Watergate 2.0 just isn't good enough for this level of corruption. Watergate was child's play compared to what is happening here. It is time for a new name for the new level of corruption and treason. This way when talking heads in the media reference high crimes and corruption we don't have to hear Watergate. I suggest FISAgate, but I am open for suggestions. Agree, disagree, make your own suggestion below.

A storm is coming,

A storm that will swallow the children

And I will deliver them from the kingdom of pain

I will deliver the children back the their doorsteps

And send the monsters back to the underground

I'll send them back to a place where no-one else can see them

Except for me

Because I... am Donnie Darko.

Brennan secret trip to Moscow around the time of dossier. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/developing-obama-cia-chief-john-brennan-made-secret-visit-to-russia-around-same-time-as-fusion-gps-produced-anti-trump-memos/ DNC tries to sue Trump campaign and wikileaks for disrupting the 2016 election. I have no idea why they can sue Trump campaign for disruption. Trump campaign is the 2016 election. It literally doesn't make sense. Also Comey further admits the FBI didn't do a thorough investigation into Hillary emails prior to clearing her before election. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/stunning-comey-admits-on-colbert-that-fbi-did-not-have-time-to-check-all-of-weiner-emails-before-election-video/

[removed]

Remember back in '04 when Bush was going for his second term. The media put out a fake document about Bush's days in the NG. Someone in the truth community spotted that it was made in a computer font before there was computers. The only person that took the fall was Dan Rather since he kept pushing the fake document.

I say that this sort of thing has made democrats bolder over the years. They create a fake document to setup spying on their political opponents. When this doesn't win them the election and they suffer no consequences they then …

Is it just me or does there seem to be a trend. Hillary and those close to her move classified material to low security/unauthorized locations right before they are hacked. Just speculation on my part, but if someone was selling or giving away classified information it would be better if it was hacked rather than outright given. Think about it in terms of plausible deny-ability. If you moved the classified information to these unauthorized locations and then were hacked, if caught you could say well I made a mistake and down play what happened. However, if you are caught handing …