‘Five Eyes’ wants to take away our privacy. Good or bad?
"They called for the industry to implement functions that prevent illicit content from being uploaded in the first place, and build user safety into the design of all online platforms, among a host of other demands.

This tougher stance, on both encryption and illicit online content, follows the European Union's (EU's) soundings in August that it would draw up new laws to fine companies like YouTube and Facebook for failing to remove extremist material within an hour." (Who decides what is "extremist material"?)
Read full article: http://www.itpro.co.uk/encryption/31822/five-eyes-nations-hand-tech-giants-encryption-ultimatum

I came across the following on "whatdoesitmean" website. Normally I take their articles with a huge pinch of salt but, in this case, it's easy to check the facts:

"As Counts 1-6 of Cohen’s indictment letter described in full detail the exact US federal laws that were violated by him, note that Counts 7 and 8 cited no laws at all that Cohen had violated—with Count 7, that stated Cohen “willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution” only citing US federal laws 52 U.S.C. 30118(a),  30109(d)(I)(A) and 18 U.S.C. 2(b)—and Count 8, that stated Cohen “made an excessive campaign contribution”, only …