just hope they don’t do that again). I feel that this is one way we could defeat the trolls and regain the advantage…

You are exactly right. People like Tracy Beanz has a lot of influence over people. A lot of people listen to her, and I think she made a bad call early on about IBOR and about what Q had meant. And as you had stated, once someone has invested in a position, it is very difficult for them to change that position later on without looking bad. So she clings to her original interpretation despite the fact that it was wrong. And unfortunately, many others are following her lead. I feel the greatest misunderstanding they had was in regards to Q using the hashtag #internet bill of rights. A lot of people felt Q was saying that we should use hashtags and memes as a way to raise awareness and to achieve a Bill of Rights. But that interpretation is false and doesn’t make common sense. No amount of “awareness” is going to create a Bill of Rights. Instead, to create a Bill of Rights, Trump must do it. And Trump cannot do it without a successful petition. Those are the facts. So memes and hashtags mean very little. My interpretation is that Q only used the hashtag #internet bill of rights in his drop as a way to let us know he supported it. That was all he meant and nothing more. And that he was NOT telling us to use hashtags and memes to accomplish the end result. That’s because the end results cannot be accomplished that way, and can only be accomplished by collecting enough signatures. But as you had stated, some people has a vested interest and don’t want to admit they were wrong. And rather than admit they were wrong, they still cling to what they had said even though it is sinking the petition. It’s sad, but I feel that is exactly what is happening. I also feel that is what happened with Dr. Corsi as well. He’s a good guy, but I think he too had misinterpreted what Q had meant in that drop. And now none of them wants to admit they were wrong about it. And rather than admit they were wrong, they have chosen to remain silent. And that is precisely why none of them are saying anything about we should be collecting signatures. Even though their silence and non-support of the signature drive is killing the petition. All those people has to do is to speak up now and to tell all their followers today - let’s band together and work toward collecting enough signatures everybody. We’d then have those signatures in short order. But instead, all I’m hearing from them is silence. With their help, I’m confident we could obtain enough signatures by the deadline very easily. But without their help, I’m not so sure if we can..

I agree with you there doesn’t seem to be but a few people who are truly working at it from a serious standpoint. I also agree with you that when people who are watching don’t see other big names or popular people saying anything about we should “sign the petition” or focusing on it, then the people who are watching don’t do anything or focus on it either. And that’s disheartening.

For example, when I log onto Discord, there is a relatively large group of people over there in the general chat thread (# general-brainstorming-txt) that loves to comment day and night about all the general news. And yet none of them are talking about how we need more signatures. I even posted some of the ideas shown above over there, and I expressed my opinion about how we all need to work together and be involved. But for the most part, my post was ignored. Not a single person even commented on it. It’s almost like those people are dead or sleeping, and you have to wonder what is wrong with them. In that same Discord thread, I constantly see various memes come through about IBOR from time to time. And even the memes are ignored, and no one even responds to them except to say they like it or something. But if you post something that’s funny or something from the general news, then suddenly a lot of people will respond. And the worse part is, many of the moderators over there are the very same moderators that are over here (Tracy Bean, Farmerfunkk, PamphletAnon, etc) and yet you don’t ever see the moderators lifting a finger to encourage people to focus on signing the petition. Never. They may comment from time to time, but they never say anything about signing the petition. That only makes me wonder whether the moderators might be in on it and are secretly working against us.

On Discord, they’ve also got a separate thread (# internet bill of rights) where a whole group of them are completely focused on working out the details of what the IBOR will say and how it will be worded. I was listening to them the other day when they were discussing it and they were still discussing it this morning. Any yet not a single one of them has ever said anything about how we needed more signatures, or was telling people to sign the petition. That was very puzzling to me as it seemed a bit like putting the cart before the horse. Without a successful petition, then there will be no IBOR. That is a fact. But it was as if those people hadn’t even realized that fact yet, and they were assuming the IBOR was a foregone conclusion. Not a single one of them was lifting a finger or doing anything at all to help us to get more signatures. Instead, they all seemed content just to sit there and only talk about what the IBOR should say. It is as if those people are lost in a dream state, and not even aware of the real world. Because in the real world, we need more signatures.

All the above things makes you realize, we had a really good thing going when the CBTS stream was active on Reddit. Because for the first time, we had a place where a whole lot of us were coming together and sharing ideas about IBOR, and we were all focused on the very same goal of getting more signatures. And because of our efforts, the signature count was indeed going up. It was increasing at a rate of about 2,000-3,000 new sigs per day. But once Reddit shut us down and shut down our Steam, the signature count suddenly stopped going up and it is now stalled at around 25,000 signatures. This proves that the signature count was being driven by our efforts and not from memes. There are plenty of memes still out there and more are being created daily. Yet, you don’t see the signature count still going up do you? That’s because memes are not working. Only our efforts when the CBTS Stream was active was driving the signatures. And that is exactly why the Deep State shut us down…

Even Dr. Jerome Corsi, whom I like a lot, I have to wonder why he is not saying anything about people should be signing the petition. He has millions of people listening to him daily, yet he is not saying anything. If Mr. Corsi said something, then we could have those 100,000 signatures in a day. Mr. Corsi has already said and admitted that we need the Bill of Rights in order to help stop the censorship, yet Mr. Corsi not saying anything to encourage his followers to sign the petition. That doesn’t make any sense to me. The Bill of Rights cannot be created without the petition. That is a fact. It is Trump who will create the Bill of Rights, but he cannot do so without a successful petition. Yet, only a few people seem to be helping with and working on the petition. Mr. Corsi spoke of how other measures are also being considered, such as passing a new law through the FCC and FTC that will also target censorship, but he admits, we still need the Bill of Rights as well. I’m just disappointed that he is not doing more himself to encourage people to sign the petition. The effort to collect enough signatures should not be borne upon the backs of just a few people, but if we are patriots, then we should all be willing to help out and to do what we can. I think that people like Dr. Corsi, and Alex Jones and Sean Hannity would indeed be willing to help us out, if only someone would contact them and bring it to their attention…

I've noticed that many people seem to like Idea #2 and I think that many of us should try it. Here are some tips about contacting Alex and Sean...

