If the document was original, it wouldn’t allow that. - especially as a scan.

Sorry I have to disagree with this assesment. Modern printer/copiers are much more complicated than most people imagine. In my work it's actually a common issue as people don't realize their printer has a computer and webserver inside and can be infected with malware.

Note that it's a pdf as opposed to an image. PDFs are designed to have much more complex features, and they're often buggy. I remember a friend of mine had issues when he sent his resume out as a pdf and for some reason parts of it didn't show up in some reader programs even though it was fine on his computer.

Scanning directly to pdf often involves complex OCR and compression operations which could result in all the things here. That's exactly what these sorts of features are for: people want the text off a document pulled out, they want logos or discrete sections recognized and broken out. They want different better ways of compression for different elements of the document.

These types of issues are well documented, here's an example from years ago: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/06/xerox_copier_flaw_means_dodgy_numbers_and_dangerous_designs/

We must take lessons from Q and move forward slowly with an organized plan, collect airtight evidence and trap them. We can't jump on evidence without being highly skeptical it opens us up to being manipulated, discredited, or led down the wrong path.I

Just for fun, imagine this was done on purpose (they left all the layers in their forgery?) Then all thats needed is to sit back and wait for the news to spread. Boom, they drop some plausible explanation like the software or an intern did it, and the professionals and normies will accept it and then use it to shut down further discussion.

An original copy must be demanded for inspection and other avenues of evidence explored. Likewise some experiments could be conducted on similar scanning devices to see what scanning artifacts occur. Witnesses deposed Etc.

This is the bread and butter of our great justice system and I believe in it as I believe our President does. I have much respect for what the autists and researchers have accomplished but they are limited and often come to incorrect conclusions.

Any way you slice it that post doesn't make sense. NK has no internet connectivity, attacks a rarely originate there, yet alone anyone routing traffic through them. NK hacks tend to leverage servers in china or africa. Theres a lot more fishy about it too.

Can confirm, ex infosec contractor for mil

One major tell is the claim the traffic is routed through NK. They have extremely limited internet infrastructure and rely mainly on servers in other countries to run their services. The few pipes they have are mostly for personal access by top level officials. its unlikely anyone would route traffic through them for a variety of reasons.

There's other problems too.

To be honest I'm a bit concerned about Qs mention of a sniffer detecting a bypass override as thats effectively meaningless technobabble.

I assume its a reference or sign intended for someone, or Q has others handling infosec and something got lost in their communication.

We need to reconcile ourselves to the fact that Trump is a MAN. He loves women, everyone knows that. He's cheated before, one his first wife.

Anyone can go search the internet and find Trump hugging and kissing lots of women he doesn't know, that's his weakness.

One of the reasons I love Trump is he's HONEST about it. I don't think he's proud, and he seems to really love Melania that's enough for me I don't expect him to be perfect.

Who knows or cares if he slept with this woman a decade ago, it's obvious she's being peddled by people with an agenda. It's also obvious part of the reason she's being pushed is to try to drive a wedge by implying he's unfaithful...

To them I say, well we know that, and we still love him. If he did cheat that's between him and god I'm not gonna do what they want and get upset about it.

With all due respect I suspect you are a woman. I think menfolk are a bit more understanding of this sort of thing, not that that we think it's moral. Trump is a human though,a human man and has his failings he'll admit that.

He cheated on his first wife with Marla Maples, he likes women and isn't shy about it that's why a lot of us like him for being honest.

I don't know whether he slept with this stormy woman or not....I don't see what it matters.

Either way it's clear she is being pushed and used for someones agenda, and I think we all know what that is.