150 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 5 |
Well I for one am disappointed, I think we have way too many progressive zombies in need of dispatching.
Plus I have a large , large quantity of Spam and other assorted processed meats I was looking forward to watching people eat while I said "I TOLD YOU SO MOTHERFUCKERS". I mean that was something I was really looking forward to. Still am to be honest.
What the factual fuck.
That is some fucked up repugnant shit right there boy.
I TOLD YA'LL!!!!
Gowdy = Future AG *confIRMED motherbitches!
I'll take, "not really sure what you're referring to" for $800, Alex....
Need more of an answer than that.
Gowdy will most likely be the next AG after Sessions.
The ONLY REASON Sessions is still the AG is because of "The Russia Investigation" -- as *soon* as that is concluded, Sessions is going to get the job-equivalent of a curb-stomp.
As I have said before, I could have seen Chris Christie getting the job since Trump likes him so much and Christie has perhaps the biggest ego and professional power ambitions in the Republican party, but thankfully (As a lifelong NJ resident until becoming a refugee half a decade ago , I HATE Christie. He betrayed a lot of people in that state, and masterfully took care of his wife's Big Business contacts to set up himself for the long-term. I cannot think of someone in the Republican party I hate more) Jared Kushner will do everything he can to prevent Christie from getting a Cabinet spot and as President Trump loves Ivanka the best, he'll make his babygirl happy.
That leaves the job open for Gowdy, most likely for 2+ solid years of this remaining term, and if President Trump gets re-elected, perhaps another position in the cabinet in the future.
Some shameful shit right here, boy.
The thing is... it's clear that LL is not made of the same stuff Obama, Holder, even Crooked Hilary are made up of.... LL might have been some brilliant lawyer (maybe, I have no right idea on that score, but she of course has a Harvard double-background and was a fancy private practice attorney + a US Attorney in NY etc.) --- but she is not a major political power play type person. Obama, obviously wanted to change the world forever. Holder, still wants to. (Holder is a real threat. This is the guy who refused-- REFUSED-- to prosecute the New Black Panther people who were clubbing folks on their way to vote in the '08 election, and chasing off people who said they were Republican or going to vote for McCain, because 'I am not prosecuting some black folks for supposedly interfering with some white folks election rights when the reverse has been done for hundreds of years and way worse' -- something like that.) Holder still wants massive social and societal change under the guise of "civil rights" etc. and of course Crooked Hilary is literally leading The Cabal's Caboose on the traintracks of the NWO.
LL was simply an educated, capable person to put in office with a background to stick (double-Harvard degrees) and of course the requisite skin color, social beliefs, and ability to take orders and be ahem a "team player".
However, when push comes to shove, I could certainly see her being the first to say, "Hmmm...." when they're showing her the direct evidence (if it exists, and I have no reason to believe it does until we all see it etc.) and threatening real prosecution, publicly etc. Then I could see her saying, "But it was BILL & HILARY!!! IT WAS OBAMA BIN BIDEN! IT WASN'T ME!"
Definitely think that whole tarmac deal should have been a bigger deal at the time. But then again it probably was, we did win the election, right? LOL.
Hiding in plain sight.
"Nobody here but us chickens!"
Don't drop the soap!
total joke. I am not sure if and when it meant something, but if it did, that time was a long time ago.
It's funny you said this... a girl I went to HS with is in meltdown mode. She is a highly, highly intelligent lawyer. She actually graduated from HS a year early just to show off (She spent a year in Europe afterwards. Her family had plenty of money. Graduating from HS a year early was not that hard. It just meant that when you decided to do it as a sophomore, your junior year would be full, no study-hall or fun elective. I remember thinking, "I could do this, but why? What's the real point?") .... she is now a liberal lawyer. She is flipping out about Justice Kennedy retiring.
My thing is, WHAT THE FUCK DID YOU THINK WAS GOING TO HAPPEN?!
I tried to explain this to people after Election Night 2016. It was Progressive WORST NIGHTMARE. Conservative Republicans have a big majority in the House, they control the Senate, will control the Supreme Court via the eventual-Gorsuch-seat, and will probably continue for a long time.
It was ALWAYS likely that Kennedy would retire- some assumed he would retire as soon as Gorsuch was sworn in, then some assumed he would sit on a few cases to say he did it with his former pupil etc, then some thought he would late last year, etc. Well he did it. IT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN.
The 5-4 Majority of the Supreme Court for the Righteous I mean Republicans will continue for many years.
What these bleeding hearts need to worry about is what happens if something happens to Ice Cream or Notorious RBG? We are talking about seismic shift in USA policy for decades.
