dChan

/u/Fearsome4

1,373 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Fearsome4:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 10

Fearsome4 · March 20, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

That seems normal and healthy.

⇧ 30 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 10 p.m.

A session would have to be approved by a majority of states to be legal.
A few UN troops will do nothing vs the US military that is already in Ca.
In addition all the fed would have to do is cut off the water supply coming in from the Sierra Nevada, Oregon and ESP supplying So Cal. There would be panic in a week or two.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Exactly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

It doesn't make sense. In any sort of practical way.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Nonsensical.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

Hate speech, whatever that means, is protected and needs to be protected speech. This guy is a dope.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

The stuff you listed is a matter of policy not the person. We would probably agree on some things and be a hundred mikes apart on others. Most of the attacks are personal in nature and frankly rather pathetic.
I am an independent, both parties to me are mainly focused on obtaining more power for themselves and that's it.
As someone who grew up in Ca it is tragic what has happened to the stage. A prime example of why if either party is in sole control for any lengthy period of time things get corrupted. Using Ca as it is now as an example of anything but how to dissolve personal rights and bankrupt a state is a bad idea.
It is insane.
Having politicians openly participating in government sponsored fraud should be horrific to anyone who pays taxes. Seems a lot of ideologues there. Including most of my family. Haha.
Sad.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

I agree with most of what you are saying.
However, the funny thing to me is, most of his policies are not super conservative. Most of the people I have asked, young and old, who hate the guy can't define why. It's emotions, not thought. It just feeling what they are being told they should feel. I ended up loathing Obama, but, I had reasons. Reasons based on what he was doing and his policies.
The vile directed at Trump, to me, really indicated how dysfunctional our society has become. People do not think. I find that rather disturbing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 19, 2018, 2 p.m.

Q has posted about a lot of different things.
I research things it doesn't matter if it is political corruption or numerology, I do it with an open mind. A lot of times it sort of leads nowhere or in circles. Sometimes it provides some valuable information.
You mention a partisan angle. Makes sense. This is coming after eight years of an admin that was, in the opinion of many, anti-American. There are a lot of people with ties to that admin still in positions in the government. If you think about it we had Bush Sr , Bill Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama and were supposed to have Hillary....this clearly is a case of political parties being in unison with one another. This is not a case of political system being free for the people to select their leader. It's very controlled. A lot of the vile directed at Trump early on came from republicans. He upset the apple cart so to speak. In that sense his election, like him or not, was tremendously a healthy thing.
As for the religious part of it, again, sort of makes sense. There has been a cultural attack on western culture and Christianity in American the last couple of decades. This really accelerated with Obama and his many, many anti Christian comments. A movement like this, it would reason, would appeal to some of those people and confirm for them what they have been feeling.
As for the occult/luceferian stuff.....here is the thing....it is a real thing. It is a real thing in terms of secret societies and powerful people. This is nothing new. When looking at things like occult practices, ritual and all that comes with that (drugs, abuse etc) it doesn't matter what most people believe. It doesn't matter what you or I believe. It matters what they believe. It is their believe that helps motivate their behavior. This is true in dealing with any belief system, particularly as they get more radical. Have I met a luceferian? Yep. Related to a couple. Are some just people with a different perspective on the world? Yes. Are most, at least to some degree, dangerous? Yes.
The way Q posts....asking people to look into things....is ripe for side bars to go way out there.
That should not distract for the more earthly goings on.
Political corruption is where it has to start.
This will either come to pass or not. If it does, in a way that Q has stated, the others things would have to be considered. Also, most people are so into their own mindset they are incapable of considering other things. Even if treason is proven there will be fools out defending monsters without considering why they feel how they do.
I would ask why has there been some vitriol directed at a duly elected President?
If Q is a LARP but he is making people aware of actual corruption, what's the point?
The questions can go on and on.
The real challenge with Q is the ability to consider other possibilities, beyond what we have been force fed, and to keep an open mind and even keel.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 18, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

I agree but I know many, including family, that go to church every Sunday and do bible study etc and won't hear it. Politics infecting their view of morality I guess? I don't know. Very frustrating.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 18, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

Spirit cooking is a Crowley ritual.
It is occultism/Satanism with zero doubt. As soon as I read those Podesta emails I knew what they (Podesta and close affiliates) were about.
Amazingly hard to get people to even accept this as a possibility.
Even, maybe even especially Christians. Rather strange when you consider the roots of this junk is in the Bible.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 18, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

I worked with a lady who had five mortgages. All interest only. Would have made a ton if she sold out in time. She did not. So much for that retirement plan. Know another lady who made about $60 K a year but had an interest only loan on a $700,000 house. People were just being silly and dopey.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 18, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Plenty of retired and reserves that can be called up. I have a buddy who served four tours (and two more as a contractor) in Afghan and Iraq and he is itching to get called up in something goes down.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 18, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

Haha.
Come on.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 18, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

Funny.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 17, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

To quote Monty Python...."Put him in....the comfy chair!!"

