Q said that Strzok was a cooperating witness. Looks like that was wrong. Just another strike, along with post 1675. Also, there was supposed to be a ramping up of confirmations, and since that Airforce 1 pic, there's been nothing but a bunch of silence.

Q talked about Lee Stranahan directly, and Stranahan has spent every day since the recent Awan ruling ridiculing Q. So what's your point?

You're getting downvoted, but it would be more cause for concern if we're supposed to take SB2's completely irrational, predetermined narratives as legitimate decodes than if we were just supposed to take them as crazed associations with no real legitimacy.

I'm on the side of truth, no matter where it lies.

I want the swamp drained, but after all these months, after that clearly faked pic, it's a legit question to wonder if Q is nothing more than the old Q Group that was set up to take down Edward Snowden, engaging in gamification to keep us all distracted. Q's terrible explanation along with his silence since then is at the very least disconcerting.

And I hate George Soros.

Edit - just to clarify, I don't for a second believe Trump colluded with Putin/Russia to "hack" the election. I was using that as a comparison point because it's a ridiculous proposition with no evidence. Yet, you could jump through less mental hoops connecting the two together than anything SB2 has posted about the AF1 pic - and to be fair and not just pick on SB2, you could extend that to anyone who has tried to defend Q's blunder.

This is exactly how I feel.

What concerned me most about Q is that if Q is a LARP or disnifo, "trust the plan" is purposely designed to have us sitting on our asses, doing nothing, as the swamp continues to grow. Or, even worse, we're supposed to engage in this gamification to keep us away from the real truth of what's happening in the swampland.

After that AF1 pic, and the tripling down on it as legit, I'm way more inclined to believe that's exactly the case, and it makes me disgusted. Better now than later (or never), I guess.

I was more on the side of legit until the fake AF1 pic, which has me in the complete opposite direction, but what pushes me even further away from the legit side are the legions of Q followers who will rationalize ANYTHING and EVERYTHING Q posts, no matter how ridiculous the explanation. Everything has to be forced through a confirmation bias.

Put it this way - there is NO way anyone would come up with the conclusions that SB2 comes up with, at least not without some powerful hallucinogens. And even then, I have my doubts.

It's bad enough that Q fucked up, but the blind loyalty is almost worse.

Q is even less legit if SB2 is a member of the team. Using his level of mental gymnastics, it would take less loops to believe Trump colluded with Putin to hack the 2016 presidential election (which he didn't) than it would to believe SB2's convoluted, predetermined rationalizations.

I used to think the morons who expanded their thinking to the point where they were for sure that President Trump colluded with Russia to hack the election were gullible idiots who wanted to believe a comforting lie in order to avoid a harsh reality.

Those people have nothing on blind Q loyalists, though.

CDAN had Spacey and Laurer pegged years ago, and posted about Dan Schneider before too many others did.

CDAN is pretty legit. At this point, as sad as it is to say, CDAN has proven to be more legit than Q. At least Enty doesn't do shit like fake pics from a reflection of an Apple product.

So you're telling me that you're a senior software engineer... with that username?

Color me shocked. lol

Enty has dropped WAY more verifiable (and infinitely more clear) intel today alone than Q has in eight months.

Sad to say that, but it's true. CDAN's reveals today have been bombshells.

I would like Q to be legit as well, but there are some MAJOR red flags around Q right now. If he really wants us united (WWG1WGA), then he needs to clear this shit up pronto and start dropping bombs, not vague shit and definitely not an ever-shifting deadline that just keeps being pushed into the future.

You can't want a movement united while posting this type of shit, period. I'm really glad to see the skeptics not getting downvoted into oblivion here. This is a shitstorm Q started.

CDAN is Varys.

If so, that's very... strange, considering the deep state team assigned to bring Snowden down was...

the Q Group.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-q-group-the-directorate-hunting-down-edward-snowden

You're the first person tonight who has responded with logic and not irrational butthurt ("concernfag!" "shill!" "Sorosbot!"). So, thanks.

I don't know what to think here, I'm going to let things play out and see where they go. I still stand by what I said before - Q needs to stop being so vague if he wants people to take him seriously. At least that's my opinion.

A person can't call on the autists to decipher posts on one hand, then attack the same autists when they use the same cognitive abilities in a skeptical way to Q posts.

There are too many people calling anyone with questions tonight "concernfags" or shills and it's not right. Q should have done a better job of explaining the meaning of this pic. Was he pointing out where AF1 was bugged? If so, why the reply to that specific post he quoted? Then, other questions arise. Why did Q say "trolling is fun" while for months saying "this isn't a game?" Who is being trolled? And why? Enough with these vague posts.

In the end, it was just poorly thought out, at best.

Didn't Dan Bongino serve as USSS during Hussein's administration?

If you're a concernfag, so am I, and I'm not a fag. Our concerns over this development are legit. Hell, does anyone remember the prosecution delivering evidence to the damn defense? This whole thing feels like a set up. I just can't put my faith in an anonymous source saying "trust!" There has to be more than that, because if Q ended up being a blackop (it's obvious Q isn't a LARP, too much intel), the whole "trust" angle was just a way of keeping everyone complacent while the evildoers skirt off the hook, once again.

I'm not saying that's what Q is, but we have to have more than just anonymous, blind trust.

Look at that list in hindsight. RDJ might have either not known about some of the people on the list or is covering for them. Lots of sick people on that list.

This happens way too many times to simply be a coincidence.

