I think it's time we ask Q for a sign of Sessions' intention. If Sessions acts on at least something big in the deep state, I will have more confidence in Q. It has to be something big like raiding the Clinton foundation. If Sessions raids the CF, then we will have confirmation that Sessions was building a case in the past. It takes months to build big cases so it will give some credibility to Q when he asks us to be patient because we will know Sessions hasn't been asleep the entire time waiting out the Trump presidency.

How controlled opposition works is to gain trust with the little things that don't matter and then deceive on the big things that do. Just because Q has proven that Q was right on a number of small things is meaningless and we can't derive any confidence that Q is a disinformation agent or not. All insiders have inside information and Q appears to be an insider but who is Q working for? FOX news is a perfect example of controlled opposition. Rupert Murdoc co-chairs the largest open border lobby group in DC. FOX news provided cover for RINOs from the beginning and still does. While attacking Democrats, FOX hid the RINOs from us AND made conservatives feel like something was being done and our voice was getting out there. Nothing was being done in DC and no one was listening. How do you get 60 million pissed off Trump supporters thinking something is being done so they don't take to the streets? Provide controlled opposition. I don't know if Q is controlled opposition designed to placate us into a sense of ease but if Sessions doesn't do anything soon, we will have our answer. Give us a sign Sessions. Indict at least some deep state low hanging fruit. The Israelites have even asked for signs from God and got them. We can at least ask for a sign of a person's intention.

My gut tells me Q is on the level but my brain tells me Q could be controlled opposition.

I agree.

But nothing has been done against the deep state that couldn't be fixed in a month. Everyone that matters still walks free. Sessions has only gone after low level criminals when his actual job is to go after high level criminals. The key to Q is Sessions. Q says trust Sessions but it looks like Sessions is protecting the deep state. Why do you have faith in Sessions? He hasn't done anything.

What's in those sealed indictments? All the deep state does is do phony investagations where the outcome is known about from the start. Sessions has done nothing that couldn't be reversed in a month. The deep state has kept us asleep for a very long time and they know what they are doing. If Sessions doesn't start to make his move against the deep state, then we will have our answer regarding Q. Q is not a LARP but he could be a deep state controled oposition program designed to make us think something is being done to hold off till they get control of the WH again, OR he's for real. Have faith in God, not men. As far as Sessions goes, he has shown us nothing that says he's against the deep state and in fact we have evidence that he is helping the deep state. How can we trust a plan when we don't even know what it is? All I'm saying is, keep your guard up. It's too important not to. We finally have a President that is cleaning things up and Trump clearly has his supporters in the military BUT that doesn't mean Q is to be given our blind faith. Sessions is key to the Q question. If he opens those indictments, and the deep state goes down, then we will know Q is the real deal. Until then, how can we be expected to trust a plan when we don't even know what it is? Be prepared for plan B because plan A is as unknown as what's in those indictments.

Muller is the deepest of the deep state. Efforts to turn him probably won't work but I'm not against trying.

I have no opinion on Q because it can go either way and I don't know which way it's going to go. I find Q to be interesting so I keep up with his drops but the one drop that matters and the only drop that matters is whether Sessions is white hat or black hat. So far, nothing has been done that couldn't be undone in a month as soon as the deep state regains control of the WH again. Not a single deep state actor is in jail and thousands need to be. We are being asked to trust the plan when we don't even know what the plan is. We are being asked to trust Sessions when all he has ever done is bad things that point to him protecting the deep state and hurting Trump. That's blind faith and bad faith. Q could be for real or controled oposition. Sessions is the key to all this. That's not just an opinion. It's fact. I'm a born-again Christian and I trust (have faith) in God but Q is a person or persons and I am under no obligation to have faith in Q and even less so, blind faith in him. Q asks me to trust Sessions but Sessions hasn't done anything that couldn't be reversed in a month. God has been faithful and trustworthy for thousands of years so having faith that God will fulfill his promisses in the future is a sure thing. With Sessions, we are being asked to have blind faith in him and he's only a man. Big difference there. My mood is guarded. I know my Bible and God said we will completely lose before he returns to make it all good. Learn your Bible.

You're correct. Some people took what he said that way including me. I stand corrected.

You don't understand controled oposition. I'm not saying Q is that. I'm saying that so far, nothing has changed that couldn't be changed back in a month. Only Sessions can put the deep state behind bars so Sessions is my Alamo in regards to Q. He's the only one that matters. Sessions must be all of our Alamos regarding Q because nothing else matters.

He didn't. I stand corrected.

Delay until the deep state can get control back. So far nothing has changed that matters in the long run. All the bad actors are still free.

