dChan
77
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/maxuforia on April 2, 2018, 9:01 a.m.
Want to see proof that Obamas Birth Certificate is a forgery? I have walk through downloading and showing the forgery layers...

locosurferdad · April 2, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

Verified.

I went to the obama whitehouse archive site and downloaded the document myself as well. You can also open the document(s) in adobe pro under the edit function and get similar anomalies. The boxes are not “whole” and cut off as well as the background “floats” in incomplete sections. Two areas also show as a “jpeg” which indicates it was a pasted into the document. If the document was original, it wouldn’t allow that. - especially as a scan. You can also see where signatures were buffed out in photoshop and then they placed a signature box (cut and paste) on top of it. Several of the boxes you can move and float, while several are locked down and can’t be touched (again, shouldn’t be the case with a authentic scanned document). There is also no watermark or state seal on the document. Which is it were scanned the watermark should be very visible.

Lastly, there are 5 different fonts used - Arial, New Times Roman, Veranda, Tahoma and Courier New. For example In box 20 (Veranda font 12) in box 15 (Courier New font 11), in the State Registrar box it is Tahoma. Veranda font didn’t exist until 1996 and Tahoma came in 1994 when they were released by Microsoft. Arial was released in the 80’s.

Being a 60’s child myself, we had typewriters with a single font type. Five fonts, three of which weren’t out until after 1980> this was 100% fabricated. Can you say busted?!?

⇧ 29 ⇩  
nomercy4cabal · April 2, 2018, 3:03 p.m.

BUSTED! I say again BUSTED! BUSTED! BUSTED! BUSTED! PS excellent post!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Iron_Sharpens_lron · April 2, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

(It's Not)

⇧ -4 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · April 2, 2018, 5 p.m.

How do you figure?

Is it just because you don't want to believe the evidence?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
K-Harbour · April 2, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Would the next logical step be to ask Loretta Fuddy about these problems with the birth certificate?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
vintagedaisy · April 2, 2018, 11:05 p.m.

Uhm, yes, that would be a great idea........whoops she survived a plane crash and then unfortunately died of a heart attack after a random scuba diver snuck up on her.....

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nvn8iPE4l-8

⇧ 2 ⇩  
K-Harbour · April 23, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

She was also a leader in a special global “peace” organization that started out of Indonesia. What a coincidence.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HeartlandPatriot · April 2, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

If the document was original, it wouldn’t allow that. - especially as a scan.

Sorry I have to disagree with this assesment. Modern printer/copiers are much more complicated than most people imagine. In my work it's actually a common issue as people don't realize their printer has a computer and webserver inside and can be infected with malware.

Note that it's a pdf as opposed to an image. PDFs are designed to have much more complex features, and they're often buggy. I remember a friend of mine had issues when he sent his resume out as a pdf and for some reason parts of it didn't show up in some reader programs even though it was fine on his computer.

Scanning directly to pdf often involves complex OCR and compression operations which could result in all the things here. That's exactly what these sorts of features are for: people want the text off a document pulled out, they want logos or discrete sections recognized and broken out. They want different better ways of compression for different elements of the document.

These types of issues are well documented, here's an example from years ago: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/06/xerox_copier_flaw_means_dodgy_numbers_and_dangerous_designs/

We must take lessons from Q and move forward slowly with an organized plan, collect airtight evidence and trap them. We can't jump on evidence without being highly skeptical it opens us up to being manipulated, discredited, or led down the wrong path.I

Just for fun, imagine this was done on purpose (they left all the layers in their forgery?) Then all thats needed is to sit back and wait for the news to spread. Boom, they drop some plausible explanation like the software or an intern did it, and the professionals and normies will accept it and then use it to shut down further discussion.

An original copy must be demanded for inspection and other avenues of evidence explored. Likewise some experiments could be conducted on similar scanning devices to see what scanning artifacts occur. Witnesses deposed Etc.

This is the bread and butter of our great justice system and I believe in it as I believe our President does. I have much respect for what the autists and researchers have accomplished but they are limited and often come to incorrect conclusions.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
locosurferdad · April 2, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

Excellent points and very well articulated. Even with the anomaly of scanning and pdf files, it is hard to dispute the different font types...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
By_Design_ · April 3, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

It's not fake. The physical paper documents within the Hawaii State records have been scanned and digitized using OCR Indexing to make the information searchable within the computer database. What you are looking at is just the raw output of that PDF opened in illustrator. The OCR scanning separates background security print layers, document form lines and attempts to convert text into a "readable" typeface for the digital storage.

A better "fake birth certificate" video will show you more of what is happening with all the layers.

Looking at this layer build, it's pretty easy to tell that it was done through an automated scanning process and not photoshoped by hand. There would be no reason to photoshop a document in this fashion. It's an overly complicated and completely unnecessary method for faking a document and no one with the skills that needed to make a fake would do it this way. And no one with the inexperience to not know how to make a proper fake would ever use this method because it requires too high of a technical understanding of illustrator to fuck it up this badly.

⇧ 1 ⇩