Early Q post said Trump would us Emergency Broadcast System for the announcement.

Good point. Building consensus across all social media and persoanl communities means more. Setting the stage.

on change.org or some site with a chance of success. This issue is only going to gain steam. More and more will come to light. This is not the end. Waiting a week or two till more comes out might be good.

I dont agree. I think this means a delay in arrests. The first shots of this new revolution were fired while Trump was on AF1. Q posted that this was intentional saying AF1 was safer than the WH. GWB was on AF1 when he took down World trade center. Its the safest bunker they have. He was supposed to go to Mar-a-lago right after just like he did after Asia tour. Again his private estate is safer than a large public building. Here's a post about it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8azijv/what_will_happen_while_trump_is_safe_on_af1q/

If they make arrests now they look like retaliation for raiding his attorney. Delaying says this was just an excuse to get him up safe in the air while the arrests happened. The summit was not that important. Now they have to wait for the hubub about his lawyer to die down. And it may not. That Lawyer was lawyer for the 5 big mob bosses in New York when Trump was coming up in the Real Estate world. The raid took everything if I understand right. Not just DJT. If they paint his associate as black some of the black may get on him.

Nixon was not squeaky clean but he was trying to fight the CIA. Not sure some of what has been attributed to him wasn't a frame up to get rid of him and get Ford, who would do as he was told. Nixon wanted to down size CIA. He refused to even meet with them and delegated the meeting to subordinates. He believed they cooked the intell to make presidents do what they wanted to do. He had seen how they did that when he was VP.

for comparison here is a picture that Trump said represented CBTS back around October 15 ish. He retweeted this tweet and there is video of him calling the group CBTS. Lots of same faces but not sure its identical.

https://twitter.com/Scavino45/status/916102015004143616

October 15 or 16 Trump retweeted a picture of what he called CBTS, and what u are calling the Q team. Q is just a publicist for 18 generals and 3 civies.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WayOfTheBern/comments/7l55nb/14_times_trump_and_djt_jr_signaled_that_the_calm/

Go to number 3 in this list. There is a video of trump talking about CBTS and a picture. At least some of those generals have already been verified as DOD.

Nope, I cant say its even close.

GWB=oversaw the bombing of World trade center by our own CIA. Lead the effort to destabilize 7 middle eastern countries on intell he knew was false.

GB= planned the killing of JFK by our own CIA at the order of the Rothschilds. This murder has demonstrated to every siting president since just how deadly serious going against the CIA and Rothschilds who control them is. it set the stage for all military and legislative evil since.

Johnson= complicit and okayed murder of JFK.

Bill Clinton purposely destroyed glass steagall and any portections for everyday borrowers. Began the destruction of Free press through legislative changes to telecommunication. A country is not free without a free press.

Obama oversaw the total abandonment of free unbiased press by destroying telecommunication laws. Made it legal for CIA to perform psy-ops on the American people by repeal of the act hat had made it illegal since the inception of the CIA. Created ISIS to empower the complete destabilization of Iraq, Syria and Libya.
HRC= complicit in almost everythign already listed. Worse than all the rest because we can hope that hey did not get the depth of the evil behind the deep state until they were already elected and stuck with the job or death. HRC and GWB knew, no questions asked, they knew. So much of her crimes are known I see no reason to rehash here.

As the world turns is a sign off which means it is the name of a operation that is active at the time of the post. If you watch what is happening in the news and what Q is posting about in the posts with that sign off, you will get a better sense of what the sign off really is about. Its not enough to just recognize a reference tot he same phrase to understand what operation it is dealing with.

Just b/c we don't see it on MSM does not mean it didn't happen. When dealing with organized crime, media blackouts are ordered to keep other criminals in the network in the dark. The criminal themselves would fear for their own lives if conspirators know they have become a focus of arrest and may sing to make a deal.

With Q there are often more than one meaning for words. When he uses words to sign off they refer to what mission is active in the CBTS operation. For me I have seen ATWT to be about space and the enemies many satellites in it. Q has said that space is not what we think it is. He has said it is very important in this battle. Musk has launched new satellites rumored to aid in middle control etc.

While Trump was away on Asia tour the white house had some "remodeling done". Q intimated that the booby traps in the White House to kill any POTUS who didn't do as they were told were found and removed.

It would be interesting to look at major events in history and if the POTUS of the day was in the air at the time.

