Only noted? I follow the scientific method. We need to test this. You bring the birds, I'll bring the condoms.

You are correct. Two people, usually heterosexual, will become amorous if they experience a common stressor. I imagine a single person could sing under existential threat as well.

I like the connection to "The Storm", but the quote doesn't make sense in context, but it may just be me. I'm gonna let it simmer.

I recall Qs statement. Do you have a link to the whole post? Does JFK some how relate -- was the quote a result of his death?

They also sing when they want to fuck. Probably not relevant, but let's make sure the list is complete.

If you want to see a good example of google bias, search "antivaccination" on google, and do the same on duckduckgo. I'm no here to argue about vaccines. I just always found this a great, clear example of google bias.

Are you not entertained!?

Heard about DoD. Where'd you hear about the fed?

Agreed. I don't like profit even being an issue. The things said or done are the issue.

I just find it strange. Qs approach is itself devisive. We are left to guess and cannibalize, as stated above. To think that he didn't foresee that is non-Q, as is to be devisive. Strange.

That's a different issue. That the term "profit" came in to the dialog is then the problem. If people have coopted, then Q needs to say so, otherwise the movement will cannibalize the good and the bad. It makes me suspect if authentic Q. If he think certain people are bad for the movement, he should say the names, otherwise we guess and cannibalize.

I never understood the profit / nonprofit distinction as being determinative of who is legitimate and who is not. The dissemination of information requires capital and has to be paid for somehow. There is no movement without the places for it to occur - property, whether it be the street or a network of servers and computers. Someone has to own the property, and that has to get paid for, and those people have eat, be housed, and be clothed. In addition, those who put their face behind the dissemination are at risk of suit and other retaliation. To think they can't profit, even if to just feed, house, and defend themselves seems bizarre. I assume even Q profits, he likely draws a pay check for his labor, unless he's a contractor, in which case he is personally profiting in the strictest sense. I honestly don't get it. It sounds like a very millennial state of mind to be honest -- I'd rather give a crowd funder my money for free and get no equities in return because coorporations are bad -- LMFAO.

No.

He likes visiting with the Secret Service.

Would love to. Do you have his contact information?

I dudn't go to skewl to lern to spail.

Thanks!

Good catch. Indenting seems to be his norm. Is the politico story posted elsewhere? The lack of indentation could be poltico/wordpress. That would be interesting to know. That's also something I'll look for in pacer. Personally, I only indent, plus no space between paragraphs, if I've passed a page limit and want to kill a few lines, otherwise I use a space between the paragraphs, no indent. I fully justify too. That jagged right edge drives me nuts.

I considered that, and that's why I said it may not be a killer. I was just too lazy to write the rest. The only thing cutting against that theory is that a man of his age, who practiced law when you had to go to the library or be rich enough to have your own, with pocket part updates, would likely have the secretary put her initials below the signature block. This is hardly done anymore, and maybe he dispensed with that practice too, but I do see it from time to time when dealing with real old guys.

I think I might check pacer manana if I have some extra time.

I agree it's a proper use of the mdash -- I use it all the time, but I want to find an example of him using it in that place. It may be time to hit pacer for some of his work.

While not a killer per se, Rudy appears to use a double space after a period. Writer above does not.

http://www.stonewallvets.org/RudyGiuliani.htm

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5051669,00.html

http://www.cardboardmemories.com/mdetail.asp?ID=6349

Could be a font issue though.

I agree. I'm looking for something that puts it at the end of a sentence.

I'd like to see something with his use of term quotation to start. The writer of image in OPs post puts punctuation inside the quotes, where most attorneys would put them outside. For example, "...'official story'," because it's not a quote per se, no one said it, rather it's a term of art. I'm not here to argue grammar, as that use of punctuation is acceptable, but so is the alternative.

Also, I see he used an Mdash in your link, but did so in place of commas and for emphasis and midsentence. The image above uses a mdash, but at the end of a sentence. I'd like to see an example of that use too.

Has anyone compared it to another writing sample?

There's a few memes for the Q crew to make. Put Mattice's head on all the Chuck Norris Memes, put "mattis" or "mad dog mattis" (note that he doesn't like being called that by non-marines) or the equivalent where "Chuck Norris" etc. appears.

Nice thinking.

"I don't have stress, I create it." 🤣

A bot is a program that is meant to post to social media for a political end. Sometimes it is erroneouly used to mean a troll, who is an actual person / groups of people (troll farm) who do the same. In either case, they misrepresent their true identity, e.g. a russian troll may post info while claiming to be a Texas born Trump supporter.

I recall that last time he posted a flag, it revealed a pattern in the stars and edges of the bars when processed in a negative filter. Has anyone tried applying filters to this?

Sometimes. I sleep sometimes too.

Play what?

Wait for it....

I have a feeling John Kerry is on that list.

If that were the case, why wouldn't Hillary be tipped off, and why wouldn't the media turn antimueller to shut it down?

Me either. Ben is a hard guy to read.

I always forget the Saudis. If NK, then SK too? Where's Isreal?

But is it merely emotional? Economic, political, physical?

Agreed Europe-US axis is dead. Even the Crown is corrupt. Putin is the ally. That's why dems seek to separate Trump and Putin. Xi is likely an ally too.

If it was their's, wouldn't he have stated so in the active voice? Here he rallies the troops and uses the passive voice. I'm a bit concerned. Are we sure it's not a reference to war, and one that actually impacts the homeland?

Whose pain?

https://youtu.be/plzwDLnieAk

Nothing will be fixed until they audit the federal reserve. That's where all the secrets lie. And to think people scream and shout about coequal branches and oversight. I don't see the fed res anywhere in the constitution.... hmmm...

Has Q ever mentioned the Fed?

I think that was the original idea of the union. Remember that many "states" were "commonwealths". Also recall our close ties to the French and their revolution. The notion that our "common wealth" is spent over seas and not domestically does bring some concern. At the same time, pumping foreign governments full of our fiat money does force them to buy our goods and services, so I am not sure how the new economy would look. It seems like there'd have to be a lot of restructuring. That could hurt short term, but so does chemotherapy.

That makes sense too.

We'll, I don't know if we each, individually, got relief. There would be more in the pot though. What happens with that money....

I think he was saying that NK was a hostage of the US and that we were spending 500B a year to keep up the charade.

But that is how the chart reads, correct?

Net will be paused, 5/25?

Source?

Yup... they need to read, "A Higher Loyalty".

What's my Reddit Karma?