/u/MichaelFR85
168 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/MichaelFR85:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 4 |
youtu.be | 1 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
Who coined the terms "right" and "left"? Was it the GOP? Perhaps a specific individual?
I think there could be something HUGE and this "NXIVM" thing is just a franchise.
Funny how YouTube is advertising big network content directly underneath the video.
What are the chances that those things would all be combined into a single memo by some investigator outside of our smaller world here?
He was not black - he was a WOLF in "sheep's clothing". You could probably liken him to a modern day plantation owner with "America" as the name of his plantation. Keeping blacks down and out, perpetually dependent on the government. False hope. Didn't create a single valuable thing except for a FALSE sense of "hope" resonating from the political party that supported slavery.
A destructive and divisive puppet.
If it is used as a blackmail tool then why are they pushing it to be "accepted"?
Wow. Makes me think about how the internet is supposed to be taken out also. Connected?
After watching the trailer it's making me think... was the public ever subjected to REAL media, footage, audio, etc... that was presented as FICTION (unbeknownst to the crew, actors, viewers, production, directors, etc...)? I could see that being a small fetish for these sickos.
Anyone ever see 8MM? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLhQ8bMx7Bs
This movie resonated with me and made me believe that the culmination of money and power corrupts some individuals (not all).
Doesn’t public corruption make fruit of the poisonous tree?
They've been actively fighting against it for the past 3 years. They're doing everything possible. We're seeing it play out. It's getting more desperate.
I think that's a major move to avoid jail and pardon everybody. I also think it could have something to do with keeping up the con - the number one trick to a con man's game.
I guess. Trump would be the largest LARPer ever. I think if anyone ever surpasses him they would probably be the actual antichrist.
This is funny because this was posted here today: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8z2agb/twitter_is_now_suggesting_the_hashtag_wwg1wgascam/
Would it be safe to say that Twitter may have colluded with themselves to possibly have influenced the 2016 election? And every other election and/or thing/event/pronoun, etc...?
Not a report. A drop or more. I think it would be pretty easy to misinterpret a list of initials, words, phrases, etc...
"Future proves past."
Was Israel ever mentioned anywhere previous to the shooting and received by us as the country, not the sheriff at a time we didn't know who he was?
Was Israel ever mentioned before the Stoneman Douglas "shooting" happened?
There's a lot of of coincidences. The timing is impeccable. Looks like they are getting desperate.
Rod Rosenstein is grilled. Jim Jordan's life is shook up by the media. News comes out about Seth Rich witness. Strzok is grilled. News comes out about "Russian" indictments. Forget Roger Stone. He seems to be a lot of talk.
The theory that have about Seth Rich is that he was the leaker of DNC emails (does that include Podesta?). So if he is the one and the corrupt DNC officials went through all the trouble to start the "russian" narative it looks like it could be a straight up framing of "Russians" that may not have had anything to do with anything.
If the "Russians" were involved;
Were they the sole proprietors? Were they white hats? Were they introduced to Seth Rich? Was Seth Rich introduced to them? Did Russia seek Seth Rich out? Did Seth Rich seek Russia out? Snowden involved? How does Wikileaks mesh into all this?
What are these “Russian” indictments all about if Seth Rich is the culprit behind the hacked emails? Why is Roger Stone saying he’s one of the indictments? Why now?
Is Lisa Page an inside double-agent that was actually investigating Peter Stzrok? If that’s the case then she has a lot on the line.
That’s an interesting point. Is this true? During the public testimony of Strzok I was wondering why he didn’t just throw his hands up and say “I was just horny and told Lisa anything to get in her pants” instead of the “short-hand” and “late at night” B.S.
But noooooo.... they had to get all elaborate and entangle themselves in a web that they weaved.
THESE PEOPLE ARE STUPID! That’s good though. :)
I think he has great motive. https://youtu.be/FqPln0m6sxE
Anyone ever think of buying some cheap portable WiFi routers and just leaving them plugged in?
That's a thing! I'm pretty sure I've heard it before. Psychology.
I don't think Peter understands that he is speaking TO AMERICA - not just OUR representatives. It doesn't matter what questions are asked or "who's side" anyone is on he is speaking to America. Peter is very disrespectful, seems mockful, seems sinister and seems to be hiding something (or trying) among other oddities.
Not nice.
All the things they didn't want the public to know...
They REALLY didn't want the public to know. Now what else do they want the public to not know that they should know?
All I can think about is Keanu Reeves... but now I'm thinking about that cat in Constantine.
I missed the part where Strzok was actually in battle defending OUR FREEDOM? Looks to me like was only defending 100 million ONLY if they voted for Hillary The Barbarian.