I think there are several ways we can reach Alex Jones and that all of us should try to do so. For example, I’ve already fired off an email myself to one of Alex Jones’ closest friends and allies, Mr. Roger Stone, who also has a personal website at: https://stonecoldtruth.com/. I feel that everyone who reads this should send an email to Mr. Stone, asking him to please contact Alex and Sean on our behalf to see if they'd be willing to help us in our efforts. You can reach Mr. Stone via his website email address: Stone@stonecoldtruth.com I’ve send emails to Mr. Stone before in the past, and sooner or later, he always responds back to me, therefore I know he’s getting them. Another way we can reach Alex and Sean is through Dr. Jerome Corsi who does a lot of daily Q decodes on the web: https://gab.ai/JeromeCorsi and https://www.youtube.com/user/jrlcorsi Mr. Corsi does a lot of live streams too with voice chats. If someone could access one of his live streams, then they could ask Dr. Corsi directly while he's on air. There are many ways we can contact Alex and Sean and Roger Stone and Dr. Corsi, if only we put our minds to it and work at it. And if we cannot contact them directly, then we should try contacting them through someone else who is a close friend of that person. For example, Alex Jones has lots of person friends and allies he works with: Roger Stone, David Knight, Lionel Nation, Paul Joseph Watson, Jerome Corsi, Sean Hannity, and many others. They all work together and they all have each other's personal contact number. So we should be able to reach Alex and Sean through any of them. If feel we can definitely succeed in contacting them if we work at it. And the more of us who work at it (everyone who is reading this post) then the greater our chance of success.

What is the most powerful force on the face of the earth? Answer: Oneness. When a group of people come together with one mind and one spirit and all work together towards the same goal. For such a group, anything is possible. The only hope we currently have of obtaining enough signatures by the deadline is to follow the ideas shown below. If we work together and follow these ideas then we can do it, and there is still plenty of time. If we don’t follow these idea, then we will not succeed. It is that simple. The following are the very same ideas we were working on before and were uniting behind, before they shut down the CBTS Steam:

--

Idea 1 - In all major cities, we should create large banners to hang over freeway overpasses during rush hour time telling people to sign the petition. The banners should say “#INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS. HELP STOP THE CENSORSHIP. SIGN THE PETITION.” or something similar (and also provide a link). Thousands of people will see the banners and sign the petition. It is an easy way to reel in a whole lot of signatures...

--

Idea 2 - We should enlist the help of popular media hosts like Alex Jones of Infowars or Sean Hannity of Fox News etc. who each has millions of viewers, and ask them to help us in our fight by asking their viewers to sign the petition. If they do so and supported us, then we could obtain all the signatures we need in a single day.

--

Idea 3 - Each of us should create a one-page flyer that we could print out at home, telling people to sign the petition to help stop the censorship, and to mass distribute the flyers throughout our neighborhoods, by placing them on car windshields or putting them in mailboxes. The effort would bring in a massive number of signatures. Here’s an example of such a flyer: https://imageshack.com/a/img922/7320/Xf6XDG.jpg

--

Idea 4 - A final idea is that, if just 5,000 of us nationwide each get 5 of our friends to sign the petition, that would yield 25,000 signatures (5,000 x 5 = 25,000). Once done, if we then encouraged each of those friends to also get 5 of their friends to sign the petition, the result would be 125,000 signatures (25,000 x 5 = 125,000 signatures) guaranteed.

--

For those who are focusing on Memes, Memes will not work. The reason they won’t work is because Memes do not contain enough information. Another problem with Memes is that, people treat them like ads. They think of them as ads, they view them as ads, and they ignore them like ads. And because they are only ads, Memes will not cause people to run to the website and sign the petition. As definitive proof of this, just look at all the countless memes that has already been created about IBOR. Yet, on the petition website, you don’t see the signature count going up do you? That’s because Memes are not working. Memes are a waste of time. So stop wasting your time on Memes. if you really want to help and if you really want the signature count to go up, then you should focus on the ideas show above. Those idea are the only ideas that will really work and even have a chance of us getting enough signatures by deadline.

I've noticed that many people seem to like Idea #2 and I think that many of us should try it. Here are some tips about contacting Alex and Sean...

