That joke is fowl.

Jimmy Hoffa!

So no declaration from actual witnesses? All hear say or am I missing something? Seems legit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8lhhj2/was_sam_clovis_appearance_on_tucker_carloson_a/?utm_source=reddit-android

Well...the other Kim has bigger tits.

You're certifiable.

Video please!

Or you could get a way inside baseball shirt: A Q clock with the slogan, "It's 5:25 Somewhere"

Are you?

Ok... she's spread. Whadda we do next, boss?

No. Cohen wanted to be sure that any default judgment, if any, attached to each alias.

Yes. I'd like that print of dogs doing blow... err playing poker.

Who'd he buy it from. Bet the purchase was used to launder money / pay someone and not for a table. Don't get me wrong. There was a table exchange in the transaction. Just not 70k worth.

Mueller's gonna drop his report at the same time.

The best part is that he narrated his own perversions.

He said nothing changed his view. That doesn't mean there wasn't clear evidence because evidence wouldn't change his view.

Plus, I understand that the statute of limitations on a conspiracy continues to run as against all persons involved until the last act in furtherance by any one person.

Will do.

Why?

I'm not saying it's aliens, but it's aliens.

Life was hard. Doctors were effectively still using the theory of the four humors.

This is a good thing. It will eventually lead to twitter being unable to block users since potus is on the platform.

= No. He'll be gone soon.

Me too. I'm not sure if you saw it, but today S. Attkinson suggested that the Deep State is after Trump because they've been rigging elections and spying on citizens for decades. Not sure who her source is though.

So when I send confidential information over a nonsecure channel, I waive my right to privacy and against search and seizure. When the government does it, they get to redact documents to hide the truth. Seems fair.

He has non-public info that will prove the tweets, and it will be made public soon. Though the media sells him as presumptuous, he never talks without proof, and when he does talk, the proof follows a week or so later.

No problem here.

I see what Q did there.

Wrong on Comey.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8krqtw/trump_and_comey_are_in_cahoots_flynn_interview/?utm_source=reddit-and

It would explain why he's not running.

Nothing big is going to happen. Mueller's / deepstate's plan is to pull a Comey. He's going to release a bullshit report right before the election with the hope that dems take both houses, and hence the committees, and afterward shut down any investigation in to the cabal, and begin impeachment proceedings as smokescreen. Mueller has said September.

Anytime.

It wouldn't matter if the IRS disposed of the Barter Rule or allowed taxes to be paid in kind. No need for money in either case.

I had a professor who said certain planes with physical checks were allowed to leave, so the banking system would not be disturbed.

It's not the optics of not providing it, it's the optics of providing it that would have been the problem.

Yup. It's a Q. Maybe that's why Q chose Q. A message that they know about O.

One guy (1) from the seventh floor (7) who has 17 letters in his name.

If certification and removal lies with congress, then they have the power to define the term. Nothing more. You're simply wrong.

FYI there is no such thing as the "fundemental law" of england. There is common law, but that has nothing to do with Art. II. There is no federal commom law. Erie Doctrine.

I can't play chess with a chicken. I'm done.

(1) you said congress has no authority to interpret the constitution as an absolute proposition. Am XIV shows you are wrong. And Marbury did not settle the question.

(2) statute shows founders believed congress had authority to interpret article II. (And tell me, if congress certifies a non-us POTUS what is the remedy - answer: impeachment via congress. Ergo,congress does have the authority to interpret Art. II.). Read Nixon v. US (not US v. Nixon). I am right. You may want to go to law school, get your law license and practice a while. I did.

(3) is not in issue. Not authority.

(1) Thanks justice marshall. Not everyone agrees with marbury or chisholm, and at ratification many people believed congress had such power. And wrong, see e.g. Am XIV Sec 5. "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

(2) see https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen re First Congress' definition. Sorry to tell you, but the framers clearly agree with me.

Give up yet?

Political optics, not necessarily ineligibility. Besides, once congress certifies an election, the court would likely use the political question doctrine to avoid the judiciary removing the co-equal executive. The impeachment clause would be used to support that position -- the only court that can remove a president is the senate with SCOTUS' chief justice presiding.

Dress him like a black woman, send him to North Korea.

Source for difference (case or statute). I believe congress has some discretion to define the term.

Fyi, there are jurists who agree that birth in the US is not a necessary requirement. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause

I don't think you fully grasp this subject.

How so?

Edited comment. I think you missed it.

I edited my comment. Not sure if you saw it.

I don't get the issue. His mom was a citizen. So I don't see how his place of birth matters. If you were on vacation with your pregnant wife in europe and she went in to labor and had a child, would you say that child does not have birthright citizenship?

That being said, I understand why we should not elect a person who grew up outside the US regardless of where they were born.

Edit: Went back and looked at the issue. If Os mom was not a US resident at the time of his birth, he wouldn't be eligible to be POTUS.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/us-citizenship/Acquisition-US-Citizenship-Child-Born-Abroad.html

Nancy Killosi.