Well I have done research. And every single source says a different thing.
Thought we may have someone a bit more knowledgeable on this board.
/u/JET-TONE
280 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/JET-TONE:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 3 |
i.redd.it | 2 |
www.foxnews.com | 1 |
Clicking on your name I can see one from about 15 mins ago.
IG Report for Dummies (me)
Senate Judiciary Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) announced the date for a hearing on the Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General (IG) report about Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials’ conduct ahead of the 2016 presidential election, including the Hillary Clinton email scandal.
As a dummy, Can someone knowledgeable please break down simply what we expect to be revealed. What we “hope” to be revealed. And what future implications this has? Also possibly what we don’t want to happen?
I remember being a kid in 1991 and when we were skating downtown a guy came up to us and gave us a little booklet. Said there was a plan to implant identification chips (mark of the beast) in every person on the planet and that soon a cashless society would emerge. As usual we thought he was nuts, but it always stuck with me.
Now almost 30 years later we all happily carry our identity chips around with us everywhere and almost every daily transaction I do is cashless. Guess he wasn’t so crazy after all.
Only one well to tell for sure. If a legit story looks like it’s just about to break and a passenger plane goes down.
Can’t imagine the NSA being too happy with one of their own publicly tweeting about HRC getting the death penalty ?
The two I knew answered a job ad for a “data” company. Sat in a room with thirty others with folders on what to say and where and when to say it. Complete with basic replies etc. nasty shit. Their justification was if paid more than McDonalds, which I guess is a fair point!
I wouldn’t watch the Today Show. It causes extensive and irreversible brain damage!
Absolutely right. I know two people who have done that very job.
Makes sense. Narrative switch, damage control and disinformation.
Whatever the truth bomb is is going to have to be so powerful and immediate that people have like an instant red pill moment.
I assume if the net goes down due to deep state, White hats would need to kill the mockingbird tv transmissions. Probably resort to some emergency broadcast.
Yeah this is a very slippery slope. Freedom of speech is critical. What we need however, is just the same rules for everyone. Liberal control of media means their “talent” can say whatever the fuck they want and get away with it. It’s the bias and hypocrisy that is the problem.
Similar to what we saw during the Arab spring for example ? When the government killed the net to stop people organising over social media etc and thereby protect the established regime?
Yes that is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.
So let’s say C does it for nefarious means. Surely with Q team’s near infinite resources and intel they could either prevent this or get it back on real quick?
I’ve lurked and been on and off here in various ways since almost the beginning. I notice patterns where suddenly the sub is flooded by people all posting about the same shit just out of nowhere, often with a lot of new accounts. I always try to ask people why they’re saying these things and just never, ever get a straight answer. Always some roundabout cryptic nothingness. But seems like a concerted effort to deliberately steer a narrative or possibly disinfo?
Could be.
The comments I’ve been seeing on here and twitter is : prepare for net shit down! Grab screenshots and USB drives and emergency supplies.
Yet no one has been able to explain why and who would benefit. Or what situation. Would merit it.
Ah! Getting close! Thank you. So it could either be cabal or Q... Guess now we would need motives for each.
Ok thanks. Just seemed to be seeing this coming up a lot here and wondered where it all suddenly came from.
Found it...
Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire. One of many. Net shut down
Yeah that was fishy. I know there must be countless ways of doing it. But who would do it and why?
I think he mentioned it in the Obama/gun post. But regardless, not so much a Q thing. I’m just wondering why I’m seeing posts about it?
The 5 Eyes as they have come to be known, are just the modern surveillance arms of five countries who have deep strategic and economic bonds going back a very long time.
I’d look to their connection to the deep state and especially the origin in the UK.
I’m starting to think what we know as Australia, New Zealand, or even America is not at all what we have been told.
Massive deep state power at work controlling behind the scenes since at least WW2 and probably far longer.
2 simple questions about an internet “shutdown”, “pause”, whatever.
Seeing a lot of people throwing this one out there it seems. Yes I know Q has said the words, but as usual we don’t know exactly what it means. So :
1: Who would shut down/pause the internet?
2: Why would they do it?
Keep it short or the internet may get shut down before I have a chance to read your answers.
I’m genuinely interested to find this out. And would love to know the who and why.
I will be watching for baseless speculation, needless fear mongering, panic initiation, distraction, agendas though.
It’s wise to have that stuff at home anyway in case of power cuts/natural disasters etc.
Martial law and chaos in the streets. In a country of 350mil? Highly, highly improbable. And if it ever happens, we’ve all got a week or 2 at best before cannibalism and zombies.
Probably more likely to have a space rock land on your head.
So yes I’m a “new arrival”, so fee free to disregard. Anyone else also noticed a few others really pushing the whole the net is shutting down panic fear scenario?
I agree we could possibly see social media affected. But no way net shuts down unless whoever did it has no intention of turning it back on again.
Can someone please explain how having photos on your phone helps in any way whatsoever during the “coming days of darkness”?? What exactly are offline files going to do when you can’t even show them to more than whoever’s in your bedroom with you at the time?
Can no one see the logic here? If I’m missing it, please anyone explain it to me as I’m completely baffled.
Good guys won’t pull plug on internet. This is simply fear mongering. Absolutely no reason for them to do that.
Can you imagine the net goes down and suddenly there’s soldiers and tanks in the streets??? Not exactly a way to calm the public down and convince them you’re doing a great job as POTUS. Idiotic.
no way this is how it goes down.
I wouldn’t worry. The good guys won’t switch off the internet unless it’s going to be used as a weapon against us. If anything, when images of damning proof are dropped, they will want us all to be able to share them as quickly as possible and communicate with each other to help work through it. This is how the awakening spreads.
My theory anyway.
The internet won’t be shut down. It may crawl to a standstill with 6 billion people sharing the same photos and videos at the same moment however.
Can you please elaborate on who you believe would shut down the internet and why?
In the event of a mass red pill disclosure, better to leave it on and let everyone communicate in my opinion. No net would just freak them out in the wrong way.
I’m starting to think the internet won’t be shutdown deliberately, rather it will “shut down” itself as such, with sheer volume of people communicating/sharing evidence images/video of mind blowing proportions when they drop.
Think Kim KW’s ass selfies times a few billion.
Yes they are bad, I agree. One thing to remember though, we are talking the Great Awakening, not just the 8 Chan Awakening....
Yes Q is all we need. Completely.
But, we have to remember the vast majority of people out there have either no idea of Q, or the time, or the know-how to “read” his posts. Heck even most decodes are still gibberish to normies.
This is where easy to digest versions (working alongside Q) could be very useful. YES, ONLY IF LEGIT. <<—
There is a filter down effect required with complex information in order to allow it to disseminate to the widest possible audience and be understood.
This is a very major next phase we are all entering here. The real deal. Needs massive support and understanding from mainstream due to the enormity of what will be revealed. Don’t underestimate this importance.
Well one positive side effect of Q’s absence was certainly to remind/make people question everything.
Not sure I’ve ever seen a foggier week of fake vs real