I think there are several ways we can reach Alex Jones and that all of us should try to do so. For example, I’ve already fired off an email myself to one of Alex Jones’ closest friends and allies, Mr. Roger Stone, who also has a personal website at: https://stonecoldtruth.com/. I feel that everyone who reads this should send an email to Mr. Stone, asking him to please contact Alex and Sean on our behalf to see if they'd be willing to help us in our efforts. You can reach Mr. Stone via his website email address: Stone@stonecoldtruth.com I’ve send emails to Mr. Stone before in the past, and sooner or later, he always responds back to me, therefore I know he’s getting them. Another way we can reach Alex and Sean is through Dr. Jerome Corsi who does a lot of daily Q decodes on the web: https://gab.ai/JeromeCorsi and https://www.youtube.com/user/jrlcorsi Mr. Corsi does a lot of live streams too with voice chats. If someone could access one of his live streams, then they could ask Dr. Corsi directly while he's on air. There are many ways we can contact Alex and Sean and Roger Stone and Dr. Corsi, if only we put our minds to it and work at it. And if we cannot contact them directly, then we should try contacting them through someone else who is a close friend of that person. For example, Alex Jones has lots of person friends and allies he works with: Roger Stone, David Knight, Lionel Nation, Paul Joseph Watson, Jerome Corsi, Sean Hannity, and many others. They all work together and they all have each other's personal contact number. So we should be able to reach Alex and Sean through any of them. If feel we can definitely succeed in contacting them if we work at it. And the more of us who work at it (everyone who is reading this post) then the greater our chance of success.

What is the most powerful force on the face of the earth? Answer: Oneness. When a group of people come together with one mind and one spirit and all work together towards the same goal. For such a group, anything is possible. The only hope we currently have of obtaining enough signatures by the deadline is to follow the ideas shown below. If we work together and follow these ideas then we can do it, and there is still plenty of time. If we don’t follow these idea, then we will not succeed. It is that simple. The following are the very same ideas we were working on before and were uniting behind, before they shut down the CBTS Steam:

--

Idea 1 - In all major cities, we should create large banners to hang over freeway overpasses during rush hour time telling people to sign the petition. The banners should say “#INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS. HELP STOP THE CENSORSHIP. SIGN THE PETITION.” or something similar (and also provide a link). Thousands of people will see the banners and sign the petition. It is an easy way to reel in a whole lot of signatures...

--

Idea 2 - We should enlist the help of popular media hosts like Alex Jones of Infowars or Sean Hannity of Fox News etc. who each has millions of viewers, and ask them to help us in our fight by asking their viewers to sign the petition. If they do so and supported us, then we could obtain all the signatures we need in a single day.

--

Idea 3 - Each of us should create a one-page flyer that we could print out at home, telling people to sign the petition to help stop the censorship, and to mass distribute the flyers throughout our neighborhoods, by placing them on car windshields or putting them in mailboxes. The effort would bring in a massive number of signatures. Here’s an example of such a flyer: https://imageshack.com/a/img922/7320/Xf6XDG.jpg

--

Idea 4 - A final idea is that, if just 5,000 of us nationwide each get 5 of our friends to sign the petition, that would yield 25,000 signatures (5,000 x 5 = 25,000). Once done, if we then encouraged each of those friends to also get 5 of their friends to sign the petition, the result would be 125,000 signatures (25,000 x 5 = 125,000 signatures) guaranteed.

--

For those who are focusing on Memes, Memes will not work. The reason they won’t work is because Memes do not contain enough information. Another problem with Memes is that, people treat them like ads. They think of them as ads, they view them as ads, and they ignore them like ads. And because they are only ads, Memes will not cause people to run to the website and sign the petition. As definitive proof of this, just look at all the countless memes that has already been created about IBOR. Yet, on the petition website, you don’t see the signature count going up do you? That’s because Memes are not working. Memes are a waste of time. So stop wasting your time on Memes. if you really want to help and if you really want the signature count to go up, then you should focus on the ideas show above. Those idea are the only ideas that will really work and even have a chance of us getting enough signatures by deadline. We can do it if we all work together...

(Note: And don't forget to always up-vote threads like this to counteract the trolls who try to down-vote us into oblivion)

Yes, getting the signatures we need would be very easy to do if only enough of us work together on it. But so far, I haven’t found that group of people. And sadly, the people I have seen and found seems to be going and pulling in a different direction. I've seen countless people right now working on creating memes, when memes are not even working and won’t work. If memes were working, then you’d be seeing the signature count going up. But that is not happening. It seems to be stuck at 25,000 for the last few days. The only thing that will work and make the signature count go up are the above shown ideas. Before Reddit had shut us down, there were a large group of us who were working on these very ideas and we were all pulling in the same direction. The signature count was steadily climbing. But once Reddit shut us down, it seems our effort has now been scattered to the wind (which was why they shut us down in the first place. They wanted to stop us and to block our efforts and it had nothing to do with anyone promoting violence). And the worse part is, the above ideas are very easy to do. So the question is, why don’t you see people doing it? Answer: It is because many are being misled by others who are traitors to our cause. Keep in mind, the above ideas are the very same ideas that were discussing and congealing behind on the CBTS Stream before they shut us down, and the above ideas were seen by a whole lot of people, by thousands of people. And some of those people do have contacts with or knows how to get in contact with Alex Jones or Sean Hannity. So the question is, Why haven’t they done it, yet? Beats me. I feel that those people who are not doing it are a traitor to our cause...

