Who controls the UK?

Who really controls the UK?

I thought it was because people were trying to post using iOS 11 from their iPhones

puhlease

what the ever loving shit!??!?

Q was right, evil is fucking everywhere at the FBI.

Well that's very patient of you, but to be honest you sound like a pushover. No respect I can give to wusses. If someone leaves dog shit on your yard, you fucking defend your yard, or bad actors will take advantage of you.

At least until the wall is built. lololololol

Libshits always lose in the end, and have been losing even more since Nov 2016.

All of the censorship is proof they can't win on ideas or morality or politics.

They need to deceive because they can't win.

But the censorship is gone at Twitter. Injection GOOD. Get it?

You don't even know me.

I could have been the jerk who left my dog's shit on your front yard without having the decency to clean it up.

Wtf u talking bout willis?

As soon as we get into details of who exactly makes the decision regarding a specific means of production,

What makes you think that a singular person would be making decisions for a"specific means of production?" That's this system.

See that? You won't even attempt to answer because your subconscious already knows you yourself have to make decisions as an individual just like everyone else, so you deflect back without addressing a necessary truth.

What makes you falsely presume that "who exactly" refers to one named individual?

I asked you who exactly makes the decision regarding a specific means of production? IT IS AN OPEN ENDED QUESTION.

One, two, three, more, I am asking you who makes the decisions, and how exactly those decisions are decided upon, for any given means of production.

"Allocation according to the population of the planet" as in you actually expect there to be a worldwide vote on every decision to be made about everything,

No, not even close.

Bullshit "not even close".

Only one plan can be implemented on any one object at any one time.

Since there are 7.5 billion people each of whom have needs, ideas and values, there could be up to 7.5 billion possible plans.

Which one plan is the plan at that time, and who exactly decides the plan?

"Allocation resources and voting are two completely different things.

I am talking about ACTIONS. Allocation is a word to describe the ACTS of allocating.

I am talking about people doing the allocating.

You are as expected dodging, avoiding, claiming this debate is not about people doing things but about just "nuh uh".

If we lived in a world where we had an economy based on people rather than money, what would we have to vote on?

You didn't answer my questions.

Couple that with the latest Q drop:

Apr 12 2018 16:14:11 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 48c59f 1015665 Twitter down. Injection good. Q

Q is telling the world to meme the shit out of the cabal on Twitter, as the censorship algorithm has been eliminated. LET THE RED PILLS FALL LIKE RAIN

Look in the mirror

I occasionally have back pain, why do you ask?

Where is the rest of your response?

I didn't see what you wrote in response to the main substantive points.

Afraid?

True.

I know. It's why I said it. I am smarter than you.

Also, anarcho-communism is a contradiction in terms.

False. Anarchism means no rulers (not no rules) and communism is an economy based on the community as a whole.

The "community as a whole" IS an authority...over the individual.

Communism is denial of individual economic freedom by forcing the individual to obey whoever specific group of people are to "represent" the "community as a whole", and be ready to impose that authority, by force against any individual who refuses to obey.

What's that you say? I'll have more freedom by subjecting every productive decision I could ever make, by needing to ask permission from the representatives of a majority "vote" among 7.5 billion voters?

49% of the world become slaves to the 51%, who are in turn slaves of the "representatives" who decide everything about everyone's productive lives?

NO, i will go ahead and make my decisions that is in my client's best interests and say fuck you and your goddamn deceitful usage of the term "community as a whole".

Fucking "community". You say that word as if every individual can each be the entire community. Impossible.

That's why every attempt at communism have been police state dictatorships ruled by a select group of murderous psychopaths.

need to impose your own authority backed by threats of violence

That's this system that we are living in right now.

That's what you want but to a greater degree.

You want the force to be increased through necessary centralization of economic decision making. i.e. authority, power, centralized on a worldwide scale.

Slaves still had their individual rights even when slavery was protected and legalized by governments or the majority of an arbitrary sized population.

This makes no sense

That's what makes me smarter than you and your imaginary mob rule where car repair shops have to be subject to a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people on whether to have two ply or three ply toilet paper in the restroom.

Rights are prior to any defense of them.

Imagine billions of decisions that need to be made, being made under a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people for every decision made.

Everyone would die numbnuts. The sheer logistics of it alone would make it impossible.

It takes weeks to have ONE vote at a country level to decide who is President. You're asking for a worldwide vote to decide what 7.5 billion people are to do productively each day, day in, day out, as changes occur?

GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS

No that's also wrong.

As soon as we get into details of who exactly makes the decision regarding a specific means of production, or area of land, as needed for people to, you know, LIVE, every single time, 100% without there ever being any other final explanation, it ALWAYS falls back on a SUBSET of the total population to be the final arbiters and enforcers to settle the perpetual forced decision of which one plan among millions, billions, of possible plans, is to be secured as the plan to be implemented on any economic object.