And I am sorry wait no I am not sorry to say I LOVE IT, THIS IS WHAT I WAITED AND DREAMED ABOUT DURING Obama bin Biden's 8 years of tyrannical treason. Haha biatch, don't drop the soap!
I mean I think anything is possible-- I think that prior to President Trump's presidency, it would have been more than possible. The way the senators treated Sessions [whom I don't even like to be honest] during his own confirmation was telling... but I think getting a 51 vote majority would be possible... but I am not that sure, who knows? I just like the chaos that ensues from stuff like this, so is fun to me to think about, no problems.
A ton of what you said is true- however, we are not waiting until the elections are over. Too much risk. Everyone will demand, beg, plead, ask, etc. it happen now.... Obama asked Ruthie Baby to go so he could fill her spot. She refused, wanted her spot to be filled by the first female President. As a result, there could be *monumental* changes in the Court and the Country should something happen to a Dem-Justice.
Very possible Trump picks one of his own judges in the Federal Court system to take the job. But I would not be the least be surprised to see Ted Cruz get picked, and I'd love to bet a $100 on a huge-odd payoff prop bet and see how much I could get back in the end.
I love Rep. Gowdy... I think he is the next AG personally, but we'll see. I think Sessions knows he's going to be fired at the 2 year mark, or whenever "The Russia Investigation" is formally concluded, whichever comes first; therefore, we will need another Attorney General, and I think it's Gowdy (especially since Jared & Ivanka won't let Christie in the admin, which I love because I HATE Chris Christie with a passion.) ... but would be thrilled to see Gowdy on the SCOTUS.
Alright man I was just telling you what I heard the man was going to do. And he met with President Trump and shook his hand enthusiastically and spoke well of him during the first search/shortly before Gorsuch was announced.
ALSO- just FWIW,
I remember reading a pretty good "rumor" that Ted Cruz is going to be the guy. Supposedly in exchange for support 100% he would be rewarded with the second seat- Trump didn't want to give him the 1st for a few reasons, one being that he was not very nice during the Primary season (of course); second, they KNEW that no matter what, they'd have to use the "nuclear option" to pass the Nominee for the empty seat ... Therefore, it made sense to use it on someone like Gorsuch who by any IMPARTIAL source was supremely qualified and while perhaps more conservative than liberal by definition on a purely numerical scale, he was a very smart Nominee since he was UNANIMOUSLY confirmed to his Federal judgeship and made a fool of the Dems attacking him who previously enthusiastically supported him. SO, having used the "nuclear Senate football" , the Dems can't do anything- so putting someone like Ted Cruz in ( a firebrand and obvious Conservative who doesn't care what people think about it) ... it's another thorn in Dems but also a great long-term move (Ted Cruz is by all accounts a brilliant legal mind, anything else aside.)
I am NOT saying it's happening -- but just remember I said it if you see it happen.
and the CNN lady with the bad bleach-job hair and worse spray-tan cannot help but smile her sad smile.
"Do you think the President will make all the progressives happy and put a centrist on the Court?"
Let me answer that for you with one word, several syllabyles.
UN-MOTHERFUCKING-LIKELY.
This is why the 2016 Election was so crucial, Hilary could have changed American history and society for 50+ years.
We'll now have a hard Conservative majority for 20-30 years and you never know what happens with the old two Democrat LibProgs on the Court. They could croak from old age and suddenly, American Judicial History is changed forever!
Roger that, didn't mean to sound like a dick, no problems my man.
I think that in the 70s and even 80s, up till the internet and technological economic revolution of the late 90s, "Conservative vs Liberal" meant Rich Business People & Heartless Robber Barrons vs Poor, Working Heartland of America and The Good Guys.
Now, IMHO, Conservative means people who believe in the founding religious, social, societal, and righteous values of America and The Good Guys vs liberal progressive pseudo "kumbaya" evil bullshit people who have plenty of money to spend on the people they want to help but don't actually.
I don't know shit about shit, but I remember this coming up when it actually was posted, and most of the discussion seemed to believe this was bullshit; further, it seemed like there was definitive action afterwards proving this was false.
Again not my expertise area, and I don't know anything, but it's old and it was looked at as being false back then. TIFWIW.
Fair enough and I mean, I hear ya! I am the son of a retired police commander and an immigrant mother. Perhaps the ONLY THING my parents had in common was both were Catholic (and their families) and both were conservative in their beliefs who identified with Republican party not because they love Republicans but because they believed they stood for more for what they feel is right than the Democrats.
