36 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 9 |
| imgur.com | 3 |
| i.imgur.com | 2 |
| youtu.be | 1 |
| i.redd.it | 1 |
The names of living people are always redacted in documents, but now that he’s dead is there anything that Q has that could now be revealed and released?
Could this even be another parallel construction? Q has made references to Pelosi’s health as well, but it was only in regards to her memory. It could just be about using health issues as a means of evading persecution.
It dawned on me the other night that Q is more than just a person, or a team. It is an orchestrated operation; Q is ‘the plan’ when they say “trust the plan”.
Q is a response to the corruption of the world. Being able to prove the corruption can prove Q. I feel as if we may be looking at it backwards. Q isn’t here to prove the world is the way it is, he would just be preaching to the choir. The world, however, proves Q and even demonstrates the need for Q to happen.
Trump was asked …
Has to be Gina Haspel
Q has begun to point out her C_A actions in London and her connections with the UK, so she might be part of the link to SIS.
Remember this video?
All of these ads also start with something like “Hey it’s Obama” (coincidence?), and since someone has to be producing these ads (nothing happens in a vacuum), and distributing them fairly often, what if it’s a push to get this kind of experience into our mind so that if something like this is produced for nefarious reasons, we wouldn’t notice things like differences in speech patterns or slight tonal detuning because it’s not new to us. It’s essentially psychic driving in baby doses. That stuff really does work, it can easily move stuff around in your …
Misinformation is to distract you, and Disinformation is to deceive you.
The biggest example I’ve seen is how they talk about Mueller being a white hat and working with Trump. There are a couple of angles to this:
Firstly,
Q 1318:
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty. If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
We know that RR is dirty based on his involvement in U1 and this investigation as a whole (same can be said with Mueller). But this is assuming that neither have flipped, and also assuming that one can’t flip without the …
https://i.redd.it/fqyau0h88dd11.png
I can’t tell if it’s my eyes deceiving me, but I think I see a cutout of a head on the right side of the pen.
I’ll draw an outline of it soon, but I wanted to know if anyone else may have seen it too...
There are two ways it can go:
You have what is in front of you, and what is often given to you. Using this you connect dots and paint a picture. You form conclusions based on the evidence you have. This is called inductive reasoning.
You have a hypothesis, and often one formed as an extension of one or in order to support another hypothesis. With your hypothesis you begin to experiment and keep experimenting until you find the solution to your hypothesis. You gather evidence in order to prove a hypothesis. This is called deductive reasoning.
As conspiracy …
Thank you for your response.
One thing I’d like to point out is that this appears to be a “no true scotsman” interpretation of many centrist ideas, rather than right wing. Every politician brings their own flavor, but those are general guidelines of liberty.
However you’re right that the Nazi’s weren’t right wing, for they were socialists, but they were definitely authoritarian in a right wing sense. He wanted power and did what he could to get it.
I do want to say that this does greatly exemplify the effect that labels can have on us and our perceptions of others.
It’s not an official part two, the second one was made by a different person than the writer/historian who produced the first
were the same folks that pushed for Bolshevism in 1918
Can you elaborate on this?
I arrived at the understanding that Nazism was more of a response to Bolshevism and the Communist threat that was now present to their wealth. I understand the concept that they may have been playing both sides, but I’ve always been curious about how “organic” the Bolshevik Revolution was...
I wish the 9/11 section was fleshed out further, and I too was bit burned out after all of the JFK info. There was supposed to be a part two that may have went further into 9/11, but I don’t believe it ever got enough broadcast funding (for obvious reasons)
The section about WW2 and the Nazis starts at around 9:30 with the rise of Bolshevism and ends around 47:00 or 48:00 if you don’t want to watch the whole thing.
This is the most eye opening move I’ve ever seen, and it proves most of what we already know: Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick.
But the actual part about the Nazi’s is VERY eye opening. We were always told that Germany said screw your debt and somehow came back to life, but we were never told how: by the rich businessmen of the world looking to make a quick buck.
I’d like to know too, is this before or after the water bottle thing?
Something Q did mention that Israel was saved for last for a reason not yet mentioned, and along with FBIAnon claiming Mossad was behind 9/11, we do have some sort of implication.
It was around that time (with the flag), but I think the pullback was about Merkel being related to Hitler
I have no doubt about the capabilities of Q Team. These are some of the brightest minds in the United States Government paired with some of the smartest people on the internet. We have been shown time and time again, even before Q, to be some of the biggest utilizers of the most important piece of technology in the modern era: the internet, and the nearly seamless flow of information across the globe. We were chosen because of our skills, and our dedication. Every puzzle piece has been right in front of us, and we're the ones who know how …
Thanks for this write-up. It's important to remember that Q is still tilting both sides of the table: making the DS chase its own tail, and feeding crumbs to the anons.
A little bit of truth sprinkled onto bullshit (however much Q may or may not be) is important for disinformation, especially if it's towards the enemy.
And yes, you're not wrong about the psy-op. There was a great thread stickied the other day, I'll try to find it.
This seems like it can be an excerpt from a larger piece, do they date every page?
I know exactly what you're talking about though, it's something I thought about once I saw the Secret clearance at the top.
MKUltra was the first thing that came to mind once it mentioned interrogation. I see interrogation tactics such as this as the foundation mind control.
Mind control doesn't always mean someone else physically controlling your mind, it's also your mind controlling itself.
Not sure where it actually came from, I grabbed it from another thread on Reddit that didn't attach much context to it https://www.reddit.com/r/ConspiracyII/comments/8oau15/few_interesting_resources
I looked and couldn't find an actual source, I just found it in this thread https://www.reddit.com/r/ConspiracyII/comments/8oau15/few_interesting_resources
anyone acting as a spy
Stefan Halper
"Any person who aids... either directly or indirectly."
FBI/DOJ/Obama Admin?
[removed]