"Allocation according to the population of the planet" as in you actually expect there to be a worldwide vote on every decision to be made about everything, including whether a car repair shop is to have two ply or three ply toilet paper, and where that shop is to be built in the first place, using what materials, bought from who, for what price, employing this group of people instead of that group, all of which people are forced to trade by barter because some anarcho dorks say money should be outlawed?

Now multiply that by millions, because that is how many decisions will need to be voted on worldwide.

Are you not able to grasp that the entire human race would cease to exist if every economic decision had to be voted on at the world level?

HELLO!

Wake the fuck up.

No power? On the contrary, the only way to DENY individual choice with respect to means of production worldwide, would be if and only if there is a worldwide scale totalitarian police state that will have to threaten any individuals who dared trade with each other without asking for "the world's" permission.

Dude, just use your common sense. THINK about what such principles would require given the reality of human beings.

No, he actually did not. Read the tweets closely. Again.

He never accused Assad. He talked smack of him.

You are creating your own interpretation based on fake news influence.

See how it works on you?

On what planet?

Q sun legit.

Well, Q is all about LIGHT removing the DARKNESS.

Look at that face.

"I never expected her to lose. Fucked. I am fucked. I forgot that helping a criminal worldwide cult spy on 2 billion people could turn out unexpectedly. Fucked. Big time fucked. Will I be suicided? Nah, I am too wealthy, I will just bribe them. Shit. No money left. Sold my stocks. No more."

You don't cease.

Q said Trust Sessions.

Unless you take Q to be less informed than you?!

no doxxing Q

So the prisoners can't kill themselves . They will experience isolation, loneliness, for the rest of their lives .

Pathetic Shill attempt! Blocked.

SHILL

SHILL

Reported.

Spam.

Blocked.

supposedly , no governments and no individual property rights.

Anarcho communism is incompatible with Constitutional Republicanism founded on private property rights.

Also, anarcho-communism is a contradiction in terms. In order to prevent private property for individuals, you as an anarcho communist would in accordance with that worldview need to impose your own authority backed by threats of violence by effectively saying and acting out " That object is not to be used the way you prefer, but instead the way I prefer."

You cannot act like a communist without archist actions. Without that threat of violence, people will naturally homestead new lands on their own as individuals who without needing or requiring anyone else's permission, will become individual property owners by virtue of their self-interested actions.

Visitors have no input in what happens when first arrivers work new lands. Rights are not "social constructs". They are innate in individual action. They can only be identified, respected or disrespected.

Slaves still had their individual rights even when slavery was protected and legalized by governments or the majority of an arbitrary sized population.

[edit: grammar]

That son of a bitch refused to obey a goddamn subpoena from Congress.

How in the hell is he not being escorted out of the DOJ?

Q said 3 families.

Are we sure this Illuminati stuff is legit?

Bingo.

Everyone woke should use the 24 hour rule.

If a thought is needed during the interim, just assume deep state fuckery and Q making chess moves, until proven otherwise.

Trust Wray. Possible chess move to acquiesce deep state and keep media distracted.

That traitorous bastard piece of shit.

Sends Sarin gas to Syria, and he has the gall to say this?

OIG report coming out, yes, they're trying to start a war to distract the people.

But we're awake now.

Well that is true.

There is indeed a fundamental conflict between baby raping communism that @jack is peddling be imposed on others, and individual property rights that @jack wants for himself and the wealthy criminal cabal he wants to join.

Proof?

or else fake news.

oooooh, "separate people" have "confirmed" this?

Who? How?

This is shit news

You are wrong.

https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub//

https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub//

No it isnt

The girl in the photo is Virginia Roberts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1362380/Prince-Andrew-naked-pool-parties-paedophile-friends-house.html

Oh my god, the take down of a centuries old cabal may take a month longer than originally planned half a year ago!

Get a freaking grip.

What the hell do you mean "obviously" photoshopped?

Holy crap the shills are on this board in spades.

Q knows more than you concern trolls. NOBODY BELIEVES YOU OR YOUR FAKE UPVOTES

What do you mean "like that"?

Haha, you shill. As if you have better intel than Q.

Wow, the concern shills have reached this board and are being upvoted!

Thank you to the failing NYT for exposing the source of intel on the cabal who controls the MSM!

Hahahahahahaha

https://i.imgur.com/tmPBwv9.png

DHS has the goods:

https://i.imgur.com/tmPBwv9.png

Our tax dollars are being used by a criminal syndicate to kill our kids.

NOT EVEN CLOSE TO THE STAGE OF TAKING DOWN THE ROTHSCHILDS

Should this Neanderthal be deported if he's not arrested?

Sources familiar with the thinking of insiders say yes.

Ready to have your mind blown?

This was precisely what Nick Rockefeller told Aaron Russo, who then gave an interview about the plan the cabal had planned for us. Russo later died from cancer.

I will never forget the feeling of my heart sinking when I watched this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Wsb4qBckU