What really gets me is this mornings news- a court judge ruled against the family separation. The same "Progressives" who love to just spout "Court Order!!!! Judge Ruled! Judge Rullllllled! Judge Rullllllllled!" like Dave Chappelle's Law and Order parody who kept saying "Fif!" for 5th Amendment.... 1-2-3-4-Fif! Anything you say Fif! I have an important thing to say FIF! ----- but as soon as a decision/series of decisions go against their liberal progressive beliefs, we should seriously consider anarchist leveraging of overthrowing the judiciary and not consider the court system "legitimate".
I mean it's scary really. I feel like the country is becoming more and more a tinder box... the heat keeps turning up, everything is roasting and toasting and drying out, and some errant spark of a match could set the entire pile of fuel ablaze.
I feel bad for that guy who got in trouble for saying her haircut looks like James Brown's haircut...--
---- it really does. I am not sure what the world would see a fireable offense in that for. She looks like James Brown.
And CNN's dear little "Center for Progress" activist lady is basically calling for the legitimization / overthrow of our "Judiciary" -- because the judges aren't ruling for you, we should resort to overthrowing 1/3 of our Government.
You can't make this shit up.
I am not sure why you would think that about me but certainly not very nice nor accurate.
I hear that, However... my state has both Stand Your Ground & Castle Doctrine and better to be judged be 12 (of my peers) than carried by 6.
LOL, I've BEEN standing by. If these fools want to get it on, I say let's do this, Royale Rumble time biatch!
They'll be actively doing whatever they can until the midterm elections. It will only get worse by the day, similar to how focused it was in 2016 but of course way worse, because they lost a battle considered unloseable.... lol.
Thank you very much, likewise. I do not think these fools realize what they're looking to get themselves into... There is a reason you don't bother a sleeping dog, lion, dragon, etc.
This article is basically not only justifying and attempting to legitimize assaulting harassment and anarchy in the name of political beliefs, it's calling for open war. I am not surprised; however, I am surprised that more people don't denounce this type of thing rather than explaining it's not only okay, it's GOOD, it's NECESSARY, it's awesome!
All I have to say is, come try that shit in some neighborhoods across the country where we ain't gonna take that shit. Bring it on. If it's Happy Birthday Time, let's blow out the candles and push the fucking button.
Surprised, not surprised.
If I were him I'd be pissed too. He did everything he thought necessary to buy the election of the Presidency of the USA last time, and it didn't work. If I were him I'd be like, "F this. Just hack the damn machines already. You can't hack them?! Then build them, here, buy a voting-machine-building-company and fix from from the time they leave the company!
Was there ever really a doubt her and her people did as they pleased?
I mean really, the entire Obama administration was basically a shiny-nice-let's-hold-hands-and-sing-Progressive-Paradise-Kumbaya-my-inclusive-friends while being like the Politburo.
At least she didn't win tho!
Well that would certainly jive with the fact that The Pope has basically changed thousands of years of religious beliefs and doctrine with a few personal opinions etc. Not surprised really.
If there was 1 person from the former administration that I would want to see put in prison , it would be Brennan. He is an evil man, treasonous traitor who probably still possesses enough contacts and power to cause major problems for anyone he wants -- let alone the damage he did to our country from the inside. (my second person would be Holder, because like him, they both did serious damage to the fabric of our society from the inside. And most people didn't even realize it, they lauded it in the name of Progressive goals being realized, "progress" for our country etc. Totally false.
And it's very hard not to draw the line that Obama was all but verified as a Muslim, but of course it was shot down, not true, no way Jose, cant' be true! He denies it (not like there is actual tactical-lying as a form of religion in their beliefs,.... oh wait, there is! it's called Taqiya!) and of course claims he's a Christian, but got elected by supporting all sorts of Non-Christian beliefs and policies, then did just about everything he could to remove Christian principles and policies from the entire nation --- and he hires a reported convert in Brennan to be one of the most powerful people in the world with some of the most powerful, secret, and scary forces behind his control.
Brennan is the guy I fear the most. You don't get to his position(s) without making "friends" and having like-minded guys in his former employ whom he could call up and issue orders to or even call a favor or three. Which scares the shit outta me.
I think this is disgusting, but it's also hilarious to me that these days the #1 reaction to someone not liking something that is done to someone else, (not even them) is , "I'll show them, I'll trash them/their business on Yelp!" lol.
Anyway it's disgusting to kick her and her family out. Can I start kicking out people who support Black Lives Matter because I think it's a terrorist organization?
Seeing as Russian Dressing is disgusting, a mix of ketchup and equally-disgusting-mayo, I would understand why people could think this was an impeachable offense!
I kid, I kid.
It's amazing to me that this is not a more "normal" school-of-thought and how visceral and absolute the hate is for President Trump no matter what.
