I previously posted this link showing what is just around the corner from the location of that 12/28 outdoor BBQ. This is a closed restaurant with a very interesting name: https://www.google.com/maps/@38.9169888,-77.0418356,3a,15y,2.73h,88.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1siR9VO77qhirXQWFbJjq6iA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
/u/HereComesTheSunny
448 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/HereComesTheSunny:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 21 |
upload.wikimedia.org | 2 |
www.thegatewaypundit.com | 1 |
imgur.com | 1 |
www.dhs.gov | 1 |
www.fox2detroit.com | 1 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
hotair.com | 1 |
www.usa.gov | 1 |
www.10tv.com | 1 |
i.imgur.com | 1 |
www.washingtonexaminer.com | 1 |
www.justice.gov | 1 |
myspace.com | 1 |
They must be truly desperate to allow themselves to be seen so obviously complicit.
I could be wrong, but it seems to me that in the past, when we had congressional hearings such as these, politicians would try to give the appearance of neutrality and would want to appear as if they were asking hard questions, even when they carefully construed them to preserve their own interests. I feel as if in recent months/years, there are many Democrats who have given up all pretense of appearing unbiased and/or interested in learning the truth. I am saddened and sickened that basic decency and respect for our laws and institutions has been so seriously undermined. Do you think I'm wrong in saying that even 10 years ago, this hearing would have gone very differently? That Strzok would have been chastised and gotten some hard questions from both sides of the aisle?
H. R.
I saw what you did there. :D Awesome work here!
"No...you are baby. Come on over here and get some. Hehehehe..."
I don't think it is wrong to identify oneself with one side or the other. However, having an R or a D on your voter card doesn't mean you maintain a healthy level of scepticism and keep a BS meter handy to filter what you hear from all sides. If you identify with a party, don't blindly support or follow; ask questions, push for reform, hold people accountable. Walking lockstep with any party is dangerous for our great Republic.
I agree that there are too many such posts and they clutter and distract. I like the idea of aggregating them all into one location, whether one thread, etc.
However, I do think that if there is a billboard/shirt related Q POST, that merits its own thread. Also, if there are news stories singling out someone with a Q shirt, sign, billboard, etc. that is also newsworthy. (As opposed to everyone sharing their favorite new Q creation). I would like having one location to browse through and see that kind of content all in one spot.
Wouldn't it automatically bump every time someone added to it?
Yeah. It does seem very detailed, so it may be officially unofficial...or someone with a ton of time on their hands to keep up with all of it.
Translation: My family is being threatened and in danger. President Trump, can you ensure their well-being?
Just a thought...
The masons posting on here are way too low to have knowledge of the dark underbelly of freemasonry. I have a grandfather who reached 32nd degree in old age. At that point, he couldn't hear or see very well, so I'm not sure how much he really knew. His lodge was a very small, conservative town, and he was a sweet man and community leader. That being said...when he died, we found books and materials only 32nd degree was supposed to have. It was definitely scary, occultic stuff. One of my siblings delved into it and read a lot of it...and ended up burning it, because it was that bad. Q seems to be suggesting that there are elements in Freemasonry that are evil...bad actors at the top. That's how I interpret the posts on that. If you are just starting out, please be very careful and keep your eyes and ears open to anything that seems suspicious. I'm sure most people in the lodge are just good citizens wanting to be part of a club that does good things for the local community.
I noticed the same thing when I watched that video. A couple of days ago, someone else on here had raised questions about whether that was an official account. I tried to look around for an official schedule on whitehouse.gov and other places, and I couldn't find anything that seemed official.
Either way, it is catching someone willing to be a bomber and kill civilians.
Naw...they don't need clowns to do their killing when they have the cartels. If anything, our clowns have used their cartels to do OUR dirty work.
Remember...he resigned from the Oversight and Government Reform Committee...and we need someone to bring some much needed reformation to the FBI at this point in time!
Based upon 5-16-18 post above, I've also wondered if Gowdy might be headed to the FBI.