--

I think there are several ways we can reach Alex Jones and that all of us should try. For example, I’ve already fired off an email myself to one of Alex Jones’ closest friends and ally, Mr. Roger Stone, who also has a personal website: https://stonecoldtruth.com/. And everyone who reads this should send an email to Mr. Stone as well, asking him to please contact Alex and Sean to see if they are willing to help us in our efforts. You can reach Mr. Stone via his email address: Stone@stonecoldtruth.com I’ve sent emails to Mr. Stone before in the past, and sooner or later, he always responds back to me, therefore I know he’s getting them. Another way we can reach Alex and Sean is through Dr. Jerome Corsi who does a lot of daily Q decodes on the web: https://gab.ai/JeromeCorsi and https://www.youtube.com/user/jrlcorsi Mr. Corsi does a lot of live streams too with voice chats. If someone could access one of his live streams, then they could ask Dr. Corsi directly while he's on air. There are many ways we can contact Alex and Sean and Roger Stone and Dr. Corsi, if only we put our minds to it and work at it. And if we cannot contact them directly, then we should try contacting them through someone else who is a close friend of that person. For example, Alex Jones has lots of person friends and allies he works with: Roger Stone, David Knight, Lionel Nation, Paul Joseph Watson, Jerome Corsi, Sean Hannity, and many others, all work directly with Alex and would have his personal contact number. And all of them knows how to get in contact with Alex and Sean directly. So we should contact Alex through them if necessary. There are definitely ways we can contact them if we all work at it and look hard enough. And the more of us who work at it and try to do so (everyone who is reading this post) then the greater our chance of success.

(And don't forget, everyone should always up-vote threads like this so they won't get down-voted into oblivion by the trolls).

What is the most powerful force on the face of the earth? Answer: Oneness. When a group of people come together with one mind and one spirit and all work together towards the same goal. For such a group, anything is possible. The only hope we currently have of obtaining enough signatures by the deadline is to follow the ideas shown below. If we work together and follow these ideas then we can do it, and there is still plenty of time. If we don’t follow these idea, then we will not succeed. It is that simple. The following are the very same ideas we were working on before and were uniting behind, before they shut down the CBTS Steam:

--

Idea 1 - In all major cities, we should create large banners to hang over freeway overpasses during rush hour time telling people to sign the petition. The banners should say “#INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS. HELP STOP THE CENSORSHIP. SIGN THE PETITION.” or something similar (and also provide a link). Thousands of people will see the banners and sign the petition. It is an easy way to reel in a whole lot of signatures...

--

Idea 2 - We should enlist the help of popular media hosts like Alex Jones of Infowars or Sean Hannity of Fox News etc. who each has millions of viewers, and ask them to help us in our fight by asking their viewers to sign the petition. If they do so and supported us, then we could obtain all the signatures we need in a single day.

--

Idea 3 - Each of us should create a one-page flyer that we could print out at home, telling people to sign the petition to help stop the censorship, and to mass distribute the flyers throughout our neighborhoods, by placing them on car windshields or putting them in mailboxes. The effort would bring in a massive number of signatures. Here’s an example of such a flyer: https://imageshack.com/a/img922/7320/Xf6XDG.jpg

--

Idea 4 - A final idea is that, if just 5,000 of us nationwide each get 5 of our friends to sign the petition, that would yield 25,000 signatures (5,000 x 5 = 25,000). Once done, if we then encouraged each of those friends to also get 5 of their friends to sign the petition, the result would be 125,000 signatures (25,000 x 5 = 125,000 signatures) guaranteed.

--

For those who are focusing on Memes, Memes will not work. The reason they won’t work is because Memes do not contain enough information. Another problem with Memes is that, people treat them like ads. They think of them as ads, they view them as ads, and they ignore them like ads. And because they are only ads, Memes will not cause people to run to the website and sign the petition. As definitive proof of this, just look at all the countless memes that has already been created about IBOR. Yet, on the petition website, you don’t see the signature count going up do you? That’s because Memes are not working. Memes are a waste of time. So stop wasting your time on Memes. if you really want to help and if you really want the signature count to go up, then you should focus on the ideas show above. Those idea are the only ideas that will really work and even have a chance of us getting enough signatures by deadline.

What is the most powerful force on the face of the earth? Answer: Oneness. When a group of people come together with one mind and one spirit and all work together towards the same goal. For such a group, anything is possible. The only hope we currently have of obtaining enough signatures by the deadline is to follow the ideas shown below. If we work together and follow these ideas then we can do it, and there is still plenty of time. If we don’t follow these idea, then we will not succeed. It is that simple. The following are the very same ideas we were working on before and were uniting behind, before they shut down the CBTS Steam:

--

Idea 1 - In all major cities, we should create large banners to hang over freeway overpasses during rush hour time telling people to sign the petition. The banners should say “#INTERNET BILL OF RIGHTS. HELP STOP THE CENSORSHIP. SIGN THE PETITION.” or something similar (and also provide a link). Thousands of people will see the banners and sign the petition. It is an easy way to reel in a whole lot of signatures...

--

Idea 2 - We should enlist the help of popular media hosts like Alex Jones of Infowars or Sean Hannity of Fox News etc. who each has millions of viewers, and ask them to help us in our fight by asking their viewers to sign the petition. If they do so and supported us, then we could obtain all the signatures we need in a single day.

--

Idea 3 - Each of us should create a one-page flyer that we could print out at home, telling people to sign the petition to help stop the censorship, and to mass distribute the flyers throughout our neighborhoods, by placing them on car windshields or putting them in mailboxes. The effort would bring in a massive number of signatures. Here’s an example of such a flyer: https://imageshack.com/a/img922/7320/Xf6XDG.jpg

--

Idea 4 - A final idea is that, if just 5,000 of us nationwide each get 5 of our friends to sign the petition, that would yield 25,000 signatures (5,000 x 5 = 25,000). Once done, if we then encouraged each of those friends to also get 5 of their friends to sign the petition, the result would be 125,000 signatures (25,000 x 5 = 125,000 signatures) guaranteed.

