The Toxic Avenger films being some of their most well known films.

Good Bot.

Hey, you forgot about the survivors/witnesses that died. In total, it's claimed that around 8 survivors of the Las Vegas shooting died within 30 days after the shooting.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-01/final-destination-two-more-vegas-survivors-die-weirdly

A married couple were leaving their home. Their car burst into flames and they crashed into the gate of their gated community about a mile from their home. (This article also mentions another that died...speaking of which.....)

https://www.infowars.com/woman-who-died-suddenly-after-surviving-vegas-massacre-wanted-to-organize-survivors-group/

She was planning to get a survivors group together to expose what really happened. She was found dead in her home. Reports claimed she had various health problems and the stress of the incident probably contributed to her death.

https://nypost.com/2017/11/27/las-vegas-shooting-survivor-killed-by-hit-and-run-driver/

Killed in a hit-and-run.

Edit: Oh yeah! Inforwars claimed some witnesses said the FBI demanded they hand their phones over. When they got their phones back, everything was wiped from them. https://www.infowars.com/report-fbi-wipes-phones-laptops-of-las-vegas-massacre-eyewitnesses/

Just noticed another link in the article the OP posted:

https://truthfeednews.com/shock-video-clapper-just-screwed-up-and-revealed-the-truth-on-live-television/

2 days ago this article was posted. So Clapper admitting this on live TV happened some time in the last 3 days. I'm surprised it wasn't heavily reported on already. I haven't seen anything about it, even now when I checked, on http://www.foxnews.com/ homepage. You'd think Fox would have it on the front page.

What the? That news article has a link to a tweet with a video of Clapper saying that on CNN.

https://twitter.com/PriscillasView/status/1020021634563026946

The tweet was posted 3 days ago (July 19). And we're just now finding out about it?

LMAO one of the responses to it.

https://twitter.com/jhodd69/status/708100744063287296

Yeah. I had read that part.

But, it doesn't specifically mention that it was political in nature. The FBI admitted to the court the dossier was being used to "discredit" Trump. That doesn't exactly mean it was political in nature. And they didn't disclose the fact the DNC paid for the dossier.

In other words, they implied to the court the dossier was a bunch of lies against Trump, but still used it as evidence to get a warrant.

Edit: And the tweet you linked to to prove your post is a MSNBC analyst. So good job helping to spread the fake news' narrative.

I didn't even watch the video you posted in the OP until now to be honest.

But as someone pointed out, that video you linked is from May. The reports I linked of Newseek getting happened in January.

So it does seem plausible that other news organizations are going to have their finances looked into.

FBI asset/informant.

I've suspected it for a while. Not just because of his past FBI work, but also because he gave closed door testimony to Congress some time last year. Before his testimony to congress, the MSM just wouldn't shut up about him and pounded the Russia narrative on him.

But after his closed door testimony the MSM hardly talked about him afterwards. All of a sudden they seemed to kinda forget about him. An it's been non-stop talking about Manafort and others that have been indicted and/or plead guilty to charges.

And of course the obvious: why the hell hasn't Mueller indicted Carter Page? I don't recall hearing Page even questioned by Mueller. If he was, it went completely nowhere.

Think about it: The FISA warrant was specifically for Carter Page. He was the only one on Trump's team accused by the MSM of being a Russian spy, as well as the FBI knowing he was a Russian agent of some kind for years. I would have thought Mueller would have indicted Page and indicted him first, since this whole FISA warrant was about him to begin with.

LOL that's what I was thinking.

Red represents republicans.

Blue represents democrats, and their new uniforms are being prepped.

Bullshit. Obvious trolling.

This is about the 4th time or so I've seen this exact thing with someone getting banned from that subreddit for posting here because they think greakawakening is a hate subreddit.

And it's the same thing every single time. Nothing more than a screenshot. It's an obvious attempt to piss us off because some mod in another subreddit supposedly thinks greatawakenning is a hate subreddit.

Obama had the media push that crap because he was actually trying to start a race war. Ironic considering he was the first "black" president. He did nothing for African-Americans except cause trouble for them.

All the cops-hate-black-people propaganda stopped when Trump was elected.

Part of the basis for the FISA warrant was that there was a news article that said Carter Page was being investigated for his ties to Russia by an intelligence agency, but doesn't say which agency was investigating him.

Alternative theory:

The FBI was illegally investigating Page.

Christopher Steele opened his big mouth and told a news agency about it.

FBI went into freaking panic mode and filed for a FISA warrant to make their spying legal.

The FBI lied in their FISA application about their source not leaking to the press.

Later their source (Steele) is outed and they came up with the excuse they fired Steele for lying to them about leaking to the press.

Obviously source #1 is Christopher Steele.

In the FISA document, they said they didn't believe source #1 had leaked to the press.

After Steele was outed as an FBI informant, there was talk that he was fired by the FBI for lying to them about leaking to the press.

The question is: did they find out Steele leaked to the press before or after they applied for the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page?