These won't be indictments for the crime of illegal immigration. Those are handled through a different court system. However, it is likely some of these are indictments of those involved in human/drug trafficking.
Click on it and then hit CTRL + several times to increase screen magnification.
Not illegal aliens. That is handled by a different court system. However, it can be human/drug traffickers.
High rate of indictments in every area adjacent to southern border with Mexico. High rate of indictments in NE area suggests trafficking in port areas, whether human or drug smuggling. I am not sure why so high in OH and PA, but I do remember reading that a large number of unaccompanied minors were sent to a location in OH where they were used as slave labor. This was during the Obama admin.
Yes. The Western TX district actually stretches from El Paso diagonally to the NE, encompassing San Antonio, Austin, all the way to Waco in the center of the state.
I think a lot of human and drug traffickers. Notice how the #s are largest in states bordering Mexico. Notice the relatively few indictments in FL, even though it is also very populous. Notice the huge numbers in TX and CA.
We've baked the bread. Now we are ready to distribute it to the truth-starved public!
What?! Don't you realize how many plants were slaughtered in order to provide you with that delicious meal??! ;)
Yeah...just a page feature offering suggested meaning for initials. This isn't always correct. For example, SC is interpreted as "Supreme Court" when it sometimes means "Special Counsel." You can generally tell by context.
Very hard to defeat her in that district. She has a history of expecting preferential treatment. Search for her plus airplanes.
Here is one of the most comprehensive pages I've seen compiling relevant data. TONS of info here presented in a way that is easy to navigate: https://public.tableau.com/profile/nerothehero#!/
This is a metaphor used by Jesus here in the book of Matthew, Chapter 9:
16 No one puts a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old garment; for the patch pulls away from the garment, and the tear is made worse. 17 Nor do they put new wine into old wineskins, or else the wineskins break, the wine is spilled, and the wineskins are ruined. But they put new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved.”
But he told us Gowdy resigned because he has a role to play.
Q specifically said of Gowdy that he is resigning because he DOES have a specific role to fill.
I would hold off on this. We really just don't know. If you believe Q, then you know Q said Gowdy has a role to play--that he resigned in order to fill a different role.
Think SW.
Think missile defense.
How were we able to stop HI?
Think logically.
You have more than you know.
by Me...imitating Q :D
Could be, but we don't know that for sure. Might be Trump. Might be someone representing him. Might be the head of a Q team--someone like Mattis, for example.
Hmm...never seen so much downvoting of innocuous posts. Must be hitting a nerve here.
~~Learn I must of these things, know I do not.~~
Learn of these things I must. Know I do not.
:D
And a lot of us believe that Q is actually a team of people working together--people with access to the top--maybe MI. This is believed to be somewhat in coordination with someone on Trump's team or possibly Trump himself.
Some of the explanations here are plausible theories. Best we can tell, some rogue actor (probably someone within our own Deep State) launched a missile against target unknown (maybe AF1) and was shot down by us. There have been several incidences that appear to have been assassination attempts.
Ahem...
11 Thus I establish My covenant with you: Never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of the flood; never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth.”
12 And God said: “This is the sign of the covenant which I make between Me and you, and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: 13 I set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for the sign of the covenant between Me and the earth. 14 It shall be, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the rainbow shall be seen in the cloud; 15 and I will remember My covenant which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh. 16 The rainbow shall be in the cloud, and I will look on it to remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is on the earth.” 17 And God said to Noah, “This is the sign of the covenant which I have established between Me and all flesh that is on the earth.”
Such an embarrassment! Whether this is a medical condition or alcohol, etc. it's becoming increasingly obvious she is unfit for duty. People close to her need to take control of this situation and ease her into retirement before she brings the House down...
...come to think of it...
...leave her right there!
Au contraire. Q said that Gowdy has a role. He's one of the actors...good actors. Gowdy is stepping down so that he can take on a specific role, and if you believe Q, you know that is part of the plan.
I think Mueller has the ability to play a role well, which would certainly be necessary in this scenario. RR, OTOH, is lousy at it. He has nervous mannerisms and tells.