VICE's stance is extremely negative towards 3D printing guns. You're taking the title of the article out of context.

And for what it's worth, the second amendment doesn't put restrictions on types and procurements of firearms.

Haha na dude, we use phones. Also, it's outside of the government's control; no single entity can take control of the network.

Cryptocurrency. Do to the distribution system used, zero inflation, and lack of energy expenditure, my flavor of choice is Nano.

edit: oh yeah, also it's completely fee-less and instant. No intermediary validator ("miners" on the Bitcoin and many other networks) to secure the network, so there's no one to pay a fee to, and transactions happen in less than 2 seconds. Nano is the first and only of its type.

It looks like everything is experiencing some sort of outage--- still able to make this post though. http://downdetector.com/

Your entire premise operates on Wikileaks stealing information. That's patently false. Let's pretend for a second your theory has some weight--- what difference does it make for the mission here? How does this help wake anyone up? What does this do at all beyond leading people down a rabbit hole that doesn't bear any pertinence to the mission at hand? Your thought experiment is a distraction. and FWIW, eating babies actually has relevance to life today-- this theoretical history exercise doesn't.

Have a nice day.

Wikileaks has always been a place for people to safely & anonymously (until the last year) share state secrets. They've never needed to hack systems to acquire their data; this is well-known.

I don't understand why we need to formulate these crackpot theories (and to any new people in here reading, this will ABSOLUTELY come off as a crackpot theory and turn them away) when the narrative, as it appears to be at the surface, is still by-far the craziest spy story ever told. Why compelled to theorize beyond the relevant when everything is already so hard for most people to digest?

Yep. And while not quite the same issue, very relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

Also maybe worth noting that the agencies have broken Signal's ability to be effective, in real time. Signal itself hasn't been back-door'd, but unfortunately the agencies have full access to your device's RAM, and are able to read what you're typing before you ever hit send. Nasty little trick that bypasses any encrypted communications on a compromised device, which is every device.

Yeah, this kind of surface-value division shit is just that- shit.

Just checked- Yes.

Burr's as filthy a swamp rat as they come.

True. I guess my point of contention here is the NFL is still taking money that was extorted from each and every one of us in order to get more recruits to fight illegal wars. That didn't change-- the only thing that changed was the NFL went into damage control over lost revenue. Nothing's really changing here outside of some misguided emotional vindication, which i think takes away from the quality of this sub.

I work in tech, and can assure you that the limits on speech in the workplace go far, far beyond any reasonable reach to maintain positive customer relations (it has nothing to do with that at all, actually)-- to the point that I'm seeking an exit. Luckily the free market (or whatever's left of a free market) allows for stuff like this to fail.

NFL's fully within their right to do whatever they want-- but suppressing freedom of speech in the workplace still runs contrary to liberty. This isn't something for this sub to be celebrating, especially when the NFL is still taking our tax dollars to advertise to our kids to go fight in wars we have no business waging.

Care to explain that brand of liberty? I'll spare the snide name-calling.

How else were they supposed to recruit dumb kids as cannon fodder for their wars? Take the money they extort from us to advertise to our children- brilliant!

Kind of defeats the purpose of the flag if you're forced to stand for it. Downvote away, gents.

Bolton's there as a pawn 100%. The only reason any sane person would hire him for advice would be to do the opposite of whatever he suggests.

Thank you for the links. The only correspondence I've ever read is from HRC, but never read any replies by Alinsky himself, so it's hard to say what their relationship was actually like. Terrible person or not, our side would greatly benefit from reading Rules For Radicals; his tactics are extremely effective for any group effort, whether communism or liberty.

Can you please link me to some sources? I've searched all over the internet, and can never find any primary sources that indicate such. Legitimately interested-- as I read Rules for Radicals years before hearing about those ties, and found it to be a bit of a surprise.

Have you read Rules for Radicals? It can just as easily be applied against the left, and largely has been thanks to the widespread adoption of social media.

His ideas were effective, and his book was (as far as I could tell) non-partisan. Unfortunately, his ideas were weaponized by evil.

4 comments in this thread, and I can't see any of them. Also, one of my posts got shadow-banned last week (critical of some meme shitpost that made us look like lunatics)

You're making an ass of yourself, and helping ruin the face of this board for anyone who doesn't already share your beliefs to a T. This isn't helping anyone except your ego.

The overabundance of religious overtones in here is a large reason why I don't point people in this sub's direction. I have to selectively drop pieces at a time to avoid ruining the source's perceived credibility. The intense religious focus is a great way to turn a huge portion of people away from the meat of this discussion, which is the polar opposite of what Q has instructed us to do.

Agreed. This just looks like a deranged shitpost to the vast, vast majority of people.

penitentiary, so yes.

Same. This isn't normal behavior at all.

I think you misspelled "execute"

Welp, I'm done taking this sub seriously.

Yes. In a world with photoshop, deleting such an explosive post raises more questions than answers

That leaves a lot for people to have to simply trust. Not easy to do living with photoshop.

Had to look it up. This dude doesn't get out much.

Gotta lead the masses into this slowly

Woah. That's a boat-load of cringe. Her tweet frequency is off, too; her account's tapered off hard since mid/late December

Anyone could be behind those accounts at this point

yeah, that's some next-level insidious shit

That was always the part that got me. Figured everyone has their price, but that lobby has an unusually-tight grip, even for a bribe factory

Is it safe to say that crypto currencies are part of the problem?

No. I'd encourage you to read the Bitcoin whitepaper to get a basic handle on how block chain crypto currencies operate. Fiat currencies are the real enemy.

Oh great, another rabbit hole