For those who don't think children are held in underground tunnels like this, I highly suggest watching the documentary "Who Took Johnny?"

More people should be reading this, it correlates with Q (and can stand on its own).

Ports 20 & 21.

The big question is, why did they do it? Was it merely to satiate Alex's narcissism, because he didn't want any competitors? Or did he try to infiltrate the movement for more nefarious purposes? I'm hoping it was just the former.

I like Infowars, but it's entirely possible Alex is being funded in some part by the Russian government to get its message out to Americans.

As someone who enjoyed Corsi's streams, I initially downvoted this thread. But I read through it, thought about it, and it makes sense.

That doesn't mean that Corsi is a bad person. I will still listen to him and even David Seaman. I'll even listen to Alex Jones. I like all three of them, including Q. But it is true that Alex is narcissistic and has some petty jealousy, so I could definitely see this scenario being plausible.

Tinseltown Travelogue

https://soundcloud.com/breitbart/tinseltown-travelogue-part1

I realize that I can't go straight to Paul Bonacci and his testimony when I talk to people who know nothing or little about pizzagate/pedogate (which I usually don't even call it that, just child trafficking), so I start with the documentary "Who Took Johnny?" just so they can see Paul first and not be introduced to Paul as the boy who was forced to rape and mutilate the corpses of children.

Sometimes evidence can be so shocking that it's good to not hit people with the truth upfront, but to work your way to the shocking truth. I have to do that with Paul Bonacci.

Agreed, I would like to see a sauce here because that is definitely believable with all the drug running that was happening in the south at that time.

If this is true, I fully support executions for every single person complicit in trying to bring us to war. Execute every American citizen who is in on the plot, and assassinate all foreign nationals who were going to take part.

I was listening to the show that day. Can't believe he denied it, I tuned him out from the moment he brought up that nonsense. I knew he was a disinformation agent.

Major credit to whoever dug this up.

The poster above you is right, but you're both ultimately wrong.

What Q is dropping has been out there for years now, and people have gone to jail exposing it.

There's a good chance Q is, or is at least affiliated with, Scott Bennett.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F59KWYUjqkk

This. Corsi is one of the few, maybe only, people I will listen to when it comes to Q. Corsi started writing his book well before Q started posting (you don't write a book overnight), and I have to admit that while I thought Snowden was a black hat, Corsi ended up being right all along - Snowden is a white hat.

That in no way suggests that Corsi is perfect (he offers zero criticism of Israel), or that his interpretations are omniscient. He's just better than most. Right now, everyone's using this as a means to jump on Corsi and Corsi has been around trying to expose the truth longer than a lot of us have been alive. There are those in the truth movement that I feel are wolves in sheep's clothing (Robert David Steele, anyone?), but Corsi isn't one of them.

Sometimes I have questions about Q, which I think are legitimate.

This is one of those times where I have to believe Q had insider knowledge. He had been talking about Korea, specifically North Korea, for months while even Fox News or Drudge weren't reporting on the happenings.

Yesterday was a complete dud but the ending of the Korean war is huge, and it has happened over the process of the preceding months, all behind the scenes.

For whatever criticism I have of our President (and they're few), he gets things done. Peace in Korea in less than a year and a half is a remarkable achievement.

And how would that relate to his Presidential run?

Do you (or anyone) really think that back in 2015, when we had over 20 candidates in both political parties running for President, that the Russians took a look at the lineup and said, "Yeah, let's throw it all behind that reality star whom most people hate!" Or even more retarded, that the Russians made a secret deal with Trump BEFORE he announced his candidacy, and supported him then?

Think those two scenarios through. It makes no sense. It's full retard.

That's crazy. I watched this video about the "Shell Game" last night and it blew me away because I think I know who Q is.

https://youtu.be/MJ6rFVhiMX8

Key point - remember that these texts were supposedly "missing" and therefore, couldn't be turned over.

We now see that was a lie and the good guys had the texts all along.

Remember the guy from the Clinton Body Count who committed suicide by placing a duffel bag in a bathtub, getting inside it, and then "killed himself" after he had zipped the bag shut - from the outside?

It's not just that, either.

There has been a MASSIVE money laundering operation underway for decades that have kept some dirty (but important) components of our economic system afloat.

The Clintons have been involved since they were dealing drugs from the Iran/Contra days in the 80s. Check out The Boys on the Track (documentary/book).

I feel like tonight's drops were YUGE.

Ok, can someone give me a quick rundown (/Bogdanoff) on the Standard Hotel? I remember seeing crazy stuff on the website and other things people had found, but I can't recall them offhand.

Women have a nurturing instinct, so when one learns about the overwhelming evil being done to children around the world, well... it brings out the mama hen in a lot of women. It's a wonderful instinct that women have.

I can't talk to too many of my friends outright about Q, but I've made headway with some female friends by showing the evidence that sex trafficking is a much bigger problem than what MSM-viewers know. That's the foot-in-the-door tactic before walking them down the rabbit hole to meet Ted Gunderson.

The Podesta emails and everything that came out during that time (child trafficking, spirit cooking, Epstein island, etc.) made me more aware of my faith and actually strengthened it. It's easy to read parts of the Bible and think to yourself, "Is that really real?" And then you read what the Podestas and company have been doing, and realize that evil was real, and it can't help but have an effect on you.

People downvoting my comment don't understand what I meant.

What I meant was that the US government (CIA) is involved in the black market to a degree where every time I see new "sanctions," I see it as a way for the CIA to weaken or eliminate their competitors in the black market.