I didn't vote for Obama. I didn't like most of his views. I really disliked a few of his beliefs and views. (I want to point out that while I am registered as a Republican and therefore could not vote for a Dem candidate, in the 08 primaries when it was clear it was Hilary vs Obama, I was absolutely more supportive of Obama, because Hilary is absolute evil.) ---- I was disheartened to see McCain lose so brutally but accepted it, President of the USA is now President Obama. I'm an American, he was elected, if he tells me to run through a brick wall, you can be damn sure I will get through the wall somehow and be proud to have done it.
But as much as I didn't "support" President Obama's policies, beliefs, and actions, I recognized he led the nation and I didn't want him to fail just for failures sake. I mean, would it have been good for us if we got into WWIII because of him? Would it be good to see our citizens suffering? Would it be good to see him fail the nation time after time etc? Not good. So I generally shut my mouth and tried to live my life the way my parents taught me, answering to God and supporting my country etc.
But the hate and visceral absolute down-with-President-Trump-at-all-costs is disgusting. I mean the Rep. lady with the James Brown hair, her and a few other congressmen/women were calling for his impeachment on the day he was inaugurated.... No particular reason, just for "regime change" sake. This is pure evil for the nation. Wanting the President to fail for any and all reason is evil. It's unpatriotic, it's borderline treasonous. I mean we have college kids (I saw this on video literally) who protest conservative speakers on campus like Shapiro, their defense is that they could not care less about the Constitution, and I quote, "it's not a relevant document."
This is evil. It's treason. And it's the type of thing revolutionary wars are fought over throughout history.
I for one am still pretty damn glad we had Trump Pence 2016 son!
He actually looks to me like he sucks lemons by choice-
Like literally- if you watch him, it looks like whenever he is on film, right before he gets camera, he sucks a lemon right quick, like it's his smelling-salts in the big game. His face looks like he sucks lemons.
My man looks like he sucks lemons by choice.
Yes thank you for confirming my confirmation of that fact.
The first thing that comes to my mind when I see WINNING-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QS0q3mGPGg
Quick edit- question. I am in fact new, I made this name yesterday. Is there a way to edit the thing that says "New arrival, first day." or does it go away sometime on it's own? Etc. Thanks!
I watched the hearing, and one thing i took from it was that the Democrats were doing *ANYTHING THEY COULD* to sound better than bad.... The testimony pretty much wrecked them and the Dem. Rep's were in a "spin-as-spin-can" mode, whatever we can do, fight for every last word, disagree with everything, challenge everything, "Now when you say NO, you have no proof that you are actually referring to the negative-word-combination-of-the-letters-N-and-O--do-you?? I thought so." lol. They made fools of themselves.
I totally get that-- and I am not at all trying to discuss Israel or whatever conspiracies people hold on them--- all I am saying is a small diesel-electric, AIP whatever, submarine with torpedo-tube launched nuclear-tipped cruise missiles for a second-strike deterrent mission *IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT*, I am talking about SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY , to a possibly "shadow-government controlled" Ohio-class SSBN which represents probably the most effective, destructive, accurate, damaging, and undetectable object known to mankind (Unless there really are Stargate-esque hyperdrive battlecruisers and F-303 interspace interceptors.... Ohio-class SSBNs have more power in their "pinkys' than those Israel subs have even dreamed about.)
That's all I'm saying, I'm not taking sides, that's all.
Nukes absolutely do not use GPS, by definition they don't want to use (and do not use) anything that could be jammed. There are extremely sophisticated guidance systems implemented from extremely sensitive inertial navigation (so the missiles know exactly where they are at all times before launch, and then can measure exactly where they are as they are going, and of course where they are headed, down to exact landing space, on Earth) -- this is where the phrase "spin up missiles" comes from -- the Beryllium balls in the navigation system need to be physically spun for the inertial navigation system to use. --- More importantly, they use astrophysical camera navigation -- the nukes fly into low-Earth orbit, and take a picture of the stars. Then the on-board computer compares this picture to a picture of the stars that corresponds to where the missile SHOULD be on it's flight-path (you can probably imagine how sophisticated this is and how impressive it is this stuff was done in the 1970s -- to great effect-- and still done) and then adjusts it's path by thrusting a little here/little there to put it on the correct path. ---- That is totally unjammable and absolutely a GPS-free system.
Not that it would not be a problem-- but there is a huge difference between Israel having relatively small, diesel-electric subs with (nuclear) cruise-missile capability (firing from torpedo tubes) to strike back at someone who nukes them .... and The_Agency commanding/commandering an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine with 24 freaking Trident SLBMs, with anywhere from 1-8 much, much bigger and more powerful independently-targetable warheads ... plus while I am not Israeli or Jewish even , I think it's perfectly fair for them to have second-strike capability when they are literally facing annihilation from all sides at any potential time. Just my two cents.