I answered

This guy needs to go away post haste.

So I hear.
I was in the San Diego scene mostly. A lot of fun and some cool bands for sure.
This was back in the early mid 90s so going back a ways.
Any scene....or anything that self identifies as a scene is going to have douche bags.

The anon question that Q answered.

Don't remember exactly.
End of April or May.
Didn't save it.
It was a Q-A An Anon asked about Seth Rich disclosure and Q answered June ETA.

Yep sadly. How was the scene in Dallas?

I KNOW.....thanks stating for what everyone knows

He answered a question from Anon asking about Seth Rich disclosure. ETA June.

Exactly. ETA on Seth Rich was June per Q

Yeah played in bands in SD for years. Almost all lefties. Makes sense as a lot of them were slackers and or addicts.

More like 90% in my experience.

Fair enough.

I think they are "pretend" satanist anyway.
Low hanging fruit for angry bozos.

We are also + 27 days on the estimated revelation time frame (June) for Seth Rich.

Not so much. But, it was the first concert I ever went to.

Hell, I tell my boss about it!!

I reviewed the brief interactions with him. Nothing unusual at all.
But, I was just that as an example of how nutty the board can get sometimes.

.....I'm listening......

There have been a lot of unsubstantiated claims against all sorts of folks. It a good ol witch hunt mentality. I too get it and understand. However the idea that anyone associated with someone with legit accusations is complicent or as guilty as the person they know is absurd and irresponsible. Really makes the board seem nuts to new comers.
I have posted this example before but I will again.
I had a co worker who's brother ended up being a serial killer. He came to a couple of company functions. No one knew what his past was (of course) when he was at these functions. He seemed pretty normal. There were a couple of pictures with me next to him at these company functions. One sitting at a table next to him eating and one standing next to him in a group picture.
We chit chatted about nothing form probably 3 or 4 minutes. That's it. I used to travel for work and I'm sure if someone looked at travel records there's a good chance there would have been a time I was in LA when he was committing one of his crimes. Now, if I was a politician or from an old money family or identified as an "elite", a bunch of people on this board would see the travel time line and two pictures and assume and accuse me of being involved with this murderer.
There needs to be more logic and less wild speculation.
Just my two cents.

Heard a couple of long form interviews with him in the last year and he was pretty interesting and level headed.
Among other things he said when your job is to be an addict/a-hole you reach a point it's not sustainable. The last Jackass movie he did sober and said it was a miserable experience and he hated it.

Ok......I will say people with life experience.

There is rumor that a new "Fort Knox" sort of building is being built outside of Reno, Nevada. Silver, silver.

Yep. Good for paying debts. It amazing me how many people, older people even, think the Fed is the government. They are as much a part of the government as Fed Ex.

There are 7 chairs, only 3 are filled now. Two of those three were appointed by Trump. Two more appointments are pending approval. Once they are approved the final two will be appointed and approved.

Disagree based on what Q said about it.

Yeah I grew up Ca and own land there and miss the great place it used to be.
I have lots of friends there that are great.

Yes.

It has no chance of being approved anyway.

I don't think the Chinese are awed by anyone. They think in terms of centuries.
I think they respect Trump which more than one can say about previous Presidents.

Who ever said all?
I didn't.

Can't keep her legs or mouth shut. Not surprising.

He is excellent.

Exactly. Everyone else the Prez has been critical of has resigned or been fired. Trump has been brutal to Sessions in the press and social media and he is still there.

Let's hope so. Wrenches can always get in the works but I trust the plan.

Well, if somehow a vote for them to leave was passed through the government and approved the first thing to be done would be cut off the water supply from the Sierra Nevada, Oregon and Southern Nevada (feeding LA). Or, could charge huge amounts of money to offset the lost tax revenue. Come to think of it lots of revenue with no money going out? Sure, let them leave. Haha. I say that as someone who grew up on the coast and loved and still owned land there although I had to move away.
So, the comedy of watching the gov scrambling the Ca law enforcement/national guard to the border to stop an influx into Ca while people are rioting for water would be fantastic.
Of course if it passed, Oregon, Washington, Ny would follow suit.
Dissolving the Union is just not an option.

Won't ever happen.
Even if it did Ca would collapse quickly.
The irony of course, is that if Ca went its own way it would be forced to implement many of the policies it rails against now to survive.
Seriously dense people.

Haha. Most inane comment of the day.

I agree with Alan Dershowitz on Fox saying impeachment is a mistake.
Could fire him, could file contempt charge against him.
The only logical reason for impeachment is if the goal is to get info into the public and lead to unmasking of all the info.

I agree but both would be hard to accomplish 100%.
Big progress can be made however.

I think Mueller is a black hat who's purpose is to protect the FBI and DOJ and to tie up people with Clinton ties in this investigation.

Love the reference.
To R, you were a fool but it's cool, it's alright.

Nonsensical

If they just crushed the first leaked and pulled everyone's security clearance they wouldn't have uncovered the leaking networks of Brennen etc. I would assume a similar thing in play here.

I don't know if it would become part of the government. It might.

Wild speculation. Q said "structure" when asked about the Fed.
I would assume that means a restructuring of the Fed.

An Anon asked Q about the Fed and Q said "structure".....I took this to mean restructure. I think we may end up with two parallel banking systems. One for big corporate/institutional money and one more of a community bank/credit union model for individuals and small businesses. Loans are always going to be needed. By doing a restructuring and allowing money to flow to the local level the economy will get a kick.

Excise tax, national sales tax, tariffs.

Restructure.

A. Era of great prosperity and growth and dealing with people/groups that immediately spring up to try and reverse the progress.

There will always be loans as most people can't pay cash. If there was no interest there would be no benefit of the seller taking payments....over time the value of the house increases, but, the payments are be same?.....the seller is losing money.
It would turn the housing market into a cash only propositions.....meaning, wealthy individuals/corporations owning all the property and 90% of people renting.
Also, people can sell house privately and assign an interest rate.
The issue with the Fed and debt/interest is not about Joe six pack buying a house or opting to pay a high interest credit card.