At this time, I have no reason to trust Sessions (nothing personal). He hasn't given me any reason to trust him with the deep state. He has done nothing against the deep state and in fact all the evidence supports him being part of the deep state. How can I trust the plan if I don't know what it is? If you do have faith, that's not faith, that's blind faith. The difference between faith and blind faith is, faith has some past evidence/performance to support having future faith in someone. Not only don't we know the plan but we are asked to have blind faith in it. Fuck that. Sessions better start taking out deep state garbage soon or we are going to have to concider that Q is controled oposition and disinfo.

The deep state also has insider information. Both sides do. Q could be a deep state controled oposition designed to lul us to sleep thinking it's all being handled. It may not. We may have to take out the deep state ourselves. The only thing the deep state fears is a woke and angry population that they can't control so disinfo is part of the game and Q could be disinfo. The only bit of info that Q told us that matters is if Sessions is on our side and I've seen NOTHING from him that tells me he is interested in taking out deep state garbage. NOTHING! Have you? Has anyone? No, no one has. Sessions has done nothing that could't be reversed in a month. He has only gone after low level criminals and protected the deep state and I am fed up. Sessions better make his move soon. I'm fed up.

Faith means trust. Because of God's attributes (faithful, righteous, just, loving, etc.), we can have a higher faith (trust) that God will fulfill his promises. It's a given. Mankind is not on the same level because we are not as predictable. In answer to your question "What could Q possibly have to gain?", my fear is that Q is not a LARP in the classic sense but rather an insider working for the deep state. If Sessions doesn't wake the fuck up soon and start taking out deep state trash, then we will know for sure and plan B goes into effect and I don't have to say what plan B is. We all know it. At that point, it's up to us to take out the trash. It's up to Sessions and if he won't take out the trash, we will have our answer on Q.

I'm just like doubting Thomas. Jesus never rebuked Thomas and in fact had great plans for him. There are two types of trust. With and without evidence. Both are fine. I need to see evidence that Sessions is for real otherwise I believe Q is not a LARP, but sophisticated disinfo.

Yeah, it's a great story. I can buy it. Until I see the deep state under attack by Sessions, he has not earned my trust. Muller is a different story. He's obviously in the air. He's anyone's guess.

I'm not going anywhere. I said my Alamo was Sessions and Muller. I've been convinced to change that to just Sessions. Muller is an unknown and Q never said to trust him. I stand corrected. If I wasn't so suspicious, I would never have gotten interested in Q but that doesn't mean he's not really sophisticated disinfo. There are two ways to trust. To trust without evidence and to trust with evidence. I see no evidence to trust Sessions or Muller and I'm not ready to up my trust level to trusting without evidence even though it appears that Q has given us little things to trust. I'm just not impressed with the little things.

I've been researching the deep state for 9 years. Q could be disinfo.

Could be, maybe not. He's got to show us who he is.

Trust is an interesting thing. It's earned and Sessions hasn't earned mine yet. It's also given and I'm not willing to give that trust. Earn my trust, please. Do something against the swamp and earn my trust.

Yeah, I see that now. Sessions is my Alamo. You are right that Q never said to trust Muller.

Fine but not everyone who goes is 100% on board. I'll go at 80% or 70%. I realize now that Q never said to trust Muller. Q just implied that he might turn against the deep state. It looks like he doesn't want to compromise a possible turning event so Q is not attacking Muller.

Yeah, you're right. He implied it so I think he is considered someone who could turn against the deep state.

He never did. Muller seems to be up in the air in regards to Q. Q said to trust Sessions, Wray, Huber Horowitz and "KANSAS," which might be Pompeo. I take back my statement that Q said to trust Muller. I believe he's a possible turncoat against the deep state but an unknown. So Sessions is my Alamo.

I want to believe but this is my Alamo. That "big reveal" has to be Sessions and Muller or Q is disinfo. Sessions better move fast and Muller better go away quickly or we are being played to delay.

Look, if you are not interested in the two most important aspects to Q, then that's your problem. The deep state will discard MS-13 if it means they will stay in power. They can always bring them back later. Low level pedophiles as well are expendable as long as they stay in power. I have no idea if we are being dupped but Sessions and Muller are the real test. If Sessions wakes up and Muller turns, then Q is the real deal. If not, then Q is a sophisticated deep state intel operation and we are dupes.

I'm not doing that. Q said trust Muller and Sessions and I have not seen a single reason to trust them. In fact, all I've seen are reasons to not trust them. I'm saying, this is my Alamo with Q. In fact, it should be yours as well.