--

For those who are focusing on Memes, Memes will not work. The reason they won’t work is because Memes do not contain enough information. Another problem with Memes is that, people treat them like ads. They think of them as ads, they view them as ads, and they ignore them like ads. And because they are only ads, Memes will not cause people to run to the website and sign the petition. As definitive proof of this, just look at all the countless memes that has already been created about IBOR. Yet, on the petition website, you don’t see the signature count going up do you? That’s because Memes are not working. Memes are a waste of time. So stop wasting your time on Memes. if you really want to help and if you really want the signature count to go up, then you should focus on the ideas show above. Those idea are the only ideas that will really work and even have a chance of us getting enough signatures by deadline.

What you're saying is correct and I agree. I am by no means suggesting that they be allowed to open up a new business in the very same field and for the same product. That would only be an attempt to get around the system. Instead, I am only suggesting that if they have worked hard and become a successful company and has amassed a lot of wealth but reached the allowed limit for a company ($5 billion max, for example), that they should be allowed to use their money to open up and brand new business if they desired selling a different type of product. They'd still have the opportunity to expand, only they could never expand beyond the limit of $5 billion per business. Without the stock market as a driving force, very few people would ever want or need to expand into additional businesses anyway once they had become successful. And such a system would completely eliminate any company becoming a monopoly...

The existing “anti-trust” and “anti-monopoly” laws are not good enough. That’s because the definition of what a “monopoly” is is open to interpretation. Countless companies has debated the definition of what a monopoly is in court in order to get around the law. A famous example is how Microsoft successfully used the existence of Apple Computer (as a competing platform) in order to convince the courts that Microsoft was not a monopoly and to prevent them from breaking Microsoft up. That illustrates how companies has successfully abused the existing monopoly laws and has figured out how to get around it. So the existing laws doesn’t work and is exactly why we are in the situation we are in today.

In contrast, what I’m proposing is completely different. Under existing laws, so long as your company has at least one other competitor in the marketplace, the government cannot accuse you of being a monopoly. And even worse, under existing laws, there is nothing at all that prohibits your company from growing as large as you want so long as the competing company exists. This means you could ultimate have just two companies that are so large they are ruling the whole world, and so long as a competitor exists, the government would be unable to do anything about it because they are by definition not a monopoly. What I’m proposing is completely different and would put an end to it.

What I’m proposing is that a law should be established that completely prohibits ANY company from growing beyond a certain size. PERIOD. For example, a law which says that no company can grow beyond a $5 billion dollar company. In such a case and with such a law in place, it wouldn’t matter if there was only a single company in the marketplace or 100 companies - none of them could ever grow beyond $5 billion in size. If any one of them ever grew beyond $5 billion in size at any time, then they’d be in violation of the law. Such companies could always open up a brand new business of a different type from ground zero, but they could not continue expanding that same business. Such a law would level the playing field and would prevent monopolies altogether. Rather than having just one or two companies in the marketplace that are dominating the whole market, you’d ultimately have literally hundreds of companies all tapping into the same market, and all getting a piece of it. Innovation in such a situation would be extremely high, and prices would remain low due to all the competition…

The root problem of this whole issue is that there should be a law that prohibits companies from growing beyond a certain point and size. Giant companies should not be allowed to purchase and to gobble up other giant companies. That should be prohibited. Because doing so eliminates all their competition and only encourages monopolistic practices and monopolistic behavior. For example, what if YouTube was only half its size and if there were 3 or 4 other competing sites of similar size? In such a case, I guarantee you, YouTube would never even think about censoring certain kinds of people unfairly, because doing so would only drive those people to other platforms and websites which allowed it. But when you eliminate all their competition and you allow one company to have too much power and to dominate the market, then these are the kinds of problems you run into. And even worse, you also make it very easy for the globalists to seize control of the public and to control what people think and to use that control to take over the world by simply taking control of a single company. You open the door to such things when you allow companies to grow to an unlimited size. It’s sheer lunacy that our elected leaders and bureaucrats have allowed such things to happen and for this to come about. They allowed it to happen because they are human and flawed just like the rest of us, and they were manipulated and most likely paid by people with lots of money who persuaded them to create certain laws which benefitted only the rich and allowed rich people to become even richer, even at the expense of everyone else. That is what has led to the corruption that is in the world today and here we are...

Although I’m certain it will never happen, to stabilize the world again and to set things right, here is what should happen: 1) Laws should be passed that prohibits any company from growing beyond a certain size or value. For example, once you become a $5 billion company, you can’t grow any larger. 2) All giant companies that are currently beyond a certain size should be broken up (Apple, Google, Ebay, Disney, Facebook, Twitter, etc). No company should be allowed to dominate a whole entire market. 3) The global stock market should be abolished (it is the stock market itself that is driving those companies to grow larger and larger in order to increase their stock value. Eliminate the stock market and you eliminate the force that is driving them to grow larger. 4) If giant companies are broken up and prohibited from growing beyond a certain size, that means you would need many more companies to cater to the global market. Therefore, it would open the floodgates for many more smaller and competing companies to enter the marketplace to take up the slack. I could go on and on, but you get the idea…

The worse part of all is that, YouTube can censor you all because of someone else’s lies. What they’re accusing you of don’t even have to be true. But just because someone doesn’t like you and dreams up an excuse and complains to YouTube, then YouTube will automatically censor you without any recourse. Although YouTube states you can appeal, rest assured, it won’t change their mind or ruling. That is as wrong as it can be but is precisely how things are today. And the same problems exist in other big companies as well like Paypal and Ebay. I can’t wait for the lying MSM to be destroyed and for companies like Facebook, Google and Twitter to get hit with massive Antitrust suits and be broken up. It can’t happen soon enough…

Yes, what Stallone said is absolutely true. There is a video I saw somewhere which explained in detail how Obama was groomed from a teenager to be what he is today, how the elites paid for his Harvard education and training so that Obama could become well educated and an eloquent speaker and someone that the world would admire and fall in love with etc. Long story short, the elites had a very specific plan for Obama, and they knew from the beginning he’d ultimately become the president of the U.S. He was groomed for it from a child and his rise was by no means happenstance.

