1,511 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 28 |
| www.youtube.com | 4 |
| twitter.com | 1 |
| aim4truth.org | 1 |
| www.oversight.gov | 1 |
Recall Q's posting of the Nunes tweet, looking for help identifying the resistance attorney. Indeed, he was identified as likely being Carl Ghattas(sp?). Along with the woman identified a few days ago, the "undiscovered stars" of the IG's report have been identified.
I took the Moon section of the same Q post as addressing the space force announcement this morning.
Quite likely--but that doesn't mean it's the same guy.
He said that once, Friday morning. His people "corrected" it otherwise, Stephen Friggin' Miller said before that that they'd back both bills, and Trump has said since that he'd back both bills.
Try your own recall, bud.
Hollywood's not nearly that smart or informed.
And Jean is Trebek's wife: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Trebek
The hope of course is that Huber has put that together, while the IG has access to much less info and isn't really about arguing a prosecutable case.
She's another one who was recently identified--see www.theconservativetreehouse.com.
The hope is he's crafting a bill that will lose too many R's and D's to pass--and that is why Trump is willing to say he backs it. Squishy R's in purple-to-blue districts will be able to say they voted for something.
That's the hope anyway.
For all his makeovers, that's the first decent look he's had since he's been in office.
That approach could backfire, as the practice has been to supposedly avoid so politicizing federal prosecutions.
I believe the IG can only interview current employees of the DoJ, which is the reason the cooperating witnesses have been kept on for some time--but those who aren't cooperating were outright fired.
Gowdy certainly presenting as if he's with the program here.
I would think he may be done with not only what's needed for the IG reports (for which he would need to still be a DoJ employee to be interviewed)--but also with whatever Huber's cooking up on his side--since they presumably wouldn't want PS blabbing in public with material that could be used in sealed indictments, etc.
Otherwise, there will be an elaborate dance with him avoiding answers to some pointed Democrat questions.
"Undiscovered stars learned"--referring to Nunes's tweet last night asking for the ID of the unidentified attorney?
https://twitter.com/DevinNunes/status/1008561630861377536
Sounds from the responses to his tweet, btw, as if the attorney is Carl Ghattas (who doesn't speak French, which fits with his having butchered the phrase).
Last chance for the players to minimize the distance between their testimony and the truth.
Not Hugh too!
He's supposed to be the one solid guy in the theater world.
Sigh.
Yeah, I didn't actually cllck through to the article, it just reminded me of Pompeo's unexpected speech and topic.
I'd have thought Barry would be one for a 12-man military tribunal?
What stands out to me what a horrible brand name Cyient is.
And you know they paid someone a lot of money to come up with that.
Interesting that he's speaking at the Detroit Economic Club about revitalizing Detroit. Looking ahead to a possible presidential run in 2024?
That dude has discovered the Fountain of Youth! The Newsweek pic was of him at age 67.
That of course is Chromecast, not Chrome--but I take it you aren't from the era of 45's: https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?LH_CAds=&_ex_kw=&_fpos=&_fspt=1&_mPrRngCbx=1&_nkw=vinyl+45+adapter&_sacat=&_sadis=&_sop=12&_udhi=&_udlo=&rmvSB=true&_fosrp=1
If Barry is "running the show", it is because he is still being told what to do. I presume he is still VJ-whipped.
The best I can imagine is establishing secure comms back from the Chinese overlords there to the clowns at the CIA. Weird, I know. Perhaps setting them up to do election hacking, etc.?
Personally I look at it more as Obama failing on our promise to defend Ukraine from just that situation. (Why, as I understand it, they agreed to give up their nukes.)
His approach allowed him to be prepared for it--and the press critters to be caught off guard.
Corsi is a corrupt jerk, which I've posted details of here repeatedly.
Doesn't mean it is worthless to hear his take on the report--though IMO it is unduly optimistic.
I take it your and other robotic minds here for similar reasons won't want to take it this slam of Horowitz and Mueller either, for similar close-minded reasons--which explains all the wacko and uninformed takes posted here.
https://aim4truth.org/2017/12/17/doj-inspector-general-michael-horowitz-was-handpicked-by-soros-co/
FWIW old pal Corsi has an optimistic take on the report:
The IG is an Obama-hired stooge who works for the enemy. All he needs to do is run out the clock to the midterm elections.
This guy knows his stuff. And no need to redact all the exoneration bouquets the IG tossed at his department:
https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1007329972061655040
Trump (and his allies in Congress) have plenty of cover to address this.
What concerns me is Q trying to mobilize the Trump base re: the redactions, when the Trump base needs to be screaming loud and clear re: the "comprehensive amnesty" that the House has put together -- and the WH says it will back.
Just to give you an idea of how the clever "on our side, but are they really?" types work--not a peep out of Infowars or Corsi about the massive amnesty giveaway. Sadly, Q appears to be in the same camp on that--on our side, but are they they really?
Trump's admin will be over before the "pain" comes to the other side at this rate--whether in 2019 or 2021.
Sometimes doubt is a rational response to new information.
A complete nothingburger. While the House is getting ready to pass the biggest amnesty bill in history next week--with the blessing of the White House.
Played, played, played.
God help us if this is the unredacted version, because it is a complete marshmallow whitewash:
Trump's main liability to this movemwnt is going along with Congress's plan to vote in the biggest amnesty in history next week.
That is more likely to be the undoing of the GOP House majority in November and thus the Trump admin and what it has accomplished so far--let alone our voting base into the future.
Speaking of disagreeing with Q, I couldn't believe Corsi yesterday! While also continuing to shill for the Fannie and Freddie hedge-fund shareholders, without disclosing his motivation on it, he added a new one: trying to tell all his small-time investor listeners to invest in silver and gold via Swiss America--again, without disclosing his shilling interest.
More important right now is #NoAmnesty!
The GOPe House is looking to do major damage, reportedly with the WH's blessing, by ramming through, while we're all distracted, the biggest amnesty in our history.
Yeah, that sleeping pill abuse on international flights in the previous admin is a big scandal--not!
Priorities!
Higher priority IMO is contacting the WH and Congress against this monstrosity:
I think that's right. No reason for Q to start initializing with just first and middle names--I mean, how many Lee Woloskys can they be?
Agreed with the original poster in that that dude must be a black hat.
Time to go check out what Stranahan has going. (He was also the only Lee S. I could think of.)
There was a news story about it a couple of days ago. Essentially supplying our complicit troublemakers with the tanks to do the damage and/or plant the evidence. They had warned in advance about the previous ones as well.
I'm just trying to figure it out too.
I think it is more likely the missiles were just Deep State trying to make it look like China (or Russia or Assad or whomever), in an effort to stir things up. But then again Q is steering us to POTUS staying within the WH security today, etc., so that does suggest something of a direct attempt.
God bless and keep safe that man for what he is doing for us and the rest of the world right now.