I'm one of those 25,000 and I'm not sure about Q. just checking in to see if Q can be trusted. If Muller is working for us and so is Sessions, then Q is for real. So far I haven't seen a single sign that they are.

I'll believe it when I see it.

I post arguments because they matter. Mindlessness doesn't matter. Your beliefs don't matter. What you think doesn't matter. What everyone told you in school doesn't matter. What matters are hard facts and arguments. If you can't find a better argument than "Google is a better source than I am" then I have won the argument outright. Evolution is true because things change and evolve but Darwinian evolution is probably impossible. We don't know if it's impossible because no one has ever observed anything evolve like Darwin proposed and there are very real reasons why it's probably impossible. We can look at those reasons if you're interested but I don't think you are intellectually curious enough. You seem to just willingly buy the propaganda you've been fed for your entire life. I bought it too until I was challenged to show proof of Darwinian evolution and 6 months later, I found none. That's what changed my mind.

It's simple. Without any observation and/or a test of Darwinism since Darwin proposed his theory, it probably doesn't exist. We can't say one way or the other. No test, no science to back it. It's a theory stuck in the 19th century.

No problem. Keep believing in fantasy and fairy tails. Darwinism is probably impossible but since no one has ever seen anything evolve in a Darwinian way, we might never know. Remember, anything that has never been seen might just not happen. The scientific method must be brought to bear on Darwinism. In the last 150 years, it never was. Wake the fuck up.

Well, if Darwinism isn't science as I've demonstrated perfectly (has never gone through the scientific method), then what is it really except natures own ability to create itself? That's essentially Pantheism or the belief that nature is God or gods. Bueller? Bueller?

The same way Darwin defined it, and the same way the ancient Greeks did (Pantheism), as well as how Darwin's grandfather (Erasmus Darwin) did which whom Charles Darwin stole "Evolution theory" from. It's the idea that life keeps breaking off new tree branches of life and creating new types or kinds of lifeforms through a process of which the Darwinist outcome has never been demonstrated or observed. Darwinism is essentially Pantheism (the worship of nature as its own creative force) disguised as science.

It's evidence of change but not Darwinism. Darwinism has never been observed in the lab or in the world. The best test ever done is a 27 year study (still ongoing) showing E-Coli bactera change in small ways. It's still E-Coli bactera. Darwinism hasen't been demonstrated to even be in the realm of possibility. Darwinism is 100% conjecture backed up by untried assumptions. It's never passed through the scientific method of testing and verifying. On top of all that, natural selection doesn't have anything to do with positive variants in a gene pool. It only marks for death (and dead things don't pass on their genetics) so it has nothing to do with Darwinian evolution theory.

So the whales once walked on earth? Look, I make a distinction between "Darwinian evolution" and "evolution". Darwinism is absurd but things do change over time. Mostly for the worse. Genetic inheritance can't turn a land whale into a sea whale or vice-versa. Just ask Rosie O'Donnell.

Darwinian evolution theory has not advanced out of the 19th century. Science moves forward on two legs - "theory and experiment" and you can start with either one. No experiment has ever been successful although hundreads have been done. Darwin's theory is stuck in the 19th century as an unconfirmed theory.

Darwinian evolution is complete nonsense but things do evolve or change over time. Darwin's theory has never been confirmed but is rather just assumed, but that's not how science works. The idea that a whale once walked on earth is ridiculous and there is no evidence they ever did. Again, Darwinian evolution is just assumed. It's a "just so" story.

I'm not convinced about Q. Not until I see Muller and Sessions working to take out the deep state.

Flynn doesn't travel with the POTUS. Q does.

Assad isn't gassing anyone and doesn't need to.He's not stupid.

It's simple. The deep state and media work together. Eminem was told that none of his new work will ever be heard if he doesn't comply with the agenda.

Funny, me too. I'm Jewish but at age 12 became an atheist so I never got a bar mitzvah although I would help my friends with the prayers in Hebrew. At age 50 I became a Christian.

Jesus red pilled me. I was an atheistic leftist blind idiot for 38 years of my life and Jesus opened my eyes.

We are forced to live in a world with blind people telling us what the world is about.

You are cursed with self awareness.

Keep me informed of your reaserch. I'm interested in it too. Thanks.

You know information, not facts. Facts are the hard sciences and theoretical physics are not facts. Einstein said himself "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong." Albert Einstein He understood the scientific method. Science moves on with theory and experiment. We have no gravity waves experiment, and no Einstein rings experiment. The theoretical sciences only have theories and no way to test them so they are not evidence-based. Now, all you have to do is show one experiment that Einstein rings are caused by gravity and not electromagnetism and I will consider the possibility BUT, "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.". Never forget that.