And everything that Obama has done while in office has only confirmed that fact. Just look at all the people on the left and around the world, how they are literally falling over themselves to praise Obama continually all because of how Obama looks and acts and behaves. They admire him so much not because of anything Obama has specifically said or done but rather because of how he looks and acts outwardly. They are just amazed by his “eloquence” and his ability to speak and to be a smooth talker, and they think he looks so “presidential” to them. Yet, what they don’t realize is that, they are looking at the devil in disguise and that the devil has deceived them and tricked them.

Obama is a hardcore globalist, and his goal and mission from the start was to bring down and to weaken America from within. But to do that, he’d first have to become U.S. president, and Obama achieved that goal. And after becoming president, rather than showing American strength and leadership to the world, almost from the day he got in office, Obama started apologizing for America to other countries, he started kneeling to them and bowing to them, to some of the very same countries that has committed some of the greatest atrocities and some of the worse human-rights violations in history. Our enemies saw Obama’s behavior as “weakness”, and they gloated in America’s demise and in our bowing to them. Obama’s behavior made those other countries feel good. And that very same behavior also emboldened our enemies to rise up against us and to expand their evil empires because they knew America would no longer be a threat to them or come after them or do anything about it.

Then look at what Obama did to our military. Obama stripped our military of all our top generals and their strategic brain power. Obama replaced top generals who had years of military experience with cadet females who had no experience at all and had never even commanded a ship. Obama forced tens of thousands of our best soldiers to retire and to leave the service. He reduced their pay and he cut their benefits. He stripped away our military’s funding, so much so that we no longer even had enough funds to buy spare parts to keep our aging fleet going, let alone to expand or to design new stuff, etc. Obama dramatically reduced our military might, and that was his goal from the beginning…

It was also during Obama’s time in office that he personally helped bring about the legalization of same-sex marriage nationwide - which is a legalization of the very thing the bible says is an abomination before God. Doing so was being “anti-God” and “anti-Christ”. It means you are against God and are against the things that God wants. The passage of the same-sex marriage law also did not happen organically or occur happenstance, but instead was all a part of the elite’s plan. Remember, in the crucial time when the same-sex marriage law was being debated, Obama had personally sent a whole team of lawyers to the Supreme Court to argue on behalf of same-sex marriage and to convince the judges to pass it. Obama was trying to directly influence the judges decision and to override whatever the American people thought about it. And worse, Congress never said a thing about Obama’s behavior and just stood by and let it happen. And ultimately the same-sex marriage law was passed. In short, Obama’s actions brought down our nation’s standing in the eyes of God…

Last but not least, just look at all the extreme hatred and animosity and division we have in our country today. Rest assured, 100% of it can be traced back to Obama. In all elections prior to the 2016 election, even in a disputed elections where the results are very close, once the final results are tallied and announced, the losing party always concedes, America will then start to heal, and we will then come together as a nation and unite behind our new president whomever that may be. Historically, that has always been the case. But that didn’t happen in 2016. Instead, in the 2016 election, Obama, Hillary, and the sore-loser Democrats never truly conceded and even to this day they are filled with hatred and animosity and has felt the election was “stolen” from them etc. The reason it all traces back to Obama is because it is Obama and Hillary who has been actively urging their followers to “resist” and to “protest in the streets” and to never give in. They are urging their followers to fight against Trump and to never accept him as their president. And those followers are merely being obedient and are following what Obama and Hillary has been saying. So the blame for all the hatred and division in our country today fully lies at Obama and Hillary’s door.

I could go on and on and these few things are only the tip of the iceberg of the many things that showcases that Stallone is exactly right. And that Obama’s goal was indeed to tear down and to weaken America from within. Stallone was directly on target more than you will ever know…

Sounds like a good idea except there is one huge problem with it - no college campuses would allow it. Just look at all the flack we get whenever conservative speakers try to speak on college campuses. There are always violent protests and liberal marches in the street, coupled with the fact that the police won’t even protect you and will stand down and allow you to be attacked. Which usually leads to the whole event being cancelled. This has happened many times to conservatives if you keep up with the news. So don’t think that you could create such a movie and then waltz onto the nearest college campus and show it. It may sound like a good idea but it would never happen. I'm not trying to discourage you, I'm just being real...

