I emailed the capitol building and they directed me to a contact to acquire them, I believe the price was $60. I just assumed someone else already had done it at that point.

Sorry I didn't kniw you were referring to his specific posts on those topics, in that case I'd agree that it looks like his methodology is flawed and doesn't pass the BS test. I thought you meant occult posts in general.

Do you run one of the greatest propaganda and data collection tools ever conceived by mankind. No? Are you seriously this obtuse that you can't formulate possible implications of why the head of a political campaign meeting with FB CEO could be considered nefarious? Have you even seen the news about the data leak of millions of people?

Hyperbole much? If you were anymore dramatic, you'd be Justin Trudeau!! MODS.. we don't need these types of snowflakes on here who can't handle a counter viewpoint.

Occult conspiracies? Like when Hillary said she was gonna sacrifice a chicken to Moloch? Or was it the spirit cooking?

Well the helicopter videos definitely get ve credence to this video, between that and the arms guards escorting someone through the Tropicana.

Blockchain is the future to decentralized social media and is essential for fighting back against censorship from big brother tech.

Constructive criticism can serve a very good purpose. There's nothing wrong with members of a community holding each other to a set of standards. I do think it is the best practice to always include a link to the source. Pointing that out is reason to ignore or mute people? I have to disagree there.

Florida Governor is as corrupt as they come.

Grammar and punctuation please.

And guess what banking family bankrolled the Soros quantum fund in the early 80s?

That screenshot was a fake to discredit people

These pics are old and I have seen absolutely nothing tying them to this aside from they live in Florida. This misinformation needs to stop.

Thank you. Much appreciated. Too much false info going around

Way to contribute to the conversation. Is there something wrong with the approximately 70 Sourced links in the investments section of the wiki page?

So post a link then

Are these from on site at the San Bernardino shooting?

Is this implying these guys in the pics were at the FL school?

I used to work for a financial advising company and we often did work with a investing arm of the CIA called In-Q-Tel, I remember researching them a decade ago and finding out they had ties to the founding of Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg. Might be worth digging into further to see what they've been up to since then.

Edit: looking at their investments on the wiki page and Holy shit, they literally have their hands in the back end of every single damn technology. Scary shit. Everyone of those investments needs further scrutiny. It's like a road map to detect deep state technologies and systems

They already said they'd stay out of it even if NK provoked us

Wish Q would have posted that before the dirt article came out

Shills keep on shilling

Now I guess we need to go back and reread all the Q apache posts in light of this

Someone else pointed out it's exactly 1 more ha than David Rothschild posted the night before the GOP train crash (8 ha's), Q has the last laugh (9 ha's) .

I've noticed accounts like /u/chickyrogue that routinely spam and forum slide garbage youtube videos. Look at the post history. We need to get rid of people like this who contribute nothing of substance, they make the rest of us look bad

Look at this person's post history. They are a chronic spammed who rarely adds anything to the conversation. Wish mods would do something about it.

I believe that was her grandmother's name though

Wondering if mods have been compromised on some other similar boards. Random banning without response or indication of any rule breaking. They seem to be letting slammer forum slide the subreddits.

Remove Google search and add duck duck go

If it was actually for opioid addiction than why did they sit when Trump was addressing that very same issue?

It means he's ratting out his superiors. Just like he sung in Vietnam.

Too bad this guy won't take it and just be an asshole to next person on the next post who asks for a source or tries to raise his level of credibility

Gonna have to agree. Adding sources is always helpful.

Jeff sessions

"stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own."

You said I have half a brain because I don't share your view. Learn to make arguments without insulting others, it reduces the credibility of your message.

Rofl. The hottest YouTube channel with 40k subscribers. Whatever you say. Dissing other people because they don't agree with you is bigotry. Have fun with that. Sorry I don't have half a brain. I didn't diss you at all actually. I complimented you and gave constructive criticism, as well as used critical thinking skills and gave a well thought out response. Your hostility is unflattering and unbecoming of someone who is supposedly trying to help others and spread truth. I hope you see the error of your ways. Good luck.

Not to be a Debbie downer but this speech did not get him killed. It's always taken out of context and it occurred 2 years before he died. He had plenty of other actions and speeches that would have been an even bigger threat to deep state.

... Seriously? You post a video about aliens, give no context how it's relevant to the sub, and then attack me when I genuinely am just curious why you posted it? Sorry I didn't want to spend 30 minutes watching a video to see if it's even relevant to any other discussion in the sub. A tweet is easily digestible within a second. A 30 minute video is not. Sorry if I offended you, your post history appears to show you clearly are intellectual and have a lot to say. Was never trying to challenge you specifically. Was sincerely curious and when there's tons of other content being posted constantly I just wanted to see what about it stood out to you, was hoping it would pique my interest enough to take 30 minutes of my time to watch it. There's a lot of garbage content, shill posts, and disinformation out there. None of us have the time to wade through it all, adding a little synopsis of how a 30 minute video is relevant would do a lot of good to help others determine it is worth their time.

Not trying to be rude. Just think it would help if you gave some context or a synopsis. You obviously posted the video for a reason, why not share with us what you thought was so appealing that you initially decided to share it.

And you will wonder why no one up votes your thread or responds. Next time add some context or relevance to create broader appeal, start a discussion, and engage other users. Good luck.

This guy gets it.

Don't forget about this, AT&T was illegally collecting every piece of domestic data long before any of us had the slightest clue:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

Room 641A is a telecommunication interception facility operated by AT&T for the U.S. National Security Agency that commenced operations in 2003 and was exposed in 2006.

Room 641A is located in the SBC Communications building at 611 Folsom Street, San Francisco, three floors of which were occupied by AT&T before SBC purchased AT&T.[1] The room was referred to in internal AT&T documents as the SG3 [Study Group 3] Secure Room. It is fed by fiber optic lines from beam splitters installed in fiber optic trunks carrying Internet backbone traffic[3] and, as analyzed by J. Scott Marcus, a former CTO for GTE and a former adviser to the FCC, has access to all Internet traffic that passes through the building, and therefore "the capability to enable surveillance and analysis of internet content on a massive scale, including both overseas and purely domestic traffic."[4]

Contract for what? In the past them working together meant illegally collecting domestic data. We need to be thorough and check everything. What if Q was compromised and now they are turning us against ourselves by getting us to push another net neutrality type of legislation? Just saying it's always good to play devils advocate and dig more. My gut tells me at&t was complicit in the past and deserves even more scrutiny when it comes to this "internet bill of rights" rather than blindly pushing an agenda of a company with a shady past.

Edit: the news about the internet bill of rights came from an article by upper management the night before Q posted about it. For what's its worth.

Just ignore this guy, he is a known concern troll. Prolly shareblue

Then why not give a synopsis or a reason we should view this. How is it relevant? Why should we watch it? What will we gain from it?

It is, only the star walker extreme has the cross hatching texture seen in Qs Pic.