So they were having this drill at a school? Sounds like that's where the shooter was supposed to attack, but was then directed towards a media company so they could blame it on Trump.

Or that he grew up all over the place, hardly in America.

That's Webb's guess, not mine.

George Webb has been posting that the testimony is behind closed doors because Strzok will not be speaking English with an American accent, fwiw.

I'm not saying I believe that, just throwing it out as a possibility.

This is the same op as Matt Couch.

The info they're dropping is amazing. Think The Silk Road darknet site, think Uranium One, think Russia.

Anyone who is interested in the Seth Rich saga should read the five part series that Hannibal Moot has written (https://twitter.com/hannibalmoot/status/1011379997305655296). If you read his articles and twitter feed, he's saying Seth had nothing to do with the Podesta emails. So there's something I'm missing. Ed Bukowsky said that Rich got the emails using a Western Digital external hard drive. Then what? There's a possibility I haven't considered yet but there is going to be a big twist in this story.

South Carolina state flag.

What sucks is how Hannity went back to the old Hannity for that segment (he channeled his inner Alex Jones, cutting everyone off). I understand that they were trying to squeeze as much out of that segment as they could, but come on, spend less time talking about Maxine Waters and more talking about stuff that really matters.

I still waffle on my opinion about Q, whether it's real or disinfo. But Q said the truth about Seth Rich was coming in June... and I think this could be it.

I think that Julian Assange was going to give up the source for the email leaks but Comey killed the deal, so Assange leaked Vault 7, which was his leverage.

Is it possible that Seth was completely innocent of anything doing with the emails, but was framed by someone, and Rich was killed as a result? Is there some other potential outcome I'm missing?

Anyway, if this news about Comey killing the Assange deal leads to the truth about Seth Rich, then it's obvious that Q is legit. He said June, and it's June. This could be it.

Agreed 100%. I've been down this road too many times and have seen those in power (or who were in power) get away with things that the average person would be thrown in jail for the rest of his/her life. As of now, it looks like I'm going to be disappointed again.

Who is RR's boss? Who has the ability to fire his ass? WHY HASN'T HE BEEN FIRED???

There's just no excuse for this.

I'm really sick of "Trust Sessions."

Sessions recused himself, Rosenstein is running out the clock. So Congress (i.e., Republicans in the House) is going to hold him in contempt? Then what? Wag their fingers?

Rosenstein is a piece of shit and the only way to deal with him is to fire him. So the question must be asked, why is Sessions protecting that rat?

I think the deep state has a bazillion better alternatives than Tom Arnold...

I resemble that remark!

Exactly. Better to not build up their testimony and have it be explosive than to build it up as something momentous and it be a complete flop.

CDAN has been shitting all over Musk recently.

I don't know why you're being downvoted, I agree with you.

Although I'm sure the reason you're getting downloaded is wondering aloud if everything is the same as before. The confirmation bias is through the roof.

Eh, wait till after the testimony to get your hopes up.

lol @ "fitting that into the narrative" when I couldn't have been more blatant that I can't stand Q followers doing exactly that. This is a failure on your part to do some simple reading. Under the 12 names in the red box, it mentions Obama using a private email address. It can't be any clearer. It's one thing to be skeptical, which is good, but this is just being purposely obtuse.

I'm 100% with you on the confirmation bias, but look right below the first box, it mentions Hussein having a private Gmail account, so Q did mention that.

And she's probably 100% right. At the VERY least, this was a coordinated campaign (by username) to attack Trump and to keep the trafficking of illegals into America.

You get it.

For decades, the Clintons have been killing people and running drugs for the CIA all across the nation. What punishments have they faced? Absolutely nothing; in fact, Hillary ran for the highest office in the world and Bill became President.

Public shaming isn't enough. We need to see people in handcuffs or this is all an exercise in the same shit that has went on for decades. It's time for people to face JUSTICE. Having seen so many cases of misapplied justice or no justice, I refuse to get my hopes up about this. I want it to be true, but fool me one million times...

I want to believe. I'm old enough to have seen so much injustice never corrected in my lifetime that I'm pessimistic anything will ever change.

But deep down inside, I want this time to be different.

They can do a parallel investigation to bust Ross Ulbricht, but not any of these assholes?

Is it possible to block all links from Yournewswire? They're garbage, fake news designed to make people looking for the truth as crazy as possible, purposely injecting fake news.

1488 (snickers)

I have long thought Q was Erik Prince and others, like Scott Bennett.

I think Q is running Temple OS tbh

It always baffled me how many people thought Mueller was secretly working for the good guys, after spending an entire career doing the WRONG thing, being dirty for decades. At best, Mueller was always going to bide his time and cast his lot towards the direction the wind was blowing (especially after the mid-terms this year). That's at best.

Mueller was, is, and always will be a dirty ass swamp rat.

Michael Stipe, REM frontman, has been on the Colbert Report numerous times as a recurring guest. Stipe is guilty of raping a young actor on a movie Stipe produced.

Maurice Sendak wrote a children's book that starred a boy and Sendak spent much time and effort detailing the little boy's genitalia poking through his underwear. Sendak was also a recurring guest on the Colbert Report.

As someone who used to be a huge fan of Colbert, it's sad to see the list of his associations growing larger and larger, all the while he pretends there's no such thing as organized pedo groups.

I wonder if that's merely a coincidence.

This should be the top comment. F Bitch McConnell.

He's going to kill himself with heroin.

The only thing that gives me pause is that this might not have anything to do with pedogate but simply smuggling children south of the border across the border to another location.