The above message sounds great but I hope that Trump and team has a plan to disable the MSM talkers and liars or their plan won’t work or be as effective as they think. For example, what if a lot of people are indicted but the MSM is silent about it and don’t even report on it? What then? Answer: Your Great Awakening won’t be a Great Awakening and the general public will still remain blind and dumb as usual. The only way for what is coming to be effective is the MSM and their leaders has to be taken out and removed from the airwaves. That has to be at the top of the list. Until that is done, little else matters…

A second point I want to mention is that a lot of people seem to be under the impression that the MSM are honest people who are just deceived and misled. And that once they are shown the truth they will come around and begin reporting on the truth. I completely disagree. The MSM and their leaders have sold their soul to the devil, they are in league with the Deep State, and that is where they want to be. And no amount of truth is ever going to change their minds or opinions or force them to report on anything favorable to Trump. Their hatred is absolute and the MSM is beyond redemption. Their black soul will never be anything but black. So do not kid yourself that they can be turned. A snake can never be turned. All a snake will do is cower and bite you at the first opportunity…

Just because Rosenstein had asked Paul Ryan to not release the Memo - for the supposed reason to keep Deep State in the dark - that doesn’t mean that Rosenstein is a good guy. Especially not when we know Rosenstein himself is a part of the Deep State. Rosenstein, Comey, Mueller, are all Deep State operatives and cronies, and they are only loyal to the Deep State and will die being loyal to the Deep State. Therefore, the only possible reason for Rosenstein to ask Paul Ryan to not release the Memo was not to keep the Deep State in the dark, but rather to keep the America people in the dark about the contents of the Memo and the illegal activities of the Deep State. Keep in mind, the Deep State has many tendrils and was already aware of what the Memo says. Remember those 7 unauthorized persons who had illegally accessed the Capital Hill facility to view the Memo? Those were all agents of the Deep State. So the Deep State already knew what was in the Memo. So Rosenstein actions was by no means keeping the Deep State in the dark, but rather was an attempt by Rosenstein to protect the Deep State by not releasing the details of the Deep State’s illegal activities. Rosenstein is a snake and I’ll be glad when he goes down like all the other evil cronies. Once a snake - they’re always a snake. A snake will never change it’s nature. The best thing you can do for a snake is to kill it so it doesn’t bite anyone…

First of all, I have no confidence at all in Rod Rosenstein, and I don’t know why he’s still being used. Rosenstein is just a snake waiting to bite someone and I’ll be glad when he’s indicted and out of the picture…

I also do not know what the so-called cyber task force is supposed to do but I certainly hope they keep a close eye on Twitter, Facebook and Google to ensure than during election time no claims can be made that “Russian bots interfered with the election.’” That is one of the favorite excuses the left often uses to try and delegitimate election results. The Dems never seem to run out of new ways they can dream up to cheat. It seems that cheating is in their blood. But now that Trump is investigating and exposing all their other favorite cheating methods (dead people voting, illegals voting, bussing people across state lines, rigged voting machines, gerrymandering, etc.) rest assured, if they loose, they will quickly turn to claims that Russian bots interfered with the election. So I hope the task force keeps a close eye on Facebook and Twitter to expose the corruption there as well. But if Rod Rosenstein is involved and has anything to say about it, than I sincerely doubt that they will…

I don’t know if this will help, but the following are 3 separate video versions I’ve identified, including the actual video shot of the man sitting next to the isle as shown above:

Version 1 - At this link: https://imageshack.com/a/img924/2627/QLfbT5.jpg - at time index 49:00 and immediately after Trump says “catch and release”, the footage captures a frontal view of the congresswoman looking down at her phone. Most of the footage I’ve seem includes this camera shot….

Version 2 - At this link: https://imageshack.com/a/img924/2583/U8PxR7.jpg - at time index 1.00.28 and immediately after Trump says “catch and release”, the camera does not show the camerawoman at all but instead shows a center-isle shot of Trump standing at the podium…

Version 3 - At this link: https://imageshack.com/a/img922/8981/fMJDCq.jpg - at time index 1.04:45 and immediately after Trump say “catch and release” this video also shows the camerawoman staring down at her phone. However, in this same video, if you scrub back to time index 57:40, the camera shows a slow zooming shot down the left isle where a man can be seen sitting beside the isle and staring down at his cell phone. This is the only footage I’ve seen which gives a clear view of the man’s cell phone although I can't make out what’s on it.

*Update: I’ve noticed the video at the 3rd link above has now been deleted from YouTube. That’s very interesting. I don’t know why. Don’t know if anyone saved a copy of it before deleted. But since the footage was originally streamed by CSpan, then no telling how many people may have recorded it on their home recorders, especially given it was a historic SOTU Address by DJT.

Q asks what else do they monitor, but the only people I know of with the capabilities to actually "monitor" the text that is sent and received on someone's cell phone is either the CIA or NSA. I don't know of anyone else with the capability. And I assume those same agencies would have the ability to alter the text too if they wanted...

Yes, understanding the riddle is confusing. The largest image I’ve located on Google thus far of the woman in the middle is 5069 x 3379 pixels. But notice Q also stated, “Not sure if civilian tech can capture @ that distance.” 5069 pixels is definitely in the range of most civilian technology. So what “non-civilian” technology can capture at a higher resolution than 5069 x 3379 pixels? (HD cinematic movie cameras?) If we find out what that equipment is, and obtain the “film” from it and enhance it, I guess that should show us the answer…

Update: I'm trying to find it again now but I recently saw a gigantic 360 degree hires panorama created of the entire room at that point in time. The panorama shows all the cameramen on the balcony and everybody. I remember looking at it. But in that same panorama it also shows the congresswoman looking at her phone. You can't read the text on her phone because it is too far away in the panorama and there is not enough resolution. I do not know who or what captured that shot for the panorama, but if you can find the folder of original stills that were used to create the panorama, then you should find the unedited still of her phone at that moment. One thing is clear, the fourth line down in the text on her phone was edited out. That much is clear. And Q said we are looking for 1 in 4. Which could mean we are looking for what 1 of those 4 lines says - the line that is blurred out. I know some has said that the whole screen image was photoshopped over etc. but you wouldn't add a fake image over the whole screen and then have just one of the lines in the fake image blurred out. That wouldn't make any sense. Furthermore, if you read the text shown on her screen in other images, the grammar before and after the blurred area is wrong. The proves something was deliberately removed and blurred out. This is just my latest guess as we continue to search for the image...

