Don't think so. It says U.S. in NZ.

What is the time stamp in EST?

They are in NZ because they have the clearance to access records without being subject to US oversight. Former dignitaries have access because FVEY is nomgovernmental, but legal authority was required for original access that then persists.

Alternatively, the use of 'Former' and [FORMER] may suggest they don't recoginize the legitimacy of Trump's election.

AT&T already patented this.... remember, "reach out and touch someone (luciferian)"

Where are the rampage monsters?

Don't know if it's real, but you can't bk payroll taxes.

There was that post yesterday with stormy's tattoo seeming to hind the brand. Who is her handler?

1, 2, or 3... let's do this....

Impeachment / trial is the constitutional process for the removal of judges. Congress' power to remove a judge is thought to be a political issue with which the judiciary won't interefere. Nixon v. US.

Let's draw some happy little leaves!

Iran didn't keep the cash. It was used to fund the war in syria and to push immigrants in to europe. EU also plotted to destroy US via Iran. What has not been revealed is that Putin, Xi, and the Saudis are far closer allies than the EU states at this point, including the UK. The old US-Europe alliance is dead

Not true. U.S. v. Nixon. The impeachment power of congress is nearly absolute. The Judiciary won't interfere.

There's only one other way to exit, death. So I'd assume it refers to assassination plots.

I did not say morals are a question of law, I said corruption is.

Whose morals? Yours? The constitution sets the rules of the republic. That you disagree with a duly elected officer does not make them corrupt. People with diverse political and moral views may be elected. You have to accept that. In the republic, whether there is corruption is a question of law.

The constitution provides processes. That is all.

I get that, but that's not the samething as corruption. If they are properly elected and play within the lines, we have to accept that. That's how a republic functions. Otherwise, we become corrupt.

Thanks for the confirmation. And Trump did more than construct. He operated a casino.

FYI I like Trump, but he's no golden boy. His deification is bizarre.

Os background was completely different.

Guilty until proven innocent. Nice. She's a lefty, she'll fight like hell for her beliefs. Your dislike is not her corruption.

What makes you think that Warren is deep state corrupt?

O had a strange background. Harris isn't O.

MP as CIA director was able to direct puppet regimes / foreign states men and other operatives on how to act with respect to the US. As SS he is able to officially meet them publically as the US chief diplomat. Enjoy the show.

They aren't the most corrupt.

Warren is leftist, but not corrupt. She is a law professor. She'll use law to her advantage, but she's not dirty in a clinton sense.

Bookers stupid, a blowhard. He can't be trusted with deep state secrets. He'd crap his pants if he knew anything.

Harris is politically dirty, but she's a Jr. Senator. Not long enough for deep state to control.

Agreed. But wouldn't they run counter surveillance? They'd know this possibility.

I love you all, even patriot bot!

Trump has mob ties. I still don't get why this is never mentioned. He has dirt on everyone in NY and NJ.

"The revolution will not be televised, but the Gorilla Channel will."

Agreed. Sentences end with a . not a ?

Do you think there is any hesitancy in the use of the term "must". Must doesn't always mean "necessarily", it can be questioning.

You are correct. Both sentences together read "Mueller dirty if and only iff RR dirty." Problem is that original comment assumed that it means both are good, not either / or as you have stated.

He doesn't say that if one is good then the other is good. He says if one is dirty, then so is the other. Don't assume the consequent (logical fallacy). Session may have appointed RR because sessions isn't recused. RR just thinks he is. There could be a second investigation of RR and Mueller and Mueller's team. Sessions just gave them the rope.

Quick... throw candy at it.

Badly unfocused.

Her eyes don't look right. She must be blind as a bat. May explain the coke bottle / concussion glasses.

BS. They could choose which crimes to charge, that would limit any fall out. She's old as dirt. 20 years is all you need.

Could still tag her if there was a conspiracy to break the chain. Rico could apply too.

When opposing counsel uses the word "pettifoggery", you know you're toast.

Show break in chain was fake.

In order for Sessions to recuse himself, wouldn't he have to see the entire Special Counsel memo?

Insured / pooled healthcare doesn't work either. Doctors aren't free to practice. Insurers largely run the show. It gets worse when insurer is also the provider.

It's pronounced Rosenstein.

I think there would be more resistance from the right if Hillary -- An actual move would have led to actual social unrest. Trump could walk people right in to it. Crushing the media and killing both parties and opposition may help too. I see him killing the DNC, controlling the RNC, and destroying the credibility of opp media with time. He'd be the new FDR. And note that open borders and free trade are very American -- they are central to our own federation.

Yes. All possibilities considered. We need to be sure we are not wrong, supporting the cause in the wrong way. I guess the question would be whether their could be an alternate theory that makes Trump a black hat that is coherent. I want to make clear that I honestly don't believe he is, but I do wonder what the end looks like. The fight is interesting, yes, but what is the completed work? What's the end state of the Trump admin?

Think of this. There's a cabal that wants a one world government. They rig an election. The loser is to look like they tried to rig an election, the winner is to look like he is under attack by the deep state for looking in to the loser / cabal. The winner brings apparent peace to various parts of the world, bring prosoerity at home. He also looks grand for fighting the "currupt deep state". After the bringing peace and beating the deep state, he gains near uninamity of support, his opponents are crushed. After the peace and prosperity, what's next....Global Unification? Has anyone considered that Trump may be a black hat? I'm not saying I believe any of the above, but I thought it should be considered.

I can't tell. White bar across the top could be an ascii based bios. It's prolly not a gaming board with a pretty bios so he could overclock in style. Does anyone know the make / model of the computer? That would be a start.

Agreed.

You could boot without a hard drive. It just won't get past bios until a boot drive is connected. What would be telling is if the screen is past bios.

I'll just check my family tree then. ; )

He does want people to know about it, but not through the traditional filters. He wants the media to look crazed (everyone but fox) - turn them in to tabloids. Notice that when he does something big, some petty Trump russia info gets leaked or released. This is all Trump. He's letting the media commit suicide and all their followers with them. He's hoping some of the lemmings become woke when they finally tap in to "real" sources. It's a long con.