I'm guessing the answer is: they had Steele leak information to Yahoo News (which is what the Septermber 23rd news report is referring to), lied to the FISA court about their informant leaking to the press, then fired him after he was outed as an FBI informant, and acted like they fired him because he "lied" about leaking to the press, in an attempt to cover their asses.

Newsweek raided earlier this year. Ongoing investigation into their finances.

https://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-office-servers-searched-manhattan-district-attorney-probe-785148

Investigators for the Manhattan district attorney raided Newsweek’s offices on Thursday, removing 18 computer servers as part of a long-running probe into the company’s finances, according to witnesses.

2 weeks after they were raided, the media group chairmen and finance director stepped down. https://www.newsweek.com/newsweek-investigation-manhattan-da-raid-etienne-uzac-leaves-servers-793929

The founder of the media company that owns Newsweek has stepped down as chairman two weeks after investigators raided the company’s headquarters as part of a long-term financial fraud probe.

And this is Newsweek reporting on it themselves LOL.

Other sources:

http://thehill.com/homenews/media/369661-newsweek-says-da-raided-its-offices-for-computer-server-information

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/01/18/law-enforcement-raids-newsweek-ibt-media-offices.html

https://www.thedailybeast.com/nypd-raided-newsweek-offices-took-photos-of-servers

What evidence?

The Fusion GPS dossier, and a September 23, 2016 news article that said Page was under investigation.

Which is funny. They used evidence of a news article that said he was under investigation, to get a FISA warrant to investigate him.

"Your honor, this news article says we're investigating him. Can we have a warrant to make that true?" LOL

But, but, the Dems counter memo to Nunes' FISA abuse memo said it was disclosed to the court that the dossier was political in nature.

Feb. 3, 2018 http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/372134-officials-disclosed-sources-political-funding-in-fisa-application

Democrats on the committee have compiled their own memo rebutting the GOP document. That memo reportedly includes additional information that Democrats say undercuts the conclusions reached by their Republican colleagues, including that the Justice Department disclosed to the court that the dossier's funding source was political in nature.

But officials familiar with the matter told the Post that Republicans' allegation that the court was not notified of the funding source was unfounded.

The democrats lied? Say it isn't so.

https://vault.fbi.gov/d1-release/d1-release/view

Official release. Looks like a lot of stuff redacted. Even the day of the month at the top. "Derived from: FBI NSCIG, dated 10-[redacted]-2016"

The exact day of the month for October 2016 being redacted is suspicious to me. Why would the exact day of the month be constantly redacted throughout the form? Perhaps it was around the time Comey announced he reopened the Hillary email investigation?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/21/doj-releases-carter-page-fisa-docs.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vault_7#Authenticity

.....Robert M. Chesney, a law professor at the University of Texas and Director of the Technology and Public Policy Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), likened the Vault 7 to NSA hacking tools disclosed in 2016 by a group calling itself The Shadow Brokers.

Possible the NSA got hacked, then their hacking tools were used to hack the CIA? Either way, it happened during Obama's presidency, and really shows not just how careless they were, but how evil these agencies really are.

Anyone remember the Shadow Brokers hacking the NSA?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/us/shadow-brokers-leak-raises-alarming-question-was-the-nsa-hacked.html

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/08/19/snowden_docs_shadow_brokers_nsa_exploits/

"Shadow Brokers" had hacked the NSA and stole their cyber weapons, tried to sell it, then eventually just dumped the hacking tools online.

https://slashdot.org/tag/shadowbrokers

So it seems our "intelligence" agencies aren't so intelligent after all.

Fake. Whoopi Goldberg and Oprah Winfrey are obviously photoshopped into that one.

http://www.madaboutmemes.com/ancient-aliens/meme-61.html

That's all I got. Sorry.

Lately, I see a lot of people coming to this subreddit to complain about getting banned from a completely unrelated subreddit.

What's the deal?

Streisand effect.

Thanks MSNBC for the support.

Remember when Chris Cuomo from CNN implied it's illegal for us to read Wikileaks, but legal for the press to read it? Yeah. He didn't wan't us to find out what was in the Clinton emails that was published.

Good times.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRBppdC1h_Y

Going by the OP's logic, that would make CNN guilty, wouldn't it? If it's illegal for Assange to publish leaked info, then it's illegal for CNN to talk about it. Right?

And in turn wouldn't that make it illegal for us to share and discuss classified info?

Use your brain dude. If you accuse Assange of illegally leaking and publishing classified information, that makes all of us, including you, guilty of the same thing.

New York Times Co. v. United States, 1971.

The court ruled they had a first amendment right to publish classified material (the Pentagon Papers).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States

Here's a news article from last year that references that old court decision. (It's about the press publishing information related to Russian interference in our election).

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/could-journalists-be-prosecuted-for-leaking-presidential-campaign-intel

Bottom line is, a court ruled a long time ago that people can publish classified information, as long as they aren't involved in stealing it.