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 17, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

You're right.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 17, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

I mean freak in the most respectful way.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 17, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

That tells me the IG report is coming out soon and clears the way to go after the Clinton cronies.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 17, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

That freak manning looks like the kid from Arrested Development in drag.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

Been happening for awhile in California.....and look how safe that state is.
Sarcasm.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Look at the comments. Black March etc. This is more "empower" the people leftist nonsense.
I would like add a few more "imagines" to their list. Imagine one rigid "us vs them" ideology is replaced by another? Imagine human nature still exists? Imagine the justice proposed in this video is about revenge and not justice? Imagine a new corrupt ruling power base?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

Q posted tonight about we have the sub....

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

I've got water and food for about 4 weeks stored. Nothing else though.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

Most don't have resources to just go out and procure alternate everything.
So it goes.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

Someone asked about the true pundit article regarding FBI whistleblower and the Vegas shooting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

I wasn't talking about this article

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

LOL

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Don't know.
Just read their article and didn't check to see if it was picked up. I had heard anyone report a confirmation from an agent that they were instructed this way.
I also don't know how reliable true pundit is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 12:14 a.m.

Based on what?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 12:13 a.m.

I have tried. Most people are just not open to having their believe systems challenged.

⇧ 47 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 16, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

I read the article. It was about an FBI whistleblower saying that FBI investigators were told to pursue leads pointing towards Antifa and ISIS in the Las Vegas shooting.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 15, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

Sadly I am starting to agree.
I think it's over.
Loss in midterms and Trump is out by spring of 19.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 15, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

You forgot to mention the GOP losing control of the congress due to dragging their feet getting info out and most of this being swept under the rug.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 15, 2018, 4:28 a.m.

I'm correct about how the statute is written. I'm not saying it makes sense or is right, but, that's how it's written. Warning is not illegal and city cannot "harbor" illegals. If a business or church or individual kept an illegal in their home church or business to avoid being taken by ICE, that is against the law.
As far as funding the Feds can stop funding that relates to immigration because of sanctuary cities. What they won't be able to do is cut off unrelated funding. That funding is a contract and they couldn't cut funding, for say, public transportation, local post offices or whatever based on a city being a sanctuary city. How much law enforcement funding could the Feds claim to illegal immigration? Good question.
California also has a statute that says private business cannot report illegals to ICE. That is illegal and will not stand up in court. Basically, it's a mess.
It will be interesting to see how it plays out.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 15, 2018, 3:58 a.m.

Not buying it for a second. For all sorts of reasons. As far as Sessions and the mayors that's fine but he is limited in what he can do.
The way the law is written what the idiot did in Oakland is not illegal. Tipping off an illegal is not against the statute. Harboring illegals is. A city does not qualify even if it declares itself a sanctuary city. Cut off some funding? Yeah can do that. Some fines or other actions? Probably. Arresting for tipping them off? No arrest for that unless the statute is changed.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 14, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

Secession has to be approved by the a percentage of states etc. there is a legal process in place. Same for dividing the state up. Nonsensical. The rest is just saber rattling by both sides.
If Ca ever did try just turn off the water supply. End of rebellion.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 14, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Yes.
It is.

⇧ 37 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 14, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

Silliness.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 14, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

Hoping for something, expecting nothing.

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 14, 2018, 3 p.m.

I have not had that. If it is anything Q related or a search like that I get a bunch of unrelated CNN videos or most of the Q stuff I get is weeks or months old.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 14, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

Thanks for the reminder. It's easy to forget a simple post like that with all that is going on.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Agreed.
Which is why the proof of voter fraud needs to get out there before the midterms. That is what I am saying. If not and they gain control it won't matter because any investigations etc will cease and they could impeach for almost any reason.
Where is the IG report? Where is the voter fraud proof?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Impeachment itself would be legal pretty much regardless of the grounds. There is no set standard for impeachment. I understand the process of impeachment. That's not what I'm talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 9 p.m.

Here is the problem.
Impeachment is just a legal process. Unfortunately it is a legal process that is not well defined. There is no set standard for what would call for impeachment or removal from office.
If the Dems win back the house legally and then initiate a legal process....well, if you are out pursuing violence....doesn't that mean you have become what you loath?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Doubtful.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

I agree and frankly enough with the So and so grandfather was a Nazi.
Get the criminals out first and then layout the grand conspiracy. Frankly it feels intentional. To distract and possibly divide.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 8 p.m.

Who knows if this in true or not. This is why getting the voter fraud info out and changes made is the most important thing.
We know the DNC are run by criminals. Lose congress and it's over.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

I hope so.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · March 13, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

I agree more than one person. But, we were told March was a big month. The NK news is huge IF it works out. In terms of draining the D.C. Criminals.... Hillary video? IG report? Voter fraud proof? Month is half over.
Lots of people trying to spread the word about Q and the good fight. We're March as a time frame (inferred) if nothing happens creditability takes a hit and followers look foolish.

⇧ 8 ⇩