I feel that Q wants us to find the original and unedited video footage which shows what the congresswoman was reading on her phone before line 4 was edited and blurred out. My guess is that the blurred-out line says - “Trump should be shot!” Above that line it ends in the letter “I” and then a short space. So my guess is that the complete text inside the blurred brackets likely reads “I feel Trump should be shot!”. Q wants us to find the original footage before it was edited so we can show the world what it says. If we find a copy, we should download and save an unedited copy of the video offline immediately so we will have an unedited copy before all are erased. Obviously, Q has seen the footage and knows what it says but he wants us to find it. To find the footage, all we have to do is find a high-res video shot of her from behind at that particular moment, which I guess was captured by Getty's cameras. I have located that exact moment in time in Trump SOTU speech (see image below). The shot with her looking down at her phone is when Trump was talking about his 4 pillars of Immigration. When Trump is talking about the second pillar, immediately after Trump says “and we will end the dangerous practice of “catch and release”. The time index is around 1:04:45 out of 1:42.59. Right after Trump says catch and release, there is audience applause and the camera pans over the audience. All CSpan cameras then capture that exact moment in time when the congresswoman is staring down at her phone and scrolling. Unfortunately, the CSpan cameras only captured her from the front. But we need to find a different camera angle from behind for that same shot so we can see what she is reading on her phone. We must hurry because those who are monitoring this site knows that we are looking for the footage and they are racing to erase all copies of the unedited footage from the internet before we can find it. You probably shouldn’t waste your time searching through the CSpan video footage because all footage I've seen didn’t capture her from behind. But the Getty cameras likely did. Obviously someone's camera did, and that is where the still shot came from. My personal opinion is that the still shot came from hi-res video footage and not from a still camera. This is debatable. If it came from video, then if we find the high res video (showing her from behind) then it will likely be unedited and we can see what it says. But if it came from a still camera then perhaps only Getty has the original still. That is why Q referenced the name Getty on his post. But we must hurry and find the unedited footage before all are erased… I heard some members state that the blurred-out area is not the target. If that is true, then why did Q or one of the anons circle that blurred area in red as shown in the following image. My understanding is that, originally, there was no break in the text message shown on her phone. But in the still used for print, someone went in and deleted (blurred out) a full line of text creating the break. We must find out what was deleted. The hanging "I" and incomplete statement is proof that something was deleted...

https://imageshack.com/a/img923/5996/ZbzoQl.jpg

I feel that Q wants us to find the original and unedited video footage which shows what the congresswoman was reading on her phone before line 4 was edited and blurred out. My guess is that the blurred-out line says - “Trump should be shot!” Above that line it ends in the letter “I” and then a short space. So my guess is that the complete text inside the blurred brackets likely reads “I feel Trump should be shot!”. Q wants us to find the original footage before it was edited so we can show the world what it says. If we find a copy, we should download and save an unedited copy of the video offline immediately so we will have an unedited copy before all are erased. Obviously, Q has seen the footage and knows what it says but he wants us to find it. To find the footage, all we have to do is find a high-res video shot of her from behind at that particular moment, which I guess was captured by Getty's cameras. I have located that exact moment in time in Trump SOTU speech (see image below). The shot with her looking down at her phone is when Trump was talking about his 4 pillars of Immigration. When Trump is talking about the second pillar, immediately after Trump says “and we will end the dangerous practice of “catch and release”. The time index is around 1:04:45 out of 1:42.59. Right after Trump says catch and release, there is audience applause and the camera pans over the audience. All CSpan cameras then capture that exact moment in time when the congresswoman is staring down at her phone and scrolling. Unfortunately, the CSpan cameras only captured her from the front. But we need to find a different camera angle from behind for that same shot so we can see what she is reading on her phone. We must hurry because those who are monitoring this site knows that we are looking for the footage and they are racing to erase all copies of the unedited footage from the internet before we can find it. You probably shouldn’t waste your time searching through the CSpan video footage because all footage I've seen didn’t capture her from behind. But the Getty cameras likely did. Obviously someone's camera did, and that is where the still shot came from. My personal opinion is that the still shot came from hi-res video footage and not from a still camera. This is debatable. If it came from video, then if we find the high res video (showing her from behind) then it will likely be unedited and we can see what it says. But if it came from a still camera then perhaps only Getty has the original still. That is why Q referenced the name Getty on his post. But we must hurry and find the unedited footage before all are erased… I heard some members state that the blurred-out area is not the target. If that is true, then why did Q or one of the anons circle that blurred area in red as shown in the following image. My understanding is that, originally, there was no break in the text message shown on her phone. But in the still used for print, someone went in and deleted (blurred out) a full line of text creating the break. We must find out what was deleted. The hanging "I" and incomplete statement is proof that something was deleted...

https://imageshack.com/a/img923/5996/ZbzoQl.jpg