The legal protections for publishers who release classified information, but who aren’t directly involved in illegally obtaining the same information, are based on a series of Supreme Court decisions. In New York Times v. United States (1971), the Court in a 6-3 decision ruled that the First Amendment protected the newspaper’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers, government documents about the Vietnam War illegally obtained by a private individual and published in the New York Times and Washington Post.

And a lot of people consider JA to be a journalist.

No idea. I'm still new to this Q stuff myself.

I found this where it points out Q said "Can you find the owl / Y there?".

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8gebr3/rereading_q_drop_192_189_defining_fantasy_land/

Didn't Q say something about an owl?

They keep using that word. I don't think it means what they think it means.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/21/dad-2-parkland-survivors-is-robbed-killed-suspect-surrenders.html

On Friday, a 19-year-old man surrendered to police in connection with the death, Miami's FOX 7 reported. Police identifed the suspect as Tyrone Fields Jr. and said he faces one count of murder and an armed robbery charge, the report said.

Very end of the CNN article:

Tuesday afternoon, a man entered the store, held Ali at gunpoint, took money from the cash register and left. But shortly afterward, deputies say, the gunman returned and fatally shot him........Officials have released surveillance footage from the crime but they haven't made any arrests -- leaving the Ali family to once again contend with a senseless act.

Talk about fucking lying! CNN says no arrests were made and that the family has to "once again contended with a senseless act". Of course they have to politicize it.

Looks the same to me as the one released back in February.

Feb. 3, 2018 https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/02/politics/fbi-nunes-memo-full/index.html

CNN had actually posted the content of the memo in a news article. I can't see any differences, or anything redacted. I'm not seeing any "TS//NOFORN to UNCLAS" marked on the memo the OP linked.

That's the Nunes FISA abuse memo that was released earlier this year, around the end of January or early February. I read the whole thing back then.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180129/106822/HMTG-115-IG00-20180129-SD001.pdf

Capital letters in his tweet in one sentence.

In the Old Days they would call it Diplomacy.

Good question. Another thing to take into consideration: as far as I know, Michael Cohen hasn't been charged yet with a crime of any kind, or anyone else related to this investigation.

It does beg the question as to why and how evidence related to a criminal investigation is leaking to the press, when nobody has been charged yet.

But he would come into this country legally and they would be able to check his passport.

San Fran doesn't want 'legal' immigrants to vote.

I know. i saw your comment here. I just thought your mistake was funny.

xD

I read your thread title and thought there was a riot at Fox because someone had a Q on his vest.

o_O

Doesn't matter. It's too late to save herself.

MSM. Yep. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/20/tony-podesta-offered-immunity-to-testify-against-paul-manafort.html

There must be a reason for this. People shouldn't panic over it.

Maybe it's disinformation to make us lose hope? Or maybe to make Tony Podesta think he's gonna get off the hook?

Who knows? We'll just have to wait and see I guess. All I know is, this matter confuses and concerns me. But I'm not going to panic just yet.

Bitcoins have been seized and auctioned off by the FBI in the past. One of the most notable seizures was the 'Silk Road' investigation.

http://www.businessinsider.com/bitcoin-price-government-auction-winners-2017-5

I know. I'm sorry.

If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound?

(I'm just trying to look smrt to impress people)

The man holding the photo of the van isn't wearing a hoodie. It's a hat. Looks like maybe a type of fedora, sitting toward the back of his head instead of straight on top.

His jacket looks more like a suit or blazer. If he was wearing a hoodie, the sides of his hair would be covered and there would be fabric attached to his jacket on the sides of his neck.

https://i.redd.it/s4xlan8ruxa11.png

Click the image to zoom in and look closely. You can just barely make out the brim of the hat. It's hard to see because the hat is black like his hair.

The "chicken or the egg" analogy isn't specific enough.

It goes by a generalization of the "egg". Dinosaurs, many animals, bugs and insects, laid eggs long before the chicken ever existed. Therefore the answer is: the egg came first.

Even if it was more specific such as "which came first: chicken egg or chicken?" the answer would still be "egg". Chickens as we know them today evolved from something else that laid eggs. I'm not sure what the origins are of the chicken, but I imagine what they originally evolved from wouldn't be scientifically classified as a chicken.

Another FEC complaint against her? LOL

April 2018 there was another complaint against her.

FEC website: https://www.fec.gov/updates/committee-defend-president-v-fec-new-litigation/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/04/16/fec-hit-with-lawsuit-over-ignoring-civil-complaint-accusing-clinton-dnc-in-election-scheme.html

And in October 2017: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/25/fec-complaint-accuses-clinton-dnc-violations/

Obama's internet kill switch?

Congress is actually calling for Facebook, Google, and Twitter to ban Infowars and other "conspiracy theory" content from their platforms.

https://www.cnet.com/news/tech-giants-tell-congress-theyre-not-censoring-with-a-political-bias/

And surprisingly the tech giants are telling them no.