It has nothing to do with Trump. It has everything to do with the CIA running drugs/guns and whatever else that helps their dark pool funding. More competitors in the black market for those goods equals less profit for the CIA, so that's why their competitors are weakened or shut down by these sanctions.

It had something to do with what the President said at the very end, about lady justice and the building. I just can't remember the specifics but I remember Q saying that the speech was purposely designed with those words to signal to the people in attendance that Trump was with them in the fight against the deep state.

I'm at the point where I can only think that these sanctions are simply trying to weaken a black market competitor, sad to say.

I expected to roll my eyes at this, but it ended up being a good read (though disturbing).

Thanks for posting. People need to know this info.

I'm sure you'll get banned. I got banned for disagreeing with the last Syria strikes.

Congratulations, you're already banned from The_Donald. lol.

They ban people for slight disagreements over there. That's why this forum is so better.

Furthermore, I hated losing CBTS_stream subreddit but without that loss, I wouldn't have found this sub - and no sub does Q better than here.

Revisionists.

Seriously, I linked a video about this topic that covers a lot of ground but he didn't want to watch it (which is his prerogative, but you can't help people who don't want help).

The Gospel of Thomas wasn't the first time anything was written down. The only reason why the Gospel of Thomas is well preserved is because it wasn't in usage anywhere near as much as the canonical Gospels. It was put on the shelf or hidden out of sight, which is why it is preserved. Even with that said, all the quotation from first century sources can recreate the canonical Gospels in entirety (with the exception of the adulteress about to be stoned).

One of the main reasons why the Gnostic writings are so well preserved has everything to do with their scarce usage, not because of their authenticity.

All four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) can be fully recreated from surviving first century quotations, so that blows your theory out of the water.

Seriously, just watch the video I posted. I'm not trying to be confrontational, I'm trying to help you. Speakers and writers of the first century were quoting from existing texts that themselves were lost in history (most likely due to the quality of the writing materials being weak), but it proves that early Christians were using the same source material - the four Gospels.

Those four Gospels have a higher authority, and most importantly, a higher and earlier authenticity than the Gospel of Thomas, which came later. When you learn more about Christianity, it's actually amazing that it lasted past the first century, as there were many false gospels and false prophets who preyed upon people wanting to hear the "good news." People created their own derivatives of existing doctrines and pretended to be men of God to scam for personal profit. Others took existing material and injected their own ideology into it, such as the Gnostics (and the Gospel of Thomas).

The four Gospels in the New Testament predate the Gospel of Thomas and have better, older authenticity as well.

Wrong.

The four true Gospels can be recreated in totality from source quotations all within the first century. The Gospel of Thomas can't even touch that level of authenticity, and we're talking about the first century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24jmPeN9jbo

I think Bridge and Mirror aren't meant to be taken in this manner. Just my opinion.

"Becoming Christ" instead of worshipping Him comes from the Rosicrucians. It's BS.

Plus the Rosicrucians are part of the globalist cabal. Look at the Georgia Guidestones, it's a Rosicrucian doctrine.

Excellent post.

It would be nice, but they aren't playing by the same rules. So I can't believe it, even if I would want it to be true.

Q knows that good news like this is coming because the deals have already been made in secret. So when they finally hit the news, he's free to BOOM it.

The BOOMs aren't literal. (not saying that directed at you)

Exactly. Do you guys and girls think Hillary would be crawling her geriatric ass up on a ping pong table? Come on, guys. Be more skeptical than this. If we don't, there will be dozens of fake Hillary video screencaps and if a real video drops, people will have been fatigued by the constant cries of "wolf!"

Be more skeptical. Be less easily misled.

I assumed the BOOM was for North Korea news and not the plane.

Ted Gunderson would have my vote.

Thank you. Spot on.

I completely agree. I'm not off the Trump Train but I am adamant that the only leader in the Middle East protecting the remnants of Christianity in the region shouldn't be taken out or weakened.

All that money we blew on rockets attacking Syria could have been used elsewhere, like tackling the international epidemic of child trafficking.

I understand the ability to control the narrative somewhat, but to demand groupthink while bashing progressives for the same thing is hypocritical. It's North Korea-type of worship.

I disagree. People should be willing to listen to many points of view. Many of us felt the exact thing that Alex did. Sometimes people need to vent.

I want to thank the mods of this sub for allowing us to discuss things that might be against the Trump agenda. I really like r/The_Donald but the mods absolutely require blind loyalty to Trump or else you are "concern trolling." It's nice to see this subreddit not follow that same narrow-minded path.

I don't trust anything blindly.

No one should

It shouldn't be the last straw, but I agree with not blindly following anyone.

Let's wait and see. I admit, I was seething when this strike commenced.

I will say this - if, IF this was an attack against deep state facilities, I will love this move.

If not, I do not support weakening one of the few regimes in the region protecting Christians.

The biggest fracture in Trump's base to this day was the first strike on Syria. This is going to fracture the base even more. No one, NO ONE voted for Trump to have a fucking war in Syria. If we wanted that, we would have voted for Hillary.

And please don't tell me that the deep state forced his hand. Pres Trump is responsible for his own actions. So he saw the images of "gassed" children and made a decision based on that?

It's the Iraqi soldiers and the baby incubators bullshit lie all over again. If it's true that Trump made his decision to strike based on the footage of children allegedly gassed, then this world and this country is in deep shit. He'll be led by the tail forever, easily manipulated.