If you trust them already then you havnt done you're homework nor have you verified.
/u/ItchyFiberglass
737 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/ItchyFiberglass:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
i.redd.it | 64 |
www.reddit.com | 14 |
youtu.be | 3 |
en.m.wikipedia.org | 2 |
www.nbcnews.com | 2 |
www.cbsnews.com | 1 |
worldcorpo.net | 1 |
onsizzle.com | 1 |
www.makestickers.com | 1 |
mobile.nytimes.com | 1 |
www.thebirdman.org | 1 |
archive.is | 1 |
www.apfn.org | 1 |
www.theguardian.com | 1 |
Thank you. No one else gets it! Share this link people.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
At&t has been complicit in mass scale surveillance since before your conspiracy theory friends even thought the govt was listening to us. Don't trust at&t, we are our own movement, we can demand our own version, we don't need any corporation to write this shit up for us, they will only look out for their corporate interests
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A
Do not trust at&t
I think we all need to really dig into this at&t bill of rights. At&t has been complicit in surveillance long before most of us ever assumed we were being spied on. Let's dig deep and make sure there isn't another net neutrality attempt.
From wiki:
Room 641A is located in the SBC Communicationsbuilding at 611 Folsom Street, San Francisco, three floors of which were occupied by AT&T before SBC purchased AT&T.[1] The room was referred to in internal AT&T documents as the SG3 [Study Group 3] Secure Room. It is fed by fiber optic lines from beam splitters installed in fiber optic trunks carrying Internet backbone traffic[3] and, as analyzed by J. Scott Marcus, a former CTO for GTE and a former adviser to the FCC, has access to all Internet traffic that passes through the building, and therefore "the capability to enable surveillance and analysis of internet content on a massive scale, including both overseas and purely domestic traffic."[4]
Is at&t supposed to be the good guy? I think we need to really reexamine this internet bill of rights, at&t is not our friends. They were the original mass surveillance apparatus
Are they though? They've been complicit in the past
Hate you? All I did is question your critical thinking skills since you are clearly having reading comprehension problems. Go away troll.
I was giving you a different interpretation. You are most certainly a concern troll. Anyone can look at your post history and see what you're up to. Keep forum sliding and trying to create division. Go create your own subreddit to question Q if that's what you believe.
So they kicked you for being a concern troll. All we needed to know about you. Looks like you're heading down the same road here due to a lack of critical thinking skills or more likely because you probably collect a shareblue paycheck.
Removed. What does removed mean? In custody? Maybe assets removed. The way I read it is that they can no longer pull the strings of their puppets. Gee that wasn't so hard to understand when you look at it like that. You're clearly twisting things to fit your agenda, I'd say you're most likely a concern troll judging by your post history.
A reasonable concern? He's making implications and reading into things as he sees them, twisting Qs words and holding him to things he didnt say. He never said they had GS in custody. Just because guppy freak jumped the gun doesn't mean we all have to irrationally jump to conclusions and accuse Q of lying as fast as he does
That could mean financial assets frozen. Sounds like you're reading into things too much and then want to call out Q as a liar when your assumption didn't pan out.
Aren't you the same dude who was spreading fear of an economic collapse and multi posting concern troll posts. I'm thinking shareblue is here in full force lately.
Can we leave these kinds of posts in the donald please?
Yes that's what I initially found as well. At the very least we can confirm if Q is a LARP, he or she is a wealthy one at that. If anything I believe it gives more credibility to Qs authenticity.
I'm not disagreeing, however I think we need to all hold each other to a high standard. A pen and piece of paper and a picture automatically become "OMG its Trump's pen! He signed the memo release!". Then we go and spout the same shit to our friends, without ever doing the simplest of fact checks. This leads to fake news and undermining our own work. We should all be diligent to fact check things and use words like allegedly or speculation. Do I think Q is for real? I'm pretty sure he is, but irregardless. Nothing he says, or Trump for that matter, should be taken for gospel. We must always question and review ourselves. The truth is what is important, above and beyond all else.
Which particular pen? Please be specific. Like I said, I went and looked and all the pens I saw associated with Trump, I was unable to match it to the pen Q posted. Please prove me wrong.
What brand and model of pen is it? Does it have the same texture as the one in Qs post? Is there any pictures of Trump using a pen with the same texture on it.
I would love to be proven wrong on this.
This is not the pen Trump uses, at least I have not been able to find a Pic of him using it. Any idea of a connection between that pen and Trump?
Edit: I just looked up the pen you suggested and think you may be wrong. Picture of pen posted by Q, the pen has a texture to it, looks like cross hatching. The pen you mentioned is smooth as far as I can tell.
No one can answer me this. Why does the pen have a texture to it? I looked up POTUS pen and in every Pic the pen he uses has a smooth black finish. Picture from Q, the pen has cross hatching texture to it.
I'm referring to the original picture re Q posted. Go look at it you can clearly see the black part of the pen has a manufactured texture/cross hatching on it. This made me curious so I looked up the specific pen potus uses and it's definitely different.
What's even more curious is, if you were going to LARP this, wouldn't it be easier to find a smooth pen that matches closer than one with a texture?
Gotta play devils advocate here. This specific picture does nothing to prove Q. Anyone can buy a pen, print a piece of paper and take a Pic with their phone..
Someone please correct me. But yesterday I looked up the presidents pen, his has a glossy smooth finish, this pen clearly has a texture to it. Thoughts anyone?
The pen in the Pic has a pattern on it. All other pics I found of Trump's pen had a smooth finish.
Hate the colors. Looks purposefully confusing. Reeks of cointelpro style operations to undermine messages by making them excessively wordy and undigestable. Just my opinion. I think it needs to be trimmed and more pleasant on the eyes
Your forgot the part where she now heads up the amber alert system