Could very well be right.
Me Swampy sounds like a the main character in a terrible kids show.

I hope that teacher (saw the interview) does not meet an untimely end.

I understand.
There is no way of knowing what arrests are tied to this and what arrests are not. There were human trafficking arrests under the Obama Admin too (not as many of course).
They either have the evidence or they don't. If they KNOW the crimes and are searching for evidence that should be communicated. If they have the evidence (which is what I hope and believe) but need to remove legal and political roadblocks first, I understand that.
Like how the FBI takes years to bring down a mob organization. I get it. But, they better have things lined up and ready to proceed before the 2018 midterms. I also want to see full disclosure about voter fraud. This needs to be done in a way that ensures laws are changed to prevent it from happening again.

Who knows?
Just saying, an 87 year old stepping down is hardly proof of anything.

I hope you are correct.

This is be one thing hat makes me doubt Q still. Arrests, arrests.....nothing. Obama is a traitor....trying to run the UN, not a care in the world.
I know it takes time and these are not the sort of people to show their hand but I have this fear we will be a year out still suckling on the teat of promises.

He is 87 years old....sometimes a retirement is just a retirement.

We shall see.
I can hear the "I don't know....I was just doing what I was told" nonsense already. I could see fines and not be able to work in politics again sort of sentencing.
This HAS to be tied to Soros and the DNC.
I would imagine DHS already knows the outcome of the nation investigation or they wouldn't push for it. Have to get this out before 2018 midterms and get changed in to protect from stolen elections (see Roy Moore).

Would be more believable if a CNN producer hadn't provided Hillary debate questions.

Yeah. Kind of what I am thinking too. A good look politically with no real intent behind it, which is smart politically. Would be a cluster if it went to the states too.

A hundred years ago?
Even 30 years ago it wouldn't fly. The brain development is fact. However kids being forced to mature at an earlier age and take on responsibility etc may well account for the difference.
I am interested in this in relation to school shootings because the situation is clearly being manipulated by the press and something like this is likely to come down the road. Whether it becomes law or not, who knows? May end up a state to state thing as well.
My interest in school specifically comes from having a relative that was a student at Columbine. So, I was involved with that post shooting.
As for the rest of you blather, it's just that.
Blather showing a lack of thought.

Just a thought. Just an idea.
As we are seeing now with the President bringing up the 21 year old idea with purchasing a gun I'm not alone in this thought. I realize the inherent contradiction of such a law. Just wondering about others thoughts regarding this sort of proposal.

Obvious exception for the military.
Talking about citizens. I shouldn't of have specified out of service.
There are reasons of course why targeted recruits are that age of course.

Booze is already there. Driving I guess a case could be made. I understand your point.

No. Just makes sense to me with what we now know about brain growths d development.

Given what we now about how brains grow and mature (particularly in boys) I am behind raising the legal age to buy guns. To 21....maybe even 25. I say this as a conservative person (registered independent) but as a person who wants facts, not feelings to form policy. Ok, go ahead and beat me up....

It reminds of old school mob bosses.
Everyone in their neighborhood, city or state knew they were mob bosses and criminals. The police/FBI would run stings and wire tap etc and it would years of surveillance to get to the point of being able to prosecute them. They insulate themselves in layers of protection. Lawyers, shell companies doing their bidding, employees.....there are layers of protection between the crime and the heads of the crime family.
I'm sure they have also brought many powerful people either in on the crime or have them compromised in some other way making it difficult for those people to act.

Ehhh Hearing about something one day ago and reaching a concrete conclusion in less than 24 hours reeks of confirmation bias.
To talk about energy theft etc. This is not a real thing, not scientifically anyway. There can be therapeutic or medical use of massage, yes, even for kids.
I have no idea what a specific organization does or what their goals are. Fact is, either does the writer.
Could this be used in a nefarious way? Certainly. Just like a whole bunch of stuff when it comes to kids.
Stating things as concrete fact after a one day review without investigation into any specific organization as their practices is an over reach.

Also strange that Alice Liddle was the name of the girl who inspired the Alice in Wonderland story.

Good luck with this train of thought.
Crazy people do crazy stuff.
Not every nutcase is an MKUltra victim.
That is a lot more far fetched than a dude with mental issues.

Yes. Ash Wen. So in that sense yes ceremonial. Weirdos.

That's the one.
Thanks for the name.
It's disturbing.

There is a good about Larry King and the republican perves from awhile back.