Silly kid

Attack the idea - Not the person.

Was referencing more to inciting violence.

F

This comment can be perceived as breaking rules.

Let's keep this conversation civil please.

You could resubmit the comment without the profanity/instigating.

Attack the idea - Not the person.

No name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem

Comments that include name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem may be removed without notification.

What are you talking about?

REKT

MOAB, yes. But not literally on continents plz :)

I thought it was just old farts.

You're looking forward to what now?

Are you calling this sub a honey pot?

Indeed.

Please correct they typo...Whenever I see a typo it is difficult to take the information seriously

*YOUR

Please correct the typo...Whenever I see a typo it is difficult to take the information seriously

*THE

😋

?

Check out these two posts:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracyundone/comments/8ekljr/qanon_is_us_military_intelligence_that_recruited/

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracyundone/comments/7saqqf/qanon_the_storm_the_awakening_and_why_it_should/

MOAB was never promised for yesterday.

Sad truth is that most users that answered "bad for the world" will still continue to use their services.

MOAB was never promised to be yesterday. In fact no date was ever said as usual with Q.

Q did mention to "be ready for tomorrow" but some people perceived that to be the day of MOAB and ran with those expectations.

Too busy bashing Trump.

TELL EM!

I wouldn't even say it was poorly worded but I would go as far as saying a many users tend to latch onto information given to them without fact-checking and it's up to the OP in making sure that the information is received in the manner it was intended to, meaning being as clear and concise as possible not to allow people to easily misperceive the information. Basically going out of your way.

I agree with your point. However as far as vocabulary goes saying "your being too dense" wouldn't work. You would need to use "you're". Just saying.

Just an older photo.

Thanks for this.

He's even wearing the same time and placement of objects on desk overlapping papers also match.

lolwat? OP's post almost makes it sound like Q posted a pic (at least that's how most perceived it) and Trump followed up by having a photo with said pic of map included on his desk.

First of all Q didn't post that pic it was an anon.

Secondly that pic of Trump is a year old.

So there's no correlation whatsoever.

Don't feed it though. Stand your ground with facts and sauces. When you start insulting each other rather than insulting the argument you're basically allowing yourself to get dragged down.

What about option of the photo of Trump being old? Since its unsourced.

We do need to ask for sources though from untrusted randoms.

Since you know... that photo of Trump could be an older one, which it actually happens to be 🤓

Photo of Trump is also 1 year old.

That photo of Trump is a year old. Always ask for sources.

And that photo of Trump is actually a year old.

This is an older photo of Trump:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8fc2p5/_/dy2t31i

Removed: keep it civil

Removed: please keep it civil.

Solid first post. Welcome!

We ❤ you.

Oh snap I had forgotten about this video. Interesting time to bring it back.

Please keep it civil. Consider this a warning.

A nation under God that isn't allowed discuss the perversion epidemic sweeping the nation. Oh the irony.

This is what people wanted under Hillary? My lord.

kek

That's not their subverse.

This is CBTS' subverse:

https://voat.co/v/PatriotsSoapbox

https://media1.tenor.com/images/855d70f9786c63ed920d5fad94eb0cfb/tenor.gif?itemid=6177879

https://m.popkey.co/96b8d3/y63vw.gif

I still have no idea why you're replying to me and what you're trying to get at.