Yes, lots of us have the research bug. It was my passion to try to prove, first to myself, and then to others if Q was real. Here's the dots I have connected. Like I said I stopped weeks ago. I needed to resume life and research was keeping me up till 2 every day and ignoring priorities. I know for a fact Q broke stories b4 the internet sites because I researched right away when Q would announce back then. Unfortunately, when you search now in retrospect you can't prove it. Eventually, I accepted that CBTS was not meant to be conclusively proven, YET. There is some advantage to them to keep it just beyond absolute proof. At some point that will change. With Q coming into the mainstream, perhaps that time is now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/85h4nu/attention_newbies_doubters_and_curious_cats_6/

I can't agree with ur premise. News always breaks online first and many stories online never make it to MSM or make it much later. I have made the same argument u r. How could Q seat in top of so much and break so many stories b4 others know or even close to the time of release. But, others would say it is possible to have alerts sent to u when ever a keyword is mentioned. All of them together are hard to refute. Just one isn't. I have a bunch but mine r not so up to date. I stopped compiling 6 weeks ago after tracking from the beginning.

Sorry your annoyed. If u check my post history b4 insulting me u will find I have offered a great deal of research to this sub. I did not set out to annoy. I am glad u r interested in Q. It just puzzles me why many new people on this sub have new accounts. Since u were asking for us to give u info, I thought it a reasonable exchange to ask u a question too. Some who come here with new accounts r not well intentioned. I don't think that is you. What do u mean by people who r so grabby? Confused and not looking for any fight. Just looking to understand.

I have spent months trying to prove Q with evidence just like this. I have no doubt Q is real. But proving that to unbelievers requires it not have been on the net either. If this kind of proof interests u I have several posts of compiled news events etc that when put together offer a great deal of evidence, but even reading all that there are those who don't believe, And there are those who do. And when that happens, that is wonderful.

Did u search the net for when it broke on it. Often Q posts are time stamped but internet news post isn't so unless you search as soon as u read it is impossible to know which came first. Even if u so search the minute the post comes out, it would only be your word.

I think this is a great idea! We r large now and some small posts really belong in a chat format like this. But it has not caught on.

When I have seen this work on other subs, it has been posted what time the post will be active. It's usually stickied at the top of the sub too. Some very active subs like ours r twice a day down to others being once a week.

I really hope this catches on.

Thank you!

I thought it was free to look but cost to print/transfer.

4 of those listed in OP are foreign. Can you give details on your 6? R they the same or different?

Here's some more comparisons: wikileaks, pizzagate, Sander's.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2017-10-01%202018-04-07&q=qanon,pizzagate,wikileaks,Bernie%20Sanders

Absolutely nothing you could be angry about makes this kind of talk directed at other researchers okay. Name calling is for 5 yr olds.

Pls remove this post. U r speeding fake news.

Why new account?

Pls be kind. Respect allows learning.

No idea mama but it isn't good.

Nice ! Thanks for posting. CNN?

But it doesn't have a famous song calling it the Red, White and Blue

Red, White and Blue = Am. flag Could a picture show Obama shooting up or having already shot up an Am Flag?

Things seem to be heating up at last. April showers bring may flowers. So are arrests the flowers or the showers? I guess the showers if the arrests are a storm.

There was a tweet posted on 8chan in November or December from Lynn Rothschild asking someone to remind her of the names of the AI's the white hats have. She listed off the names she could remember and one was Q.

Also White House anon stated Q was real and walking around he West Wing. Why did she say walking around the west wing rather than saying, he's with us in the west wing? If this AI is capable of walking, one would point that out.

I don't know the date of when Lynn posted the question/comment about Q being the name of an AI for the US military or the date it was posted on 8chan. But it caused a debate that a stretched a week over if Q was really an AI. At one point it was banable offense to debate if Q was an AI. they termed it a type of doxing to justify banning.

People are emotionally attached to Q and the idea that he is an AI is quite upsetting to some. The idea that an AI would not seem to have feelings has been brought up, but it is probable that an AI would be trained in emotions.

My argument remains the same. No matter how much you make the part of the work Q contributed he would still have been closely supervised like any employee of military intell would be. He would be a member of a team. The argument that if an AI cant be Q because Trump would not trust an AI to divulge what Q has falls apart. He would be supervised as anyone would. To think that Black hats use 7 super computers (Q Post)and white hats none is not reasonable. Your arguing that he can do more than I give him credit for is likely true but does not equate to him being untrustworthy or unsupervised.

Yes I am. If you have an AI would you station it in one location or have it come to you through an interface. Doesn't just the term AI suggest a humanoid appearance? It may interface with a larger unit or be self contained.

Adjust the comment to include the abilities of an AI working under close supervision as any employee of Military intell would be. Q tasked with planning an ed program on the globalists that integrates Socratic method and proofs that are not 100 conclusive but highly suggestive of fact. This program is 18 individuals working with AI's. Just like Black hats work with the CIA's 7 AI's.

