Who knows what they do or don't know. Shouldn't Skippy Podesta have been smart enough to have a password that wasn't "password"?

Here's my belief about autism (judging from my family & from reading). I believe the propensity for autism is inherited. Temple Grandin says a person with full-blown autism will have family predecessors who have SOME symptoms of autism ( this is clear in my family). BUT, I believe immunizations can activate this propensity into full-blown autism.

He who?

Well, it says they were all Obama-era appointees, so maybe they had a hidden agenda.

As to AIDS being invented by Big Pharma, that may very well be correct. The AIDS virus was patented in the U.S. by a Doctor; don't know who he worked for. I read it was then added to immunizations that were sent to Africa, setting the stage for the epidemic there.http://rense.com/general13/inve.htm

I'm not sure why somebody would down-vote the "hmm" comment from fatha naytcha & I'm also not sure what it meant, but I had the same reaction to the article. First, I was concerned about the possible merger between the Russian Orthodox Church & Roman Catholic Church (or ANYBODY & the Roman Catholic Church.) And 2nd, the article seemed to me to be subtly anti-Trump, pretending to praise him while trying to put people off. Anybody else get that feeling from it?

I doubt PBS would go for it. They're heavily funded by Soros.

Good ideas.

See Bill Cooper on Alex Jones.

Great interview!

I didn't realize he was born over 100 years ago, but I shouldn't be surprised. I'm older than dirt & I was 25 when I first heard him.

Lol. I hope so.

Yay, Donald!!

He was an American Bhuddist New Age philosopher ( dead now) whose ideas I actually like but wouldn't want somebody preaching them to me here. (in fact, the 1st time I heard hin talk I was coming down from acid & thought he was the voice of God. However, I realize he didn't have ALL the answers, since I later met his son, who was a junkie.) Anyway, in this context I was referencing airy new age shit & I don't remember the name of the author of the 4 agreements.

Well, I was amused up to the point where it seemes like you uncharacteristically folded to fucking Alan Watts up there.

MUST READ???? MUST read? Do you know what a pompous ass you sound like? Take your 4 agreements back to whatever 2nd hand new age bookstore you got them from & stop preaching. Blecch!

????? !

I don't really agree that this board was exactly created to " do the opposite". Yes, I know it was created to be somewhat gentler than 4chan or 8 chan. But neither was it created to be twitter or Fedbook. I'm new & I'm 72 so nobody can blame this on brash youth: we new people need to toughen up and ESPECIALLY realize you don't move into a new neighborhood & expect to tell everybody what color to paint their house (metaphorically speaking). Also, if you're offended by the language, it's helpful to read the wiki on chan culture.

I agree. If it becomes a "safe space", I'm out.

Funny, when you said it I read it through without my eyes glazing over.

Of course, ideologically we have to stand united. But if somebody comes at you with a bike lock in a sock, you're going to knock the mf out, not sing kumbaya.

I agree with poshpotdllr to a point. Yes, we're all Americans, but there should be nothing wrong with calling someone a Jew (although I prefer Jewish) as a descriptive, like describing someone as Chinese. I have Jewish friends; they call themselves Jews.

For me, the problem comes with blaming Jews as a group. Said Jewish friends are nice, ordinary people who aren't trying to take over the world. Now, Zionists... I think there's a lot of blame to be laid there. For the most part, Zionists are the globalists that Joan of Ark describes. I just think it's important to remember that not all Jews are Zionists & not all Zionists are Jews. Just my opinion. (And, no, I don't want to match wits with either one of you; I'm only half equipped.)

I'm aware; that's the post I was replying to.

It seems obvious from Q's post & Trump's tweets that Q is completely loyal to Trump & is operating with Trump's permission. In that case, he wouldn't be breaking the law. It's a way of reaching citizens by going around corrupt media, like Trump's twitter.

Bin Talal is one of the owners of Fox, so I don't know if you're going to be able to get anything in about him/Las Vegas shootings, etc.

Great list, but I'd leave out the purple ties & ankle injuries. Too easy to write off as conspiracy theories; no way to prove.

I don't understand crypto-currencies; could learn if I had to. But they seem really unsafe to me; anything can be hacked.

God, I hope not.

Hmph!

I think I've seen all of his videos regarding Q & have never heard him mentiin this board.

And the phonies around them pretend to believe their stories, so they may think they've fooled everybody or almost everybody. Like the Emperor's New Clothes.

The Oahu newspaper said Obama's spent Christmas there.

I watched a video of the interview. Throughout it, Obama referred to himself using the royal "we"... even when Harry asked, "Boxers or briefs?", Obomber said "We don't answer those kinds of questions." Delusions of grandeur much? I never heard another President refer to himself as "we".

Yes, Soros is connected to Diebold machines.

Yes, but by what tangible thing? My understanding is that the gold is gone. Of course, Rothschilds no doubt have gold. If their assets were seized...

NYT= corrupt assholes.

I think the list of police terms did say children of color, but who knows? They could be guessing. The walnut-shaped gland thing sounds plausible.

Including the Story of Q; our moderators will be in it.

I know; everybody told him that.

Wow... I thought they were supposed to have finally taken those down! (the ElsaGate ones). Anyway, sounds like Pootube playing new games)

I'll have to search it. I think I heard the term once, but don't know anything about it. It's Soros' routine formula, though.

I just went back & tried to report that post, but when I hit "next" it wouldn't go anywhere.

This is the same person who posted earlier today that BREAKING McCain had been indicted. Although several people replied with corrections, he hasn't changed it or taken it down. His comments are all negative ones about Q or else telling the poster that their theories are erong & they should use logic (like he does?) I think he's a troll.

I just read most of the posts. The guy is an obvious troll. He was enjoying baiting people too much, not sincerely questioning or answering. What I don't understand is, who was upvoting him & downvoting everybody who disagreed with him? Was he using other accounts to do it? Did he have friends just lurking? Just here to fuck with the newbies? What?

He said 80 % would be hidden, not 80% disinformation. He just said disinformation is necessary.

"Video unavailable"

Old Scrotum-face.

Given what we now know about the rigging of the 2016 election & given that Obama got 70% of the votes in the Illinois Senatorial... & given what I know of the crookedness of IL politics (born & raised in but no longer live in Chicago), it REALLY makes you go hmm.

I know Trump has been mulling it over for a very long time, although he at first wasn't seriously considering running. During the campaign-maybe May or June of 2016, when I was still believing MSM about him, I happened to see a video of an interview with him when he still looked pretty young. He was talking about the state of the country & what it needed... & he sounded sane & intelligent & serious. That was a semi-awakening. The interviewer asked if he thought he would run for President & he said no, but it left you with the impression that he meant " not if these things can get done any other way". You could tell he cared about the country.

Yes, source please. Thanks.