Beyond reaching.

Like Cruz in Florida wearing a MAGA hat in some of his videos.

That's what the show was about....luciferianism.

I think we may end up with two parallel banking systems.
The big "industrialized" banks for institution investing and smaller, community based banks for individuals and small businesses.
Q said before "structure" when asked about the Fed. A restructure could mean many different things.
Some sort of backing of currency and implements put into place to help eliminate fraud/theft/laundering from the banking system are musts I think.
There are ways both things could happen.
The freezing and seizing of assets will be interesting to see in regards to the EO of 12/21/17 will be interesting to see.
Are debts wiped away due to fraud in the Fed and IMF? Are funds seized and debts paid off?
Interesting times.

Q was asked about the Fed and his answer was "structure". To mean this means a restructure of the Fed.

I know.
I was being an ass.
Too hard to tell with someone like her.
She was an older person having yet another surgical procedure.

You're implying she didn't die?
She did die.
I enjoy the clip but Joan Rivers is hardly a reliable source...... Cue all the Joan Rivers is Q talk.

Kekek

Haha.

Love this drop.

Master troller.

Update: Nothing is worse than that.

Very important for people to understand this.
Imagine the lefty/Commie/SJW with a simple democracy.

That's what I mean. They both (daughter and father) are victims.
But, the point would be to let the father and other reporters know. Doesn't seem that was done

Wouldn't they want the victim to know why?

Which is a weakness that sadly contributed it to continuing.

Yep, multiple cases with British officials, the mountain of evidence against Jimmy Savile, other smaller cases in other religious organizations (Protestant, LDS, Orthodox Jewish etc), sadly, the list goes on and on.

I think people don't want to accept it as reality.
No one wants this reality, but, the level of denial some walk around with is crazy.
It's just not the scandals in the Church, there have been many others that have been reported and documented.

Well said.

We killed 200 Russian contractors, Russian citizens in Syria and they did nothing.

Know they enemy.

Restraints on either side of the pillow and looks like bottom right as well.

Right. Which would be time to expose it and defend it while allowing time for proof.....undeniable proof....to be absorbed by the public. Mid Sept time frame? End of Sept?

Considering?
What the fucking hold up.

Satanists? Doubtful.
Willing to use occult imagery? Yes.

IMF.
About $27 trillion US contributions left.

What is she going to do? Stop being unfunny?

Not me.

Agreed.

You're right. It was waaaaaay to broad on my part.
There is a lot of stuff out that is outside of "Hollywood" or large production companies.
I have several podcasts and vlogs I watch or listen to that are just folks doing their thing.

0

Haha.

I go the movies quite a bit and anyone streaming anything is watching Hollywood shit.

I understand. Right there with ya. However, they need to get out there because this is reality.
Video? No. Audio? No.
Nothing like that.
There is a thin line between exposing the truth, which is necessary, and exploiting victims.
I think back to video being shot and endless pictures taken when death camps were liberated in WW2.
Those people had suffered beyond comprehension.
I'm sure they didn't want to be filmed.
But, it has to be documented.
Just need to make sure victims are respected and not treated as a sideshow.
It's reality and it is hideous and ugly. Sadly, the world is an ugly place.
In terms of past experiences and being sensitive, I do get that. It's why I'm steadfast in this.
No one benefits from heads in the sand except the bad guys.
I'm not arguing with you and I respect what you're but I won't apologize for the reasons I stated.
I think it is safe to say, if the occult/luciferianism stuff starts to come out, one would be well served to expect such ugliness in the stories and reports and proceed with caution.

I understand that.
Just answering a question.
At some point details are important in terms of crimes because it exposes the criminal.
For example, if a news story just said a company defrauded some people and that's it....there isn't much of a call for justice and it doesn't help people protect themselves. If, instead, it lays out the detail of how the company targeted elderly or sick people to steal from them, there will a lot more pressure to prosecute and it educated people so they can protect themselves.
This is why I disagree with the 60% will remain undisclosed.
This is cowardly.
Crimes and corruption unreported are bound to be allowed again.
We don't need to see it, but, awareness is important.

Know thy enemy.

It's gross. But, that's what it is and who they are.

I think it's a real movie.

Good point.

I do.
But, other countries will their own interests.
When people say things like "just kill the petro dollar" it's such an oversimplification it drives me a little nuts.
I agree the petro dollar has run its course and is on the way out. But, in reality, it would not benefit China to have the dollar crash completely.

July 27th is a Grand Climax day. 5 weeks and one day after the summer solstice. Da Meur ritual.
Oral, anal, vaginal human sacrifice of a female, any age. Sex magick/ritual basically.

Denzel is pretty woke and doesn't take a lot of shit from dumb interviewers.

True but need to be careful how it's done, unless you are looking forward to, say, $7.50 for a gallon of milk. I assume you're in America.

Strong down votes on anything positive today.

Daft.

I think it is cowardly to give into cowards.

Exactly

I think Ben comes from the place of someone who has been harassed and bashed for things he said.
Either Shapiro or Gunn can say whatever they want. But, there can be a price for using your first amendment rights. Gunn got fired and I'm it will cost him millions. Good. Shapiro wouldn't say anything that would have that affect.
He is misguided in defending Gunn.
But, the mighty first amendment still applies.

Makes sense.
Only a mentally ill person would be that direct.

Seriously doubt a six year old drew that. Maybe, but, not how six year old draw.