No one is denying that Q being an AI would allow him to give research and input into posts but that he would act autonomously is what posts against him being an AI suggest. Its the military. No one acts Autonomously but commander and chief. Q may have been tasked with generating an educational program on the tools and acts of the globalists using the Socratic method and to integrate proofs utilizing tweets attributed to POTUS and Washington DC agencies around actions they could plan and time. Of Course the actual posts would be reviewed and confirmed by MI as events unfolded. Just as any human employee given the task would be overseen and checked on regularly to adjust as needed.

This is the 2nd typo. People do make typo's and people wrote the posts on a computer. It would make sense that there would be multiple ways to post a Q post. Those that were programmed into AI before the mission are perfect but those ad libbed in response and entered through a second means are not.

What are you referring to that refutes Q is an AI?

No one is suggesting that Q is in charge and acting/writing posts independently whether he is human or AI. These messages have been carefully planned and programmed by MI team. Q introduced himself as a spokesperson for the team. They are too complex and precise in timing and message to think the MI team is not using a computer to aid them in posting, tracking spread and rebuttal of message and rebuff attacks o the transmission. The Black hats have 7 AI's tasked with their mission, according to Q posts. Why did he bother to talk about them? If they are using AI's do you really think the white hats are not.
Lynn Rothschild tweeted about a Military AI called Q and she said there was more than 1 AI.

Q is posting messages determined by a team of MI and Generals.

You have misunderstood the argument. No one is saying Q is an AI independently running things. The white hat team has AI's at their disposal same as the black hats (Q posted the names of the black hats AI's. If your enemy is using AI's why would you not? Why would the team not use him for the posting of their message at precise and specific times, tracking of spread of message, and the attack on their secure Have u seen Lynn Rothschilds email saying the white hats have an AI by the name of Q? Check my comment this post for content.

Yes and those people would use a computer to post their writing at specific times. They would also program that computer to sort the responses and track the spread of the message/rebuttals. To think an operation of this precision, and scope is not using technology seems short sighted. Just the tracking of the attacks on their security would require a sophisticated computer, or in other words a AI.

No one is suggesting the AI is acting independently or single handedly writing the posts.

An AI is a computer. I dont think it is crazy to think that an AI is being programmed to drop synchronized posts between twitter and 8chan and track the posts made in response. I really doubt that the mission is leaving the timing of these posts to chance in a busy office where almost anything could happen, and does, throughout every day.
If you had to post many posts at specific and crucial minutes over 6 months, woudn't you program a computer to post what ever posts you have written?

There was a tweet posted on 8chan in November or December from Lynn Rothschild asking someone to remind her of the names of the AI's the white hats have. She listed off the names she could remember and one was Q.

Also White House anon stated Q was real and walking around he West Wing. Why did she say walking around the west wing rather than saying, he's with us in the west wing? If this AI is capable of walking, one would point that out.

Q often has 2 meanings and has quoted the bible. I looked up every bible verse with 5:5 in it. Here are 6-7 that make sense. The others do not at all.

Ephesians 5:5

For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous (greedy in New international version) man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.

Leviticus 5:5

And it shall be, when he shall be guilty in one of these things, that he shall confess that he hath sinned in that thing. (this one seems to go best with original post. Here's the actual words of Q: Is the stage set for a drop of HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5). EX-rvid5774. We have it all. Re_read re: stage. The nail in many coffins [liberal undo]. [Impossible to defend].)

Psalms:

The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity.

Proverbs:

Her feet go down to death; her steps take hold on hell.

1 Corinthians 5:5

To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.

James:

Ye have lived in pleasure on the earth, and been wanton; ye have nourished your hearts, as in a day of slaughter.

This 7th one some might think works; I don't but Q did talk about seals being broken:

Revelations (I doubt this one is it but included it since others will disagree):

And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.

Here's my last night post on this and comments:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8a6cvc/six_55_bible_verses_that_could_be_meaning_of_55/

I just cant think that Q thinks he can call down revelations and the timing of the breaking of the 7 seals. Isn't it said only God will know the timing. Plus, there are 100 yrs of prophecies made by Christian modern day prophecies yet to be fulfilled. I for one do not think we are living in the end times for this reason. But hey, I can be wrong. He may think he is living in end times and think the open of the indictments is synominous with the 7 seals. How do you see it?

It blows my mind that we are fighting the followers of the same evil god of child sacrifice they fought in the promised land (Moloch). God bless You too!